Hot flush? Why - just open a window! How men are in the dark on menopause
But a study has revealed how men remain in the dark about the menopause – including how nearly a quarter think that hot flushes can be dealt with simply by 'opening a window'.
A third of chaps were revealed to have 'little' to 'no' understanding of their partner's menopause symptoms.
And 40 per cent were unable to even list 'hot flushes' as a sign of the change.
Some 57 per cent had never heard of 'perimenopause' – the transitional period before menopause.
And 80 per cent of both men and women did not know dry eyes were a common symptom.
The study of 2,000 adults was commissioned by Vision Express, which is introducing menopause training to its high street stores in an attempt to address the knowledge gap concerning the impact on women's eye health.
Dan McGhee, clinical services director at the opticians, said: 'These findings starkly show the widespread lack of understanding surrounding perimenopause and the menopause, even the misconception that a hot flush is simply solved by "opening a window".
'Adults wouldn't spot dry eyes as a menopausal symptom. Too often, women are left to navigate these changes without the support or information they deserve and we hope to change that.'
The study by OnePoll.com also found 22 per cent of women admit they too have a lack of knowledge of perimenopause.
Some 44 per cent didn't know mood swings were a menopause symptom, while 57 per cent were unaware of weight gain. And 40 per cent hadn't realised anxiety was also a sign.
And while 66 per cent of men admit their knowledge of the topic could do with work, a third of couples said they 'rarely' discuss menopause.
The perimenopause is the stage before the menopause.
During this time your hormones start to change but your periods have not yet stopped for good.
It usually happens in women between the ages of 45 and 60 and can last for a few months or several years.
During the perimenopause, your hormone levels change and your ovaries start to produce fewer eggs.
Once you haven't had a period for 12 months or more, you've officially reached the menopause.
Symptoms are caused by hormonal changes and for some people these symptoms can affect their daily lives.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
28 minutes ago
- Telegraph
NHS to pilot AI prostate cancer tests
An AI tool to spot prostate cancer earlier is being piloted by the NHS. The two-year scheme involving more than 3,000 men aims to speed up diagnosis of the disease, which is the most common form of cancer in men. Every year around 55,000 men in the UK are diagnosed with prostate cancer and 12,000 die from it. But just half of cases are caught at an early stage, when treatment is most effective. Trials suggest the technology can help radiologists detect around 11 per cent more early-stage cancers by highlighting suspicious regions in MRI scans. The software by Quibim uses advanced AI, trained on real pathology results, to segment the prostate into zones and highlight areas most likely to contain aggressive disease. The two-year pilot, backed by £2.6 million in NHS funding, will be rolled out to seven hospitals in England. Clinical trials suggest it can raise detection rates from 80 per cent to more than 90 per cent. Early detection dramatically improves survival rates. Almost all men who are diagnosed with stage one or two of the disease are alive five years later, compared with rates of less than 50 per cent for those with late-stage disease. As well as looking at detection rates, the pilot will examine the cost-effectiveness of the approach to see if the NHS can save money by catching the disease sooner. It will also examine the impact on inequalities in heath, with black men twice as likely to get prostate cancer. Prof Peter Johnson, national clinical director for cancer at NHS England, said: 'The NHS is funding and testing this exciting AI technology to help us diagnose and treat prostate cancer patients as quickly as possible and offer them the best chance of survival. 'As part of the 10-Year Health Plan, the NHS is taking advantage of our unique position to test state-of-the-art technology like this, and rolling it out as fast as we can to make the NHS fit for the future.' Dr. Ángel Alberich-Bayarri, chief executive of Quibim said: 'This NHS rollout is a major milestone in our mission to improve cancer diagnostics through AI. 'We're proud to support the NHS in advancing early detection and addressing health inequalities in prostate cancer care. By empowering radiologists with AI, we can help ensure more men are diagnosed earlier, when their chances of survival are highest.' Screening could cut deaths by 40 per cent The findings come as The Telegraph launches a campaign calling for the introduction of targeted screening for prostate cancer. Currently, men are not offered tests, even if they have a family history of the disease. Experts believe there is a growing case for targeted screening, meaning that PSA blood tests would be offered to those at heightened risk of the disease. Even though prostate cancer is the most-common male cancer in the UK, it is the only major cancer with no screening programme. The UK National Screening Committee (UKNSC) is currently considering whether to recommend the rollout of testing. In the past, it has rejected the idea because of concern that PSA tests are too unreliable, and would result in too many men undergoing needless procedures. In recent years, however, the back-up technology used to confirm a diagnosis has significantly improved, with hopes that further advances being tested, could mean that in the future, screening could cut deaths by 40 per cent. Prof Shonit Punwani, Professor of magnetic resonance and cancer imaging and consultant radiologist at UCLH, said: 'Initial studies have shown that the tool helps radiologists to enhance their diagnostic accuracy through identifying subtle early stage lesions that are sometimes not obvious on scans. 'Ultimately, QP-Prostate aims to improve patient outcomes by assisting radiologists in creating more accurate and reliable MRI reports.'
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Families hit by Britain's worst scandals face inheritance tax threat
Families of the victims of two of Britain's worst scandals face an inheritance tax sting on their compensation. Ministers had promised that money paid to dead victims of the Post Office and infected blood scandals would be free from inheritance tax, capital gains tax and income tax. But lawyers representing bereaved families have since discovered that this only applies to the first transfer of money from a victim's estate. If the money went to a victim's spouse or civil partner and they then passed it on to their children, that would be a second transfer and could be subject to inheritance tax at 40 per cent. For the compensation to go to a child or someone other than a spouse inheritance tax-free, that recipient would have to be specified in the victim's will as the beneficiary of the first transfer — not something that is possible for the children of victims who have died. It is estimated that 30,000 victims were given blood infected with HIV, hepatitis B or hepatitis C by the NHS between the 1970s and early 1990s. More than 3,000 people have died as a result. Thousands of sub-postmasters were wrongly accused of taking money from their tills between 1999 and 2015when a glitch in the Horizon accounting software was really to blame. Some £13.6 billion was set aside for compensation to victims across both scandals. Jade Gani from the Association of Lifetime Lawyers, a trade body for those who represent older and vulnerable people, said: 'It is a massive flaw in the system that families who have already lost so much could now have to pay back significant sums to the body ultimately responsible for the scandal.' The infected blood scandal is widely considered to be the biggest treatment disaster in the history of the NHS. Thousands of patients were given contaminated blood after accidents, during childbirth or medical procedures. Patients were also given treatments that contained infected blood. About 6,000 people who suffered from haemophilia, a condition that prevents the blood from clotting properly, and other bleeding disorders received treatments to replace missing clotting agents that were made from contaminated blood plasma. In May 2024 the prime minister Rishi Sunak apologised for a 'decades-long moral failure' and promised to pay 'whatever it costs' to compensate victims. More than £11.8 billion was set aside, which included money for infected victims and those affected by the scandal, such as partners and children. The government has paid £1.5 billion to victims since payments began in December. Payments were said to be protected from inheritance tax, but it has now emerged that this only applied to the first transfer. This is not an issue for victims who get their compensation during their lifetime because they can change their will so that family members are mentioned as first transfer beneficiaries of the compensation and so won't have to pay tax on it. • Infected blood judge angered by slow and 'unjust' compensation But the payments to victims who have already died, which are due to begin later this year, will only be inheritance tax-free for the first-transfer beneficiary — usually a spouse or civil partner who can inherit their partner's estate inheritance tax-free anyway. The first £325,000 value of an estate is free from inheritance tax (£500,000 if it is worth less than £2 million and includes a main home left to a direct descendant). Spouses or civil partners can inherit without paying inheritance tax, and they can also inherit each other's allowances, meaning a couple can pass on up to £1 million inheritance tax-free. With some blood scandal compensation payments set to hit £2 million and many in line to get about £1 million, it is likely that most victims' estates will breach the allowances. Anything left in an estate above the tax-free allowance can be taxed at 40 per cent. The decades-long delays to compensation payments mean many surviving beneficiaries are now in their eighties and nineties, and will not have enough time to give away their money tax-free. Gifts fall out of your estate for inheritance tax purposes if you live for seven years after they are made. If you live for three to seven years then anything above your allowances is taxed on a sliding scale. Die before three years and it will remain part of your estate and may be taxed at the full 40 per cent inheritance tax rate. It was reported on Wednesday that the chancellor was considering scrapping the seven-year rule or extending the seven years to ten or beyond. Ben Bell from the Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners, a trade group for inheritance planners, said: 'This is a major injustice. Parliament made provision for the payments to be exempt from inheritance tax, but the delay in making the payments means that the government will, in many cases, get 40 per cent of the payments back in inheritance tax.' Owen McLaughlin's father, Steve, was born with haemophilia and died in 1989 aged 34 after being given blood plasma infected with HIV. 'My father has never met my wife, he never met my kids. All the important events in my life, he wasn't there,' said Owen, 55, from Exeter. Steve left everything to his wife, Pam, who is now 80 and suffering from a number of health conditions, including multiple sclerosis. She expects to get more than £500,000 in compensation and wants to pass it on to her two sons and six grandchildren, but will then need to survive at least seven years if they are to fully escape inheritance tax. 'It is unfair because if my dad had known there would be this future compensation and the tax rules would be as they are, he would have written his will differently,' Owen said. 'It is completely immoral that the government can pay compensation for a frankly heinous act and then think about immediately taking it back through inheritance tax.' Chris Wood's father, John, was infected with HIV in 1982 after being given blood during a triple heart bypass operation to treat his angina. He lived with the disease for years without knowing, before getting seriously ill during the Christmas of 1992 and being admitted to hospital. He died three weeks later, devastating Chris and his two sisters. Chris's, mother Rita, who is 91, will inherit John's compensation and wants to give it to her children straight away but with her estate worth more than her IHT-free allowances the family face having to pay back £360,000 if she dies within three years. 'I understand it has to stop somewhere, but the exemption should carry through to immediate family,' said Chris, 53, from Chelmsford in Essex. 'We could have to pay back 40 per cent of what we get within a year or two — it's a kick in the teeth after all we have been through.' About 700 sub-postmasters were convicted of offences including fraud, false accounting and theft based on incorrect information provided by the Horizon accounting system. Some went to prison and thousands more were wrongly accused. With the earliest cases now 26 years ago and compensation still being paid, the victims are facing similar inheritance tax worries. Stephen Lewis from the law firm Schofield and Sweeney, which represents 50 sub-postmasters, said that while there would be fewer families affected than with the infected blood scandal, inheritance tax was an issue. 'I anticipate there will be a sizeable element that this could affect just by the fact that we are dealing with compensation for events from up to 25 years ago,' he said. A third of the 10,814 Post Office victims are still waiting for compensation, and at least 345 died before being compensated. Neil Hudgell from the law firm Hudgell Solicitors, which represents 1,000 sub-postmasters, said: 'Compensation ought to be treated holistically as to the close family unit, and there shouldn't be any tax payable on the first or second transfers after compensation is paid.' The Association of Lifetime Lawyers and Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners has written to HM Revenue & Customs about the issue in a push for change. A beneficiary of a will has the option to redirect money to new beneficiaries if they choose through a deed of variation. If done within two years of death, the change will be treated as if the deceased included them in the original will, meaning that compensation could be exempt from inheritance tax. This, however, is not an option for the beneficiaries of many infected blood victims, who died more than two years ago. The Association wants the two-year limit to begin on payment of compensation, rather than death, which would give the initial beneficiary time to ensure that family members benefit from the tax exemption. Gani said: 'Many victims have paid the ultimate price with their lives and now, unless the law changes, their families are forced to pay again; this time to the taxman.' The government said: 'While no amount of compensation will make up for the suffering people have endured, we are committed to delivering compensation as swiftly as possible. 'Victims' compensation is exempt from inheritance tax when applied to the estate of the person to whom the compensation payment was made, and this relief will not extend to subsequent beneficiaries of the deceased person's estate.'
Times
5 hours ago
- Times
At three weeks old, I thought my baby was going to die
F ive months ago, aged 41, I gave birth to my daughter, after five gruelling years of fertility treatment as a single mother. When Violet was eight days old, a friend came to visit. She's a neonatal nurse. She had a cold sore and said: 'I'm not going to kiss her, of course.' I thought little of it, assuming she was being overcautious because of her profession. When Violet was two and a half weeks old, I said to my maternity nurse: 'She feels a bit warm, she doesn't feel quite right.' She looked as though she was getting conjunctivitis. Thermometers gave variable results, so we took her to the GP, who said: 'She's fine.' The next day, Violet still felt warm. After an e-consultation with the GP, who again told me not to worry, I called 111. You don't want to be a nuisance, but they said to bring her in. Though she was smiley during the examination, I had this funny feeling. They said: 'Because she's so small, and going on your gut, we're going to do a lumbar puncture.'
