Intel CFO: Division responsible for Ohio plant remains on track; layoffs have dual purpose
NEW ALBANY, Ohio (WCMH) — Intel's chief financial officer clarified updates for the division behind Ohio's Intel plant this month, including impending layoffs.
Dave Zinsner, executive vice president and CFO of Intel, spoke at a Global Technology, Media and Communications Conference on May 13. In his discussion, he addressed changes under new CEO Lip-Bu Tan and the future of Intel Foundry, the division responsible for the $28 billion Ohio One plant. See previous coverage of Intel's Ohio plant in the video player above.
$250M facility opens down the road from Intel in New Albany, creating 225 jobs
'While it's not to where we were driving, when you look back, it's actually a fair amount of progress that we have made,' Zinsner said.
Once the face of American semiconductor manufacturing, Intel announced its New Albany project in 2022, preparing to build two chip factories across 1,000 acres in Licking County in the largest private investment in Ohio history. Those plants were originally scheduled to be up and running this year, but financial turmoil contributed to a delay into the early 2030s. When Tan stepped into the role of CEO in March, it was unclear where he would take Ohio One and rumors of a buyout persisted.
Ohio's plant is still far from central to Tan's public plans, but Zinsner said he is committed to the Foundry business. Despite initial concerns that Tan could abandon the Ohio plant or Intel Foundry entirely, Zinsner said Tan isn't thinking about massive changes. Instead, Tan is focused on streamlining internal operations and addressing customer needs.
'We have lost talent at the company and we do need to rebuild that and the great thing about Lip-Bu is that he's a magnet for talent,' Zinsner said.
Zinsner said he believes Tan's biggest concern is a lack of execution, he said he will 'flatten' the organization, which he has already done at the executive level. Tan has far more engineers and leaders reporting directly to him, and he hopes decision-making will be easier with less bureaucracy.
Teen on the mend after tree falls into house during storm
Part of this streamlining process involves significant layoffs, with Bloomberg reporting 20% cuts across the board and Tan confirming a mass firing will happen by the end of July. Although layoffs help with finances, Zinsner said cuts had less to do with cost reductions and more to do with restructuring and becoming more nimble.
'What he (Tan) wants is the lowest level of the organization to be closer to him so that he's hearing the good, the bad, the ugly of what's going on,' Zinsner said.
Zinsner, who served as co-interim CEO before Tan was selected, said the Foundry business behind Ohio's plant was in good shape. He said he was 'highly confident' that Foundry will break even in 2027, positive news for Ohio's expensive plant.
Zinsner said many of the problems Intel Foundry faces stem from the makeup of the company. As a Foundry business, Intel wants to develop and manufacture semiconductors for external companies, many of whom compete directly with Intel's other half, Intel Products. Zinsner said that can make it difficult to earn trust as a Foundry.
Investigation alleges Kroger overcharges customers on for sale items
'What we have to do is make sure they feel confident that IP is getting protected, but maybe more important that supply is getting protected, that we aren't going to disadvantage their products in terms of supply,' Zinsner said.
Tan has a plan for that, too. Zinsner said Tan spends much of his time meeting with customers to hear what they need and earn trust. He recalled Tan had 22 meetings on a weekend once, trying to gather insight from customers.
Zinsner did not address the Ohio plant directly, and he also did not address any other developing manufacturing hubs. Construction continues at the Ohio One plant.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
15 minutes ago
- CBS News
Primanti Bros. closes location on Penn Avenue in Pittsburgh
The Primanti Bros. location on Penn Avenue in Pittsburgh's Garfield neighborhood has closed. A company spokesperson said on Wednesday that the restaurant has closed. The spokesperson said Primanti Bros. is "focused on our four other locations within Pittsburgh city limits." "Through the normal course of business, we continually evaluate our portfolio to ensure our restaurants have the resources to achieve their growth potential," the company spokesperson said. "We have known this lease agreement was ending, and after careful consideration, we made the decision not to renew the lease." Primanti Bros. is known for its sandwiches loaded with meat, cheese, french fries and coleslaw, but it also has American classics like burgers, wings and pizza on its menu. Primanti Bros. also serves beers, liquor and signature cocktails. Primanti Bros. opened in 1933 and has grown to 42 locations, including 24 in western Pennsylvania. Primanti Bros. also has locations in Maryland, West Virginia, Ohio and central Pennsylvania. The Pittsburgh-based chain opened its first restaurant in the Baltimore area in 2024. In the past 10 years, Primanti Bros. said it has more than doubled the number of restaurants in its portfolio. "Pittsburgh's Strip District will always be our original neighborhood - but we're working every day to bring a new Primanti Bros. to yours," Primanti Bros. says on its website. The Primanti Bros. on Penn Avenue is the latest establishment to close in Pittsburgh. This week, Voodoo Brewing announced the closing of its location on the North Shore. Last week, Nakama Japanese Steakhouse and Sushi Bar on East Carson Street closed abruptly.
Time Magazine
18 minutes ago
- Time Magazine
How Doubling Tariffs on Steel and Aluminum Will Hit U.S. Businesses and Consumers
Canned foods, cars, houses, and a range of other goods could soon get more expensive as businesses face a newly doubled tariff rate of 50% for steel and aluminum imports. President Donald Trump described the increase, which raised the levies from the 25% rate announced in February beginning on Wednesday, as an effort to 'further secure the steel industry in the United States' during a Friday rally at a steel mill in Pittsburgh, Penn.—once the heart of the domestic steel industry. But while American steel industry groups have hailed the tariff hike, economic experts have sounded alarms, saying it could further disrupt the already-volatile global supply chain and put more strain on businesses—and Americans' wallets. 'Consumers will have to pay the price,' says Virginia Tech economics professor David Beiri. 'The continued uncertainty that is created by the government is poisoning business plans.' How will steel and aluminum tariff hikes impact businesses? The United States is highly reliant on steel imports, bringing in more of the material from abroad than any other country in the world, according to the International Trade Administration. More than 26 million metric tons of steel were imported last year, most of which came from Brazil, Canada, Mexico, South Korea, and China. 'We are equally dependent on aluminum,' says Jonathan Colehower, managing director at consulting company UST. The domestic steel industry has voiced support for the increased tariffs, saying they will help it weather increased competition from foreign steel manufacturers. 'Chinese steel exports to the world have more than doubled since 2020, surging to 118 million MT in 2024—more than total North American steel production,' the American Iron and Steel Institute, one of several trade associations representing the American steel industry, said in a statement after Trump announced the higher rate. 'This tariff action will help prevent new surges in imports that would injure American steel producers and their workers.' But experts worry about the industry's ability to meet increased demand as businesses, facing the additional import costs, seek cheaper alternatives for their products. While the U.S. once dominated the steel industry, the boom has died down in the last century. 'With domestic capacity not necessarily being able to produce what we might need…there is going to be a transitory effect,' says Beiri, referring to the adjustment period the steel industry will have to navigate as the supply chain changes. Colehower says the domestic steel supply may tighten as a result of the increased tariffs, which could cause domestic prices to rise amid high demand. 'There's absolutely no way it's going to be able to make up the difference immediately,' he says of the domestic steel industry. The Aluminum Association, a trade group that represents both U.S.-based and foreign companies, said it supports tariff-free Canadian aluminum, pointing to the American aluminum industry's reliance on the country's northern neighbor. 'Aluminum is a critical material for our economy and national defense – used in everything from cars to beverage cans to fighter jets. Today, the United States is investing significantly and will need both smelted and recycled aluminum to meet growing demand,' the association said. 'In the years if not decades it will take to build new U.S. smelter capacity, our metal needs must be met by importing.' How will the higher tariffs impact the prices of goods? Steel and aluminum are used in various products, from beer cans and office supplies to automobiles—the prices for all of which are likely to rise as a result of the doubled import taxes. The Can Manufacturers Institute, the trade association of the metal can manufacturing industry, opposed the tariff increase in a statement after Trump announced the coming change in the rate, saying it would 'further increase the cost of canned goods at the grocery store.' The can manufacturing industry imports nearly 80% of its tin-mill steel from foreign countries. 'Doubling steel tariffs will inflate domestic canned food prices, and it plays into the hands of China and other foreign canned food producers, which are more than happy to undercut American farmers and food producers,' the trade association said. Beer companies and other beverage businesses are also set to be impacted. The real estate and construction industries, both of which use steel to build homes, warehouses, and other structures will be footing a bigger bill, as well, Colehower says. He predicts businesses such as Lowe's and Home Depot, the latter of which vowed before the tariff hike that it would not be increasing the cost of its goods, will be severely affected. Farm equipment and transportation vehicles, including cars, bicycles, and others, will also likely cost more as a result of the new tariff rate, Colehower says. Some companies could seek to adjust their business models in the face of increased costs. Coca-Cola CEO James Quincey, for instance, said in February that the company would consider making more beverages in plastic bottles to offset aluminum price hikes under the tariffs announced that month. Negotiations over the tariffs are ongoing between the U.S. and its trading partners, several of which have expressed ire at the increased import taxes. Bea Bruske, president of the Canadian Labour Congress, called the steel tariffs a 'direct attack on Canadian workers.' A European Commission official on Friday said the decision 'adds further uncertainty to the global economy and increases costs for consumers and businesses on both sides of the Atlantic.' The U.K. has been spared from the tariff hike; Mexico announced Wednesday that it plans to ask for a similar exemption. Canada, Mexico, and the European Union were previously exempt from steel and aluminum tariffs Trump imposed during his first term in 2016, but are subject to the current levies.
The Hill
18 minutes ago
- The Hill
Musk attacks underscores pent-up tensions with White House
Elon Musk's harsh criticism of the White House's signature policy bill is laying bare the tensions between the world's richest man and the administration where he worked over the last four months. Privately, Musk rubbed a number of senior officials the wrong way during his time in government, and his complaints about a key legislative goal may further agitate his critics in the administration. Multiple sources close to the administration told The Hill that Musk frequently clashed with Cabinet secretaries and other senior officials who viewed him as overstepping his role leading the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). The Tesla CEO — who spent millions of dollars to help Trump get elected and whose 130-day window as a special government employee ended last Friday — sparred with Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Treasury Department Secretary Scott Bessent and Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy at various points throughout his tenure. He also publicly bickered with senior trade adviser Peter Navarro, calling him a 'moron' after Navarro weighed in on Tesla's assembly process for its electric vehicles. While White House aides dismissed those disagreements as a sign of healthy debate among top officials, they were part of a larger pattern of tensions between Musk and others in the administration. The latest instance came over the weekend, when Trump withdrew the nomination of Musk ally Jared Isaacman to serve as NASA administrator. Musk had pushed for Isaacman's nomination, and the nominee had already advanced through the Senate Commerce Committee. But within hours of Musk's departure from the government, Trump pulled the pick, citing 'a thorough review of prior associations.' But the break that threatens to irk Trump the most and could undermine his agenda is Musk's frustrations with the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which passed the House last month and must now clear the Senate. Musk exited the administration after an Oval Office press event with Trump on Friday and has since ratcheted up his criticism of Trump's bill. By Wednesday afternoon, Musk was urging lawmakers to 'kill the bill.' A day earlier, he railed against the legislation in a post on the social platform X, which he owns, calling it 'an abomination' and 'pork-filled' due to its effects on federal deficits. 'In November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people,' Musk wrote in a separate post, while sharing another that highlighted criticisms of Republican lawmakers. Top White House officials have publicly brushed aside the criticism and said Musk's issues with the legislation had no impact on their approach. 'The White House knows you cannot have perfection be the enemy of the good. And Elon is someone who can put a rocket on the moon … but has to understand that this is how government works, and there's a lot of bureaucracy, and this is a team sport,' said one White House ally. 'I think the Trump White House is handling this right by choosing their words wisely,' the source added. Outside the White House, however, Trump allies have begun to fire back at Musk while signaling the president's disappointment. Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) told reporters Wednesday morning that Trump was 'not delighted' with Musk's outburst toward the legislation. Multiple sources on Capitol Hill and in the administration seeking to explain Musk's tirade against the bill suggested he was frustrated by the legislation's language that would phase out tax credits for new electric vehicles, a potential hit to Tesla's business. Trump himself has not directly addressed Musk's comments. Multiple top aides have mostly held their fire and instead focused on what the bill accomplishes. Deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller has led that charge, posting on social media and going on television to tout the benefits of the legislation and offer thinly veiled critiques of Musk's argument. 'Sometimes, in life, a great thing is just a great thing for a great reason. It's OK to win. Winning is wonderful,' Miller posted on X. In a separate post, Miller argued the bill was 'designed by President Trump, his loyal aides, and his closest allies in Congress to deliver fully and enthusiastically on the explicit promises he made the American People.' Russell Vought, the director of the Office of Management and Budget, was similarly gentle in his pushback to Musk. He argued it was a 'fiscally responsible bill' and suggested projections that showed it growing the deficit were flawed. 'We think the bill is very good one. We think it's very strong fiscally. Nothing's changed from our view of the world. We understand where [Musk's] coming from,' Vought told reporters at the White House. The fallout over the reconciliation package comes after Trump gave Musk a warm send-off last Friday. The president held a press conference in the Oval Office, which he opened by extolling the work of Musk and DOGE and by presenting the Tesla CEO with a ceremonial key to the White House. Musk told reporters that he would be 'visiting here and be a friend and an adviser to the president.' Trump allies are skeptical that the Tesla CEO's criticism is a sign of a permanent breakup, pointing to Musk's significant support for Trump in 2024 and Trump's tendency to never fully abandon those who found their way into his inner circle. 'No one ever truly leaves Trump's orbit,' the Trump ally told The Hill. 'Second, Elon is the brightest guy anyone knows and he's also somebody who cares deeply about this country, particularly when it comes to things like free speech and debt. And those are things that, despite the shouting matches, those aren't going to change.'
