Severe warning on extending Help-To-Buy to second-hand homes
Surging house prices could rise even more if plans to extend first-time buyers' grants are followed through on, Finance officials have warned.
Internal briefing documents prepared for Finance Minister Paschal Donohoe, obtained by Extra.ie caution that extending grants to second-hand homes, which has since been provided for in the Programme for Government,' represents an additional upside risk to prices'.
The Help-to-Buy and First Home schemes, which only apply to newly built properties, are widely agreed by experts, including the ESRI and Central Bank, to have driven up house prices. Minister Paschal Donohoe. Pic: Leah Farrell/RollingNews.ie
The Opposition says that if second-hand homes are now included, it would 'turbo-charge' inflation and push even more people out of the property market.
The price of new and second-hand homes has soared in recent years, with a report from DNG estate agents last month finding the average price of a resale property in Dublin is almost €600,000 – an increase of €50,000 in 12 months, even while excluded from the grants.
Former finance minister and Fianna Fáil TD Michael McGrath warned against the move of extending grants ahead of last October's budget, saying it would 'provide no incentive effect to encourage the building of new homes and would be likely to have a significant dead-weight element and a high Exchequer cost'.
Despite this, Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael both campaigned on including second-hand homes in the grants in the November election. Michael McGrath. Pic: Sam Boal/RollingNews.ie
Mr Donohoe's Fine Gael party pledged to expand the Help-to-Buy scheme to include second-hand homes if re-elected.
The scheme provides first-time buyers with an income tax rebate of €30,000 if they purchase a newly built home up to €500,000.
During the election, Fine Gael pledged to increase this to €40,000 and include second-hand homes.
Fianna Fáil committed to including second-hand homes in the First Home scheme, which allows the Government and banks to provide up to 30% of the property's cost in exchange for a proportional stake in the home. Pic: Getty Images
The promises were branded as 'classic auction politics' that were 'using young people as a tool' during the campaign by Technological University Dublin lecturer and housing expert Professor Lorcan Sirr.
The Programme for Government, agreed between Fianna Fáil, Fine Gael, and the Independents, commits to 'retain and revise' Help-to-Buy. It also says it will work with banks to 'expand the First Home scheme to first-time buyers of secondhand homes'.
Both schemes are 'demand-side' supports, meaning they help individuals purchase homes rather than increase housing supply.
A briefing note for Mr Donohoe, last month, warned that extending 'demand side' supports to the second-hand market risks stoking home inflation further, at a time when falling interest rates are making housing more affordable. Paschal Donohoe. Pic: Niall Carson/PA Wire/PA Images
'Lower interest rates and robust income growth will improve the purchasing power of buyers, while the potential for extension of demand-side measures to existing dwellings represents an additional upside risk to prices,' the officials wrote.
They noted that second-hand home sales are now the primary driver of residential property prices'.
'Rising property prices continue to reflect a structural shortage of supply, with strong demand for existing dwellings now the key driver of price growth,' the officials wrote.
Sinn Féin housing spokesman Eoin Ó Broin, whose party campaigned to phase out Help-to-Buy during the election, told Extra.ie that adding second-hand homes to the schemes would 'turbo charge' inflation. Pic: georgeclerk/Getty Images
'If you were to extend Help-To-Buy or First Homes, or worse, both, to second-hand homes, all you are going to do is turbocharge what is already a high rate of inflation,' he said.
Mr Ó Broin also said that the consequence of including second-hand homes would be to lock more people out of the housing market, adding: 'This is a disaster of a policy and the Government shouldn't proceed with it.
'Not only is the advice [from officials] correct, I would suggest you won't find a policy expert or economist who will disagree with it,' he said.
There have also been warnings from within the Government's own ranks at such a move. On May 21, 2024, Ireland's European Commissioner, Michael McGrath, also a former finance minister, ruled out extending the Help-to-Buy (HTB) scheme. Eoin O'Broin. Pic: Leah Farrell/RollingNews.ie
He said: 'HTB is specifically designed to encourage an increase in demand for newbuild homes in order to support the construction of an additional supply of such properties.
For a property to qualify for HTB, it must be new or converted for use as a dwelling, having not previously been used as a dwelling.
A move to include properties which were previously used as residential homes/second – hand proper – ties within the scope of the scheme itself would not improve the effectiveness of the relief; on the contrary, it could serve to dilute the incentive effect of the measure in terms of encouraging additional supply.'
He added: 'For these reasons, there are no plans, at present, to extend the HTB scheme to include such properties.' Pic: Getty Images
When asked if second-hand homes would be added to the HTB scheme, a Department of Finance spokesman directed Extra.ie to a recent parliamentary question response from Mr Donohoe, in which he said it will be considered in the next budget in October.
Mr Donohoe said: 'Any revisions to the scheme would have to be considered in advance of the annual Budget and Finance Bill processes, having regard to the Department of Finance Tax Expenditure Guidelines and the sound management of the public finances; and would take into account the effective operation of the scheme and the impact any proposed changes would have on the broader housing market.'
A Department of Housing spokesman said work is ongoing to assess the impact of the proposed change.
He said the First Home scheme is 'being examined by the department and Housing Minister [James] Browne' with analytical and technical work underway to look at the potential for such an expansion as soon as possible.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Independent
8 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Over 11,000 Cork families to receive back-to-school financial support in the coming weeks
The Back to School Clothing and Footwear Allowance will help eligible families across Ireland as €54.4m is available for the once-off scheme. The rate of payment varies based on age, as €160 per child aged between 4-11 and €285 will be given per child over the age of 12 and in second-level education. Cork North West Fine Gael TD John Paul O'Shea said the scheme is 'extremely important' in terms of easing the financial burden. 'The scheme itself is extremely important in terms of easing the financial burden associated with the purchase of uniforms and shoes ahead of the new school term. 'Fine Gael is deeply conscious of the need to continue to support families,' he said. Payments will be made during the week of July 14 and most payments will be made automatically and no application is required. Mr O'Shea urged families to check their eligibility and to make an application if necessary. 'I know the pressure families can be under with back to school costs, and this allowance will go a long way in helping people. 'I urge all families to check their eligibility for this important scheme and encourage any family who does not receive notification from the Department of an automated payment to make an application online at he added. The closing date to apply for the Back to School Clothing and Footwear Allowance is September 30.
RTÉ News
9 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Did Ireland's 'bad bank' NAMA work?
At the height of the financial crisis in 2009 Ireland set up the National Asset Management Agency, better known as NAMA. Its purpose was to deal with the loans given by banks to developers and builders - many of which would never be repaid. By any measure, it was one of the biggest decisions in the State's history, taken by a Fianna Fáil and Green Party coalition. With unemployment rising, taxes increasing and general loathing of boomtime bankers, there was little surprise it was an unpopular decision. At the time, the Government had guaranteed the Irish banks, which meant that the Irish taxpayer was on the hook for their losses. The financial institutions were highly exposed to the plunging property market. Confidence in the banks steadily ebbed and it became impossible to calculate the losses they faced. As banking was grinding to a halt, loss of confidence fed into the wider economy, which was rapidly contracting. The bond market, which had provided funding to banks, walked away from the Irish financial system. Irish banks had to borrow from the European Central Bank through a mechanism called emergency liquidity assistance. The amounts borrowed from the ECB began to rocket and alarm spread across the euro zone about the unfolding banking crisis in Ireland. The challenge was how to stop the rot in the Irish financial system. One of those involved in designing a mechanism to deal with the banks; bad loans was Professor Alan Ahearne who was advisor to the late Brian Lenihan, Minister for Finance during the crash. Professor Ahearne advocated using an Asset Management Company (AMC) to deal with the problem: "I had seen AMCs used previously when I was at the Federal Reserve in the US. This was a prominent tool used before." It was deployed in South Korea and Malaysia during the Asian crash and in the US to deal with the Savings & Loans crisis in the 1980s and 1990s. The idea was that a State-backed company would buy failing property loans from the banks at market prices. When those borrowings were transferred, confidence in the banks would return and they would be able to access funding again. Professor Ahearne says: "There were two key objectives: stability for the banks and the public finances." NAMA, the so-called bad bank, was designed by officials in the Department of Finance, the National Treasury Management Agency and the Attorney General's office. The figures involved were nothing short of enormous. During the financial crisis, politicians of all hues worried that banks were hopelessly unrealistic about the losses they faced. Many bankers were slow to admit that lending approved by them had become horrible miscalculations which would be paid for by the taxpayer. A day of reckoning came when NAMA bought loans from AIB, Bank of Ireland, EBS, Irish Nationwide and Anglo Irish Bank. The borrowings were valued by the banks at €74 billion. NAMA paid a total of €31.8 billion for them - that left a black hole in excess of €40 billion in the banks' balance sheets. The gap was plugged by the Irish taxpayer. When the loans were transferred to NAMA, some of the writedowns were as large as 70%. That transaction was critical and effectively crystallised the losses of the banks. Professor Ahearne says: "The crash created those losses. You have to recognise those losses one way or another." The fact that the Government had guaranteed the banks meant the losses would have to be paid by taxpayers, regardless of what mechanism was used to clean up the mess. After the loans were transferred, NAMA faced a huge task. Brendan McDonagh became its chief executive, seconded from the NTMA to start NAMA from scratch. His job was to sell off the 60,000 individual assets bought from the banks and repay NAMA's €31.8 billion in borrowings. Hot on the heels of the agency's creation, Ireland entered a bailout in late 2010. The Troika or bailout team, made up of the European Commission, the International Monetary Fund and European Central Bank, provided €67.5 billion to the State. Representatives of that triumvirate took control of Ireland's financial decisions. NAMA was under enormous pressure to sell loans quickly and repay its debts. But it was doing so at a time of depressed property prices. NAMA's decisions were frequently controversial. It had a series of high-profile legal spats with developers who fought the agency in the courts. Some questioned whether better value could be obtained if NAMA waited for property prices to recover. One prominent example was the Battersea Power Station site in central London. It was part-owned by Treasury Holdings and its loans came under NAMA's control, which sold its stake in the asset to a Malaysian consortium in 2011. The sale was criticised by Treasury Holdings' former owner Johnny Ronan who said "a very shortsighted view was taken, especially by NAMA." But Professor Ahearne argues: "The main aim of NAMA was to restore stability to the banking system and financial conditions. Judged by that, it did achieve its aims." The agency will be dissolved at the end of 2025. It has paid back its borrowings and generated a larger than expected surplus to the Exchequer. This week, Brendan McDonagh said: "In the early days people said NAMA was going to lose €8 billion, €10 billion or €12 billion. And today we stand here making €5.5 billion." But some questions remain to be answered and some lessons remain to be learned. Would it have achieved more value if allowed further time as property prices recovered? Was it put under too much pressure to sell quickly? To what extent did its establishment help the Irish banks get back on their feet? And did that allow Ireland to recover faster than expected too? Professor Ahearne believes there is merit in a "look back study" given the scale of the policy intervention. Mr McDonagh said the agency put the taxpayer at the heart of each of its decisions. NAMA's chairman Aidan Williams said: "We have never lost sight of the fact that NAMA, unlike other commercial entities, was designed to disappear." But it won't entirely vanish. Ten legacy legal cases tied to assets worth less than €20m will be taken over by the NTMA next year. Mr McDonagh will return to the NTMA after withdrawing his name for consideration to lead the Government's housing activation office, amid political fallout over his proposed salary. This week he said it had yet to be decided what he would do in the NTMA or if he would retain his €430,000 salary. Did NAMA work? It certainly did what it was charged with doing, and its critics have become notably less vocal.
Irish Daily Mirror
10 hours ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
Figures show the amount of Child Benefit being paid to children living overseas
Over 3,000 people not living in Ireland are claiming child benefit for over 6,000 children, new figures show. It means that at least €866,040 in Child Benefit is being paid to children living overseas each month. This adds up to €10.4m over the course of a year. However, the actual amount could be higher as different rates are paid in respect of twins and triplets. Social Protection Minister Dara Calleary confirmed the figures in response to a parliamentary question from Fine Gael TD John Paul O'Shea. The Cork North-West TD asked the Minister for a breakdown of child benefit paid to persons living in countries other than Ireland. Child Benefit is an automatic monthly €140 payment to the parents or guardians of children under the age of 16. Since 2024, parents can apply for the payment if their children are 16, 17 or 18 and still in full time education or if they have a disability and cannot support themselves. Minister Calleary confirmed that under European Union (EU) regulations, Child Benefit is considered a 'Family Payment'. If a UK, EU or European Economic Area (EEA) citizen is working in Ireland, they can apply for Irish Child Benefit. If the child is living in a different EU or EEA country from the worker, they can also apply for any family benefit payments they are entitled to in the country where their children live. Minister Calleary confirmed that as of April 30, Child Benefit was being paid to 3,381 customers in respect of 6,186 non-resident children.' In total, people in 22 countries were in receipt of these payments. The highest number of claims was in the United Kingdom, where 1,310 people were getting the payment for 2,695 children. Some 1,129 people are in receipt of Child Benefit for 1,129 children living in Poland, while 685 parents are claiming for 1,320 children in Romania. All other countries have receipt numbers in the hundreds, and payments are being made to countries including Lithuania, Croatia, Bulgaria, Spain, Slovakia, Latvia, and Hungary. Deputy O'Shea told the Irish Mirror that he inquired about the figures to assist him in his work as Chairman of the Oireachtas Social Protection Committee. He said: 'As the newly elected chairperson of the Oireachtas Committee on Social Protection, I have put in a series of questions about expenditure across a range of different schemes, such as disability, illness benefit and child benefit. 'This information is useful in providing me with a greater understanding of the social welfare system. 'I intend to tease through all of this detail out further with the Department when they appear before the committee.'
