ICSA: Uncertainty around GAEC 2 ‘completely unacceptable'
Ongoing uncertainty around the good agricultural and environmental condition GAEC 2 is 'completely unacceptable' as the Basic Income Support for Sustainability (BISS) application deadline looms, according to Irish Cattle and Sheep Farmers' Association's (ICSA).
Sean McNamara, president of the ICSA said the current situation is also 'deeply unfair to farmers' as they simply do not know where they stand.
GAEC 2– one of several GAEC rules that govern conditionality for payments under the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) – is described as a baseline requirement for the protection of carbon-rich soils, including peatlands and wetland.
McNamara said: 'There has been no formal approval from the EU Commission on Ireland's proposed approach to GAEC 2, and there is no appeals mechanism for farmers to challenge how their land has been classified – because an appeals process will not even be established until that approval is secured.
'What use is that to farmers? It is outrageous that such a fundamental issue remains unresolved at this critical time'.
ICSA
According to the president of the ICSA its members are worried about the future for their farms.
'The risk is that these maps, developed for CAP compliance, will be used as a back door to further restrictions under the EU Nature Restoration Law or other environmental designations down the line.
'We are constantly being told that the Nature Restoration Law will be voluntary, but there is widespread fear that if Ireland falls short on its targets, these so-called voluntary measures will suddenly become mandatory.
'If that happens, farmers rightly fear that the GAEC 2 maps will be repurposed to enforce rewetting or impose other land use restrictions in the future. This would be a total betrayal,' McNamara said.
Mineral soils
The ICSA has again voiced its concerns about mineral soils being included in GAEC 2 mapping.
'Whole land parcel identification system (LPIS) parcels have been designated using a 50% threshold for peat soil content.
'This means large areas of productive mineral soil are being unfairly caught up in GAEC 2 restrictions, limiting agricultural activity and potentially devaluing land,' McNamara said.
The organisation said it is now 'demanding urgent clarity'.
'Farmers cannot be expected to make informed decisions about their BISS applications – or their future – without official confirmation of the rules, a functioning appeals process, and certainty about how GAEC 2 will be implemented.
'The department must move immediately to provide clarity on this issue and give clear guarantees that GAEC 2 data will not be used for any purpose beyond CAP conditionality.
'If this clarity cannot be provided in time, then a further derogation must be sought so that GAEC 2 does not come into effect until next year,' the ICSA president added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Agriland
2 days ago
- Agriland
Claim that emissions targets could lead to less food production
The Irish Cattle and Sheep Farmers' Association (ICSA) has warned that Ireland is at risk of meeting its emissions targets at the expense of rural communities, food security, and the future of farming. ICSA Rural Development chair Edmond Phelan was speaking following the Agriculture and Climate Change Conference, which was held at Dublin Castle this past week (Thursday, June 5). 'It is all very well defining success by hitting targets, but what happens when we look around and realise there are no farmers left on the land?' he commented. 'We cannot afford to lose the people, the communities, and the generations of farming knowledge that make food production possible in this country. 'There appears to be a complete lack of joined-up thinking when it comes to reaching our climate goals. 'Farmers are being squeezed from all sides – expected to cut outputs, and compete for land with energy production, solar farms, biomass, and rewetting etc. At the same time, sectors like aviation face little scrutiny,' he said. The ICSA has questioned why Dublin Airport Authority is not held accountable, for instance, when it wants to increase passenger numbers by 25%. 'It all adds up to farmers becoming increasingly frustrated by a system that demands more and more from them, with little in return,' Phelan added. 'There is an excessive fixation on agricultural emissions, while the carbon being sequestered every day on farms – through hedgerows, grasslands, and soils – is being completely ignored. 'The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), in particular, shows no real interest in acknowledging this reality. It's a clear case of not being able to see the forest for the trees, and farmers are expected to just accept that policy is being shaped without seeing the full picture.' Food production The farm organisation has said that food security must not be forgotten in the climate debate and that policymakers and the public cannot lose sight of the fact that there is a growing global population to feed. 'We need climate plans that reflect the complexity of land use, respects the role of farmers, and gives them real tools to be a bigger part of the solution,' Phelan stated. 'Farmers want to play their part, but that goodwill will evaporate if they continue to feel vilified rather than supported.'
Agriland
3 days ago
- Agriland
Minister urged to retain tax relief for farmers
The Irish Cattle and Sheep Farmers' Association (ICSA) is urging the Minister for Finance, Paschal Donohoe to retain key tax relief for farmers ahead of Budget 2026. ICSA Rural Development chair Edmond Phelan has said that the retention of key tax reliefs for farmers is absolutely vital, particularly in the context of generational renewal and the need to provide greater certainty for family farms. 'These reliefs – such as the Young Trained Farmer stamp duty exemption, Agricultural Relief from Capital Acquisitions Tax [CAT], and Farm Consolidation Relief – are not just technical tax measures,' Phelan said. 'They are essential supports that underpin efforts to improve farm viability, encourage land mobility, and, crucially, to support young people to enter and remain in farming. 'There should be no disincentives to farm transfers,' he said. The ICSA was responding to comments made by Minister for Finance Paschal Donohoe, who confirmed in response to a parliamentary question, reported by Agriland, that several farm-related tax relief schemes are currently under review ahead of Budget 2026. According to Minister Donohoe, a number of tax reliefs are due to 'sunset' at the end of 2025. The first scheme under review is the Accelerated Capital Allowance (income tax) for slurry storage. The second scheme the minister mentioned was the Young Trained Farmer (stamp duty) Relief. The Farm Consolidation (stamp duty) Relief is also under review and the minister also mentioned Revised CAT Agricultural Relief. Phelan said the looming expiry or 'sunset' of these schemes at the end of 2025 must be addressed with clarity and urgency. 'ICSA is calling on the Minister for Finance to commit to the long-term retention of these reliefs in Budget 2026,' the ICSA chair continued. 'Farmers need certainty to plan for succession, make investment decisions, and meet environmental obligations. The absence of a firm commitment to extend these measures risks creating unnecessary hesitation at a time when we should be incentivising action. 'The other targeted tax reliefs mentioned by Minister Donohoe – Farm Restructuring (CGT) Relief and the Accelerated Capital Allowance for slurry storage – are equally vital for improving both environmental performance and economic sustainability on farms,' he added. The farm group has said that all of these measures align with national goals around climate action, biodiversity, and generational renewal. It added that removing or weakening them would send the wrong message at a time when the sector is being asked to do more than ever.
Agriland
5 days ago
- Agriland
Livestock ‘essential' to meeting climate targets
A paper published by an EU body of agri-food research organisations – including Teagasc – has said that livestock systems are essential to meeting climate and biodiversity targets, when they are designed with 'circularity and multifunctionality in mind'. The paper, described as a policy brief, was published this week by the Animal Task Force (ATF), an EU public-private partnership entity that brings together organisations in several EU member states that work in the areas of livestock research and science. Teagasc is one such organisation, and Teagasc director Prof. Frank O' Mara is the president of the ATF. The paper, titled Livestock are more than food, said that livestock systems in Europe 'are at a crossroads'. 'In the middle of growing calls to reduce meat consumption, livestock numbers, and agricultural emissions, the broader contributions of livestock are often overlooked by both the general public and policymakers. 'Yet, when managed sustainably, livestock plays a key role in delivering climate resilience, resource efficiency, rural development, and ecosystem services,' the paper added. According to the report, the benefits of livestock, apart from food production, include: manure as a renewable fertiliser; use of certain products in pharmaceuticals, textiles and construction; biodiversity and landscape management; rural livelihoods; health and nutrition; renewable energy through biogas production; and companionship and therapeutics for humans. The report said that these functions 'align closely' with the EU's sustainability agenda, while being 'unrecognised' in many of the EU's policy frameworks. The ATF cited the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), saying the policy offers eco-schemes and agri-environmental supports 'but often lacks the tools to reward livestock systems for their ecosystem services or circular contributions'. The paper said that animals are 'sentient beings', citing concerns over animal welfare. However, the paper also said that it is 'of vital importance for the livestock industry as well as European citizens' that arguments used to enhance welfare-related regulations 'are based on solid scientific evidence'. According to the ATF, there are a number of policy challenges to the livestock sector in the EU. These include what the ATF claimed were 'misaligned' environmental metrics which undervalue the ecosystem services of extensive livestock systems. The ATF also said that there are regulatory barriers which 'often block the circular use of materials'. The ATF went on the claim that there are 'biased narratives' in which public and policy debates are polarised, 'making it harder to build nuanced, sustainable strategies'. As well as that, there is insufficient investment in farmers' roles, with farmers poorly represented in funding decisions, and weak support for new entrants or mixed systems, the ATF said. However, the paper said there are also 'policy opportunities', including: supporting circular livestock systems; integrating livestock into broader sustainability metrics; fostering innovation; reframing public communication; and creating 'enabling conditions' for diverse farming models.
