logo
Hong Kong must treasure the natural assets that help make it special

Hong Kong must treasure the natural assets that help make it special

Hong Kong is well-known as a busy and bustling metropolis, with crowded streets, congested roads and tightly-packed skyscrapers. The city's amazing biodiversity, including many endangered species, is not widely appreciated.
But flora and fauna is an integral part of what makes Hong Kong special. The city boasts more than 50 types of land-based mammal, over 130 dragonfly species, and 240 kinds of butterfly. There are 580 bird species, 1,000 types of marine fish and 3,300 species of vascular plants. It is imperative that these assets are preserved and able to flourish. Sadly, many are under threat.
A two-month public consultation on the updating of Hong Kong's Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan concluded this month. The plan, required by an international convention, was introduced in 2016.
The review is a chance to make biodiversity a top priority for all sectors, public and private, and instil a love of nature in the community.
Four action areas are highlighted in the document: nature conservation, mainstreaming, capacity building and collaborative partnering. But the most important part is the 10 questions posed to the public at the end. These are broad and open-ended, essentially asking what Hong Kong's vision should be for nature conservation and how to realise it. The government should be very receptive to submissions that can take the strategy to a new level.
Think-tank Civic Exchange, in a compelling submission, argues that nature should be integrated into decision-making across public and private sectors, with Hong Kong making an active contribution to the world's efforts to reverse biodiversity loss, becoming a regional leader in the field. It advocates the establishment of a central hub for 'nature-based solutions'.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How to choose between single-sex vs coed schools in Hong Kong
How to choose between single-sex vs coed schools in Hong Kong

South China Morning Post

time19 hours ago

  • South China Morning Post

How to choose between single-sex vs coed schools in Hong Kong

Deciding on an educational path can be confusing for parents, with myriad considerations making choosing schools seem an insurmountable task. Which education system or curriculum is best? Would a public, private or international institution be most appropriate? And what about day schools versus boarding schools? Then, further complicating the issue, is the choice between coed and single-sex schools. Advertisement In Hong Kong, single-sex schools were established in the late 19th century, mostly by missionary groups. Some of the most popular schools from this period include St. Joseph's College, a Catholic boys' school; and Queen's College, a government-funded boys' school established by the British government in 1862. After World War II, the number of single-sex schools in Hong Kong proliferated in response to a significant increase in educational demand. A series of co-educational reforms were introduced in the 1980s and 90s, but this didn't diminish the popularity of gender-specific institutions. Today, single-sex schools remain relatively popular in Hong Kong, with experts estimating that they account for up to 40 per cent of schools in the city. Some of the most notable examples include Diocesan Girls' School, Maryknoll Convent School, La Salle College and Good Hope School. But just how relevant are these single-sex schools for parents making this choice for their children? Experts acknowledge that gender-specific schools better cater to the development of each sex. Photo: Eugene Lee 'I believe parents are choosing [single-sex schools] for their reputation, their academic achievements and perceived prestige, not because they are single-sex,' says Ruth Benny, founder of admissions consultancy Top Schools. 'Many parents [in Hong Kong] choose single-sex schools as they believe they can provide a more tailored learning environment specifically designed to meet the needs of boys or girls,' explains Julianna Yau, director of local education specialists Ampla Education. '[But] some parents prefer coed for secondary [school] as they recognise the importance of social skills and interaction between the genders.' Experts generally acknowledge that boys and girls develop at different rates and will have disparate interests and motivations. It follows that – theoretically at least – gender-specific schools would better cater to the development of each sex, thereby justifying their continued popularity. Advertisement Separate tailored experiences can be offered for each sex: for example, boys might thrive in shorter classes with frequent breaks, while girls may do better with group work. Additionally, single-gender classrooms may give students more confidence in speaking up in lessons.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store