
Scale AI's Alexandr Wang describes ‘moral imperative' for his company to work on military solutions
Alexandr Wang, the founder of the increasingly powerful tech firm Scale AI, will not be apologising for his company's contracts with the US military. Mr Wang's start-up, which trains artificial intelligence applications, already boasts some of the world's biggest technology giants as its clients, including Meta, Microsoft and OpenAI. It also works with the US Air Force and US Army. Other tech firms have faced criticism for working with the military, but Mr Wang, who became the world's youngest self-made billionaire in 2022 at the age of 25, has no such concerns. 'We're at the brink of this incredibly powerful new technology, and the applications for national security are obvious," Mr Wang said during a discussion at the Centre for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) in Washington. "It's going to be imperative for the US to stay ahead." Mr Wang grew up in Los Alamos, New Mexico, famed for housing Robert Oppenheimer's development of the atomic bomb through the Manhattan Project during the Second World War. It was this Los Alamos upbringing that led Mr Wang to believe it's a moral imperative for AI companies to work with the military, he said. A visit to China, where he saw AI companies working on facial recognition and surveillance, bolstered the entrepreneur's belief that Scale AI should work with US defence entities. 'At that moment it was clear for me that the US would need to have the highest quality human capital and the best companies focused on this problem,' he said, referring to national security. Mr Wang acknowledged there had been some fallout in the years since his decision. There was initial pushback from investors, and some employees resigned fearing the stigma that might come from working with the military. 'Knowing about the history of where I grew up, and the impact that Los Alamos and the Manhattan Project had on Pax Americana had on the global order, it felt so clear that great AI technology needs to be applied to national security problems," he added, also not shying away from his warnings about China's goals with AI. "The CCP has had an AI master plan," he said. "They've discussed the need to win on the sort of implementation and proliferation of this technology throughout their military." Scale AI's footprint continues to grow as buzz surrounding the self-described "data-centric end-to-end solution" AI infrastructure company shows no sign of slowing. Essentially, if a company needs reliable and well-organised data to help create a large language model for just about anything, Scale AI has become the go-to experts. Mr Wang founded Scale AI in 2016 shortly after dropping out of MIT when he saw AI developments creating the need for ways to label, curate and manage high quality training data for both technology companies and other large businesses. That proved to be a wise bet. As of 2025, it now has more than 900 employees and secured at least $1.3 billion in financing, resulting in a $13.8 billion valuation. Few companies in the world currently have the equivalent of Scale AI's defence and commercial portfolio. The rapid ascent of Scale AI has also put Mr Wang in the rarefied air of AI tech entrepreneurs and celebrities such as Nvidia's Jensen Huang and OpenAI's Sam Altman. He has graced the cover of magazines, testified before Congress and is increasingly sought after for interviews. His comments about 'agentic warfare' and 'lethality deterrence' at CSIS in Washington came in the context of a question from interviewer Gregory Allen, who previously worked at the Pentagon. Mr Allen asked about Google's decision in 2018 to pull out of a military initiative called Project Maven, which sought to use technology to enhance military and weapons systems. Some critiqued Google at the time for joining the project, accusing it of profiting from potential wars and conflicts. Yet Mr Wang decided to pivot his company to such research. 'One core belief I have is that over time, rationality prevails,' Mr Wang explained, adding that in his view the AI applications for national security were 'very obvious' and therefore necessary to assist with. Mr Wang's defence of Scale AI's military work comes as other companies like Microsoft have faced criticism for making similar moves. In April, Mustafa Suleyman, Microsoft's head of artificial intelligence, was interrupted by an employee who criticised the company for having contracts with the Israeli military. 'Stop using AI for genocide, Mustafa. Stop using AI for genocide in our region … 50,000 people have died. You have blood on your hands,' said the protester at an anniversary event on the Microsoft campus in Redmond, Washington state. The employee and several others were later fired, but consternations from some inside the company have remained. There's no sign that fears of demonstrations or similar backlash have impacted Mr Wang's business decisions. In January, he also surprised some by writing a congratulatory letter to recently elected US President Donald Trump, offering some thoughts about how the US should proceed with AI compared with other countries. 'China's government outspends our government by about 10 times on AI implementation and adoption,' he wrote, urging President Trump to increase American AI investment. He also suggested the US should prepare for the vast amounts of energy that AI infrastructure would require, and to not stifle AI innovation through regulations. 'Attracting the best technology companies to flourish in America relies on the right regulatory framework,' he said. During Thursday's CSIS event, Mr Wang also wasn't shy about critiquing export policies that limit US AI chip exports to various countries, while also acknowledging the complexity of the issue that some say is key to maintaining US technology leadership. He said AI developments from Chinese companies like DeepSeek and Huawei show chip export enforcement can only go so far.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Broadcast Pro
5 hours ago
- Broadcast Pro
SESs 7th and 8th O3b mPOWER satellites set to begin connectivity services
With these satellites, SES is enhancing the O3b mPOWER network to serve customers across multiple market segments SES has announced that the latest pair of O3b mPOWER satellites launched in December 2024 is now ready to offer services across the globe. Featuring redesigned payload power modules, the seventh and eighth O3b mPOWER satellites are bolstering the capabilities of SESs second-generation medium earth orbit (MEO) system, supporting the delivery of high throughput and predictable low latency services at scale. To date, SES has launched eight out of 13 O3b mPOWER high-throughput and low-latency satellites. The next O3b mPOWER launch is scheduled for summer 2025. SES has also expanded its strategically located satellite ground stations, and now has 12 operational O3b mPOWER gateways located in South Africa, Peru, Brazil, Portugal, Australia, Greece, the US, Chile, the United Arab Emirates and Senegal. Five out of these are co-located and operated by Microsofts Azure data centres. Our O3b mPOWER services are in high demand and we were eagerly awaiting the additional satellites to strengthen our MEO network, said Adel Al-Saleh, CEO of SES. As we continue to deploy additional O3b mPOWER satellites, we are bringing substantially more capacity and improved network efficiency, resulting in a threefold increase in available capacity by 2027 to better serve our mobility, government, enterprise and cloud customers. SES started offering O3b mPOWER services worldwide since April 2024 and has been delivering high-performance network services to customer sites across Asia-Pacific, Africa, the Middle East and the Americas in multiple market segments. The systems exceptional flexibility means it can provide services ranging from tens of Mbps to multiple gigabits per second of capacity to any site.


Middle East Eye
a day ago
- Middle East Eye
For Palestinians, to exist is to resist Israel's war of annihilation
In a speech to the UN General Assembly on 22 September 2023, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu brandished a map in which the occupied Palestinian territories were no longer distinguishable from Israel, as he threatened Iran while touting the future glories of artificial intelligence (AI) and a world in which Israel would lead the region into a limitlessly bright future. Less than a month later, Israeli AI-driven technologies such as Lavender, Gospel, and Where's Your Daddy - developed in partnership with US corporate giants like Microsoft, Google and Amazon - exponentially boosted target banks, resulting in the murder of tens of thousands of Palestinian men, women and children, wiping out entire families in one fell swoop. The following year, at the 27 September 2024 General Assembly, Netanyahu doubled down on his earlier claims, further amplifying his division of the world: "As Israel defends itself against Iran in this seven-front war, the lines separating the 'blessing' and the 'curse' could not be more clear." By then, at least 41,000 Palestinians had already been killed in Gaza by Israeli air, naval, artillery and ground attacks. This against a people - needless to say, but still needing to be said - with no air force, air defences, navy, or mechanised units, not to mention bomb shelters or, most of the time, electricity. What is finally becoming clear to more and more people is that, as far as Israel is concerned, Palestinian resistance begins with simply existing. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters This resistance through "being" then extends to all other human activities: breathing, sleeping, eating, walking, farming, giving birth, and on, ad infinitum, to everything a person might do in life. Thus, every Palestinian, by virtue of their very existence, is considered a "legitimate" target. Carceral geography Since the inception of Zionism, colonisation in Palestine has exerted every possible effort to erase, usurp and fragment the land and its indigenous people into ever-smaller and less contiguous areas and communities. We have now reached a point where, in addition to the wholesale destruction in Gaza, there are towns and cities in the occupied territories where Palestinian residents must pass through checkpoints simply to exit their own homes. In some towns, Palestinians must pass through checkpoints just to exit their own homes. This extreme spatial fragmentation has been replicated inside Israel's vast prison system - at least until the more recent mass kidnappings and torture of Palestinian hostages, primarily from Gaza but also from the West Bank. Netanyahu's brazen display at the UN in 2023, his aim to expand the Abraham Accords at the expense of any possibility of Palestinian self-determination, the relentless atomisation of Palestinian land and society, and mass incarceration without charge, trial or hope of release - are all elements of the incendiary mix that exploded in Operation al-Aqsa Flood on 7 October 2023. No matter one's opinion of it, the stated aim of the operation was to unify a deeply fragmented Palestinian population under the banner of resistance - with the support of other resistance movements - while capturing prisoners of war and hostages to exchange for Palestinians held hostage in occupation prisons. The sentiments expressed by prisoners in the first exchanges between Israel and Hamas are so distant from western conceptions of individual personhood as to seem almost incomprehensible. Follow Middle East Eye's live coverage of the Israel-Palestine war Muhammed al-Arda, understanding all too well the enormity of the collective sacrifice involved, declared: "If you gathered all the poems, elegies, proverbs and sayings of the land, they would not do justice to Gaza." Another said: "Our freedom was paid for by the blood of the martyrs of Gaza. We owe them a debt that can never be repaid." Narrowing the frame The propaganda of so-called liberal democracies narrows the horizons of thought, severely limiting our ability to make sense of what is actually happening. When the official 9/11 Commission recommended the need to "bureaucratise imagination", it was not forecasting some future Orwellian dystopia, but describing the world we were already living in. With all the terminology used in discussing Israel and Palestine - genocide, apartheid, settler colonialism, anti-Zionism, and more - the key missing words remain "imperialism" and "national liberation". Trump's Middle East moves revive the question of who's in charge Read More » We cannot, for instance, even speak about Palestinian armed resistance - their political or military strategies, successes or failures - without first making a disclaimer of some kind. Under the standards his administration has set for ordinary civilians, it would seem that President Donald Trump's own team should be charged with consorting with "terrorists", as they negotiated the release of dual US-Israeli citizen and soldier Edan Alexander. The absurdities abound and multiply, as does the impunity: mere hours after Alexander's release, the Israelis assassinated journalist Hassan Eslaih, reducing to rubble the hospital where he was being treated after a previous assassination attempt. They went on to execute 12-year-old Mohammed Bardawil, the sole surviving witness to the actions of Major Nikolai Ashurov and Israeli tanks during the execution of UN field security supervisor Kamal Shatout, during the massacre of 15 Palestinian paramedics and other civilians on 23 March 2025. Since Alexander's release, the litany of new weapons tests, executions, forced displacement to new kill zones, systematic hospital destruction, and the use of starvation as a tool of genocide has continued apace. Breaking the spell As the "two-state solution" fades further into fantasy in the minds of western leaders - buying time for Israel to steal more Palestinian land, destroy more homes, and displace and kill more people - it might be time to open the floodgates of imagination. While many credit student movements and public opinion with ending the US war in Vietnam, the more decisive factor - rarely acknowledged - was the insubordination of US soldiers. Urban uprisings also pulled the National Guard away from overseas deployment. How many more generations will be enslaved to guard the imperial front of US interests, upholding a totalitarian, colonial ideology that dominates their lives? In Vietnam, whole units were known to refuse orders, sabotage operations, and refuse to engage in combat. "Fragging" - the use of fragmentation grenades against overzealous officers - was not limited to a few isolated cases. One book alone, Fragging: Why US Soldiers Assaulted Their Officers in Vietnam, documents 500 such incidents. We have become so accustomed to self-incriminating social media posts by Israeli soldiers - cheering the demolition of homes, mosques, hospitals, schools and universities; prancing around in women's clothing in vandalised and destroyed homes - that it is almost impossible to conjure anything else. But can we even imagine these same soldiers refusing orders, let alone bearing arms against their commanding officers or staging a revolt? How many "existential" wars will they be expected to fight? How many more generations will be enslaved to guard the imperial front of US interests, upholding a totalitarian, colonial ideology that dominates nearly every aspect of their lives - and every aspect of Palestinian life? Once there was "denazification"; then came "de-Baathification". Did they work? What about "de-Zionisation"? Could it work? Could we even imagine a democratic Palestine, from the river to the sea? Is this genocide yet another attempt to forestall that inevitability - by etching irreversible traumas into bodies and minds? From Balfour to the present As we travel down the road of Sykes-Picot 2.0 - with Syria's newly installed regime negotiating with Israel, and Lebanon on the path to becoming a protectorate - we are witnessing the culmination of processes set in motion by the 1917 Balfour Declaration. These processes were vividly imagined in Abdelrahman Munif's Cities of Salt, and most cogently analysed in Ghassan Kanafani's The Revolution of 1936–1939 in Palestine, written in the shadow of the Naksa, the 1967 "setback" and what has come to be known as Black September. Kanafani's text, as Palestinian editor and educator Hazem Jamjoum has noted, "has everything to do with the imperialist victory over the Arab and internationalist liberation movements in the 1970-1971 war in Jordan." As if written today, Kanafani notes in his introduction: "In the years 1936–39, the Palestinian revolutionary movement was dealt a devastating blow by the three formations that have since evolved to become the major forces working against the people of Palestine: reactionary Palestinian leaders, Arab regimes surrounding Palestine, and the alliance between Zionism and imperialism." As the US shores up support among Gulf oil and other Arab regimes while silencing dissent on imperial policies regarding genocide and famine in Gaza, and as Mahmoud Abbas's collaboration forces repress uprisings in the West Bank, what has actually changed? We are at a crossroads. The forces arrayed against justice in and for Palestine remain largely the same, though their firepower and technological reach have expanded dramatically, as shown by the entourage of CEOs accompanying Trump to Saudi Arabia, including Palantir's openly genocidal Alex Karp. But Palestinian resistance must not only be further understood, it must be embraced by anyone who hopes to retain earthly and spiritual value while rejecting the despair and nihilism spreading across the political and cultural spectrum. Israel and its western allies have made their choice unmistakably clear: total destruction, mass population transfer, genocide, and full compliance with their agenda. Most Arab regimes have also chosen to lavish Trump with gifts while offering not a single loaf of bread for Gaza. As the lines are drawn, the question remains: who else will join the struggle for justice, and what form will it take? The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.


The National
2 days ago
- The National
Scale AI's Alexandr Wang says US is trailing China on data
Scale AI founder Alexandr Wang said that in the race for artificial intelligence superiority, the US and China are "neck and neck", but Beijing is ahead in terms of accumulating data to build models. " China has had large-scale government programmes to win on data," Mr Wang said on Wednesday during at the AI+ Expo in Washington. But he said privacy is not a top priority for Beijing. "So you know, there are all these ways that naturally they will be ahead on data, and we need to make sure that we can match that." The race for AI dominance is not over, Mr Wang said: "We're ahead on compute, they're ahead on data and we're neck and neck on algorithms. He blamed "legacy reasons" for the US lagging behind China on data, the backbone of large-language models that make AI so powerful. To catch up to China, he suggested that the US create a national data reserve, and think of data in the same way as petroleum or other natural resources. "The first priority [in the reserve] should be national security data," he said. "There's so much incredibly useful and valuable data that right now is fragmented and not leveraged for building powerful capabilities." Mr Wang also insisted that the US has "much more" military data than China, but that data was segregated and fragmented. Mr Wang's discussion about AI came on the third and final day of the technology conference in Washington. While his was one of the more high-profile talks at the event, his company Scale AI – whose technology helps to train AI applications – has been criticised by those concerned about the junction between artificial intelligence and the defence industry. It already has some of the world's technology giants as its clients, including Meta, Microsoft and OpenAI. The company also works with the US Air Force and US Army. Mr Wang has openly stood behind his company's defence contracts. During a discussion at Centre for Strategic and International Studies in May, he insisted that the company's work and the use of AI for US military solutions was a "moral imperative". 'We're at the brink of this incredibly powerful new technology and the applications for national security are obvious," Mr Wang said. He said that a visit to China, where he saw AI companies working on facial recognition and surveillance, bolstered his belief that Scale AI should work with US defence. 'At that moment it was clear for me that the US would need to have the highest quality human capital and the best companies focused on this problem." The buzz around Scale AI continues to grow as the self-described "data-centric end-to-end solution" AI infrastructure company expands its footprint. Originally from New Mexico, Mr Wang founded Scale AI in 2016 shortly after dropping out of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology when he saw AI developments creating the need for ways to provide and manage high-quality training data for technology companies and other large businesses. His company has more than 900 employees and secured at least $1.3 billion in financing, resulting in a $13.8 billion valuation. At the AI+ convention, he spoke highly of the AI partnerships recently announced during US President Donald Trump's visit to Saudi Arabia and the UAE. "Now what we're seeing is that we want to get ahead in this AI age and that's the motivating idea behind what you saw in the Middle East," Mr Wang said. He said that he expects similar partnerships and announcements with other countries in the years ahead.