Federal Court gives green light to part of '60s Scoop' class action lawsuit
The Federal Court has rejected the federal government's motion to dismiss a claim for monetary relief in a class-action lawsuit brought by non-status individuals and Métis who were involved in the so-called ''60s Scoop.'
It's also granting the plaintiffs' request for a motion declaring that the Crown had a duty of care to these kids — but only the ones placed or adopted through Saskatchewan's Adopt Indian Métis [AIM] program.
The '60s Scoop refers to a period when governments in Canada oversaw the large-scale removal of Indigenous children from their homes to live outside of their communities, mostly with non-Indigenous caregivers.
Story continues below advertisement
A class-action settlement for survivors saw the federal government pay about $750 million in compensation — but Métis were largely excluded from that because child welfare services for them were run by the provinces.
Métis and non-status individuals who were apprehended as children from their families filed a class-action lawsuit arguing Canada should compensate them as well — but the Federal Court says Ottawa is not liable.
2:01
Indigenous musician shares dark part of Canadian history in song
The Federal Court says that only those who were placed or adopted through Saskatchewan's AIM program fall under Canada's duty of care because that program received federal funding.
Get daily National news
Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
'This is because the federal government directly funded AIM, which, in the context of the historical relationship, creates the proximity necessary to establish a duty of care,' wrote Justice Sébastien Grammond in the decision released April 29. 'The harm was foreseeable and there are no countervailing policy considerations negating such a duty.'
Story continues below advertisement
The AIM program ran newspaper campaigns that advertised Métis children available for adoption.
Grammond wrote that when the federal government funded that program, it would have known the outcome would be the permanent separation of Indigenous children from their families and communities.
'This was obvious from the grant application, and even from the name of the program itself, as adoption severs the relationship between a child and their biological parents,' he wrote.
'What matters is that funding the program enabled the harm it allegedly caused to class members.'
Manitoba Métis Federation president David Chartrand, whose organization was an intervener in the case, said he was disappointed by the decision.
'But I think at the end of the day, the question really has to (be) to the federal government of Canada,' he said.
'How can you settle the First Nations and leave the Métis and non-status out? The federal government will definitely have to look in a mirror and ask themselves that question.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Calgary Herald
43 minutes ago
- Calgary Herald
Bruce Starlight honoured for work in preserving Tsuut'ina language with postage stamp
Starting June 20, Canadians buying stamps for their mail will notice new faces on the postage — including that of Indigenous leader Bruce Starlight. Article content Starlight will have his face on a stamp, alongside Julia Haogak and Sophie McDougall, as tribute for their work in preserving the culture and languages of their Inuit, Metis and First Nations communities. Article content Article content The stamps are to be unveiled separately, with the one featuring Starlight unveiled Thursday at the Seven Chiefs Sportsplex and Jim Starlight Centre in Tsuut'ina Nation. Article content The stamps featuring Haogak and McDougall were unveiled June 13 and 17, respectively. Article content Article content 'Not everybody gets the honour to be put on a postage stamp,' Starlight said during Thursday's unveiling. Article content One of the last remaining fluent speakers of the Tsúut'ínà language, Starlight founded an institution in 2008 dedicated to instructing others in the language and developing materials for Tsúut'ínà instruction, including dictionaries and recordings. He served numerous roles since the 1970s as councillor, language commissioner for the Tsúut'ínà chief and council, and the first elected Indigenous director on the Calgary Stampede board of directors. After his retirement in 2022, he continued to advocate and advise on Indigenous issues. Article content His most recent contribution is a collaboration on a collection of traditional narratives and historical accounts in Tsúut'ínà and a Tsúut'ínà-to-English glossary. Article content Article content 'There's very few of us left,' he said, of those who can speak the language. 'And of the 24, only 12 of us can get around. So we're saving an actual dead language.' Article content Article content Tyler Thomas, director of Indigenous and Northern Affairs at Canada Post, said the unveiling comes as part of the company's annual initiative to release an Indigenous leader stamp series. Article content Now in its fourth year, the company works with the Assembly of First Nations, Metis National Council and the Inuit Tapirit Kanatami to identify individuals worthy of being placed on the stamps. Article content
Global News
an hour ago
- Global News
Major projects bill amended to remove cabinet power to sidestep Indian Act
The federal government's major projects legislation was amended by opposition parties on Wednesday to withdraw the power the bill gave cabinet to sidestep the Indian Act, following weeks of criticism from First Nations leaders. But Assembly of First Nations National Chief Cindy Nepinak Woodhouse said Thursday the 'limited changes' made to the bill don't go far enough. She still wants the government to give members of Parliament more time to study the legislation. The Liberal government's controversial legislation, which would allow cabinet to quickly grant federal approvals for big industrial projects like mines, ports and pipelines, was introduced on June 6, and sailed through the committee study in about eight hours on Tuesday and Wednesday. Amendments to the bill made in committee include removing the Indian Act from a list of laws the government can sidestep when determining whether a project should move forward. Story continues below advertisement Bloc Québécois MP Xavier Barsalou-Duval said in a media statement the change came from a sub-amendment his party posed, and that the Liberals did not vote in favour of it. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy In French, Barsalou-Duval said he regrets that the Liberals didn't vote for the amendment, but he is pleased it passed. From the moment the bill was first discussed, First Nations leaders warned the bill could violate their constitutionally protected rights. First Nations leaders also said Ottawa could face legal challenges, and its fast-tracked projects could be slowed down, if Indigenous communities are not meaningfully consulted. 1:54 More pushback for Bill C-5 from Indigenous groups Some First Nations leaders are warning of a wave protests if the bill doesn't fundamentally change. Prime Minister Mark Carney said respect for section 35 of the Constitution, which recognizes and protects treaty rights is 'at the heart of this legislation.' Story continues below advertisement He said it's also important that the bill doesn't approve projects, it just 'creates the possibility of these projects,' which must undergo 'full consultation with Indigenous Peoples to define what is a nation-building project.' 'And then, if something is one of those projects, then what are the conditions in order for that project to move forward, including participation — obviously, I would think, in almost every case, environmental, other conditions — and then only if those conditions are met would the project move forward.' Woodhouse Nepinak said it appears some other 'constructive suggestions' to amend the bill were voted down. 'These limited changes don't go far enough and were developed without input from rights-holders. We continue to call on Parliament to honour the Crown and have a full discussion with rights-holders before passing the bill, instead of ramming it through in a week,' she said. 'We will continue monitoring the debate closely and will have more to say as the situation develops.' The legislation, which has support from the opposition Conservatives, is expected to pass Friday. — With files from Michel Saba
Toronto Star
an hour ago
- Toronto Star
Mark Carney's government reviewing suggested changes to infrastructure bill
OTTAWA — The Liberal government is reviewing a series of changes to add oversight and restrain some — but not all — of the extraordinary powers created under its controversial legislation to fast-track major development projects. The proposed law, Bill C-5, has sparked warnings of Indigenous resistance in the coming weeks, along with condemnation from environmental groups, and some reservations within the Liberal caucus. But the government insists the legislation is necessary in the face of U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs, after the Liberals won a minority government in the April 28 election while promising to supercharge economic growth and reduce Canada's reliance on the unpredictable United States.
