
Drone escalation: Is the Kurdistan Region's economy at risk?
A recent wave of drone attacks has dealt a serious blow to the Kurdistan Region's oil sector, triggering shutdowns and placing vital infrastructure under growing strain. The most recent incident occurred early Thursday, when an explosive-laden drone struck the Bahrka subdistrict in Erbil province. No casualties were reported.
The night before, another drone targeted the Baadre oil field in Sheikhan district, sparking a large fire and forcing a halt in operations. That strike followed a series of earlier attacks in Duhok province, where the Tawke and Bishkabour oil fields—both operated by Norwegian firm DNO—were hit, along with a US-managed site in Malperkeh.
While no injuries have been reported across the incidents, damage to equipment and facilities has been confirmed, raising concerns about operational safety and infrastructure resilience.
These attacks were preceded by repeated strikes on the Khurmala and Sarsang fields on Monday, bringing the total number of drone incidents to at least nine in less than a week. On Tuesday morning, three additional sites—Peshkabir, Tawke, and a Hunt Oil installation—came under fire within a 90-minute window, deepening the disruption to production.
Output in Freefall
In the aftermath of the strikes, operators including DNO ASA and Gulf Keystone Petroleum moved swiftly to suspend operations. Tawke, Peshkabir, and Shaikan—the Kurdistan Region's most productive oilfields—remain offline.
Acknowledging the gravity of the threat, the Kurdish Ministry of Natural Resources called on all operators to conduct urgent safety assessments, as fears over infrastructure vulnerability continue to mount.
Before the attacks, oil production in the Kurdistan Region hovered between 285,000 and 300,000 barrels per day in 2024. The strikes have cut output by an estimated 140,000 to 150,000 barrels daily—nearly half of the total volume.
Peshkabir, producing roughly 49,500 barrels per day, alongside Tawke at about 29,150 and Sarsang at approximately 30,000, collectively contribute over 108,000 barrels daily. These three fields alone represent close to 6% of Kurdistan's projected 1.8 million barrels per day output this year.
Oil revenues remain the cornerstone of the Region's economy, generating more than $4 billion last year, with nearly $2 billion retained after deductions. Based on current Brent prices, a daily loss of 150,000 barrels equates to roughly $3.8 million in missed income—amounting to over $1.1 billion per month. Even a more cautious estimate of 140,000 barrels per day results in a weekly shortfall of around $70 million, intensifying pressure on Erbil's budget.
'This is a direct hit to Kurdistan's economy,' oil expert Dr. Kovend Sherwani told Shafaq News, emphasizing that some fields have ceased production entirely and the full extent of damage remains under assessment.
Sherwani also interpreted the timing of the attacks as a calculated message, stressing that 'They come just days after Baghdad signed a deal with an American company to develop Iraq's Hamrin field. It's a hostile signal against foreign, especially US, investment in Iraqi oil.'
Voices of Outrage
The Association of the Petroleum Industry of Kurdistan (APIKUR) warned that the attacks endanger both Iraqi and expatriate workers, stressing that the authorities in Baghdad and Erbil to enhance protection for personnel and critical infrastructure.
On the political front, the Kurdistan Region Presidency described the strikes as a serious threat to sovereignty and investment. 'This is a dangerous escalation that targets the Region's stability and its partnerships,' the presidency noted, urging Baghdad to take decisive steps.
Iraq's presidency echoed that position, cautioning that repeated violations put national security and the public interest at risk. Moreover, Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani ordered an immediate investigation, directing the reinforcement of air defense and radar systems.
Despite mounting international and regional pressure, no official accusations have been issued. The Iraqi military dismissed claims involving the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF), noting no irregular activity had been detected.
The PMF-aligned Coordination Framework also condemned the strikes as destabilizing acts carried out by rogue groups. 'None of the factions affiliated with us were involved in these operations,' affirmed senior Framework figure Amer al-Fayez in comments to Shafaq News, emphasizing the need to avoid further regional escalation.
Across the Kurdistan Region, unease is mounting among local communities and workers' unions. Growing concerns over oil-sector staff safety have prompted renewed calls for authorities to prioritize the protection of strategic energy facilities.
Pipeline on Pause
These attacks deepen an ongoing political stalemate over oil exports. The Iraq–Turkiye pipeline, capable of transporting 300,000 barrels per day, has remained idle since March 2023 following an arbitration ruling. Talks between Baghdad and Erbil continue to stall amid disagreements over pricing, operational control, and contract terms.
Tensions have been further strained by Baghdad's decision to cap recoverable production costs at $16 per barrel. International companies operating in the Kurdistan Region argue that actual expenses range between $24 and $26 per barrel, making a compromise essential for any restart in exports.
Dr. Sherwani warned that the drone campaign appears designed to disrupt any fragile momentum in Iraqi-Kurdish dialogue. 'These strikes don't just damage infrastructure—they complicate already difficult negotiations and weaken the prospect of reaching a unified oil policy.'
He also pointed out that continued production halts could prevent the Region from meeting its crude supply obligations to Iraq's Oil Ministry and SOMO, a failure that may deepen the rift with Baghdad.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Shafaq News
20 minutes ago
- Shafaq News
Russia, Ukraine trade overnight airstrikes
Shafaq News – Kyiv/Moscow Russia and Ukraine launched large-scale aerial attacks overnight, with Kyiv reporting the interception of more than 300 threats and Moscow announcing it had downed seven Ukrainian drones across multiple regions. According to Ukraine's General Staff on Monday, Russian forces fired over 330 aerial weapons—including Shahed drones, cruise missiles, and Kinzhal hypersonic missiles—mostly aimed at Khmelnytskyi, with Ukrainian defenses intercepting 309 drones and two Kh-101 missiles, while three Kinzhal ballistic missiles missed their targets. The barrage reportedly began at 7:30 p.m. on July 27 and stretched into the early hours of July 28, originating from Russian regions such as Bryansk, Kursk, Oryol, Lipetsk, and Saratov, with Starokostiantyniv and its key airbase appearing to be the main target. Ukraine responded with fighter jets, surface-to-air systems, electronic warfare units, and mobile teams to repel the assault. Meanwhile, Russia's Defense Ministry reported that it shot down seven Ukrainian fixed-wing drones—four over Rostov, and one each in Oryol, Kaluga, and Bryansk. The strikes came shortly after a third round of direct talks in Istanbul, where both sides agreed to exchange 1,200 prisoners each, including both civilians and military personnel.


Shafaq News
37 minutes ago
- Shafaq News
Three years on, Is PM Al-Sudani responsible for Iraq's failing services?
Shafaq News – Baghdad When Mohammed Shia al-Sudani assumed the premiership in 2022, he declared a clear priority: building a 'services government.' From electricity and water to healthcare and education, his cabinet pledged to reverse Iraq's chronic infrastructure failures. But nearly three years into his term, many Iraqis see little improvement, raising a pressing question: how much of the country's persistent service failure falls on al-Sudani himself? From Promise to Disappointment Al-Sudani's government identified key priorities: fighting corruption, improving public services, stimulating the economy, enhancing national security, and resolving federal disputes with the Kurdistan Region. On paper, the focus was comprehensive and ambitious. In practice, however, delivery has lagged far behind public expectations. The Prime Minister has repeatedly emphasized anti-corruption efforts, infrastructure development, and economic diversification. Still, Iraqis continue to suffer from recurring power outages, water scarcity, and poor health and education services. The symbolic slogan of a 'government of services' now risks eroding public trust as the realities on the ground diverge sharply from official rhetoric. Mounting Frustrations and Heatwaves The current summer has seen electricity failures spike dramatically amid soaring temperatures above 50°C, forcing many provinces to suspend work and schools. Political analyst Abbas al-Jubouri told Shafaq News that 'there is clear negligence across all services, particularly electricity,' noting that drought-induced water shortages, stalled projects, and the delayed disbursement of the federal budget have all worsened the service crisis. 'The government made promises, but the situation in Baghdad and other provinces is visibly deteriorating,' al-Jubouri added, arguing that basic infrastructure projects like roads and bridges—now hailed as achievements—should have been the norm, not exceptions. Political Structure or Executive Failure? Critics are divided on where ultimate responsibility lies. Political analyst Mujashaa al-Tamimi argued that while al-Sudani's administration carries part of the blame, Iraq's systemic flaws run deeper. 'Service deterioration did not start with this government,' al-Tamimi said, noting that since 2003, successive cabinets have promised reforms that largely remained 'ink on paper.' He pointed to Iraq's entrenched ethno-sectarian power-sharing system, or Muhasasa, as a major obstacle: it prevents the appointment of qualified officials, empowers party loyalties over state performance, and shields corruption. Al-Tamimi also emphasized the absence of effective oversight mechanisms and political stability, which he believes have rendered the legislative branch incapable of imposing executive accountability. Despite what he described as 'some visible achievements' by al-Sudani's government in limited sectors, political interference and appointments based on loyalty have curtailed the Prime Minister's ability to lead sweeping reforms. Civil Society Response and a Warning from October Civil society voices echo a growing sense of frustration. Activist Noor Salem told Shafaq News that the political class, especially ruling parties, bear primary responsibility for the deterioration of services. He argued that the lessons of the 2019 October protests—which triggered government resignations and political reckoning—were not absorbed by the ruling elite. 'The system has regressed,' he said. 'What we're seeing now—sectarian quotas, project mismanagement, and administrative chaos—is worse than what triggered the October Uprising,' Salem warned of rising public anger and hinted at renewed protest movements if the situation remains unchanged. His warning is underpinned by a financial reality: despite massive spending over recent years, infrastructure and service outputs remain modest. Delays in passing the 2025 budget tables are adding fuel to popular dissatisfaction. Budget Paralysis and Institutional Decay Parliamentary voices, such as that of Mahdiya al-Lami from the Services and Reconstruction Committee, offer a mixed diagnosis. Al-Lami acknowledged that protests are constitutionally protected and a legitimate response to poor services. She attributed the crisis partly to chronic underfunding and, at times, the complete absence of financial allocations. 'Despite passing the tripartite budget law, budget schedules haven't yet reached Parliament,' she explained, describing widespread institutional paralysis across ministries and departments. She also blamed delayed projects, rampant corruption, and the lack of administrative and technical capacity. More significantly, al-Lami pointed to a broader decay in national responsibility and vision. 'There is no genuine political will to reform or deliver,' she said bluntly. Accountability in a Captive System While al-Sudani's term has not been devoid of progress, especially in launching select infrastructure and employment initiatives, the failure to deliver comprehensive service improvements is increasingly viewed as a leadership shortfall. However, as analysts and lawmakers agree, he operates within a dysfunctional structure that limits reform. With time running out and popular discontent deepening, al-Sudani faces a critical test: either break the political mold or become yet another prime minister who promised services and delivered frustration. Written and edited by Shafaq News staff.


Shafaq News
3 hours ago
- Shafaq News
Oil prices rise on trade deals
Shafaq News Oil prices rose on Monday after the United States clinched a trade deal with the European Union and may extend a tariff pause with China, relieving concerns that higher levies could have hurt economic activity and limited fuel demand. Brent crude futures inched up 20 cents, or 0.29%, to $68.64 a barrel by 0336 GMT, while U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude stood at $65.31 a barrel, up 15 cents, or 0.23%. The US-European Union trade deal and a possible extension in the US-China tariff pause are supporting global financial markets and oil prices, IG markets analyst Tony Sycamore said. 'With the risk of a prolonged trade war and the importance of the August tariff deadlines being steadily defused, markets have responded positively,' he added in a note. Sunday's US-EU framework trade pact sets an import tariff of 15% on most EU goods, half the threatened rate. The deal averted a bigger trade war between two allies that account for almost one-third of global trade and could crimp fuel demand. Also set for Monday is a meeting in Stockholm of senior US and Chinese negotiators aiming to extend before an August 12 deadline a truce holding off sharply higher tariffs. Oil prices settled on Friday at their lowest in three weeks weighed down by global trade concerns and expectations of more oil supply from Venezuela. State-run oil company PDVSA is readying to resume work at its joint ventures under terms similar to Biden-era licenses, once U.S. President Donald Trump reinstates authorisations for its partners to operate and export oil under swaps, company sources said. Though prices were up slightly on Monday, gains were limited by the prospect of OPEC+ further easing supply curbs. A market monitoring panel of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and their allies is set to meet at 1200 GMT on Monday. It is unlikely to recommend altering existing plans by eight members to raise oil output by 548,000 barrels per day in August, four OPEC+ delegates said last week, though another source said it was too early to say. ING expects OPEC+ will at least complete the full return of 2.2 million barrels per day of the additional voluntary supply cuts by the end of September. That would work out to a supply hike in September of at least 280,000 barrels per day. However, there is clearly room for a more aggressive hike. The producer group is keen to recover market share while summer demand is helping to absorb the extra barrels. JP Morgan analysts said global oil demand rose by 600,000 bpd in July on year, while global oil stocks rose 1.6 million bpd. In the Middle East, Yemen's Houthis said on Sunday they would target ships of companies that do business with Israeli ports, regardless of nationality, in what they called a fourth phase of military operations against Israel over the Gaza conflict.