Leland Vittert's War Notes: Defying Political Logic
Cost of MAHA: Liberty (my sister) is out with a must-read opinion piece in The Hill, 'MAHA will make groceries UNAFFORDABLE again.'
Never talked about in the discussion of dyes and ultraprocessed foods is the cost of taking them out.
'For example, a dye-free snack bar from Truvani — the health food company of one of MAHA's most vocal proponents — runs $42 for 12 bars, compared to $5 for 12 Nutrigrain bars that do have artificial food-dyes,' Liberty writes.
Liberty joins us tonight on whether Americans will pay the cost of going healthy.
Bonus coverage: 'Is Ozempic Really the Reason Americans Are Snacking Less?' headlines The Wall Street Journal.
By the rules of politics, Donald Trump had a God-awful, lousy week.
A sinking stock market.
The Dow closed out today with a loss of 700 points.
A major national security scandal.
For more on SignalGate, read Wednesday's 'War Notes' here.
Deporting multiple college students.
Over 300 student visas have been revoked, according to Secretary of State Marco Rubio.
Consumer confidence is down.
The University of Michigan's consumer sentiment index fell to 57.0 – its lowest rating since 2022.
Trump announced tariffs that will raise the cost of many cars by thousands of dollars.
According to the Anderson Economic Group, prices of cars could rise between $4,000 and $12,000 with the proposed tariffs.
For a wrap-up of Trump's week, check out NPR's piece, which shows how the Left is almost giddy with Trump's recent bad fortune.
BUT: The rules of politics don't apply to Donald Trump.
An Economist/YouGov poll shows his personal approval rating up two points as of Tuesday.
The number of Americans who say the country is on the right track is the highest it's been in over a decade.
Oh, and most of the big law firms that waged war against Trump and Republicans are rolling over while promising millions in pro bono work to Trump's pet projects.
The big law divide over capitulation versus fighting Trump in his retribution campaign is an awesome sideshow to watch.
Conclusion: There's something going on that the American people are responding to.
Watch here: Tim Walz explaining the problems of the Democratic Party – namely not being bolder on DEI and wokeness:
'We let them define the issue on immigration. We let them define the issue on DEI. And we let them define what 'woke' is. We got ourselves in this mess because we weren't bold enough to stand up and say, 'You're damn right we're proud of these policies. We're going to put them in and execute them.''
Maybe Americans feel how Jon Stewart does:
'Jon Stewart screams 'OMFG' and is rendered speechless after hearing all 14 steps to apply for 'Build Back Better' funding.'
Stewart was talking to Ezra Klein, a liberal New York Times columnist, about his new book.
Stewart realized why Americans feel so angry: It's because Trump is promising an answer to their anger.
Reminder: Trump won by stealing the Democratic agenda on working-class issues.
Warning signs: Trump's agenda can derail in many ways – a Democratic Congress would flip everything on its head.
A complete stop to his legislative agenda – plus investigations into his administration.
Math problems: Republicans hold a very slim majority in the House – 218 GOP seats to 213 Democrats.
Special elections in Florida for former representative turned national security adviser Mike Waltz and former Congressman Matt Gaetz's seats are already too close for Republican comfort.
Latest polling shows the Democratic candidate in Florida's 6th Congressional District now closely trailing the Republican within the poll's margin of error.
'How the hell is this race close,' headlines our friend Chris Cillizza.
My buddy Chad Pergram with the math on Trump withdrawing Rep. Elise Stefanik's nomination for ambassador to the United Nations to protect the House majority.
Warning bells from the race for a judge position on Wisconsin's Supreme Court could change the make-up of the court, but more importantly, show just how close swing states remain.
Watch tonight: Steve Cortes and Nina Turner on what happens if Trump loses the House of Representatives.
Cold as 💩
Vice President JD Vance showed up in Greenland today.
He wasn't invited to visit anywhere in Greenland, so he arrived at a U.S. military base.
'It's cold as s–t here,' Vance told the assembled troops.
Fact check: True.
But not exactly the most diplomatic entry to a country that America wants to 'take over.'
He then proceeded to trash Denmark:
'Denmark hasn't done a good job at keeping Greenland safe,' said Vance.
Vance's Greenland trip highlights a couple of things – and none of them are good for the VP.
Trump views him as an errand boy.
Trump wants him to play attack dog.
His portfolio is all of the administration's unpopular issues.
He's unable to push back in his own defense, yet he's a lightning rod for the Left.
From The New York Times on Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., trying to take on JD Vance:
'In an interview, Mr. Khanna, 48, said he intended to cast Mr. Vance as a unique threat to America's constitutional order, and argued that there was no time to waste in building the case against Mr. Vance, a likely heir to President Trump's right-wing political movement.'
Trump refused to name Vance as the rightful heir of the MAGA movement.
Be fair: At 40 years old, JD Vance is one of the most impressive political figures in American history.
His rise is JFK-adjacent but even more impressive since he came from drug-ravaged Appalachia rather than silver-spoon Boston.
Watch tonight: What's next for Vance and whether he can move out from the shadow of Trump.
He needs to move out of that shadow – he has the lowest favorability rating of any new vice president, at the two-month mark of their first term, since the polling began.
The Left finally figured out how to really show their displeasure with Donald Trump – by burning Teslas and stealing prosciutto, or anything else, from Whole Foods.
Yes, you read that right – the billionaire heroes of the Left, Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos, are now villains.
A year ago, driving your Tesla to Whole Foods proved that you were virtuous.
Now, it's worthy of attack – literally.
🪧 This weekend, anti-Elon groups planned protests at more than a dozen Tesla dealerships across the country.
Yes, protest American-made electric cars – that will certainly help Democrats win back working-class voters.
And, Business Insider reports that shoplifters are taking food from Whole Foods to express their displeasure with Jeff Bezos.
One thing never accounted for in politics is luck – and nothing continues to help President Trump more than those who oppose him being stupid.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
19 minutes ago
- Axios
Amid backlash, Tesla remained resilient in Texas
Even as Tesla deliveries plunged nationally this year amid Elon Musk's very visible (if short-lived) alliance with President Trump, there was at least one state where Tesla registrations were up: Texas. Why it matters: The registration data, obtained by Axios through public information requests, indicates loyalty to the brand in its home base, including Texas' large urban and suburban counties. The depth of conservatives' enthusiasm for Musk's automobiles now faces a major test amid the absolute meltdown last week between the Tesla CEO and the president. By the numbers: Texans registered 12,918 new Teslas in the first three months of 2025, a period when Musk, who contributed more than $250 million to a pro-Trump super PAC during the 2024 election campaign, was enmeshed in the Trump administration as the overseer of DOGE, the president's cost-cutting initiative. Over the same period in 2024, Texans registered 10,679 Teslas. That's a 21% increase year over year. The intrigue: The spike in Texas registrations came as Tesla was flailing elsewhere. Tesla's vehicle deliveries plunged 13% globally in the first quarter of 2025 (336,681 electric vehicles) compared with Q1 2024 (386,810). Tesla vehicles were torched at showrooms and the brand's reputation cratered. Zoom in: Tesla saw year-over-year improvements in its sales in some of the most populous Texas counties. In Travis County, new Tesla registrations grew from 1,369 in the first quarter of 2024 to 1,424 during the first quarter of 2025. In Harris County, they grew from 1,526 to 1,837 during the same period. Tesla registration grew from 1,316 to 1,546 in Collin County and from 990 to 1,146 in Dallas County. In Bexar County, registrations grew from 631 to 664. What they're saying:"It's homegrown pride," is how Matt Holm, president and founder of the Tesla Owners Club of Austin, explains the car company's resilience to Axios. "And regardless of all the drama going on these days, people can differentiate between the product and everything else going on, and it's just a great product." "Elon has absolutely and irreversibly blown up bridges to some potential customers," says Alexander Edwards, president of California-based research firm Strategic Vision, which has long surveyed the motivations of car buyers. "People who bought Teslas for environmental friendliness, that's pretty much gone," Edwards tells Axios. Yes, but: The company had been enjoying an increasingly positive reputation among more conservative consumers. Musk was viewed favorably by 80% of Texas Republicans polled by the Texas Politics Project in April — and unfavorably by 83% of Democrats. In what now feels like a political lifetime ago, Trump himself even promoted Teslas by promising to buy one in support of Musk earlier this year. "In some pockets, like Austin, you have that tech group that loves what Tesla has to offer, can do some mental gymnastics about Musk, and looks at Rivian and says that's not what I want or might be priced out," Edwards says. Between the lines:"Being in the state of Texas, you're naturally conditioned to think you're better than everyone else in the U.S. And when you buy a Tesla" — a status symbol — "that's what you're saying. It doesn't surprise me that there's an increase in sales" in Texas, Edwards says. Plus: Tesla's resilience in Texas could have practical reasons as well, Edwards says. Texas homes — as opposed to, say, apartments in cities on the East Coast — are more likely to have a garage to charge a car in, he adds. What's next: Musk said late last month that Tesla was experiencing a "major rebound in demand" — without providing specifics. But that was before things went absolutely haywire with Trump and Tesla stock took a bath last week.
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
This AI Company Wants Washington To Keep Its Competitors Off the Market
Dario Amodei, CEO of the artificial intelligence company Anthropic, published a guest essay in The New York Times Thursday arguing against a proposed 10-year moratorium on state AI regulation. Amodei argues that a patchwork of regulations would be better than no regulation whatsoever. Skepticism is warranted whenever the head of an incumbent firm calls for more regulation, and this case is no different. If Amodei gets his way, Anthropic would face less competition—to the detriment of AI innovation, AI security, and the consumer. Amodei's op-ed came in a response to a provision of the so-called One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which would prevent any states, cities, and counties from enforcing any regulation that specifically targets AI models, AI systems, or automated decision systems for 10 years. Senate Republicans have amended the clause from a simple requirement to a condition for receiving federal broadband funds, in order to comply with the Byrd Rule, which in Politico's words "blocks anything but budgetary issues from inclusion in reconciliation." Amodei begins by describing how, in a recent stress test conducted at his company, a chatbot threatened an experimenter to forward evidence of his adultery to his wife unless he withdrew plans to shut the AI down. The CEO also raises more tangible concerns, such as reports that a version of Google's Gemini model is "approaching a point where it could help people carry out cyberattacks." Matthew Mittelsteadt, a technology fellow at the Cato Institute, tells Reason that the stress test was "very contrived" and that "there are no AI systems where you must prompt it to turn it off." You can just turn it off. He also acknowledges that, while there is "a real cybersecurity danger [of] AI being used to spot and exploit cyber-vulnerabilities, it can also be used to spot and patch" them. Outside of cyberspace and in, well, actual space, Amodei sounds the alarm that AI could acquire the ability "to produce biological and other weapons." But there's nothing new about that: Knowledge and reasoning, organic or artificial—ultimately wielded by people in either case—can be used to cause problems as well as to solve them. An AI that can model three-dimensional protein structures to create cures for previously untreatable diseases can also create virulent, lethal pathogens. Amodei recognizes the double-edged nature of AI and says voluntary model evaluation and publication are insufficient to ensure that benefits outweigh costs. Instead of a 10-year moratorium, Amodei calls on the White House and Congress to work together on a transparency standard for AI companies. In lieu of federal testing standards, Amodei says state laws should pick up the slack without being "overly prescriptive or burdensome." But that caveat is exactly the kind of wishful thinking Amodei indicts proponents of the moratorium for: Not only would 50 state transparency laws be burdensome, says Mittelsteadt, but they could "actually make models less legible." Neil Chilson of the Abundance Institute also inveighed against Amodei's call for state-level regulation, which is much more onerous than Amodei suggests. "The leading state proposals…include audit requirements, algorithmic assessments, consumer disclosures, and some even have criminal penalties," Chilson tweeted, so "the real debate isn't 'transparency vs. nothing,' but 'transparency-only federal floor vs. intrusive state regimes with audits, liability, and even criminal sanctions.'" Mittelsteadt thinks national transparency regulation is "absolutely the way to go." But how the U.S. chooses to regulate AI might not have much bearing on Skynet-doomsday scenarios, because, while America leads the way in AI, it's not the only player in the game. "If bad actors abroad create Amodei's theoretical 'kill everyone bot,' no [American] law will matter," says Mittelsteadt. But such a law can "stand in the way of good actors using these tools for defense." Amodei is not the only CEO of a leading AI company to call for regulation. In 2023, Sam Altman, co-founder and then-CEO of Open AI, called on lawmakers to consider "intergovernmental oversight mechanisms and standard-setting" of AI. In both cases and in any others that come along, the public should beware of calls for AI regulation that will foreclose market entry, protect incumbent firms' profits from being bid away by competitors, and reduce the incentives to maintain market share the benign way: through innovation and product differentiation. The post This AI Company Wants Washington To Keep Its Competitors Off the Market appeared first on
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
California City Terminates 'Divisive' ICE Contract Amid L.A. Protests
Glendale, California, which is located just minutes from Los Angeles where anti-ICE protests erupted this weekend, has decided to end a contract with Immigration and Customs Enforcement to hold detainees in its jail. In a press release Sunday, city officials said that 'public perception of the ICE contract—no matter how limited or carefully managed, no matter the good—has become divisive.' 'And while opinions on this issue may vary—the decision to terminate this contract is not politically driven. It is rooted in what this City stands for—public safety, local accountability, and trust,' the statement said. Ahead of the unrest in Los Angeles, Glendale had come under some scrutiny over a 2007 contract to house ICE detainees despite a 2018 sanctuary state law ensuring that no local law enforcement resources are used for the purpose of immigration enforcement. In one year, the city collected $6,000 to house ICE detainees, and The Los Angeles Times reported that the city receives $85 per detainee per day. In the last week, two ICE detainees were held in Glendale's detention center, leading to an outcry over the city's potentially unlawful compliance, as the Trump administration has moved to increase the number of daily ICE arrests. But it seems that Glendale will no longer be complicit in the Trump administration's immigration crackdown. The statement continued, emphasizing that local law enforcement was not responsible for enforcing immigration law, and that the city would remain in compliance with the law. 'The Glendale Police Department has not engaged in immigration enforcement, nor will it do so moving forward,' the statement said. Just a few miles away in downtown Los Angeles, massive anti-ICE protests are still ongoing after immigration authorities arrested at least 44 immigrants Friday. In response to the protests, Donald Trump bypassed California Governor Gavin Newsom to deploy the National Guard, which has used tear gas, flash grenades, and rubber bullets against the protesters and journalists. The decision on behalf of Glendale is a victory for the protestors, and a clear response to the ongoing direct action in Los Angeles, as well as the Trump administration's escalating efforts to conduct mass deportations of undocumented immigrants.
