Black children 15% less likely to be offered diversion choice, new London data shows
Black children, who commit minor crimes, are less likely to be diverted away from the criminal justice system, figures shared with ITV News London have shown.
Diversion aims to end criminality among young people and offers them an alternative path.
It's used for minor offences or first time offenders - allowing them to be diverted rather than going through the standard court process.
New research from the Youth Endowment Fund shows the impact of diversion:
There is also a postcode lottery to where diversion is being provided.
The highest rates are in Bromley (66%), Bexley (65%) and Kingston Upon Thames (65%). Where as the lowest are in Haringey (43%), Lambeth (42%) and Hackney (41%).
Omarni has benefitted from diversion after he was arrested for carrying Class A drugs.
He is now a mentor at United Borders.
"When I was younger, all I was focused on was having fun and trying to make money as well," he said.
"When you're a teenager you want to go out a lit, and have fun with your friends.
"Being around here you're put in a negative environment, but when you have positive people around you, you can shift your mindset and come out of it."
The charity use music as a way to guide people away from violence.
There is a United Borders bus where young people to come and record music as well as another area to relax.
But the priority for the staff here is steering young people away from violence.
Omarni said: "If you stick with it eventually it will bring you out of whatever you're in."
Though this new research shows the success of diversion, it also sheds a light on how black children are 15% less likely to be given this choice.
Black children also faced disproportionately higher rates of police contact than children from other ethnic groups (making up 44.3% of all cases, despite only representing 24.7% of the local population over the study period).
United Borders are joining calls for diversion to be more widely offered.
Lead mentor, Tanvi Patel, said: "Young people they're our future, so we have to give them the best chances, the best opportunities and the best support.
"By diverting them away from negative activities and negative mindsets we then give them the best hope and the best chances for the future."
Ciaran Thapar, director of communications rom the Youth Endowment Fund added: "I think arresting and locking people up is not always the solution, in fact often it makes things words.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
19 hours ago
- The National
Immigration debate has been mishandled by both the left and the right
The same dynamic was visible in Tommy Robinson's recent appearance on the Triggernometry YouTube show, which reached millions online. The reaction was telling. Black men from Birmingham and London, once hostile, said they now support him. Ex-Muslims from Iran, Tunisia, and Algeria wrote that he speaks uncomfortable truths about Islam. LGBT people, pensioners, Hindus, even Canadians and Americans described him as a hero. Whether one agrees with him or not, it shows how far his message has moved into the mainstream. Ignoring that shift or writing it off as pure racism only drives more people into his corner. READ MORE: Falkirk protests face-off outside hotel housing asylum seekers The problem is that both left and right have mishandled this debate. The left is right to defend refugees and to insist that scapegoating them is wrong. But it has often treated every concern as racism, which shuts down legitimate discussion in communities that feel ignored. The right is right that immigration has been mishandled and that grooming gangs were ignored for too long. But it collapses crime and immigration into the same category, directing rage at refugees rather than at governments that failed to act. We need honesty. If someone is in Britain under asylum and commits a serious crime such as rape or grooming, the contract with the state is broken. They should be deported without delay. That is not racism – it is the only way to uphold trust in the system. At the same time, refugees fleeing persecution cannot be treated as criminals by default. Their stories show why they need protection. READ MORE: Police probe 'racist' banner outside Scottish asylum seeker hotel Take Bella, a transgender teacher from Afghanistan. When the Taliban returned in 2021, she knew discovery meant death – by stoning, by fire, or by being thrown from a building. Along with around 30 others, she was evacuated in a secret UK mission for LGBT Afghans. She arrived in Britain with one spare set of clothes and a false medical story as cover. Now she lives in Brighton: safe, free, but lonely, still struggling with the scars of fear. Others on her flight, like Ahmed, a gay youth worker, describe it bluntly: escaping was 'the only chance to stay alive.' These are the human realities hidden when asylum is reduced to slogans. And yet, we cannot ignore another reality. Earlier this year, when I went to a gay club in Manchester's Village, a car slowed down outside, its windows rolled down, and four young Muslim men shouted abuse at us as we queued to get in. In what is supposed to be our own safe space. My community has fought for 50 years to win visibility, safety, and dignity. When abuse like that goes unanswered, it breeds fear – and that fear is why some LGBT people now drift toward the far right. In the Netherlands, it was gay men and women, once a persecuted minority, who became a decisive bloc of support for Geert Wilders's anti-immigration party. They did not switch because they suddenly became racist, but because they felt their values – equality, freedom, the right to live openly – were under threat and dismissed by the mainstream. READ MORE: One man, 26, arrested at Falkirk asylum seeker hotel protests That is what this all comes back to: values. Not Muslim or Christian, not immigrant or native, but human values. Equality, dignity, respect. Many British Muslims live by those values – comedians like Guz Khan, Mawaan Rizwan, or Omid Djalili come from Muslim backgrounds and represent integration at its best. But others bring with them patriarchal and violent ideas imported from Afghanistan, Pakistan, or elsewhere: that women should obey, that daughters can be controlled, that religion overrides freedom. Those attitudes clash with the rights we have built here, and pretending otherwise helps no-one. If Scotland wants to do better, we must confront this honestly. We must defend refugees like Bella who flee for their lives. We must be unflinching in punishing those who abuse our trust, including deportation when crimes are committed. And we must insist that anyone who comes here, of any faith or background, lives by the same fundamental values of equality and freedom. If our politics refuses to do this, the far right will step into the vacuum, just as it already has elsewhere in Europe. Falkirk may look like a local flashpoint, but it is a warning of what happens when the shouting drowns out the truth. If we cannot find balance, we will lose control of the debate altogether. James Murphy Bute I WONDER if anyone from the Scottish Government and/or the SNP leadership could please explain why they are very reluctant to implement the Supreme Court's decision on gender rules for schools and prisons while happily and rather meekly accepting the very same court's decision that we cannot hold an independence referendum. Asking for a friend. Iain Wilson Stirling
Daily Mirror
20 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
DARREN LEWIS: 'It's up to each of us to challenge hate from thugs and racists'
Our society is poisoned by the narrative that the UK is under threat from Black and Brown men. The systematic bid to deem anyone non-white as someone to fear is at critical mass, writes Darren Lewis We warned about it. Now it's happening. Pockets of hate from thugs and racists, fed on lies and hungry to choose violence. I saw some distressing examples on social media last week: a Black man grabbed by the neck by a middle-aged white guy and punched – with his assailant demanding to know his address and telling him to '**** off'. And the viral clip that appeared to show a racially aggravated assault on two elderly Sikh men outside Wolverhampton railway station. Three teenagers have been arrested. And the man attacked and racially abused by two men at a Metro Station in North Shields in broad daylight. hurling insults at Black Bournemouth player Antoine Semenyo. Arrests have been made, but these kind of attacks continue across the country. Many highlight the spike in the number of Muslims and migrants harassed and assaulted in public across England since last summer's riots and the explosion of hate and xenophobia. The attackers don't even care about being filmed with phone cameras these days. They are fuelled by the rhetoric of the usual suspects spreading fear and division on social media. You will have heard it from the politicians indulged by print, TV and radio platforms who care less for the safety of ordinary people than they do for the engagement that anger and controversy generates. It is getting worse. Last week, Good Morning Britain newsreader Marverine Cole reiterated a truth we've known for some time now. Our society is poisoned by the narrative that the UK is under threat from Black and Brown men. The systematic bid to deem anyone non-white as someone to fear is at critical mass. It has never really gone away. Enoch Powell, the National Front and others pushed it in the 60s, 70s, 80s and 90s. In the past 15 years or so it has been UKIP, then the Tories and Reform in a race to the bottom, with Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer even pandering to the online right. Now, powered by Big Tech, it is rampant. When it triggered an indiscriminate targeting of Black and Brown people on the UK's streets last summer, sections of our mainstream media threw their hands in the air in faux outrage, asking: 'How could this happen?' Now some of those same platforms are producing rage bait for those who either don't have time or the inclination to read the details. The attacks you've read about here are so often the result. And the tip of the iceberg. Sections of social – and mainstream – media are dripping with the hate that will get someone killed. And if that happens, not a single one of them will be able to wash the blood off their hands. The standard of our politicians, on all sides, is so poor there are few principled enough to lead us through this nightmare. So it's on us to push back. To support those producing the stats to expose, for example, the lie that London has fallen. Crime has been proven to have fallen there. More of us need to debunk the liars and fantasists skewing statistics and throwing around words like 'per capita' to claim men arriving on small boats are more likely to commit crime compared to the rest of us. More of us need to point out the lack of focus on paedophiles like Gordon Hamilton, Stuart Compton and Michael Bolderston, all white, all sentenced in the past few weeks. As a father of two girls, protecting them from animals from any demographic has, and will always be, a priority. We now have to protect each other from those who wish to divide us.
The Guardian
a day ago
- The Guardian
Trump's DC crackdown will do little to prevent crime, advocates say: ‘That's not what creates safety'
Donald Trump's hyperbolic portrayal of crime in major American cities, and his deployment of the national guard in Washington DC ostensibly in an effort to combat it, have reignited a decades-old debate about crime, violence and which policies and approaches can address it. The US president has cited cities such as Oakland, Philadelphia and Chicago as examples of places overwhelmed by crime and violence. He has put forward an increased militarization of law enforcement, and more money and legal protections for police, as the most effective ways to address homicides and other violent crime. But to violence prevention workers, the recent statements appeared made not out of care and concern for the lower-income Black and Latino victims who bear an outsized share of the nation's crimes, but to undermine and dismiss the progress community groups have made. And, the advocates argue, the administration's emphasis on law enforcement and prosecution as the sole ways to stop crime will do little to stop the cycles of violence and property crime that these groups have faced through Republican and Democratic administrations alike. 'The police are about response. But that's not what creates safety,' said Aqeela Sherrills, a longtime community violence intervention leader in Los Angeles. 'A lot of our urban communities have been war zones because they lack investment in infrastructure and programming. It's really disheartening to hear the president of the United States put out misinformation.' Sherrills began his career in violence prevention in Watts in the early 90s. Since then he's been a leading force in several organisations that work intensely with the small portion of a city's population responsible for the most violence in an effort to prevent crime and support victims of crime. Throughout his tenure, he said, he had seen the biggest successes in violence reduction come through training local non-profits, community leaders and officials on different violence community prevention models and then allowing them to build bespoke strategies from there. Over the decades, various models have seen major successes. Some deploy violence prevention workers to middle and high schools. In other programs, they use probation officers as a conduit to connect with young adults who are carrying and using firearms illegally. Some programs send workers to hospitals after a shooting, in an effort to prevent retaliatory violence. Some models rely on a police-community partnership, others don't involve police at all. But most programs center on connecting with mostly young men and teenage boys whose conflicts spill out on to city streets, traumatizing entire neighborhoods. This method has shown promise, research shows, In 2024 the Brooklyn community of Baltimore went a year without homicides after deploying a program called Safe Streets. And cities such as Oakland, Seattle and Philadelphia, where city leaders have invested in similar gun violence reduction programs, have seen drops in homicides when the programs were thriving, according to the Major Cities Chiefs Association's violent crime survey. And while the reasons for the ebb and flow of homicides can't be reduced to one program or strategy, those working to build these programs up have been fighting for credit and acknowledgment. During the Biden administration, they got it. Their approaches finally found federal support with the creation of an office of gun violence prevention and federal dollars for community prevention groups working on the ground. In past years, programs have expanded across the US as more municipalities build their own offices of violence prevention. But these insights don't appear to inform the Trump administration's approach, Sherrills adds. 'He's not reading the data, he's not looking at the trends and reports, it's just more kneejerk reactions,' he said. 'It's shortsighted because they're only speaking about one aspect of our criminal legal system.' This most recent crime debate comes nearly four months after the Trump administration cut nearly $170m in grants from gun violence prevention organizations, including several groups founded and co-founded by Sherrills who have had to lay off several staff members, dealing a serious blow to critical summertime programming. For small, upstart organizations this loss of funds puts their work in jeopardy, said Fredrick Womack, whose organization, Operation Good, lost 20% of its budget due to the April cuts. Womack says he was dismayed to hear the list of cities that Trump singled out, because they are all cities with Black leaders who have invested in community violence intervention. The calls for increased police and potential military presences, he says, shows a disconnect between the halls of power and the needs of the people most affected by violent crime. 'How is the military going to provide support for victims when they need someone who's going to be compassionate to what they're going through?' He asked. 'I know people want justice, but they also need support. They need healing and counseling. 'They won't go into the projects and ask the people how life is going for you. But they'll look at someone who lives in the hills who heard a gunshot two miles away last week and say: 'We have a crime problem,'' he continued. Womack founded Operation Good in 2013, and since then he and his small staff and gaggle of volunteers have worked with the teenagers and young men responsible for most of the city's violence and given them odd jobs and taken them to civil rights museums so they can understand where they come from and gain a sense of community. Womack's work has made a difference: in the years since the pandemic – which saw nationwide surges of gun violence – the homicide rate started to tick down, a change city officials have attributed in part to the work of community-based groups including Operation Good, and their collaboration with the police. Community leaders also argue that not only will Trump's approach be less effective, it's not aimed at helping the people most affected by violence. During a 12 August press conference, Jeanine Pirro, the former Fox News host who was recently appointed the US attorney for DC, argued that Trump's rhetoric about crime and his administration's approach to violence in DC were done in the name of victims. Flanked by posters of mostly Black teenagers and children killed by gun violence, Pirro argued that policies including DC's Youth Rehabilitation Act have only emboldened perpetrators. 'I guarantee you that every one of these individuals was shot and killed by someone who felt they were never gonna be caught,' Pirro told reporters. And when reporters asked about addressing the root causes of crime and violence and the recent cuts to community-based programs, Pirro argued that her focus is on being punitive, not preventive. For Leia Schenk, a Sacramento-based victim and violence prevention advocate, these sorts of sentiments, while common among conservatives, miss the point. 'It's tone-deaf and an oxymoron. The root causes are why we have victims,' Schenk said. 'In my experience [crime and violence] come from systemic oppression. Meaning if a family can't feed their kids, they're gonna steal, rob or commit some sort of fraud to just live and survive.' Schenk has been working in the community advocacy space for more than three decades and in that time has seen the most successful approaches to youth crime, shootings and other forms of violence happen when schools districts, local mental and physical healthcare systems get a level of investment that matches the scale of the problem. 'We're seeing the most success when we are supported – from schools to law enforcement to churches – their support allows us to do what we're doing on a bigger scale.' Despite the comments and moves from the Trump administration, Sherrills says the field of violence prevention will continue to thrive thanks to a strong foundation that was fortified in recent years due to federal support and increased support from philanthropic groups. 'We know that we're in challenging times but it's about doubling down on success and making sure we preserve the wins,' he said. 'We're going to continue to see violence trend down because of the work practitioners are doing in the field. Folks are tired of the killing and the dying and are looking for alternative ways to create better ways of navigating a conflict so that it doesn't lead to violence.'
