logo
‘I can't afford the minimum retirement lifestyle. Will selling my home help?'

‘I can't afford the minimum retirement lifestyle. Will selling my home help?'

Telegraph4 hours ago

Receive personalised tips on how to improve your financial situation, for free. Here's how to apply or fill in the form below.
There are few things Simon Tyler cannot fix himself after a career as a mechanical engineer.
The 57-year-old is currently drawing up plans to build a hot tub for his wife Rachel in their garden, but this is small fry compared to his most ambitious project: part-funding his retirement through the renovation of their three-bedroom home.
'You could easily make it five bedrooms and then it falls into a different category,' he tells me from his study at the property in Essex.
He estimates that with the extra bedrooms the property could sell for as much as £750,000, a significant increase on its current £600,000 value. He has calculated the renovation is achievable at a cost of just £40,000, which he plans to fund using his pension lump sum.
Tyler counts every penny and estimates he can live on as little as £1,000 a month in retirement, but ideally would like more of a cushion. His savings will also support Rachel, whose pension provision is not as generous as Tyler's, when she eventually stops working.
Having recently paid off the mortgage, this would represent a sizeable windfall after he downsizes, helping to cushion the couple's transition to life as retirees. Mr Tyler plans to stop working by age 60 at the latest, while his wife Rachel, 51, will follow him some years later.
As soon as he calls time on his career, Mr Tyler is eager to visit his son who lives in Cumbria for a holiday.
'It's very hard to get out to see them,' Mr Tyler explains, 'We plan to visit them as a holiday because my wife can't travel too far.
'The first thing I'll do when I retire is get out to see them.'
He has already started saving for the trip, with a few hundred pounds tucked away in a holiday savings account. It's one of half a dozen or so pots Mr Tyler has stashed away, including one for unexpected household costs.
But his prized rainy day fund is reserved for his collection of classic cars and a motorcycle. He estimates the collection costs about £105 a month to maintain, and he's set aside roughly £5,000 for the purpose.
Mr Tyler earns £65,000 before tax and has accumulated pension savings worth £172,000. Since paying off his mortgage, he's stuffed his retirement pot with £1,000 a month, which he forecasts will rise to £1,600 in September after he pays off a small credit card debt.
He also has a £20,000 Isa and £8,000 in premium bonds, and plans to sell his Tesla, which he believes could fetch up to £18,000 on the used car market.
Ian Futcher, financial planner at Quilter
Mr Tyler has managed to save quite a reasonable pot, and it's good to see he has the bones of a plan in place. However, there are a few concerns I have, and I feel his plan depends on several variables that could drastically alter his outcomes.
My first major concern is the drop in income. His plan is to live on £1,000 per month, which is below the Pensions and Lifetime Savings Association (PLSA) minimum standard of living in retirement for an individual. While many people get by on this, Simon is currently on an income of £64,000 per annum, and he may find this considerable drop hard to adjust to.
Additionally, his wife seems to have little pension provision. However, as he plans to focus on DIY projects and live frugally, this may be possible, but he needs to be prepared for it.
His current target of £12,000 a year is just about achievable with his pension if he makes the contributions he plans to. For this, I've assumed an average growth rate of 5pc per annum on a balanced risk investment portfolio.
However, Simon plans to take his 25pc lump sum at retirement to fund the renovation. By doing so, this will severely reduce the pot that he has, and, by my calculations, his sustainable income would fall to £9,000 per annum. This is the amount he could withdraw and likely not run out of money before death.
Now, the aim is to invest the lump sum in renovations and sell the house at an increased price. The problem with this is there is no certainty he will see that uplift. This year, we have seen signs of the housing market slowing, and it's a lot to gamble with many variables and no guarantee of the desired sale price.
That's not to say that downsizing isn't a good idea. In fact, it's forming part of more and more people's retirement plans to give them a significant boost in income in retirement. Let's assume Simon didn't take the money to make the improvements and sold the house at the current value of £600,000 and moved into a £300,000 property.
This would leave them with an additional £300,000 to invest. At this stage, if he invested for income, he could potentially generate an additional £12,000 a year, pushing their living standards up further. But this is dependent on what the property market does over the next few years.
Simon has other assets, but these are of little consequence to his overall income and should be looked at as more of an emergency fund set aside for a rainy day. All of the above is a bit skin-of-the-teeth. If we saw big stock market drops, for example, before or during retirement, this could significantly affect his desired income.
However, with careful planning, it is achievable. The figures above do not take into account the state pension, which, if he and his partner have the full state pension, will also give them more room for manoeuvre.
Daniel Hough, wealth manager at RBC Brewin Dolphin
Retirement is a milestone many look forward to but it can involve countless hours of planning, projections and assumptions. Mr Tyler has begun to think about his options and I'm confident about his numbers, but he wants reassurance that his plans will hold water in three years' time.
He is hoping that his current assets will deliver income of around £1,000 per month, or £12,000 per year. Taking into consideration the safe withdrawal rate of 4pc each year, he would need an overall figure of £300,000 to achieve a sustainable income of this level.
The majority of the portfolio will be comprised of his pension and his estates. In three years, these assets combined should total around £255,000 based on a 4pc net growth rate, or £262,000 on a more optimistic 5pc net growth rate.
Mr Tyler wants to withdraw his full 25pc pension lump sum for home improvements, leaving his fund value closer to £200,000. The remaining assets – his Isa, premium bonds and Tesla sale – will total around £50,000.
This leaves £250,000 from £300,000, with the assumption that the 4pc withdrawal rate will provide approximately £833 per month. While this will provide a sustainable income, it is below the expected £1,000 per month he is after. He can indeed increase the level of withdrawals he wishes to make, but that may have a long-term impact on the fund value as the initial capital begins to be eroded.
Mr Tyler is already making a significant level of pension contributions of £19,200 per annum, but there is scope for increasing these contributions through his employer. He could even utilise excess cash as additional contributions and take advantage of the tax relief offered.
With access only a few years away, it might be worth moving the premium bonds into the pension to boost it. Care must be taken to ensure an adequate contingency fund remains at all times.
Downsizing the house and releasing equity to improve retirement options is certainly a good idea. Mr Tyler's hope of releasing £350,000 before costs and legal fees could bolster his investments to provide more income in the long term.
If the original capital is slightly eroded in the first few years until the house is finally sold, it could easily be replenished with these proceeds. This should hopefully provide comfort that he has enough until the house is sold. Assuming Mr Tyler is looking for an income of around £2,000 from age 67, a portfolio of £600,000 would be the target.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UK benefits system could collapse if payments are not cut, Liz Kendall says
UK benefits system could collapse if payments are not cut, Liz Kendall says

The Guardian

time26 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

UK benefits system could collapse if payments are not cut, Liz Kendall says

Britain's benefits system faces collapse without cuts to disability payments, Liz Kendall has said, as the government published plans that put it on a collision course with dozens of angry Labour MPs. Kendall published her welfare reform bill on Wednesday, confirming it would lead to benefit cuts for 950,000 people by 2030. She said the country's £326bn social security net might cease to exist if costs continued to escalate. The bill includes several concessions designed to win over fractious Labour MPs as ministers look to ward off the biggest rebellion of Keir Starmer's premiership. But the efforts were met with hostility by many in the party, who said they still intended to vote against the bill next month. Kendall said: 'Our social security system is at a crossroads. Unless we reform it, more people will be denied opportunities, and it may not be there for those who need it. This legislation represents a new social contract and marks the moment we take the road of compassion, opportunity and dignity. 'This will give people peace of mind, while also fixing our broken social security system so it supports those who can work to do so while protecting those who cannot – putting welfare spending on a more sustainable path to unlock growth.' The bill will cut personal independence payments (Pips) for more than 800,000 people with disabilities, as well as carers' support for 150,000 people who care for them. Claimants only able to wash half of their body or who are unable to cook a meal for themselves will no longer be able to claim Pips unless they have another limiting condition. The cuts are at the heart of an overall package of nearly £5bn in welfare savings which ministers argue are necessary to protect the financial sustainability of the benefits system. Kendall has tried to dispel widespread anger in the Labour party over the plans by introducing new concessions. Under the terms of the bill, people losing their disability benefits will get additional financial support for 13 weeks, while those with severe conditions such as heart disease or spinal injuries will not have to face reassessments. The work and pensions secretary has set out a separate £1bn plan to help unemployed people get back to work, but this is not related to Pips, which are unconnected to employment status. Whips are also issuing threats, and the deputy prime minister, Angela Rayner, refused on Wednesday to rule out the possibility of suspending any Labour rebels when the bill is put to a vote next month. The mixture of concessions and threats did not appear to have won over wavering Labour MPs, however, and many went public with their criticism after the bill was published. Rachael Maskell, the MP for York Central, said: 'Having read the bill, it is clear that disabled people will lose significant support. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion 'The explanatory notes set out that 800,000 will not receive the daily living component of Pip by 2029/2030 and 150,000 will also lose their carers allowance. Poverty will be the legacy of this bill.' Andy McDonald, the MP for Middlesbrough and Thornaby East, said the bill was 'a huge attack on the incomes of disabled people'. 'MPs are being expected to vote these through whilst the green paper consultation continues, before the Pip assessment review is conducted, and without any evidence the separate employment support package – which is not in this bill – will work. 'This bill will be a yes or no on impoverishing disabled people. It's a no from me.' Those feelings were echoed by disability campaign groups and charities. James Taylor, the director of strategy at the disability equality charity Scope said: 'This bill will be catastrophic for disabled people. Cutting benefits will plunge hundreds of thousands into poverty. Over 800,000 will lose at least some financial support from Pip. 'It will have a devastating effect on disabled people's health, ability to live independently or work.'

HS2: a complete failure by the British state and its politicians
HS2: a complete failure by the British state and its politicians

The Guardian

time37 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

HS2: a complete failure by the British state and its politicians

When was it obvious that HS2 was an economic turkey at risk of becoming 'an appalling mess', as transport secretary Heidi Alexander described today's position? A fair case can be made for 2013, a year of two neon-lit warnings of trouble ahead. One was a scathing report on HS2 from the National Audit Office (NAO), the first of many, when the project was still at the planning stage. The NAO concluded it was impossible to say whether the programme was likely to deliver value for money; the cost and benefit estimates were 'uncertain'; there had been 'past errors in the underlying model'; the Department for Transport had 'poorly articulated' the strategic need for a transformation in rail capacity and how HS2 was supposed to rebalance economic growth. In short, there was 'a weak foundation for securing and demonstrating success in the future'. Then there was Peter Mandelson's remarkable insider confession in the pages of the FT of how Gordon Brown and his cabinet came to approve HS2 in the first place in 2010. It was a tale of collective short-termism; in the grim post-banking crash era, the Labour government didn't want to be outdone by the Tories in their enthusiasm for a shiny new big project. The cost estimates were 'almost entirely speculative', wrote Mandelson, but 'the vision was exciting' and 'we were focusing on the coming electoral battle'. Laughably, ministers had imagined HS2 would attract private sector backers. By 2013, Mandelson had changed his mind on HS2 and feared 'an expensive mistake'. If only others had rethought. It would have been a painless option for David Cameron's coalition government to ditch the whole adventure. There was an excuse to do so because an earlier report in 2006 by former British Airways chief Sir Rod Eddington, which was being reread with fresh eyes at the time, had rejected the idea of new high-speed rail links. For a country the size of the UK, the best value will usually lie in improving existing rail and road networks, it argued. Instead, the HS2 show rolled on, fuelled by more political puff and short-termism. Some of the passages in the review by ex-KPMG infrastructure adviser James Stewart, published by Alexander on Wednesday, are excruciating. Key decisions, such as the passing of the first parliamentary bill in 2017 and the letting of works contracts, prioritised the schedule over costs. 'I have heard a range of reasons for this but pressure from politicians to maintain momentum, fear of HS2 being cancelled, and the belief that costs will increase as a result of delay have featured strongly,' says Stewart. Meanwhile, 'the top-down vision of building a railway that would be the best and fastest has been a major factor in undermining attempts to introduce a culture of cost control'. This is tear-your-hair-out stuff because it breaks the golden rule about getting plans hammered down in detail before you start building large-scale infrastructure projects. Even now half of Euston sits as a wasteland before a plan has been agreed for a design for a HS2 terminus. The main source of cost overruns, as Stewart and Mark Wild (the ex-Crossrail chief executive now charged with salvaging the shambles) agree, were the works contracts. The contracting model, combined with unrealistic targets, turned the contracts into 'cost-plus' arrangements whereby contractors had little to no incentive to hit cost targets. Companies rang rings around the department and its arm's-length body, HS2 Ltd. The Institution of Civil Engineers concluded roughly the same in its report last year: huge contracts created 'an imbalance of power', especially in the context of a political demand to hurry up. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion Later Tory leaders, especially Boris Johnson, deserve their own mention in the catalogue of infamy. It was Johnson who pushed the formal 'notice to proceed' button in 2020, in full knowledge that the review he commissioned from Douglas Oakervee said HS2 only made sense if built in full. Within 18 months, and with costs hurtling out of control, ministers amputated most of HS2's eastern arm to Leeds in 2021; the section to Manchester followed. In shrunken circumstances, it makes sense, as Alexander and Wild say, to slow down and complete the rump Birmingham-London link to a slower timetable in the interests of minimising yet more cost overruns. It will involve running the high-speed trains at slower speeds initially, a suitably farcical postscript to a project that has wasted tens of billions of pounds and consumed the lion's share of spending on rail for years. The tragedy is this ending has been predictable for about a decade.

Santander cuts mortgage rates with first-time buyer deals slashed most
Santander cuts mortgage rates with first-time buyer deals slashed most

Daily Mail​

time40 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Santander cuts mortgage rates with first-time buyer deals slashed most

By Santander has cut mortgage rates for those buying homes with smaller deposits, despite the expectation that the Bank of England will hold interest rates at 4.25 per cent tomorrow. The changes are aimed at first-time buyers and home movers with a 5 per cent or 10 per cent deposit. The mortgage rate cuts will be up to 0.22 percentage points. The new products are available to all customers, whether they are applying via a broker or directly. Santander's lowest five-year fix for first-time buyers will now charge 4.85 per cent with no fee and £250 cashback. On a £200,000 mortgage being repaid over 25 years that would cost £1,152 a month. Home movers can do slightly better, with Santander offering a 4.78 per cent rate - again with no fee and £250 cashback. There are slightly lower rates on the market, but these tend to come with higher fees. For example, Monmouthshire Building Society is offering a 4.75 per cent rate with £1,379 of fees. Nationwide is also offering a 4.79 per cent five year fix at 4.79 per cent with £999 of fees. Buyers can compare rates and fees using This is Money's mortgage calculator. First time buyers with a 10 per cent deposit can secure a five-year fix at 4.47 per cent with Santander with a £999 fee and £250 cashback. Home movers with a 10 per cent deposit get a market-leading 4.4 per cent rate with Santander, albeit with the same fees. The next best deal after that is Virgin Money charging 4.44 per cent for its five-year fix, with a £995 fee. Alongside the 90 per cent and 95 per cent mortgage products, Santander is also cutting deals for home movers buying with 15 per cent deposits. It is also cutting the rate on its lowest five-year fixed rate remortgage deal for those refinancing with at least 40 per cent equity in their home. Peter Stimson, director of mortgages at the lender MPowered suggests that mortgage rates are unlikely to fall any further for the time being. 'When it comes to interest rates, inflation has morphed from a blip into a block,' said Stimson. 'That's why the prospects of the Bank of England cutting its base rate again tomorrow - already very slim - have evaporated. 'The swaps market - which mortgage lenders use to set the interest rates they offer on new loans - is already implying that there will be just one further cut to the base rate this year. He added: 'For anyone planning to buy their first home or remortgage this summer, who'd been assuming that the only way is down for mortgage interest rates, this week's inflation data will have been an uncomfortable reality check. 'Mortgage rates may well have fallen as far as they can for now, and in the coming weeks rates may even creep up back as lenders recalibrate in response to rising swap rates.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store