logo
Why Labour is now cosying up to China

Why Labour is now cosying up to China

BBC News04-06-2025
The sprawling city of Chongqing in southwestern China is an incredible sight. Built on mountainous terrain and crisscrossed by rivers, it is connected by vast elevated roads. Trains even run through some buildings.TikTokers have begun documenting their commutes in the striking urban architecture, generating millions of likes and much hype. But it is also where, on a somewhat quieter trip, mayors and their deputies from the UK recently visited - the largest British civic delegation to visit the country in modern history.The whole trip, which took place in March, received substantial Chinese media coverage, despite flying more under the radar in the UK. The impression it left on some of the politicians who travelled there was vast."[The city is] what happens if you take the planning department and just say 'yes' to everything," reflects Howard Dawber, deputy London mayor for business. "It's just amazing."
The group travelled to southern Chinese cities, spoke to Chinese mayors and met Chinese tech giants. So impressed was one deputy mayor that, on returning home, they bought a mobile phone from Chinese brand Honor (a stark contrast from the days the UK banned Huawei technology from its 5G networks, just a few years ago).Roughly half-a-dozen deals were signed on the back of the trip. The West Midlands, for example, agreed to establish a new UK headquarters in Birmingham for Chinese energy company EcoFlow. But the visit was as much about diplomacy as it was trade, says East Midlands deputy mayor Nadine Peatfield, who attended. "There was a real hunger and appetite to rekindle those relationships."
To some, it was reminiscent of the "golden era" of UK-China relations, a time when then-Prime Minister David Cameron and Chinese President Xi Jinping shared a basket of fish and chips and a pint.Those days have long felt far away. Political ties with China deteriorated under former UK Conservative Prime Ministers Boris Johnson, Rishi Sunak and Liz Truss. The last UK prime minister to visit China was Theresa May, in 2018. But the recent delegation - and the talk of Sir Keir Starmer possibly visiting China later this year - suggests a turning point in relations. But to what greater intent?
A 'grown up' approach
The course correction seemed to begin with the closed-door meeting between Sir Keir and Chinese President Xi in Brazil last November. The prime minister signalled that Britain would look to cooperate with China on climate change and business.Since then, Labour's cautious pursuit of China has primarily focused on the potential financial upsides. In January, Chancellor Rachel Reeves co-chaired the first UK-China economic summit since 2019, in Beijing. Defending her trip, she said: "Choosing not to engage with China is no choice at all."Reeves claimed re-engagement with China could boost the UK economy by £1bn, with agreements worth £600m to the UK over the next five years — partially achieved through lifting barriers that restrict exports to China.
Soon after, Energy Secretary Ed Miliband resumed formal climate talks with China. Miliband said it would be "negligence" to future generations not to have dialogue with the country, given it is the world's biggest carbon emitter.Labour simply describes its approach as "grown-up". But it all appears to be a marked shift from the last decade of UK-China relations.During the so-called "golden era", from 2010, the UK's policy towards China was dominated by the Treasury, focusing on economic opportunities and appearing to cast almost all other issues, including human rights or security, aside. By September 2023, however, Rishi Sunak said he was "acutely aware of the particular threat to our open and democratic way of life" posed by China.
'The world will become more Chinese'
Labour claimed in its manifesto that it would bring a "long-term and strategic approach".China has a near monopoly on extracting and refining rare earth minerals, which are critical to manufacturing many high-tech and green products. For example, car batteries are often reliant on lithium, while indium is a rare metal used for touch screens. This makes China a vital link in global supply chains."China's influence is likely to continue to grow substantially globally, especially with the US starting to turn inwards," says Dr William Matthews, a China specialist at Chatham House think tank.
"The world will become more Chinese, and whilst that is difficult for any Western government, there needs to be sensible engagement from the get-go." Andrew Cainey, a director of the UK National Committee on China, an educational non-profit organisation, says: "China has changed a lot since the Covid-19 pandemic. To have elected officials not having seen it, it's a no brainer for them to get back on the ground".Certainly many in the UK's China-watching community believe that contact is an essential condition to gain a clearer-eyed view of the opportunities posed by China, but also the challenges.
Questions around national security
The opportunities, some experts say, are largely economic, climate and education-related. Or as Kerry Brown, Professor of Chinese Studies at King's College London, puts it: "China is producing information, analysis and ways of doing things that we can learn from". He points to the intellectual, technological, AI, and life sciences opportunities.Not engaging with China would be to ignore the realities of geopolitics in the 21st century, in Dr Matthew's view, given that it is the world's second largest economy. However he also believes that engagement comes with certain risks.But Charles Parton, who spent 22 years of his diplomatic career working in or on China, raises questions about the UK's economic and national security.For example, the government is reportedly weighing up proposals for a Chinese company to supply wind turbines for an offshore windfarm in the North Sea. Mr Parton warns against allowing China access to the national grid: "It wouldn't be difficult in a time of high tension to say, 'by the way, we can turn off all your wind farms'".But earlier this year, the China Chamber of Commerce to the EU issued a statement expressing concern over the "politicisation" of deals between wind developers in Europe and Chinese turbine suppliers.
James Sullivan, director of Cyber and Tech at defence think tank Rusi, notes there are also some questions around cyberspace. "China's activities in cyberspace appear to be more strategically and politically focused compared to previous opportunistic activities," he says.As for defence, the UK's recently published defence review describes China as a "sophisticated and persistent challenge", with Chinese technology and its proliferation to other countries "already a leading challenge for the UK".Ken McCallum, MI5 director general, meanwhile, has previously warned of a sustained campaign on an "epic scale" of Chinese espionage abroad.But Prof Brown pushes back on some concerns about espionage, saying some media narratives about this are a "fairytale".Beijing has always dismissed accusations of espionage as attempts to "smear" China.
Is the UK really a 'compliant servant'?
Sir Keir and his team will no doubt be closely monitoring how this is all viewed by Washington DC.Last month, President Donald Trump's trade advisor Peter Navarro described Britain as "an all too compliant servant of Communist China", urging the UK against deepening economic ties."When it comes to foreign policy towards China, America's influence on policy will be quite substantive compared with say continental Europe," says Dr Yu Jie of China Foresight at LSE IDEAS think tank.Most analysts I speak to in both the UK and China are still clear on the need for the two countries to get back in the same room, even if they differ on where to draw the line: in which areas should Westminster cooperate and where should it stay clear.These red lines have not yet been drawn, and experts say that without some kind of playbook, it is difficult for businesses and elected officials to know how to engage.
"You can only keep firefighting specific issues for so long without developing a systematic plan," warns Mr Cainey.Certain thorny issues have arisen, including Chinese investments in the UK. For example in April when the government seized control of British Steel from its former Chinese owner Jingye, to prevent it from being closed down, Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds admitted that he would "look at a Chinese firm in a different way" when considering investment in the UK steel industry.China's foreign ministry spokesperson, Lin Jian, warned that Labour should avoid "linking it to security issues, so as not to impact the confidence of Chinese enterprises in going to the UK".After Starmer met Xi last year, he said the government's approach would be "rooted in the national interests of the UK", but acknowledged areas of disagreement with China, including on human rights, Taiwan and Russia's war in Ukraine.Securing the release of pro-democracy activist and British citizen Jimmy Lai from a Hong Kong prison is, he has said, a "priority" for the government.
'Go with your eyes open'
Labour's manifesto broadly pledged: "We will cooperate where we can, compete where we need to, and challenge where we must."What is still lacking, however, is the fine print. Asked about the British government's longer-term strategy, Mr Parton replied: "No.10 doesn't have a strategy."He tells me he has some specific advice: "Go with your eyes open," he says. "But have a clear idea of what needs protecting, and a willingness to take some short-term financial hits to protect long-term national security."Labour has suggested that some clarity on their approach will be provided through the delayed China "audit", a cross-government exercise launched last year, which will review the UK's relations with China.The audit is due to be published this month, but many doubt that it will resolve matters.
"If we see a visit from Starmer to Beijing, that will be an indication that the two sides have actually agreed with something, and that they would like to change and improve their bilateral relationship," says Dr Yu.But many people in Westminster remain China-sceptic.And even if the audit helps Britain better define what it wants out of its relationship with China, the question remains, do MPs and businesses have the China-related expertise to get the best out of it?According to Ruby Osman, China analyst at the Tony Blair Institute, there is an urgent need to build the UK's China capabilities in a more holistic way, focusing on diversifying the UK's points of contact with China."If we want to be in a position where we are not just listening to what Beijing and Washington want, there needs to be investment in the talent pipeline coming into government, but also think tanks and businesses who work with China," she argues.And if that's the case, then irrespective of whether closer ties with China is viewed as a security threat, an economic opportunity, or something in between, the UK might be in a better position to engage with the country.
Top image credit: PA
BBC InDepth is the home on the website and app for the best analysis, with fresh perspectives that challenge assumptions and deep reporting on the biggest issues of the day. And we showcase thought-provoking content from across BBC Sounds and iPlayer too. You can send us your feedback on the InDepth section by clicking on the button below.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Shabana Mahmood: justice secretary and rising star of the Labour party
Shabana Mahmood: justice secretary and rising star of the Labour party

The Guardian

time31 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Shabana Mahmood: justice secretary and rising star of the Labour party

Shabana Mahmood knows what it is like to live in an area where crime feels out of control. While she was growing up in Small Heath in inner-city Birmingham in the 1980s and 90s, her father kept a cricket bat behind the till of the family shop to fend off would-be robbers. Three decades later, Mahmood is Labour's justice secretary and lord chancellor, tasked with cutting crime at a time when public concern about it is rising. Though violent crime has fallen steadily over decades, recent increases in highly visible offences including shoplifting and snatch theft have contributed to a feeling of lawlessness and insecurity. Fanning the flames are politicians including Nigel Farage, the Reform UK leader, and Robert Jenrick, Mahmood's Conservative counterpart, who have sought to draw a link between crime – particularly sexual assault – and immigration. For Mahmood, being the daughter of immigrants is central to her worldview about justice. 'She feels very strongly that being British is a responsibility as well as a right,' a source close to her said. 'She really does feel like it's an affront when people who come here are afforded the welcome that she and her family were, but break the laws of the land.' Another politician shaped by his upbringing as the child of immigrant parents was Rishi Sunak, who felt strongly that it was an injustice for people to arrive illegally in Britain on small boats. Though their backgrounds and politics are very different, Mahmood and Sunak crossed paths at Oxford in the late 90s, with a teenage Sunak pledging his support for Mahmood when she stood for president of the Lincoln college student union. Last week, she received the surprise endorsement of another high-profile Tory: Michael Gove. Asked by the Politics Inside Out podcast to choose this government's standout figure, he replied without hesitation: Shabana Mahmood. Mahmood is a politician with 'a totally coherent worldview' who 'embodies in some respects the Labour coalition', he said. Mahmood has a growing number of admirers inside the Labour party, too. Having been a central figure in the Keir Starmer project from its early days, she is highly rated by No 10 and is thought of as one of its most effective ministers. A cabinet colleague said she 'never wastes a word' in meetings, and recently warned that the government was still caught up in an opposition mindset and preoccupied with taking on the left instead of speaking to the concerns of the country more widely. She has also been a leading advocate for the UK to take a more pro-Palestinian stance, including on statehood. Those who have worked with Mahmood praise her political nous. This year, she emerged unscathed from a clash with Jenrick over new sentencing guidelines that would have made an offender's ethnicity or faith a greater factor when deciding whether to jail them. She forced the Sentencing Council to back down and has ordered a review of its role. Early on, she also clashed with Richard Hermer, the attorney general, amid claims he was obstructing aspects of the government's agenda. Colleagues say the pair get on well personally but come from different traditions. 'Shabana believes, above all else, in parliamentary sovereignty and the value of our common law system. That makes her more of a reformer on things like the ECHR, [European convention on human rights]' a source close to her said. A former Conservative minister said: 'She has much better political antennae than Lord Hermer – she recognises that the law ultimately has to command public confidence.' One source who has worked with her in a previous role said: 'Her instincts are so well honed, it's quite something. It's a product of a number of things, she comes from a very political family and a very febrile political environment in Birmingham.' Her father was chair of the Birmingham Labour party and would host meetings for organisers – including Tom Watson, the future deputy Labour leader – in his living room over tea and samosas. Unusually among politicians, she has spoken about the importance of her faith. 'It is the absolute core of my life,' she told Gove in an interview with the Spectator. 'It's where I draw my sense of duty and public service from. My understanding of Islam, how I've practised Islam my whole life has been about viewing life as a gift from God but it's also a test from God.' 'She is a very defined politician with a real instinct for the times,' said Charlie Falconer, who served as justice secretary under Tony Blair. 'She is somebody who does understand politics in a profound way, and having been the campaign coordinator for Labour for quite some time she knows what has to be done in order to win elections.' Mahmood was elected to parliament in 2010 and within six months was promoted to a shadow frontbench role. In Starmer's shadow cabinet, she spent more than two years as national campaign coordinator, a role in which she became indispensable to the strategy chief, Morgan McSweeney. She is credited for helping secure the narrow but fateful win in the 2021 Batley and Spen byelection, without which Starmer would probably have faced a leadership challenge that summer. In the justice department, she has arguably inherited the most difficult situation of any minister. In her first week, she announced the early release of thousands of criminals in response to the overcrowding crisis in English and Welsh prisons. 'She knows she has got two things she has got to do in the justice department: get it out of this constant cycle of crisis and also use it to actually cut crime,' said the source close to her. She has set out plans for reforming the criminal justice system, which have ranged from chemical castration for serious sex offenders to allowing criminals to spend less time in prison and instead be rehabilitated in the community. She has taken inspiration from Texas, where there is a blend of hardline and progressive measures. 'She's not bowed down by an ideological approach to these things. She can blend some populism in with what are very strong values,' said the person who worked with her in the past. Mahmood's experience of government so far has convinced her of the need to rewire the state and empower elected politicians over officials and quangos. 'Shabana is starting to be seen particularly as a leader of 'if we need to break things, we should break things' … She has come to really believe in the depths of state failure,' one MP close to her said. In a speech in Strasbourg this summer, she announced that the UK would seek reform of the European convention on human rights amid concerns about it being cited to block the deportation of dangerous offenders. The justice secretary has a busy autumn in store, starting with plans to introduce a bill in September to deliver her sentencing reforms including shorter prison sentences for some offenders. Before the end of the year, she intends to set out the other half of her reform agenda to tackle the groaning backlog in crown courts, after a review by Brian Leveson recommended that some offences be tried without a jury. However she performs in government, by the time of the next election Mahmood may face her biggest challenge at home. Her majority in Birmingham Ladywood dropped from nearly 30,000 in 2019 to 3,400 last year after a challenge from a pro-Gaza independent candidate. Zarah Sultana, the independent MP who is starting a party with Jeremy Corbyn, is said to have designs on the seat. Allies of Mahmood say that her challengers face an uphill struggle. 'She is much more deeply embedded in her community than others who lost or came close to losing were,' the source close to her said. In parliament in recent months, Mahmood has hosted dinners with small groups of Labour MPs interested in the reforms she is planning. Some on the backbenches have begun to see her as a future leader. 'If she ever put the hat in the ring, it would be because she wanted the debate to be rigorous and bold and she wanted to be the person who forced that kind of honesty,' the MP close to her said. 'But it tends to be the case that the people who propagate that kind of message don't win.'

Alpha males, ‘genuine' smiles & power gestures…Trump & Putin's body language dissected as they try out macho each other
Alpha males, ‘genuine' smiles & power gestures…Trump & Putin's body language dissected as they try out macho each other

The Sun

time31 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Alpha males, ‘genuine' smiles & power gestures…Trump & Putin's body language dissected as they try out macho each other

A TOP body language expert has revealed how Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump tried to out macho each other during their meeting in Alaska. The US President greeted his Russian counterpart on the tarmac at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson Air Base on Friday. 7 7 The pair went on to address the world in a brief press conference and negotiate with their teams in private. Putin looked relaxed as he walked down a red carpet towards Trump - giving the US leader a thumbs-up before greeting him with a warm handshake. Both of them then shared a moment alone in Trump's presidential limo - known as The Beast - before posing for journalists during a chaotic photocall. Their public interactions were watched and poured over with fine tooth comb - not just to find out the diplomatic outcome of their historic meeting, but also to dissect the two men's relationship. A top body language expert told The Sun that Trump and Putin tried to display their egos in a "frenzy" moment to perceive themselves as the two most powerful men on earth. Darren Stanton, known as the human lie detector, said Putin and Trump were matching each other's "power gestures" in a show of force to convey confidence and authority. There were also subtle signs showing Trump was trying to look stronger than Vlad. Mr Stanton said: "Both men displayed what we call the reverse steeple gesture, which is used to convey power and authority. "Both Putin and Trump are Alpha males and fully aware of what these gestures mean. Both men are trying to convey confidence, being self-assured. "They used the signs to express, 'I will not be pushed around. I am the most dominant person here'. "Both Putin and Trump match and mirror each other's gestures and behaviours. Putin is the only politician that Trump does not employ his full arsenal of trying to undermine, intimidate and make them look weak. He always meets Putin on mutual ground. "But there were signs that Trump was trying to look stronger and also trying to be subtle." He added that Trump's hero welcome of Putin will likely rattle America's European allies and Zelensky. Mr Stanton added: "Zelensky will not be happy about the way Trump welcomed Putin. The fact that Trump pulled all the stops and gave him a grand welcome." The expert said Trump showed a mutual respect for Putin, and both leaders had a genuine smile on their faces despite all the side issues. This was seen when the US leader lightly applauded his Russian counterpart as he approached him on the tarmac. And later when he "gently patted" his hand - a symbolic gesture of familiarity and friendliness. Trump also broke from his usual approach as the pair shook hands, opting to have his hand under Putin's showing a more "subordinate position". 7 7 Body language expert Patty Ann Wood told Newsweek: "Trump typically likes to have his hand on top, but here it appears he presented his palm up—a weaker, more subordinate position—indicating he sees Putin as more powerful." While Trump showed initial deference to the Russian leader, he followed up the handshake with a pat on Putin's back. Ms Wood said this is a subtle "sign of dominance" and it symbolically says "I could strike you if I wanted to." When the pair sat down for questions from journalists, pleasantries turned to chaos as the press pool began throwing tough questions at Putin. One of the journalists asked: 'How can the US trust your word? Will you stop killing?' Smirking Putin then appeared to shout over the journalists before the camera was forced to cut away. He appeared baffled as journalists quizzed him over the slaughter in Ukraine. At one stage, he pointed to his ear to indicate he couldn't hear. But body language expert Dr. Beth Dawson said this was actually a sign of the leader not wanting to answer the difficult question. She told the NY Post: "He's looking down, his mouth is turned down … It doesn't look like a genuine, 'Okay, what are you saying? I can't hear you. Could you repeat it, please?' 7 7

USSR sweatshirt and chicken kyiv: Russia dials up trolling before Alaska summit
USSR sweatshirt and chicken kyiv: Russia dials up trolling before Alaska summit

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

USSR sweatshirt and chicken kyiv: Russia dials up trolling before Alaska summit

In a not-so-subtle act of trolling, Russia's foreign minister, Sergei Lavrov, arrived in Alaska on the eve of the US–Russia summit wearing a sweatshirt emblazoned with 'CCCP', the Russian initials for the USSR. Once seen in western capitals as a pragmatic and skilled diplomat, the 75-year-old has in recent years mirrored the Kremlin's radicalised politics, adopting an increasingly combative tone and resorting to trolling and mockery. Lavrov showed up in Alaska wearing a USSR sweatshirt. Very reassuring to at least 14 of Russia's neighbors. Lavrov's choice of attire nods to the Kremlin's long-running narrative: Putin has repeatedly claimed that Russians and Ukrainians are 'one people', denying Ukraine's legitimacy and territorial integrity while promoting a broader notion of unity with Russia. Most of Russia's veteran delegation to Alaska, including Lavrov, began their careers in the Soviet Union and have been accused by the Russian opposition of clinging to a Soviet imperialist mentality. Under Russia's occupation of Ukrainian territory, pro-Moscow authorities have dismantled monuments commemorating Ukrainian suffering under Soviet rule, including memorials to victims of Holodomor, the mass famine in Soviet Ukraine in the 1930s that killed millions of Ukrainians. The former Lithuanian foreign minister Gabrielius Landsbergis quipped on X about Lavrov's clothing choice: ''Just give us half of Ukraine and we promise we will stop,' says negotiator wearing USSR sweatshirt.' Russian fashion bloggers on Telegram were quick to identify the $120 sweatshirt as the work of Selsovet, a Chelyabinsk-based brand that specialises in 'Soviet heritage' clothing. Lavrov's antics were the latest in a string of Russian provocations leading up to the summit, aimed at unsettling Ukraine and its European allies. Earlier, the editor-in-chief of RT, Margarita Simonyan, wrote that the Russian press corps flying to Alaska had been served chicken kyiv cutlets. The menu choice was quickly seized upon by other Russian propagandists. 'Putin and Trump should turn Zelenskyy into a chicken kyiv. There's no shortage of humour in the Kremlin,' wrote the pro-Kremlin commentator Sergei Markov. Sign up to First Thing Our US morning briefing breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion Russia's state press, however, were in a less celebratory mood on arrival at their modest sleeping quarters in Anchorage, Alaska's largest city, where the summit will take place. With hotel space taken up by the influx of international media, Russian reporters were put up in the local ice hockey team's stadium, which had been converted into a Covid hospital during the pandemic and fitted with army beds donated by the Red Cross. 'We are living in Spartan conditions,' one reporter is heard complaining in a clip posted on social media.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store