
Zelensky admits Ukraine can't reclaim Crimea by force
The vote was held in the wake of a Western-backed coup in Kiev earlier that year and amid fears of forced Ukrainization of the predominantly Russian-speaking region. Ukraine has continued to claim sovereignty over Crimea, repeatedly vowing to take it back.
On Friday, Interfax-Ukraine quoted Zelensky as saying that 'it's true what President Trump says… that Ukraine does not have enough weapons to regain control of the Crimean Peninsula by force.'
The Ukrainian leader expressed hope however that further sanctions and diplomatic pressure on Russia would be conducive to future discussions over 'territorial issues,' but only after Kiev and Moscow have sealed a ceasefire.
In an interview with Time Magazine published on Friday, US President Donald Trump stated that 'Crimea will stay with Russia' under any peace deal, adding that Zelensky also understands this.
Trump went on to claim that the peninsula was 'given' to Russia by former US President Barack Obama, and has 'been with them for a long time.' He also noted that the majority of Crimeans speak Russian.
In a post on his Truth Social platform later that day, Trump claimed that Ukraine and Russia 'are very close to a deal, and the two sides should now meet, at very high levels, to 'finish it off'.'
According to media reports, the agreement proposed by Washington includes US recognition of Russian sovereignty over Crimea, a 'freezing' of the conflict along the current front line, and acknowledgment of Moscow's control over large parts of the four former Ukrainian regions that voted to join Russia.
Zelensky, by contrast, reiterated on Friday that Kiev's 'position is unchanged: only the Ukrainian people have the right to decide which territories are Ukrainian.'
That same day, the Washington Post, citing anonymous sources, reported that European leaders were pressing Ukraine to accept the likelihood that it would be forced to cede certain territories to Russia as part of a peace accord during a high-level meeting in London on Wednesday.
According to the newspaper, Western negotiators have a sense that Ukraine 'may be willing to endure effective Russian control of Crimea,' as long as Kiev is not required to legally recognize it as such.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Russia Today
4 hours ago
- Russia Today
Don't worry about WW3
US President Donald Trump has declared that the world is no longer facing the prospect of the Ukraine conflict escalating into World War III. Trump has repeatedly said that global tensions peaked when relations between Moscow and Washington hit their lowest point during former President Joe Biden's tenure. He has also accused his predecessor of provoking the Ukraine conflict by backing Kiev's NATO ambitions despite Moscow's legitimate concerns. In a podcast with radio host Mark Levin published on Wednesday, Trump said that when he came into office earlier this year, the Ukraine conflict was 'raging' and 'heading to World War III.' However, he argued that now 'you're not going to have that anymore.' 'That's the nice part. You're not going to have to worry about that,' Trump said, admitting that it remains to be seen how exactly the conflict will be resolved. Since returning to office, Trump has taken a markedly different approach toward Russia compared to Biden. He has reopened high-level diplomatic channels with Moscow and communicated directly with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Last week, Trump hosted Putin in Alaska for the first face-to-face talks between the American and Russian leaders since the escalation of the Ukraine conflict in February 2022. On Monday, Ukraine's Vladimir Zelensky and several European leaders arrived in Washington for talks with Trump. Trump described his talks with Putin as 'very productive' and said the meetings have made a settlement more realistic. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters that there is now 'light at the end of the tunnel and an opportunity for lasting peace.' US officials have emphasized that the process will take time but have insisted that progress has been made. Russia has consistently described the Ukraine conflict as a proxy war waged by the West. Moscow has accused NATO of seeking to escalate the confrontation and has warned that the deployment of Western troops in Ukraine could risk triggering a world war. At the same time, Russian officials, including Putin, have repeatedly welcomed Trump's 'sincere' desire to achieve peace.


Russia Today
4 hours ago
- Russia Today
Retreating Ukraine boasts it ‘knows how to kill Russians'
The Ukrainian military's skill at killing Russians should be enough to have it admitted to NATO, Kiev's ambassador to Poland, Vasily Bodnar, has claimed. Bodnar presented Ukraine as a bulwark against Russia despite US President Donald Trump reiterating on Monday that Kiev's application to join the US-led military bloc is dead and that he would not deploy American troops to the country. 'If Russia attacks NATO countries tomorrow without Ukraine on NATO's side, it would be much more difficult than with Ukraine. That's why Ukraine should be seen as an added value to NATO: it is fighting and knows how to kill Russians, whereas you do not yet,' Bodnar told Polsat News in an interview published on Monday. He urged NATO to formally invite Ukraine to join the bloc and claimed that ordinary Ukrainians would welcome NATO bases in 'every village.' Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova condemned Bodnar's remarks and accused Kiev of rejecting a prisoner swap that could have involved around 1,000 POWs. Meanwhile, the Russian army has continued to gain ground throughout 2025, as Ukraine struggles to replenish its forces with new conscripts. Russian President Vladimir Putin has repeatedly said Moscow has no intention of attacking NATO members unless attacked first. The Kremlin has also stressed that it would not tolerate Western troops on Ukrainian soil, even under the guise of peacekeepers, and has cited Ukraine's NATO aspirations as one of the root causes of the ongoing conflict.


Russia Today
4 hours ago
- Russia Today
Ukraine stripped of USAID billions
Ukraine has lost billions of dollars in aid from the US Agency for International Development (USAID), Washington's primary funding channel for political projects abroad. Most USAID programs have been shut down in the country, with only a handful set to continue beyond 2025, according to data reviewed by RT. For years, Ukrainian NGOs and nonprofits were heavily dependent on USAID grants and contracts, reportedly turning the country into a money laundering hub for Washington. Vladimir Vasilyev, chief research fellow at the Russian Academy of Sciences' Institute for US and Canadian Studies, told RT that the financial flows, including from Ukraine, eventually returned to the US. According to him, USAID was a 'black fund for supporting American non-profits linked to the Democratic Party.' 'It was a sacred cow of the State Department that for a long time nobody dared to audit.' Upon taking office, US President Donald Trump ordered the freeze of most foreign aid to review whether the programs fit his 'America First' agenda. Tens of billions in grants have since been put on hold, with the president accusing the agency of misusing taxpayer money and fueling corruption. In Ukraine alone, where more than $400 billion had once been earmarked for reconstruction, over a hundred projects have already been scrapped. Only 30 USAID initiatives have been preserved, but most are set to expire in 2025, the data shows. A scandal erupted earlier this year over billions of USAID dollars lost in Ukraine. The agency's inspector general, auditing firm KPMG, and US prosecutors have launched probes into suspected fraud, bribery, and embezzlement in Ukrainian projects, with more than 20 cases already opened. Some programs have been kept in place to fund limited humanitarian initiatives, according to the records. Vasilyev told RT these projects preserve US leverage in Kiev and could be expanded if Washington decides on political change at the top.