Hanwoo industry says 'No' to lifting ban on beef from older US cattle
The Hanwoo Association, a nonprofit overseeing Korea's beef industry, has strongly opposed lifting the 2008 ban on imports of US beef from cattle over 30 months old, citing potential public unease over mad cow disease.
In a statement released Wednesday, the association warned on behalf of Korean livestock farmers that scrapping the 30-month restriction could lead to the spread of bovine spongiform encephalopathy, or mad cow disease, which in turn could dampen the consumption of both US and Korean beef, known as hanwoo in Korean.
Their opposition was triggered earlier this week when the National Cattlemen's Beef Association called on the Office of the United States Trade Representative to ease the 30-month age-based restriction on US beef. A USTR report last year also described the 30-month limit as a transitional measure, suggesting the need for further import liberalization.
Yet, Korean livestock farmers remain wary, the Hanwoo Association said, arguing that mad cow disease remains a highly sensitive issue in Korea. They pointed out that the US has reported seven BSE cases — the most recent in May 2023 — and said that Korea's high volume of US beef imports is due to strict adherence to the 2008 agreement, rather than in spite of it.
Amid an economic slump, the association also voiced worries that lifting non-tariff barriers like the cattle age restriction would further strain struggling Hanwoo farmers.
In 2008, Korea and the US reached an agreement to allow only US beef from cattle under 30 months old to assuage public fears over BSE.
Korea currently imports more beef from the US than anywhere else. Among $3.95 billion worth of beef imports from abroad last year, US beef accounted for 56.8 percent of the total, according to the Korea Trade Statistics Promotion Institute.
As of Thursday, the Ministry of Agriculture, Food, and Rural Affairs stated that the Korean government has not received any formal complaints or demands from the US regarding the 30-month restriction, and no concrete discussions were currently underway.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Korea Herald
an hour ago
- Korea Herald
SK Shieldus names finance veteran as new CEO
Korean security service company SK Shieldus announced Tuesday the appointment of Min Ki-sik as its new CEO-designate, with final confirmation pending board approval later this month. Min brings over 30 years of experience in the financial sector, having held leadership roles including CEO of Prudential Life Insurance and DGB Life Insurance. In 2023, he also served as vice chairman of KB Life Insurance, where he led the company's expansion into Southeast Asian markets such as Indonesia and Vietnam. SK Shieldus said Min is recognized for his strategic insight and proven leadership. He is expected to play a key role in integrating the company's core businesses — including physical security, cybersecurity and convergence security — while maximizing cooperation across its operations. 'This is a pivotal moment that calls for strong leadership to drive sustainable growth in an increasingly complex global landscape,' an SK Shieldus official said. 'We believe Min's experience and strategic vision will guide the company into its next phase of transformation.' In 2024, SK Shieldus posted an annual revenue exceeding 2 trillion won ($738 million), fueled by mid- to long-term security initiatives across the residential, industrial and public sectors.
Korea Herald
an hour ago
- Korea Herald
Yoon, wife to face special counsel probes
577 prosecutors, investigators allotted to look into ex-first couple President Lee Jae-myung's Cabinet on Tuesday passed bills to open three special counsel investigations into former President Yoon Suk Yeol and his wife Kim Keon Hee. The bills are intended to "end the insurrection" that the Lee administration and the ruling Democratic Party of Korea accuse Yoon of instigating with his short-lived martial law decree on Dec. 3, 2024. At the second Cabinet meeting since Lee took office last week, the Democratic Party-led bills passed into law to bring together 577 prosecutors and investigators in total to investigate the former first couple. The combined size of the legal teams involved in the investigations is comparable to a district attorney's office. With Tuesday's passage, a special counsel investigation will look into if Yoon committed either insurrection or treason by trying to impose martial law. Yoon declared martial law late in the evening of Dec. 3, only to lift it six hours later following a National Assembly resolution that opposed it. The Democratic Party contends that Yoon attempted to provoke military action from North Korea with his hawkish policies to lay the groundwork for the declaration of martial law. Yoon's Ministry of National Defense playing anti-Kim Jong-un regime broadcasts along the inter-Korean borders from June 2024 was one example of the former administration deliberately seeking military confrontation with North Korea, according to the Democratic Party. Before their resumption last year, the border broadcasts had been used by the South Korean military as a psychological warfare tactic in the past, before they were halted in 2018 under then-President Moon Jae-in. The Democratic Party also claims that Yoon sent drones across the border into North Korea in October 2024, echoing Pyongyang's accusations that the South Korean military was behind the alleged drone infiltration. Yoon allegedly attempting to instigate an armed conflict with North Korea in the run-up to his martial law decree qualifies as "treason," the Democratic Party claimed, on top of being a "rebellion against the Constitution, which is to say, insurrection." Yoon's wife Kim is set to face a separate special counsel investigation that will scrutinize allegations she was involved in the then-ruling People Power Party's nomination of candidates for a National Assembly seat in the 2022 by-election. Another special counsel investigation would revisit the death of a Marine in July 2023. Cpl. Chae Su-geun, 20, died when he was swept away in moving water during a search and rescue operation to locate flood victims in a rain-swollen river in Yecheon, North Gyeongsang Province. The Democratic Party says Yoon's presidential office tried to impede the preliminary probe into Chae's death at the time to cover up possible wrongdoing at the top. Special counsels will be given as long as 170 days to investigate Yoon and his wife. Yoon was removed from office on April 4 in a unanimous ruling by the Constitutional Court over the martial law debacle, leading South Korea to hold an early presidential election on June 3.
Korea Herald
an hour ago
- Korea Herald
Where do Korean celebrities stand in politics?
In politically charged Korea, celebrities walk tightrope of neutrality Following South Korea's presidential election on June 3, a seemingly innocuous act by one of the nation's most celebrated actresses ignited a storm. Actress Song Hye-kyo pressed 'like' on now President-elect Lee Jae-myung's then-election campaign video on his HR policy. The simple gesture came under fire, drawing fierce backlash from those accusing her of breaking an unspoken rule: Celebrities in South Korea must remain politically neutral — or even near-total political abstinence. The controversy underscores a long-standing tension in Korean pop culture, where public figures in the fields of entertainment and culture are expected to suppress even the slightest hint of political affiliation. During the June election, numerous celebrities, from K-pop idols to comedians, were compelled to apologize or explain their actions for reasons as mundane as wearing red or blue, the symbolic colors of the rival People Power Party and Democratic Party of Korea, respectively. In one widely discussed case, League of Legends esports team Gen.G abstained from their usual 'V for victory' gesture after setting a historic win streak, fearing it could be mistaken as a political statement for candidate No. 2, Kim Moon-soo. Similarly, popular figures like Karina of aespa, entertainer Hong Jin-kyung and rapper Beenzino faced criticism for wearing red clothing, widely associated with Kim's People Power Party during the campaign period. Others, like comedian Park Sung-kwang and actress Ahn So-hee, were accused of showing political bias simply by posting images with blue rooftops or red roses. This hyper-vigilant policing of neutrality has left many wondering: Why are Korean celebrities held to such extreme standards? Idol as 'cultural blank slate' 'Korean celebrities, particularly idols, are not merely entertainers. They are seen as projections of fan ideals — cultural blank slates,' said cultural critic Kim Heon-sik. 'This makes any personal expression — political or otherwise — subject to public interpretation and judgment.' The term "idol" in Korea has come to denote more than admiration. As The Independent put it, idols are expected to embody fan fantasies while remaining void of personal beliefs that may challenge that image. In this framework, political neutrality is not just preferred, it is mandatory. 'Fans don't see idols as individuals with agency. They are shaped, controlled and even owned — emotionally — by their followers. A 'like' on a campaign post can be perceived as betrayal if it's not in line with what the fan thinks,' Kim added. This leads to K-pop idols often avoiding using primary colors, hand gestures or even certain numbers during election periods. Some go so far as to post black-and-white photos to preempt controversy, a trend that was lauded as 'socially aware' during the most recent campaign. South Korea's hypersensitivity to political expression has deep historical roots. As a country marked by ideological division and rapid democratic transition, political affiliations have long carried career-altering consequences. Even now, expressing support for one party or another can result in social ostracism, economic repercussions or online attacks. Bae Sang-hoon, a sociology professor at Chungbuk University, explained, 'South Korea's political environment is emotionally charged, and people project these tensions onto public figures.' "The issue is compounded by the country's deepening culture of fan attachment. The emotional investment that fans place in idols, often described as 'parasocial relationships,' can blur the lines between admiration and control. That emotional ownership has only intensified as fans use celebrities as a proxy to process their own social anxieties," Bae added. Some observers suggest that intense attachment to celebrities serves, in part, as an emotional coping mechanism. 'In a highly competitive society, where people feel disconnected and under pressure, celebrities serve as emotional anchors,' Bae added. 'This can turn into a toxic dynamic when fans begin to expect moral purity and political conformity from people who are essentially strangers.' Calls are growing for a more mature fan culture — one that allows room for artists to engage as citizens without fear of professional ruin. But such a change will require a fundamental reevaluation of the role celebrities play in society and the emotional needs they are often expected to fulfill. 'If we want to continue celebrating the rise of K-pop and Korean soft power, we must also ask whether we are granting our stars the same freedoms we expect in a democratic society," said a 31-year-old surnamed Kim who is active in fandom activities.
