WhatsApp chats can't be substantive evidence: Court in 5 murder cases linked to 2020 Delhi riots
WhatsApp chats cannot be 'substantive evidence', a Delhi court has ruled in five murder cases lodged during the 2020 Northeast Delhi riots. It ruled that these chats can at best be used as 'a corroborative piece of evidence'.
In all five cases, where the 12 accused are common, the prosecution had relied heavily on WhatsApp chats as evidence.
These are among nine cases filed in connection with the murder of nine men, whose bodies were recovered a week after the riots. Of the remaining four cases, one has ended in acquittal, and three are at the stage of final arguments and statements of the accused.
A total of 53 people died and over 500 were injured in the riots.
In all five cases, the Delhi Police primarily relied on the chats of a WhatsApp group named 'Kattar Hindu Ekta'; multiple chargesheets filed by the police also named this group.
According to the chargesheet, one of the accused, Lokesh Solanki, allegedly wrote on the WhatsApp group: 'Your brother has killed 2 Muslim men at 9 o'clock.' Solanki's questioning had led to the arrest of other persons, who were eventually accused of the nine murders.
Acquitting the accused, Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) Pulastya Pramachala of Karkardooma Court noted in all five orders: 'Such posts may be put in the group solely with the intention of becoming a hero in the estimation of other members of the group. It could be a boast, without truth. Therefore, the relied upon chats cannot be substantive evidence to show that the accused… had actually killed two Muslim persons. These chats at the most could be used as a corroborative piece of evidence.' The police relied on the same chats in all nine murder cases.
While acquitting the accused, the court also pointed to the lack of reliable witnesses.
In a case filed in connection with the murder of Hashim Ali, the court in its April 30 judgment said there were no eyewitnesses and acquitted the 12 accused. 'They (WhatsApp chats) cannot form the sole basis for conviction due to their inherent weaknesses and they must be supported by independent, reliable evidence,' the court noted, adding that, except for one witness, no one else claimed to have seen the incident.
In another judgment, pronounced on March 28, the court noted that it was 'sure about the murder of Amin, but not sure about the incident of his murder.' In this case, too, all but one witness had turned hostile.
In another judgment pronounced on March 28 regarding the murder of Bhure Ali, the court noted that 'none of the witnesses vouched to have seen the incident of assault and murder on Bhure'.
In another judgment dated March 27, the court noted that it was not 'sure about the incident wherein Hamza (a riot victim) was killed.' It added: '… and when there is no clarity from the evidence as to which mob had killed Hamza, then it is only a formality to say that there is no evidence on the record to show that any of the accused was a member of the culprit mob.' All witnesses in the case had turned hostile.
In a judgement passed on May 13, the court of ASJ Pramachala acquitted all accused persons of murder, but convicted Solanki on charges of making statements conducing public mischief and promoting enmity.
'It is also well apparent that the intent of the messages posted by accused Lokesh was to instigate the others against Muslim persons. This act was in fact like spreading hatred for Muslim persons and to instigate others to resort to violence against them,' the court said.
According to the court orders, 109 judgments have been passed in the 700 FIRs related to the rioting, arson and murder cases lodged by the Northeast Delhi police from February 2020 to February 2025. While 90 have resulted in acquittals (82%), 19 have ended in convictions (18%). In 51 of the 90 (57%) acquittals, witnesses have turned hostile.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
33 minutes ago
- Economic Times
How fake meat export deal cost Delhi NRI more than $81,000, and the suspect vanished without a trace
A Delhi businessman has been allegedly defrauded of Rs 1.3 crore by an individual posing as a successful meat exporter. The suspect, after gaining trust through fabricated documents, convinced the victim to invest heavily, promising high returns. The suspect later disappeared, prompting a police investigation into the elaborate scheme. The crime branch is currently investigating the case. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads How it began Investment and false promises Suspect goes missing Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Police action A businessman from East Delhi has alleged that he was cheated out of Rs 1.3 crore by a man who pretended to be a successful meat exporter. The Delhi Police crime branch has now launched an investigation into the complainant, a Non-Resident Indian ( NRI ) currently living in east Delhi, told police he met the suspect in June 2023 through a mutual friend. The man claimed to be running a profitable meat export business and showed fake documents to support his claims. Convinced by the fake paperwork, the businessman agreed to support the venture.A few weeks later, the suspect convinced the complainant to invest money, promising high returns by January 2025. Trusting him, the businessman invested large sums, including his father's life savings. The payments, totalling Rs 67.7 lakh, were made via cheques to an account belonging to someone introduced as the suspect's business October and November 2024, the suspect claimed he needed an additional $80,000 (around Rs 69.3 lakh) to handle a shipment issue in Dubai. This money was arranged through the help of a friend in the UAE and handed over to one of the suspect's contacts January 2025, a WhatsApp chat showed the suspect admitting to owing money. But when the complainant began asking for repayment, the suspect avoided contact. He eventually switched off his phone, changed his number, and even vacated the place where he had been living with the the businessman contacted the so-called manager, he was shocked to learn that the person was not part of any business partnership. He revealed that the suspect had asked him to transfer all the funds to his personal account, and the money was never used for any export on the complaint and initial findings, police found enough evidence to file a formal case of cheating. A detailed investigation is now from agencies
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
How fake meat export deal cost Delhi NRI more than $81,000, and the suspect vanished without a trace
A businessman from East Delhi has alleged that he was cheated out of Rs 1.3 crore by a man who pretended to be a successful meat exporter. The Delhi Police crime branch has now launched an investigation into the matter. How it began The complainant, a Non-Resident Indian ( NRI ) currently living in east Delhi, told police he met the suspect in June 2023 through a mutual friend. The man claimed to be running a profitable meat export business and showed fake documents to support his claims. Convinced by the fake paperwork, the businessman agreed to support the venture. Investment and false promises A few weeks later, the suspect convinced the complainant to invest money, promising high returns by January 2025. Trusting him, the businessman invested large sums, including his father's life savings. The payments, totalling Rs 67.7 lakh, were made via cheques to an account belonging to someone introduced as the suspect's business manager. In October and November 2024, the suspect claimed he needed an additional $80,000 (around Rs 69.3 lakh) to handle a shipment issue in Dubai. This money was arranged through the help of a friend in the UAE and handed over to one of the suspect's contacts there. Suspect goes missing In January 2025, a WhatsApp chat showed the suspect admitting to owing money. But when the complainant began asking for repayment, the suspect avoided contact. He eventually switched off his phone, changed his number, and even vacated the place where he had been living with the complainant. Live Events When the businessman contacted the so-called manager, he was shocked to learn that the person was not part of any business partnership. He revealed that the suspect had asked him to transfer all the funds to his personal account, and the money was never used for any export business. Police action Based on the complaint and initial findings, police found enough evidence to file a formal case of cheating. A detailed investigation is now underway. Inputs from agencies
New Indian Express
2 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Rubble, relocation and unkept promises
On the morning of June 1, bulldozers rolled into Madrasi Camp in South Delhi's Jangpura and began tearing through homes that had been painstakingly built over six decades. Within hours, what had once been a tight-knit, working-class settlement of 370 Tamil-origin families was reduced to mere rubble. The demolition was carried out by the Public Works Department, under the supervision of the Delhi Police, the Revenue Department, and the Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board (DUSIB), following a May 9 order by the Delhi High Court. The court had deemed the settlement an 'unauthorised encroachment' on public land, obstructing drain cleaning efforts near the Barapullah drain. The court directed that rehabilitation be provided as per the Delhi Slum and JJ Rehabilitation and Relocation Policy, 2015. The demolition, the court stated, was essential to prevent potential flooding during the monsoon season. Yet, a week after the demolition, the reality that emerges is not one of successful relocation or resettlement but one marked by dislocation, distress and disillusionment.
