
The Yugo, one of the worst cars ever, is attempting a comeback
The Yugo, one of the worst cars ever, is attempting a comeback
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Cargo ship carrying electric vehicles catches fire, crew abandons ship
Crew members of the Morning Midas, which was transporting thousands of vehicles, were forced to abandon ship after a fire broke out onboard.
Electric cars have come a long way, but they're still fundamentally more expensive than equivalent gas-fed vehicles, which themselves have gotten pretty pricey lately. The answer is, of course, more affordable gas models and EVs — and some are finally here or on their way, including the 300-mile-plus, $35,000-ish Chevrolet Equinox EV, even cheaper and still great gas Chevy Trax, Ford's Maverick, and the forthcoming new-generation Nissan Leaf. Even Tesla's promising something cheaper, sometime.
But what if someone were to go, like, really, really cheap?
We're talking cheap to buy and cheap as a sort of lifestyle, a low-buck aura that cuts through modern cars' and EVs' expensive stigmas — we're talking, of course, about a potential small hatchback inspired by one of the worst cheap cars ever made: a new Yugo. Only this time, it won't be produced by an Eastern European former arms manufacturer or (so far) based in any way on an existing Fiat design.
Word began spreading earlier this year that a professor, Dr. Aleksandar Bjelic, had taken over the Yugo name — and was working on resurrecting the infamous hatchback for modern times.
The first concept has now debuted at the 2025 Car Design Event in Europe, and we're getting our first peek at Serbian designer Darko Marčeta's work.
Color us surprised that the new Yugo, as it's being referred to, hews closely to the original's severely boxy, traditional hatchback shape. It goes beyond even today's boxiest vehicle on sale, Hyundai's Ioniq 5, itself inspired by (better) 1980s hatchbacks, even adopting a forward cant to its nose like that of the 1981 Yugo.
Autos designed to offend: These are the 10 dumbest cars of all time
Other classic Yugo details are present, as well, from the way the hood line kicks up above the headlights before leveling out until the base of the windshield, to what we can only describe as feigned panel misalignment. Look closely at the way the door cuts into the rocker panel elements on the scale model's bodyside, or how the flat-seeming front bumper abruptly is cut along each front corner's vertical boundary — it's sort of a mess.
You see, the original Yugo was notoriously poorly built, to such a degree that matching that "charm" would take actual effort with today's manufacturing improvements. Maybe the designer intentionally set a bunch of body cut lines in conflict with one another to give a slightly schlubby appearance in line with the frumpy original. Or maybe we're getting too conspiratorial over a 1:5-scale model that isn't even a full-size concept car.
In case you missed it: Remembering the Volkswagen Beetle and when we said bye-bye for the last time
As fans of small hatchbacks and historical oddities, we're genuinely intrigued by this new Yugo. It would compete with other mini hatches in Europe, as we suspect it's not coming here, but never say never.
A larger, apparently working prototype, is promised later this year. Yugo — the new one — is apparently seeking larger automakers to partner with, likely for sharing running gear and other components. We mentioned already that the new Yugo could be an EV, but apparently the backers are hoping to make the hatch a multi-powertrain vehicle, one offering gas engines — including maybe a turbo option — as well as an all-electric variant.
We don't want to get too nostalgic, here, but it bears noting that a certain Italian brand once associated with the original Yugo has just such a multi-powertrain, small car that it'd surely love to get more scale from: the Fiat 500e. A new-age Yugo based on the Fiat 500e, which soon is being adapted to support gas powertrains? That'd be too easy.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

USA Today
43 minutes ago
- USA Today
Does Musk still oppose the ‘Big Beautiful Bill?' What we know after his apologetic post
Does Musk still oppose the 'Big Beautiful Bill?' What we know after his apologetic post Show Caption Hide Caption Elon Musk says he regrets some post about President Trump Elon Musk says some of his posts about President Trump "went too far" during a public war of words. Elon Musk and Donald Trump's public feud appears to be subsiding after Musk said he regrets some of his posts on Trump. Musk's apologetic post followed his "kill the bill" campaign against Trump's tax and domestic policy bill. While Musk said some posts 'went too far,' he has not publicly changed his stance on the bill he called a 'disgusting abomination.' The Elon Musk v. Donald Trump feud appears to be over nearly as quickly as it started. Shortly after Musk departed his official role at the White House at the end of May, he waged a full-on "kill the bill" campaign against Trump's massive tax and domestic policy bill. The divergence with Trump escalated to the point that he signaled support for Trump's impeachment and accused him of being involved with the late child sex-trafficker Jeffrey Epstein in now-deleted X posts. Amid the back-and-forth, Trump had said he asked Musk to leave the White House and suggested the federal government might end contracts with Musk. But on June 11, Musk posted on X, "I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week. They went too far." But given this all started with Trump's key legislation dubbed by supporters as the "Big Beautiful Bill," does he still oppose it? Here is what we know: Musk and Trump's relationship: A timeline from campaign cash to 'disgusting abomination' Does Elon Musk support the 'Big Beautiful Bill?' He hasn't changed his tune on the bill yet, at least publicly. Musk started speaking out against the legislation because he says it costs too much, calling it a "disgusting abomination." While Musk has deleted some of his more inflammatory posts about Trump, some posts about killing the bill are still live as of the afternoon of June 11. "And the big, ugly spending bill will make things much worse," Musk said in a June 5 post. A "Kill Bill" movie image is still posted on Musk's profile from June 4. But in recent days, Musk has been posting about Tesla's robotaxi and expressed support for Trump deploying the National Guard to counter protests that erupted in response to the administration's ICE raids. USA TODAY reached out to Tesla about Musk's current stance on the bill. What did Trump say about Musk's apology? Trump appears ready to put the spat behind him. 'Look, I have no hard feelings,' Trump told New York Post columnist Miranda Devine. 'I was really surprised that that happened. He went after a bill that's phenomenal. …He just — I think he feels very badly that he said that, actually.' He also said he might be able to get back to a regular relationship with Musk, but was focused on running the country. Trump told the New York Post he thought "it was very nice" that Musk posted on June 11. Contributing: Joey Garrison, Erin Mansfield, Swapna Venugopal Ramaswamy, USA TODAY Kinsey Crowley is the Trump Connect reporter for the USA TODAY Network. Reach her at kcrowley@ Follow her on X and TikTok @kinseycrowley or Bluesky at @
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Jim Chanos on Bull Market, Carvana and Michael Saylor
Chanos & Co. founder Jim Chanos discusses the outlook for the US stock market, his views on Tesla and why he is betting against Carvana. Speaking with Scarlet Fu on Bloomberg Television, Chanos also responds to Michael Saylor dismissing his recommendation to short the shares of Strategy and buy Bitcoin.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Q&A with BMI's Santiago Arieu on the magnet crisis disrupting global auto production
The introduction of a new licensing system by China, now slowing the export of rare earth elements, has sent a ripple of disruption across global vehicle production lines, raising the spectre of stalled factories and delayed deliveries. Rare earth magnets, often invisible yet indispensable, are the backbone of modern automotive technology. From the motors powering electric vehicles (EVs) to the sensors, steering systems, and regenerative brakes that define the modern driving experience, these small but mighty components are everywhere. But as China tightens its grip on these critical exports, amid a backdrop of rising geopolitical tension and new US tariffs, the industry is facing a reckoning. Europe, which sources 98% of its rare earth magnets from China, finds itself particularly exposed. Efforts to bolster domestic supply through initiatives like the EU's Critical Raw Materials Act have thus far failed to match China's scale or competitiveness. Meanwhile, automakers are issuing warnings: stockpiles are dwindling, and the clock is ticking. Ford has already paused operations at a major plant, Suzuki has pulled back production on key models, and Germany's influential automotive industry group VDA (Verband der Automobilindustrie) has raised red flags about looming shutdowns. Behind the headlines, the implications are even more serious for the EV sector, which depends on rare earth materials far more than traditional internal combustion engine vehicles. As electrification accelerates globally, the threat to supply chains grows more acute, and more costly. In this Q&A, Santiago Arieu (SA), Senior Autos Analyst at BMI, a Fitch Solutions company, sheds light on how the rare earth bottleneck could shape the next chapter for automakers and auto financiers. In conversation with Alejandro Gonzalez (AG), editor of Motor Finance Online. SA: If the supply constraints for these critical minerals do not improve, we believe it is highly likely that we will need to implement downward revisions to our 2025 vehicle forecasts (involving both production and sales projections). Regarding regional exposure, whilst rare earth magnets are utilised across all vehicle types, we highlight that markets and regions producing more technologically advanced vehicles with a greater number of features requiring these components face disproportionate risk. SA: Whilst we believe some automakers may consider reverting to older EV motor technologies or reducing premium features that significantly rely on rare earth magnets, we believe that carmakers are likely to exhaust all other options before implementing such measures. It is worth noting that these components are strategically crucial as they enable carmakers to differentiate their products in increasingly competitive markets. Moreover, many of these magnet-dependent features form a central part of the value proposition for modern vehicles. Removing such features would risk compromising brand positioning and consumer appeal, particularly in premium segments where these differentiators justify higher price points. SA: We believe the disruptions we are beginning to observe stemming from rare earth supply constraints will drive regions such as North America and Europe to accelerate and facilitate the onshore production of these minerals and components. That said, we forecast a substantial dependency on Mainland China for these critical materials and components will persist in the short term (at least 6 to 12 months). This is because the development of alternative supply chains represents a significant industrial challenge that cannot be resolved quickly, particularly given China's dominant position in processing capacity and technical expertise built over several years. SA: We believe the EU needs to significantly enhance economic incentives and simplify regulatory procedures to accelerate the development of new rare earth processing facilities within its borders. Currently, European operations struggle to compete with Chinese producers on cost efficiency and scale, creating a critical vulnerability in the automotive supply chain. To achieve genuine supply chain resilience, the EU could introduce more robust financial support measures and cut red tape, enabling European processors to achieve commercially viable economies of scale. SA: We believe that if industry production volumes are negatively affected by rare earth supply issues, similar to the semiconductor shortage in 2020-2021, vehicle prices are very likely to rise due to rapidly shifting supply-demand dynamics. These price increases could have a substantial impact on vehicle sales volumes, as higher costs would further strain affordability at a time when vehicle pricing is already elevated. We also see the potential for this situation to lead to tighter auto financing terms across Europe, as ongoing rare earth mineral supply constraints could create additional challenges for EV pricing. China's rare earth clampdown strains global auto production "Q&A with BMI's Santiago Arieu on the magnet crisis disrupting global auto production" was originally created and published by Motor Finance Online, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.