logo
NIA arrests two members of ISIS sleeper cell's module from Mumbai airport

NIA arrests two members of ISIS sleeper cell's module from Mumbai airport

The National Investigation Agency (NIA) has arrested two absconders allegedly part of a sleeper cell of terrorist outfit ISIS from Mumbai airport, officials said on Saturday.
The duo were wanted in a 2023 case related to fabrication and testing of IEDs in Pune, Maharashtra, they said.
The accused, identified as Abdullah Faiyaz Shaikh alias Diaperwala and Talha Khan, were intercepted by the Bureau of Immigration at the Mumbai International Airport Terminal 2 last night when they tried to return to India from Jakarta, Indonesia, where they had been hiding, the officials said.
The NIA team then took them into custody and arrested them, said a statement issued by the probe agency.
The two accused had been on the run for more than two years and also had non-bailable warrants issued against them by the NIA Special Court, Mumbai.
The NIA had also declared a cash reward of Rs 3 lakh each for information about the two accused.
The case relates to a criminal conspiracy by these men, along with eight other Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) Pune sleeper cell members already arrested and in judicial custody, the statement said.
They had conspired to commit terrorist acts with the aim to disturb India's peace and communal harmony by waging a war against the Government of India in furtherance of the ISIS agenda to establish Islamic rule in the country through violence and terror, it said.
These two men, already chargesheeted along with the other arrested accused, were allegedly involved in assembling IEDs from a house rented by Abdullah Faiyaz Shaikh in Kondhwa, Pune, the NIA said.
During the 2022-2023 period, they had also organised and participated in a bomb-making and training workshop, besides carrying out a controlled explosion to test an IED fabricated by them, at these premises, it said.
The NIA, which has been actively investigating the activities of ISIS in India in a bid to foil its terrorist plans, had previously chargesheeted all the 10 accused in the case under various sections of the Unlawful Activities of Prevention Act, Explosive Substances Act, Arms Act and the Indian Penal Code.
Besides Abdullah Faiyaz Shaikh and Talha Khan, the others arrested in the case are identified as Mohammed Imran Khan, Mohammed Yunus Saki, Abdul Kadir Pathan, Simab Nasiruddin Kazi, Zulfikar Ali Barodawala, Shamil Nachan, Akif Nachan and Shahnawaz Alam, the probe agency said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Personal or smuggled? Things to know while carrying gold from abroad
Personal or smuggled? Things to know while carrying gold from abroad

Business Standard

time18 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

Personal or smuggled? Things to know while carrying gold from abroad

Carrying gold ornaments back from abroad can be stressful. Travellers often carry gold jewellery with them to wear during family functions or simply for personal use abroad. However, reports of seizures by custom officials at the airport leave passengers anxious about what is allowed and what is not. The Delhi case that raised eyebrows In March 2024, this anxiety turned real for Delhi resident Shamina. Returning from Riyadh, she was stopped at the IGI Airport with four gold bangles weighing 100 grams. Customs treated the ornaments as dutiable imports and ordered confiscation. Last month, however, the Delhi High Court ruled the seizure excessive. It stressed that ornaments worn on the body cannot automatically be branded smuggled gold, and ordered the release of the bangles subject to warehousing charges. Similar disputes, such as Anjali Pandey v. Union of India (2024), involving a Thai tourist whose bangles were seized, show how the line between 'personal jewellery' and 'smuggling' is often blurred. How Customs makes the distinction? According to Mayank Arora, partner at The Chambers of Bharat Chugh, three factors guide customs officers: · Form: Ornaments worn on the body are usually treated as personal use, while bars or coins raise suspicion. · Quantity and intent: A few bangles or a chain are acceptable; multiple identical pieces suggest commercial purpose. · Declaration: Declaring jewellery at the red channel reduces risk, while concealment or mis-declaration increases suspicion. Duty-free allowances: What travellers must know? As Alay Razvi, managing partner at Accord Juris, explains, the baggage rules allow: · Men: 20g (Rs 50,000) of gold duty-free. · Women: 40g (Rs 1 lakh) of gold duty-free. · NRIs abroad for over one year: up to 1kg of gold (bars or jewellery) on payment of duty. · Tourists: no allowance, but ornaments worn for personal use can be declared and temporarily detained for re-export. Gold bars, coins and biscuits are always dutiable, regardless of quantity. What happens if you don't declare? Failing to declare jewellery can lead to costs and stress. Rohit Jain, managing partner at Singhania & Co., says: · If openly worn but not declared: duty plus fine (10–20 per cent of value) may apply. · If concealed: it may be treated as smuggling, leading to confiscation and, in high-value cases, even prosecution. Traveller's checklist · Declare jewellery at the red channel or through the ATITHI app. · Carry invoices or photos showing past ownership. · Request a detention receipt if jewellery is to be re-exported. · Avoid carrying bars or coins. · Never conceal ornaments. 'Transparency is the best safeguard,' says Arora. 'Seizures and penalties usually follow concealment or non-declaration.'

Chargesheet filed in Sivaganga custodial death case, CBI informs Madras HC
Chargesheet filed in Sivaganga custodial death case, CBI informs Madras HC

New Indian Express

timean hour ago

  • New Indian Express

Chargesheet filed in Sivaganga custodial death case, CBI informs Madras HC

A bench comprising justices S M Subramaniam and G Arul Murugan appreciated the CBI for its swift action and directed it to file a status report on 24 September on further progress in the case. Noting that the agency is yet to receive the files relating to the connected jewel theft case, during the inquiry of which Ajithkumar was subjected to custodial torture, the Bench directed the state police to hand over the case files to the CBI within a week, with further directions to the CBI to register an FIR and probe the case expeditiously. During the hearing, Additional Advocate General M Ajmal Khan informed the court that the additional compensation of Rs 25 lakh, which was directed to be paid to the victim's family, had been disbursed and that witness protection had been extended to five witnesses in the case based on a direction from the Sivagangai district court. However, one of the petitioners' counsel told the court that the direction of the district court had not been implemented in entirety and that the witnesses still lacked some protection, such as fencing. He also highlighted the absence of a vulnerable witness deposition centre in Madurai. The Bench directed the Thirupuvanam police inspector to verify whether the order regarding witness protection had been fully implemented within a week.

Govt estimates 45 cr people lose about Rs 20,000 cr annually from real money gaming
Govt estimates 45 cr people lose about Rs 20,000 cr annually from real money gaming

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Govt estimates 45 cr people lose about Rs 20,000 cr annually from real money gaming

New Delhi: The government estimates that around 45 crore people lose close to Rs 20,000 crore every year in online real money gaming , an official source said on Wednesday. According to the source, the government has realised that online real money gaming is a major problem for society and chose to forego revenue loss in preference to people's welfare. "There is a rough estimate that 45 crore people lose money every year. The total impact of the loss is estimated to be tentatively around Rs 20,000 crore," the source added. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like TV providers are furious: this gadget gives you access to all channels Techno Mag Learn More Undo The government has tabled "Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill 2025" in the Lok Sabha, which proposes to promote eSports and online social gaming while banning money gaming in any form. Also Read: Online Gaming Bill tabled in Lok Sabha, MeitY Secy explains the blanket ban Live Events "Online gaming involving money has become a major problem for society. Every Parliamentarian has raised concerns about its ill effects. Between revenue from one-third of the industry segment and society welfare, the government has chosen society welfare," the source said. According to the source, actions against entities involved in money gaming under the bill will be mainly taken by state governments. The bill proposes that any person offering an online money gaming service in violation of the stipulated provisions will face imprisonment of up to three years or a fine that may extend to Rs 1 crore or both. The provisions also stipulate imprisonment of up to two years and or a fine of up to Rs 50 lakh, or both, for those indulging in advertisements in contravention of rules. Several online real money gaming platforms masquerade themselves as a "game of skills" to differentiate themselves from gambling or betting, the source said. "Those who play the games are victims. They will not be punished as per the bill, but there will be action on those who provide real money gaming platforms, facilitate transaction services, etc," the source said. On the other hand, the bill seeks to promote eSports and online social games, which are a part of the creative economy. "There will be a budget for it, schemes and authority for their promotion. They are two-thirds of the industry. It will create job opportunities for the online gaming industry," the source said. The government has been making efforts for the last three and a half years, which were being bypassed by the real money gaming players, the source added. "The government tried to check it through GST, but it was being bypassed. There was a proposal for a regulatory body, but it was impacted by a conflict of interest. The provisions under the bill were taken after several complaints were received from the public and their representatives," the source said. Meanwhile, industry bodies representing real money game players -- India Gaming Federation (AIGF), E-Gaming Federation (EGF), and Federation of Indian Fantasy Sports (FIFS) -- in a letter to Home Minister Amit Shah raised concerns over the bill, saying it would kill the job-creating industry. The letter stated that the online skill gaming industry is a "sunrise sector" with an enterprise valuation of over Rs 2 lakh crore and annual revenue exceeding Rs 31,000 crore. It contributes over Rs 20,000 crore in direct and indirect taxes annually and is projected to grow at a 20 per cent compound annual growth rate (CAGR), doubling by 2028.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store