Military union warns 'vague' Defence Bill could lead to 'unreasonable suspensions' for soldiers
The Representative Association of Commissioned Officers (RACO) is appearing before the Joint Committee on Defence and National Security which is carrying out pre-legislative scrutiny of the proposed Defence Bill.
So far invited speakers have focused on neutrality and new measures to deploy troops abroad, RACO is the first to address the changes to the workplace which will include powers of suspension and the summary dismissal of personnel.
The group said, in its opening remarks this morning, that they have significant concerns about the drafting of the bill and a lack of consultation with them.
It told the committee members that a conciliation and arbitration mechanism to raise their concerns is not fit for purpose and is 'unproductive' due to lack of resourcing and long delays in resolving issues.
RACO said that it has 'little accountability' and has an 'inability to address the issue it was created to resolve'.
The military group examined three draft heads of the Bill, dealing with suspensions of members, the dismissal of soldiers and how soldiers will be compelled by law to tell their commanding officers they are under investigation.
These measures were introduced following high profile cases, including that of former soldier Cathal Crotty,
who was found guilty of assaulting Natasha O'Brien
in Limerick city. He was initially not imprisoned at Limerick Circuit Court but he was later jailed when the Director of Public Prosecutions appealed the case in the wake of it being raised in the media.
Crotty was not suspended from the military as the Chief of Staff of the Defence Forces did not have powers of suspension.
A report by Peter Ward, which was commissioned by then Minister for Defence Micheál Martin, found that there was an
urgent need for a clear suspension policy
to allow the military to impose suspensions in certain circumstances.
The Bill proposes that it will grant powers to a 'designated authority' to suspend soldiers under the rank of Major General.
This includes for reasons of in the public interest, national security or serious misconduct. This measure was introduced to the Bill after it emerged that there was no real power of suspension for the
RACO in its address today said that it welcomes a suspension policy but has called for a greater degree of clarity in the provisions as set out in the Bill.
Advertisement
It said that: 'we remain very concerned by the loose, vague and subjective language in the current drafting'.
'Such phrasing lacks the thoroughness and rigour needed to protect members' rights to the presumption of innocence and opens the door to interpretation without robust oversight or even an appeal mechanism,' the group added.
The garda use of suspensions has been heavily criticised by the Garda Representative Association and the Workplace Relations Commission, in a finding against An Garda Síochána, said that its process was a
'rubber stamp' exercise
.
RACO told the committee that the suspensions in advance of due process would carry 'real consequences' for an individual's mental health and professional reputation.
'The principle of 'innocent until proven guilty' must be protected—not just legally, but through fair process and proper supports. A balance must be struck between operational discipline and the dignity and safety of those who serve.
'We note that suspension is an embedded feature of many other public sector organisations and are aware of a concerning reported trend of seemingly endless, elongated suspensions without regular review or due process, where the suspension in fact becomes the punishment,' the group added.
Dismissal
RACO raised the issue of dismissal of officers by the President 'for any prescribed reason' – it said again this was too vague and wide ranging drafting which lacked precision.
The group told the committee that it 'lacks the clarity and safeguards necessary to protect members from arbitrary or disproportionate action'.
RACO also called for redrafting in regard to the new measure in which military personnel will be compelled to inform their commanding officer if they are under garda investigation. The issue is centred around the measure which would require them to keep that officer up to date on progress.
It said there was no formal or informal data sharing mechanism between gardaí and the courts martial system.
RACO warned that this meant there was no obligation on the investigating garda to keep the Defence Forces updated on the probe.
It has recommended that the Head of the Bill be updated so that it is only necessary where a military member finds themselves arrested, interviewed under caution or charged by the gardaí.
'We respectfully contend that the draft Heads as they currently stand are overly vague (even for primary legislation), and lack crucial detail on appeals mechanisms, checks or balances which could lead to a wave of unnecessarily unreasonable and protracted suspensions.
'We suggest that more detail is required to ensure clarity and support for our members who will be required to operate and administer a suspension policy, and that essential safeguards are necessary for all Defence Forces members who may be the subject of suspension or indeed dismissal into the future, in keeping with the principles of natural justice and fair procedures,' RACO conclude.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Presidential election: What Catherine Connolly says on Ukraine, the EU and Syria
With little more than two months to go until voters go to the polls, Independent TD Catherine Connolly is the only confirmed candidate in the race to succeed President Michael D Higgins . During her nine years as a TD, Ms Connolly, a committed Gaeilgeoir, has served as Leas-Cheann Comhairle and has proved to be an incisive performer on committees. She is highly regarded by left-leaning parties in the Oireachtas – reflected by the fact she has the backing of the Social Democrats, Labour and People Before Profit in the presidential election. In a contest, however, that places unremitting emphasis on the individual, their history in politics, their character and their actions, she will face criticism and scrutiny over some of her stances and actions. READ MORE The Irish Times posed questions to Connolly regarding her stance on global affairs, including her views on the war in Ukraine, Russia and Nato, the European Union and a controversial trip she took to war-torn Syria in 2018. Here is what she said. The Ukraine war, Russia and Nato Connolly's approach to the war in Ukraine has been to condemn Russia but also criticise western military alliance Nato, which she has argued was 'warmongering' before the conflict began. It is a stance that could be perceived by some as her blaming Nato for Russian president Vladimir Putin 's decision to invade Ukraine. During her nine years as a TD, Catherine Connolly has served as Leas-Cheann Comhairle. Photograph: Alan Betson / The Irish Times In a Dáil debate on the eve of the February 2022 invasion, Connolly said: 'We should be raging against any possibility of war' and Ireland 'should be using our voice as a neutral country'. She criticised Putin as a 'dictator with no respect for democracy' but also contended: 'Nato has played a despicable role in moving forward to the border and engaging in warmongering. Ireland has been hypocritical on many levels.' She has also spoken in the Dáil this year about the need to continue to 'show solidarity with the people of Ukraine'. She referred to the refugees who have come to Ireland and said it was 'really important we call out what Russia has done'. The Irish Times asked Ms Connolly if she believed Nato was equally or partly to blame for the Russian invasion of Ukraine. She said: 'Russia is conducting an illegal invasion of Ukraine – it must immediately end its horrific assault in accordance with international law and an immediate ceasefire. 'I have criticised Nato as its warmongering and escalation towards conflict over the years is at odds with achieving peace in regions across the world.' The European Union, US, UK and France During a Dáil speech on the third anniversary of the Ukraine war in February this year, Ms Connolly made criticisms of the US, the UK, France and the European Union (EU), and she highlighted the ongoing war in Gaza. She has been vocal in her criticisms of Israel , accusing it on other occasions of genocide in its campaign in Gaza and Palestine. During the Dáil contribution in February, Ms Connolly referred to Government plans to scrap the triple lock on the deployment of Irish troops abroad – a proposal she opposes, arguing it threatens Ireland's neutrality. Ms Connolly agreed with another contributor in the debate that there are countries 'we certainly cannot trust', adding: 'America is one of those and England and France are others. 'What is behind their motivation is simply an arms industry, more war, ongoing war, normalising war and making huge profits. That needs to be called out over and over.' She accused US president Donald Trump of 'supporting Israel trampling on international law and reducing Gaza to nothing'. Ms Connolly said: 'We do not seem to see any contradiction in calling out Russia – rightly so – but not calling out America or any of the other major powers. I have a huge problem with that.' She also said she has a 'huge problem with the EU, which has lost its direction', and she criticised EU Commission president Ursula von der Leyen's stance on Gaza which is seen by many to be too pro-Israel. [ The Irish Times view on the presidential election: the race now looks very different Opens in new window ] The Irish Times asked Ms Connolly if she is saying the UK and France, two of Ireland's closest neighbours, cannot be trusted and if she is a supporter of the EU. In response, Ms Connolly said: 'The US, England and France are deeply entrenched in an arms industry which causes bloodshed across the world – as a staunch advocate for neutrality, this behaviour must be condemned.' She also said: 'The European Union, which I support, has lost sight of its foundations: a project developed to promote and preserve peace.' Ms Connolly contended: 'The EU has become increasingly militarised under the leadership of Ursula von der Leyen and the European People's Party – this direction can only bring pain. As Irish people, we must resist this trend towards imperialism and show support for Palestine and Ukraine as Europeans.' She said: 'The EU has lost its moral compass.' The Syria trip Ms Connolly travelled to Syria in June 2018 along with then-fellow Independent TDs Maureen O'Sullivan, Clare Daly and Mick Wallace. At the time of the trip, dictator Bashar al-Assad was still in power and engaged in a brutal civil war. The country was under western sanctions. During her presidential campaign launch, Ms Connolly said she funded the trip herself, its purpose was 'fact-finding', and she 'met no member of government' and 'nor did I ever utter one word of support for Assad'. She said the delegation visited a refugee camp outside Damascus and 'saw first-hand the destruction of a whole city'. They travelled to Aleppo and met the Chamber of Industry, and also had a meeting with Unicef workers as well as visiting a convent. While in Aleppo, the Irish delegation met Syrian businessman and politician Fares al-Shehabi. Although he was an Independent MP, Mr al-Shehabi was a supporter of the military actions taken by the government side in the civil war. He was deemed a supporter of the Assad regime and placed under EU sanctions. After her return from Syria, Ms Daly challenged the Government in the Dáil to issue a visa to Mr al-Shehabi 'so that he might come to Ireland as a businessman and Sunni Muslim who believes in secular values and talk about what has happened in Syria'. The Irish Syria Solidarity Movement has previously criticised the trip taken to Syria by the four TDs, arguing it 'provided legitimacy to the Assad regime'. Photograph: Sam Boal/ Collins Photos During the same contribution, Ms Daly responded to criticism of Russia's role on the regime side of the civil war, arguing 'in many cases' people in Syria 'think the Russians are heroes'. The Irish Syria Solidarity Movement (ISSM) has previously criticised the trip taken to Syria by the four TDs, arguing it 'provided legitimacy to the Assad regime and its narrative'. In response to questions from The Irish Times, Ms Connolly rejected any such suggestion, saying: 'The notion that my visit to Syria to gain an understanding of a humanitarian crisis, that the EU had a hand in worsening, aligns me in any way with Assad's government is not acceptable.' She repeated she has 'never uttered one word of support' for Assad 'nor the actions of his government'. She said: 'Assad's dictatorship committed countless atrocities and human rights abuses, all of which I have criticised on the floor of the Dáil.' She said the year before the trip, 'many NGOs and charities on the ground, including the World Health Organisation, urged US and EU sanctions to be rescinded as they were not targeted, serving only to harm innocent civilians, often denying them essential medical supplies, leading to unnecessary deaths. A UN report and leaked memos at the time corroborated these facts'. Ms Connolly said: 'These sanctions served as the reason for my fact-finding mission – I also made this clear on the floor of Dáil Éireann.' Referring to Mr al-Shehabi, Ms Connolly she said 'met with a member of the Syrian opposition in his capacity as a member of the Aleppo Chamber of Commerce to get an idea of how things were on the ground'. Ms Connolly also said: 'If activists, NGOs and charities are to be blacklisted for such excursions, we will be damned to repeat the same mistakes in the future – it is only because of these fact-finding missions that we learned the extent of the destruction sanctions were causing to ordinary lives. 'Sanctions should never result in civilian casualties.' Ms O'Sullivan, who retired from politics in 2020, said the trip was a 'humanitarian visit' and 'we weren't going there to support Assad'. Asked about their interaction with Mr al-Shehabi, Ms O'Sullivan, said she did not have 'any idea of what his political views were. We met him as a businessman who wanted to get the economy in Syria back up and running again.' She insisted the trip was not 'political'. Ms O'Sullivan is strongly supporting Ms Connolly's presidential bid, describing the Independent TD as 'a woman of integrity and honesty' who is 'not afraid to speak the truth. 'She will be an excellent president particularly with her stance on human rights.' Ms Daly and Mr Wallace did not respond to attempts to contact them for comment. [ Can you have too much democracy? Opens in new window ] Áras an Uachtaráin, the official residence and principal workplace of the President of Ireland. Photograph: Getty Images Ireland's Defence Forces During a Dáil debate on a Defence Bill last year, Connolly said: 'We do not need an army.' Taken in isolation these remarks could raise eyebrows and prompt criticism, given she is seeking to become president, the supreme commander of the Defence Forces. The context, however, was a lengthy contribution where she also noted this role of the presidency; the army's aid to civil power and peacekeeping functions and said she is 'very proud' of the Defence Forces. While they are 'under-resourced', she said 'we all stand fully behind their most basic demands in terms of money and conditions' and made criticisms of the Government over the situation. She also said: 'Ireland will never be able to have an army. We do not need an army. We are an independent, neutral, sovereign country. Our strength lies in our independent voice. Our strength lies in making the UN institutions function better.' The Irish Times asked Connolly to respond to the suggestion that saying Ireland did not need an army while highlighting roles it performs, like peacekeeping, is contradictory. She reiterated that she is 'immensely proud of our Defence Forces' and its members adding: 'but pride cannot blind us to reality: conditions are worsening. 'The Defence Forces remain underfunded, under-resourced, and its members underpaid, who are left to serve and live in settings that are far below the standard they deserve. That is unacceptable, and it is long past time for change.' [ The Irish presidency is a moral role much more than a political one Opens in new window ] She said: 'There is no contradiction between what I said in 2024 and what I say today. 'Then, as now, I was clear: our Defence Forces are defined by their civic duties at home and their peacekeeping work abroad. 'They are not, and should never become, an army. Armies fight wars. They are increasingly militarised. They are, by their nature, at odds with a nation's neutrality. 'Our Defence Forces exist to protect our people, our sovereignty, and – in Ireland's case – to foster peace where conflict has broken out.' She added: 'Ireland needs our Defence Forces. We must value, respect, and support their members. But Ireland does not need an army. 'Our true strength is in our independent voice, carried above the shouts of those who beat the drums of war. 'That voice must be safeguarded and amplified – at all costs.'
The Journal
2 hours ago
- The Journal
Everything we know about the presidential election so far - and a few things we don't
ALTHOUGH THE PRESIDENTIAL election technically still hasn't started yet, we are finally beginning to see some momentum around it build. In recent weeks, a number of candidates and political parties have declared their intentions and this week we had the shock news that front runner Mairead McGuinness was withdrawing from the race on health advice. That decision has blown the race wide open and raises questions about who Fine Gael will chose as her replacement and whether it will impact the approach taken by Sinn Féin and Fianna Fáil. Meanwhile, the Electoral Commission has begun gearing up its efforts to encourage people to get out and vote. So from who's in the running, to the polling date, and the finer print and election rules, here is everything we know about the 2025 race for the Áras so far. First things first, when will it be held? Under the Constitution, the presidential election has to take place by the date the current President's term of office ends and may not take place more than 60 days before the end of the current term. This means it must take place on or up to 60 days before 11 November 2025. The new president will then take office on 12 November 2025. Minister for Housing, Local Government and Heritage Darragh O'Brien holds the responsibility of issuing the 'presidential election order' which will set the date for polling to take place. So who is officially in the race so far? To run in the presidential election a candidate has three possible routes. They must receive 20 nominees from Oireachtas members (senators or TDs); receive the backing of four local authorities; or be a former or retiring president (who can nominate themselves if they have only served one term). And remember, to be eligible a candidate must be aged 35 or older and must be a citizen of Ireland. Former EU Commissioner Mairead McGuinness had secured the backing of her parliamentary party Fine Gael and was due to be ratified by her party in September. Following the shock news of her withdrawl, Fine Gael has said its executive council will convene on Sunday to consider its next steps. As of right now, Frances Fitzgerald, Heather Humphreys and Seán Kelly are the names at the top of the list to take McGuinness's place. For now though, Independent TD Catherine Connolly is the only candidate officially in the race. In mid-July, Connolly confirmed that she had reached the 20 Oireachtas nominations needed to launch a campaign. So far she has the support of the Labour Party, the Social Democrats, People Before Profit and a handful of Independents. Who else has declared their candidacy? A number of other candidates have said they are running for president but have not yet secured a nomination. Millionaire pharma boss Gareth Sheridan this week launched his campaign, with glossy social media videos and a headline grabbing press conference in Dublin's Shelbourne Hotel. Other than Sheridan, former presidential candidate and Dragon's Den star Peter Casey has said he intends to run again and hopes to gain the support of four local authorities. Nick Delehanty, a candidate in last year's local election and general election candidate has also declared that he is running, but like Casey has not yet held an official campaign launch or any press conferences. Voters in Dublin may remember Delehanty's 'Make Crime Illegal' signs dotted around the capital during both campaigns. Advertisement The 35-year-old has so far raised over €25,000 via GoFundMe for his campaign, but wether he, Sheridan or Casey can receive the support of four councils remains to be seen. Meanwhile, Conor McGregor has also repeatedly said he is running to be president of Ireland. On the same day that he lost his appeal against the civil jury finding that he raped Nikita Hand, McGregor launched a petiton to change how the nomination process for the presidential election works. It is extremely unlikely that he will build the support required to secure a nomination. Other names reported to be considering a run are former Chief Medical Officer Tony Holohan and Riverdance star Michael Flatley. How does the Council route work again? To secure a nomination via the Council route, a candidate must get the backing of four of Ireland's 31 local authorities. It is at the discretion of each local authority to decide whether they wish to put forward a nomination and each councillor may only nominate one person. Usually council's hold hearings to allow candidates to make their pitches, these tend to be open to the public, but in the past some councils have chosen to hold them privately. Some councils have also opted not to hold hearings or nominate any candidate at all. This generally happens when a council is made up of a majority of councillors whose parties have already decided to back a candidate. So given that Fine Gael will be running its own candidate and Labour, the Social Democrats and People Before Profit are backing Catherine Connolly the likelihood that the councillors of these parties will nominate an outsider is unlikely. For example, a motion is set to go before Dun Laoghaire Rathdown County Council in Dublin next month proposing that the council does not to exercise its power to nominate a candidate. Other councils contacted by The Journal have said they will make a decision on when to hold hearings after the election has formally been called. What about the other parties? All eyes remain on Fianna Fáil and Sinn Féin to see what approach they will take for this election. Sinn Féin is still signaling that it may throw its support behind Catherine Connolly, but in recent weeks party leader Mary Lou McDonald has refused to rule out running herself , leaving the door open that they might still run their own candidate. The party is set to announce its decision at the end of August. Fianna Fáil is also keeping coy on its approach. The party hasn't fielded a presidential candidate since Mary McAleese in 1997, but given its success in last year's general election there is a widespread view in the party that it should run a candidate this year. Sources in the party have expressed frustration that no decision has been communicated yet by party leaderships. One TD told The Journal that there has to be 'at least some pretence of engagement with the parliamentary party'. It's understood the party leadership is set to decide on its approach by the end of August. Elsewhere, the Green Party is currently consulting with its members about who it should support. This follows a meeting between party leadership and Catherine Connolly two weeks ago. Aontú and Independent Ireland are also keeping their cards close to their chests for now. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
Irish Examiner
11 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Mairead McGuiness' withdrawal leaves only one clear candidate for presidential election
The withdrawal of Mairead McGuinness from the presidential election leaves what had been an unclear picture even foggier. With just ten or eleven weeks to go, there is just one candidate left in the race who has the requisite support from the Oireachtas to be on the ballot. No councils have, as yet, shown a willingness to back candidates. Catherine Connolly has secured the backing of Labour, the Social Democrats, People Before Profit, and a range of other independent politicians and at her campaign launch late last month said that she is 'ready' to be president of Ireland as 'part of a movement'. It is unlikely that Ms Connolly will be alone in the field for long as Fine Gael gets set to convene its Executive Committee. Fine Gael In the wake of Ms McGuinness's withdrawal, speculation focused on a quartet of names; former ministers Heather Humphreys, Frances Fitzgerald, and Simon Coveney, and sitting MEP Sean Kelly. While her former ministerial colleagues have kept their counsel, the former justice minister ruled herself out. On Friday afternoon, Ms Fitzgerald confirmed to the Irish Examiner that she would not seek the nomination, having declined to do so earlier this year. She had said in April that she discussed the possibility with Fine Gael leader Simon Harris and had been approached by 'many people', but would not be entering the race. She has since joined the consultancy firm Teneo. Mr Coveney joined EY as a consultant in April, but has been suggested by some in Fine Gael as a potential candidate. Mr Coveney previously served as a minister in a number of briefs — including foreign affairs, agriculture, and enterprise. However, he called time on a political career that spanned four decades after opting not to contest last year's election. Ireland South MEP Mr Kelly, who was elected with a massive 127,000 votes last June, opted not to contest the Fine Gael nomination race, leaving the way clear for former European commissioner Ms McGuinness. However, he is believed to be reconsidering his position in light of Ms McGuinness's withdrawal and sources believe he will run for the party's nomination, having been interested earlier this summer. Former minister Heather Humphreys has emerged as the favourite within the party. Picture: Gareth Chaney Ms Humphreys, the former social protection minister, has emerged as the favourite within the party, though some have questioned whether she would change her mind given her reasons for leaving politics. Ms Humphreys opted not to contest the last election, having been elected in 2011 and serving as a minister in a number of departments. She was seen within Fine Gael as someone who might contend this year's election, but speaking to the Joe Finnegan Show on Northern Sound in May, Ms Humphreys said that while she had given the idea some thought, she was committed to spending more time with her family. Fianna Fáil Within Fianna Fáil, some members of the parliamentary party believe that their candidate will not emerge until the middle of September, with Taoiseach Micheál Martin recently unequivocally ruling himself out. The party's issue is that it does not have an obvious candidate. Former taoiseach Bertie Ahern has long been linked with a run, but has appeared cool on the idea at times. Former minister Mary Hanafin was vocal last month that the party should run a candidate before writing to members asking that she be put forward. That idea was rejected by many TDs. University of Ulster professor Deirdre Heenan has been reported as being in talks with the party, while former footballer Niall Quinn is another name that has been suggested. Sinn Féin Party president Mary Lou McDonald kicked off huge speculation by not ruling out a bid for the Áras in July, but it is expected that a final decision from the party will be made in the next two weeks. Some believe using Ms McDonald as a presidential candidate would be "a waste", while others believe the party should row in behind Ms Connolly as a show of left-wing solidarity. Independents Last week, pharma entrepreneur Gareth Sheridan announced he was entering the race. Largely unknown, the 35-year-old has said that he has enough support to have his nomination brought to at least four councils. Another businessman, Nick Delehanty, also 35, ran in local and general elections in Dublin under the tagline 'make crime illegal' and has said he is seeking the nomination. He told the Irish Examiner he has the same number. Former MMA fighter Conor McGregor last week set up a petition seeking people to express their wish for him to be on the ballot paper. Picture: Brian Lawless/PA Lord of the Dance star Michael Flatley last month told a court that he 'intends to seek nominations to run for President", but said this week that he will make his intentions clearer soon. Former MMA fighter Conor McGregor last week set up a petition seeking people to express their wish for him to be on the ballot paper. The Sunday Times reported that Mr McGregor is considered a legal challenge to the eligibility rules, though it is not clear upon which grounds the challenge would be based.
