
How NYC renters could begin saving thousands in fees
Unless there is a last-minute reversal by a judge, the Fairness in Apartment Rental Expenses (FARE) Act is scheduled to take effect on Wednesday.
The law will end the process of passing along the broker's fee to tenants.
From now on, unless a tenant explicitly hires a broker to find an apartment, the landlord will have to eat this cost, which ranges from one month's rent to up to 15% of the annual cost of renting an apartment.
What brokers think about the new law
'There has been a lot of talk about this issue. As a broker, I am glad that there will be no commission charge by a landlord if someone wants to lease their apartment,' Sonia I. Christian-Bendt, a broker with Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices New York Properties, tells Realtor.com. 'I think this is a win-win move for both sides.'
4 It's forecasted that broker's fees will not longer be passed to tenants once this law goes into effect.
Getty Images/iStockphoto
She says the broker's fee was so onerous that even the wealthy weren't happy with it.
'In the past two rentals that an owner called me to represent, [the landlord] offered to pay the commission without even being asked,' says Christian-Bendt. 'It made it easier to lease her units—and attracted a lot of qualified renters who didn't mind paying a high rent, but who were relieved they didn't have to pay one month's rent commission or 15% of the annual rent as a broker's commission.'
Nor does she think landlords will raise the rent to regain the fee.
'They have to remain competitive,' she says.
But Douglas Elliman top 1% rental agent Keyan Sanai, who spoke in front of the City Council about the measure, disagrees.
He asserts that tenants will end up paying more in the long run than if they'd simply paid a one-time flat fee, because landlords will not only raise rents the first year to regain the fee, but also keep it higher.
4 Even wealthy apartment owners were unhappy with the excessive broker's fee.
Getty Images
'If you stay in an apartment for more than a year, then you've just paid more in rents than if you'd paid that broker's fee,' he tells Realtor.com.
Couldn't landlords raise the rent for a year until the fee is repaid, then lower the rent?
'We're talking about landlords here,' he says.
Additionally, he says that while higher rents will affect all tenants, the broker's fee can be avoided, as only about half of the rentals in the city carry it.
'If you want to live on Perry Street in the West Village and have your 'Sex and the City' lifestyle, then that apartment probably has a broker's fee because the demand is higher to live in the West Village,' he says. 'But if you want to live in Hudson Yards, you probably won't have to pay a fee.'
He concludes: 'The law is a short-term gain for long-term pain.'
Danielle Nazinitsky, founder and CEO of Decode Real Estate, agrees the fallout won't be good for anyone.
'For landlords, there's now a new fixed expense in a declining-value market where they're already dealing with rising property taxes, wages, and insurance costs,' she tells Realtor.com.
4 Only about half of the rentals in New York City carry broker's fees.
Getty Images/iStockphoto
'For real estate agents and brokerages, this means lower margins in an already high-turnover, low-margin segment, and that means you will get lower quality agents over time. For tenants, the broker's fee cost doesn't disappear; it will get absorbed into upfront premiums and rent increases.'
The cost of the broker's fee for tenants
The broker's fee hit about half of the 2.3 million apartments in the city, including those units that are rent-stabilized.
When nonprofit attorney Elizabeth Gyori and her partner were apartment hunting in Brooklyn last year, they coughed up about $4,000 to a broker—or 12% of their annual rent.
'We could have used that money for other things,' Gyori tells Realtor.com. 'It could have gone toward savings to buy our own place, an emergency fund, or a higher general rent for a place that would have suited us better.
'I'm sad we don't get to take advantage of the change in law, but it will be really helpful for other people,' she says. 'I think it's fantastic that the law was passed.'
What New York City renters can expect
While the final word on the new law will be up to a judge overseeing the lawsuit filed by the Real Estate Board of New York and some brokerages, the board seems to expect the shift to happen.
On its website is a fact sheet preparing landlords for what appears to be the inevitable.
According to the new law, brokers representing a landlord can no longer charge tenants a fee in connection with a rental transaction. The exception is when the tenant specifically hires a broker to find them an apartment, and landlords are allowed to pay the tenant's broker.
4 The broker's fee hit about half of the 2.3 million apartments in the city, including those units that are rent-stabilized.
Christopher Sadowski
Additionally, rental listings must include all fees paid by the prospective tenant for the rental of the unit. This could include lost key, pet, first and last deposits, and move-in/move-out costs.
Violations of the FARE Act may result in financial penalties of up to $2,000 and will be enforced by the New YC Department of Consumer and Worker Protection. (Complaints can be filed at 311.)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
‘Fare adjustment'? Sorry, Janno Lieber: New Yorkers know a fare hike when they see one
Luiz C. Ribeiro for New York Post 'Fare adjustment': That's what MTA boss Janno Lieber laughably calls the next subway-fare hike. Give us a break: A hike is a hike. And every New Yorker knows it. Lieber is resorting to Team Hochul's Orwellian-naming schtick for papering over bad news and rotten policy. Advertisement As in the faux-wonk term 'congestion pricing' for a $9-per-trip tax that's still headed back to the originally-planned $15 — which will doubtless rise on in what Lieber can call 'a congestion pricing adjustment.' More mush: Don't forget that Gov. Kathy Hochul bragged about 'saving' New Yorkers money by starting with only $9 when she socked them with that tax, not the full $15?) Advertisement OK: The subway hike is just a dime, to $3 (for now). But it comes atop countless other taxes that hit New York residents with the nation's heaviest state- and local-tax burden. 'While a small increase may seem like nothing to you at all, it makes a big difference,' one resident, Hannah Reed, told MTA board members. Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters Advertisement Yet the brass won't admit the truth: 'I would not call this a hike,' board member Neal Zuckerman huffed. It's 'a very gradual raise, and I think very respectful of the inflation and affordability issues.' What arrogance. As one straphanger, Emmanuel Vasquez, fumed, 'There's always flooding, there's always a brake emergency, there's always a power outage' on the subway, but officials never stop zapping riders with hikes. And that's despite the billions the agency collects not just from fares but city, state and federal tax revenue, corporations, individual taxes and, yes, 'congestion pricing.' Advertisement And while it diverts money to politically-driven projects like Second Avenue Subway expansion: On Monday, the board OK'd a $1.9 billion contract for just a part of project; the final tab will run at least $7 billion for just three new stations. Lieber & Co. know darn well their repeated dips into New Yorkers' pockets sting; they just don't care to admit it. Why else hide behind weasel words?


New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
$7.7B Second Avenue subway expansion will put NYC store out of business after 30 years, owner claims: ‘I'm getting a raw deal'
It's the last stop for this East Harlem business. A construction supply firm will be forced to shutter after more than three decades as the Metropolitan Transportation Authority moves to seize its property to make way for the long-awaited Second Avenue Subway expansion. Lu Nicaj, owner of Tile Stone, told The Post he'll have to close up shop because the MTA is commandeering the business' lot at 2244 Second Avenue under eminent domain. 'I'm getting a raw deal,' Nicaj, 59, said. 'They are pretty much running me into the ground. I'm closing the door. That's the end of my business.' Advertisement MTA board members this week approved a $1.9 billion contract for the Second Avenue subway's phase two — which involves a blitz of legal seizures to clear the way for planned new subway stations at 116th and 125th streets. The properties are largely along Second Avenue and 125th Street, and include 33 apartments, officials said. 3 Lu Nicaj said his store Tile Stone will be put out of business by the Second Avenue subway project. Georgett Roberts/NY Post Advertisement Tile Stone's storefront at 2250 Second Avenue — which had a 'Liquidation Sale' sign up Tuesday — is too small to hold his contracting inventory, so Nicaj had been renting a nearby vacant lot from the same landlord to keep the building supplies. While the storefront is not on the eminent domain list Nicaj said he'll nonetheless be seriously affected because that lot at 2244 Second Avenue is up to be seized by the MTA. 'I can't stay in business. I've been here for 32 years,' said Nicaj, addign that he has already shifted 75% of his inventory to a warehouse upstate. 'That puts me out of business pretty much,' he said. 'When contractors come to buy instead of saying, 'Come back in a few days,' I have the stock right here. My store is small, that's why I lease the lot. It's like a warehouse.' Advertisement 3 The MTA is seizing several properties along Second Avenue under eminent domain. Stephen Yang for the New York Post 3 The seizures will clear the way for new stations along the long-awaited Second Avenue subway. MTA The dozens of New Yorkers who'll be displaced by the project will receive help from the MTA, which spent $10 million on relocations for similar eminent domain actions during the subway extension's first phase, officials have said. Nicaj said he met with the MTA and told officials that relocating his makeshift warehouse elsewhere won't work. Advertisement 'We are going to have another meeting to see what's the next thing they can do. I'm looking for some kind of compensation,' he said. 'I've told my lawyer to be prepared to go to battle with MTA.' Nicaj is also not hopeful that he can find affordable rent anywhere else, especially below East 106th Street. 'I can't have my store here and my warehouse 10 blocks away,' he said. MTA officials didn't return a request for comment. — Additional reporting by Haley Brown
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump tariffs ‘could cover costs of big, beautiful bill tax cuts'
Donald Trump's tariffs could generate enough revenues to cover the costs of his sweeping tax cuts, according to one of the world's biggest credit rating agencies. S&P Global said the economic impact of the US president's 'one big beautiful bill' act – which was signed into law in July and includes $3.7 trillion (£2.7 trillion) of tax cuts over the next 10 years – could be offset by his aggressive trade war. The agency's optimistic outlook for the Act led to it holding firm on its AA+ long-term rating for the US. That is in contrast to fellow credit ratings agency Moody's, which downgraded the US from the gold standard AAA sovereign debt rating in May amid concerns about ballooning debt. S&P Global suggested tariffs could soften the blow to the US public finances. Lisa Schineller, an analyst at S&P, said: 'Amid the rise in effective tariff rates, we expect meaningful tariff revenue to generally offset weaker fiscal outcomes that might otherwise be associated with the recent fiscal legislation, which contains both cuts and increases in tax and spending. 'At this time, it appears that meaningful tariff revenue has the potential to offset the deficit-raising aspects of the recent budget legislation.' This will serve to strengthen Mr Trump's controversial tax-cutting bill, which was branded a 'disgusting abomination' by billionaire Elon Musk earlier this year. The bill faced significant opposition before it eventually passed through Congress, with many critics warning it would increase America's vast debt pile. It comes after Mr Trump was recently embroiled in a row with Goldman Sachs about the impact of his tariffs on the US economy. The president criticised David Solomon, the Goldman boss, by claiming that he should 'not bother running a major financial institution' after the bank said American companies would start passing on the costs from tariffs to consumers. He urged Mr Solomon to 'focus on being a DJ', in reference to the Goldman boss's previous hobby moonlighting as a disc jockey under the moniker DJ D-Sol. The US reported a $21bn jump in customs duty collections from Mr Trump's tariffs in July. However, in the same month, the government budget deficit grew by nearly 20pc to $291bn. Concerns about the US debt pile have sent the cost of government borrowing higher, with the US 30-year Treasury bond yield peaking at 5.09pc in May – although it has since fallen back to 4.94pc. Since returning to the White House in January, Mr Trump has imposed sweeping tariffs on global trading partners. The president set a baseline 10pc tariff on all imports to the US, with various additional duties imposed on different countries and products. The US remains involved in trading negotiations with various nations. Mr Trump announced this month that he would extend a suspension of tariffs on China until at least early November after the world's two largest economies briefly imposed levies of more than 100pc on each other. S&P projected the American government deficit would average 6pc of GDP between 2025 and 2028, down from 7.5pc in 2024. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data