logo
AI tool scans faces to predict biological age and cancer survival

AI tool scans faces to predict biological age and cancer survival

Yahoo12-05-2025
A simple selfie could hold hidden clues to one's biological age — and even how long they'll live.
That's according to researchers from Mass General Brigham, who developed a deep-learning algorithm called FaceAge.
Using a photo of someone's face, the artificial intelligence tool generates predictions of the subject's biological age, which is the rate at which they are aging as opposed to their chronological age.
Music Conductor With Parkinson's Sees Symptoms Improve With Deep Brain Stimulation
FaceAge also predicts survival outcomes for people with cancer, according to a press release from MGB.
The AI tool was trained on 58,851 photos of "presumed healthy individuals from public datasets," the release stated.
Read On The Fox News App
To test the tool's accuracy, the researchers used it to analyze photos of 6,196 cancer patients taken before radiotherapy treatment.
Among the people with cancer, the tool generated a higher biological age that was about five years higher than their chronological age.
Paralyzed Man With Als Is Third To Receive Neuralink Implant, Can Type With Brain
The researchers also tested the tool's ability to predict the life expectancy of 100 people receiving palliative care based on their photos, then compared it to 10 clinicians' predictions. FaceAge was found to be more accurate than the clinicians' predictions.
The researchers' findings were published in The Lancet Digital Health.
"We can use artificial intelligence to estimate a person's biological age from face pictures, and our study shows that information can be clinically meaningful," said co-senior and corresponding author Hugo Aerts, PhD, director of the Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (AIM) program at Mass General Brigham, in the release.
"This work demonstrates that a photo like a simple selfie contains important information that could help to inform clinical decision-making and care plans for patients and clinicians," he went on.
Woman Says Chatgpt Saved Her Life By Helping Detect Cancer, Which Doctors Missed
"How old someone looks compared to their chronological age really matters — individuals with FaceAges that are younger than their chronological ages do significantly better after cancer therapy."
The goal is for the tool to help eliminate any bias that may influence a doctor's care decisions based on the perception of a patient's appearance and age.
The researchers noted that more research is needed before the tool could be rolled out for clinical use.
Future studies will include different hospitals and cancer patients at various stages of the disease, according to the release. Researchers will also evaluate FaceAge's ability to predict diseases, general health status and lifespan.
"This opens the door to a whole new realm of biomarker discovery from photographs, and its potential goes far beyond cancer care or predicting age," said co-senior author Ray Mak, MD, a faculty member in the AIM program at Mass General Brigham, in the release.
"As we increasingly think of different chronic diseases as diseases of aging, it becomes even more important to be able to accurately predict an individual's aging trajectory. I hope we can ultimately use this technology as an early detection system in a variety of applications, within a strong regulatory and ethical framework, to help save lives."
Dr. Harvey Castro, a board-certified emergency medicine physician and national speaker on artificial intelligence based in Dallas, Texas, was not involved in FaceAge's development but shared his comments on the tool.
Are Full-body Scans Worth The Money? Doctors Share What You Should Know
"As an emergency physician and AI futurist, I see both the promise and peril of AI tools like FaceAge," he told Fox News Digital.
"What excites me is that FaceAge structures the clinical instinct we call the 'eyeball test' — a gut sense of how sick someone looks. Now, machine learning can quantify that assessment with surprising accuracy."
Castro predicts that FaceAge could help doctors better personalize treatment plans or prioritize palliative care in oncology — "where resilience matters more than a birthdate."
The doctor emphasized, however, that caution is key.
"AI models are only as good as the data they're trained on," Castro noted. "If the training data lacks diversity, we risk producing biased results."
"While FaceAge may outperform clinicians in some survival predictions, it should augment human judgment, not override it."
Click Here To Sign Up For Our Health Newsletter
Castro also cautioned about potential ethical concerns.
"Who owns the facial data? How is it stored? Do patients understand what's being analyzed? These questions matter as much as the technology itself," he said.
There is also a psychological impact of the tool, Castro noted.
"Being told you 'look older' than your age could influence treatment decisions or self-perception in ways we don't yet fully understand," he said.
"We need clear consent, data privacy and sensitivity. No one wants to be told they look older without context."
For more Health articles, visit www.foxnews.com/health
The bottom line, according to Castro, is that AI can enhance a doctor's judgment, but cannot replace it.
"AI can enhance our care — but it cannot replace the empathy, context and humanity that define medicine."Original article source: AI tool scans faces to predict biological age and cancer survival
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

I've tested OpenAI's claims about GPT-5 — here's what happened
I've tested OpenAI's claims about GPT-5 — here's what happened

Digital Trends

time3 hours ago

  • Digital Trends

I've tested OpenAI's claims about GPT-5 — here's what happened

OpenAI recently launched GPT-5, its latest large language model and a huge update to ChatGPT. While the new update has a lot going for it, claims are one thing, and reality is another. GPT-5 is said to be faster, less prone to hallucination and sycophantic behavior, and able to choose between fast responses and deeper 'thinking' on the fly. How many of OpenAI's claims are actually visible when using the chatbot? Let's find out. Claim #1: ChatGPT is now better at following instructions My main problem with ChatGPT, as well as one of the reasons why I recently unsubscribed, is that it's often pretty bad at following basic instructions. Sure, you can prompt engineer it to oblivion and get your desired results (sometimes), but even semi-elaborate prompts often fail to produce desired results. Recommended Videos OpenAI claims that it improved 'instruction following' with the release of GPT-5. To that, I say: I don't see it yet. Luckily for me, on the very day I sat down to write this article, I had a fitting interaction with ChatGPT that proves my point here. It's not the only one, though, and I have generally noticed that the longer a conversation goes on, the more ChatGPT forgets what was asked of it. In today's example, I tested ChatGPT's ability to fetch simple information and present it in the required format. I asked it for the specs of the RTX 5060 Ti, which is a recent gaming graphics card. Chaos ensued. To make my prompt even more successful, I showed ChatGPT the exact format I wanted to get my information in by sharing specs for a different GPU. They included things like the exact process node and the generation of ray tracing cores and TOPS. Long story short, it was all pretty specific stuff. Initially, the AI told me that the RTX 5060 Ti doesn't exist yet, which I kind of expected to happen based on its knowledge cutoff. I told it to check online. What I got was pretty barebones. ChatGPT omitted at least four things that I asked for, and gave me the wrong information for one of the specs. Next, I asked it to specify a few things. It gave me the exact same list in return while claiming to have fulfilled my request. The same happened on the third attempt. You can see it in the screenshot above where ChatGPT claims to have included the generation of TOPS and TFLOPS in the list — it clearly did not. Finally, semi-frustrated, I pasted a screenshot from the official Nvidia website to show it what I was looking for. It still got a couple of things wrong. My initial prompt was semi-precise. I know better than to speak to an AI like it's a person, so I gave it about 150 words' worth of instructions. It still took me several more messages to get something close to my expected result. Verdict: It could still use some work. Claim #2: ChatGPT is less sycophantic ChatGPT was a major 'yes man' in previous iterations. It often agreed with users when it didn't need to, driving it deeper and deeper into hallucination. For users who aren't familiar with the inner workings of AI, this could be borderline dangerous — or, in fact, actually extremely dangerous. Researchers recently carried out a large-scale test of ChatGPT, posing as young teens. Within minutes of simple interactions, the AI gave those 'teens' advice on self-harm, suicide planning, and drug abuse. This shows that sycophantic behavior is a major problem for ChatGPT, and OpenAI claims to have curbed some of it with the release of GPT-5. I never tested ChatGPT to such extremes, but I've definitely found that it tended to agree with you, no matter what you said. It took subtle cues during conversation and turned them into a given. It also cheered you on at times when it likely shouldn't have done so. To that end, I have to say that ChatGPT has gone through an entire personality change — for better or worse. The responses are now overly dry, unengaging, and not especially encouraging. Many users mourn the change, with some Reddit users claiming they 'lost their only friend overnight.' It's true that the previously ultra-friendly AI is now rather cut-and-dry, and the responses are often short compared to the emoji-infested mini-essays it regularly served up during its GPT-4o stage. Verdict: Definitely less sycophantic. On the other hand, it's also painfully boring. Claim #3: GPT-5 is better at factual accuracy The shocking lack of factual accuracy was another big reason why I chose to stop paying for ChatGPT. On some days, I felt like half the prompts I used produced hallucinations. And it can't all be down to my lack of smart prompting, because I've spent hundreds of hours learning how to prompt AI the right way — I know how to ask the right questions. Over time, I've learned to only ask about things I already had a vague idea about. For the purpose of today's experiment, I asked about GPU specs. Four out of five queries produced some kind of wrong information, even though all of it is readily available online. Then, I tried historical facts. I read a couple of interesting articles about the journey of Hindenburg, an airship from the 1930s that could ferry passengers from Europe to the U.S. in record time (60 hours). I asked about its exact route, the number of passengers it could house, and what led to its ultimate demise. I cross-checked the responses against historical sources. It got one thing wrong on the route, mentioning a stop in Canada when no such thing took place — the airship only flew over Canada. ChatGPT also gave me inaccurate information about the exact cause of the fire that led to its crash, but it wasn't a major inaccuracy. For comparison's sake, I also asked Gemini, and was told that it can't complete that task for me. Well, out of the two, GPT-5 did a better job — but honestly, it shouldn't have any factual inaccuracies in century-old data. Verdict: Not perfect, but also not terrible. Is GPT-5 better than GPT-4o? If you asked me whether I like GPT-5 more than GPT-4o, I'd have had a hard time responding. The closest thing that comes to mind is that I wasn't thrilled with either, but in all fairness, neither are strictly bad. We're still in the midst of the AI revolution. Each new model brings certain upgrades, but we're unlikely to see massive leaps with every new iteration. This time around, it feels like OpenAI chose to tackle some long-overdue problems rather than introducing any single feature that makes the crowds go wild. GPT-5 feels like more of a quality-of-life improvement than anything else, although I haven't tested it for tasks like coding, where it's said to be much better. The three things I tested above were some of the ones that annoyed me the most in previous models. I'd like to say that GPT-5 is much better in that regard, but it isn't — not yet. I will keep testing the chatbot, though, as a recently leaked system prompt tells me that there might have been more personality changes than I initially thought.

Cathie Wood Buys the Dip in CoreWeave Stock (CRWV) While Wall Street Remains Cautious
Cathie Wood Buys the Dip in CoreWeave Stock (CRWV) While Wall Street Remains Cautious

Business Insider

time4 hours ago

  • Business Insider

Cathie Wood Buys the Dip in CoreWeave Stock (CRWV) While Wall Street Remains Cautious

CoreWeave (CRWV) stock has plunged nearly 33% since the company announced its second-quarter results. The artificial intelligence (AI)-powered cloud computing company generated a 207% jump in its Q2 revenue but reported a larger-than-anticipated loss. Moreover, concerns about near-term volatility due to the end of the lock-up period, which allows early investors and insiders to sell the stock, are also weighing on investor sentiment. While Cathie Wood bought the dip in CoreWeave stock by purchasing 120,229 shares via the ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) on Friday, Wall Street remains cautious due to high leverage and significant capex. Despite the recent pullback, CRWV stock has risen about 150% from its initial public offering (IPO) price of $40. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. Meanwhile, CoreWeave's key AI chip supplier, Nvidia (NVDA), increased its stake in the AI infrastructure company in Q2 2025. Following the Q2 print, Bank of America Securities analyst Bradley Sills lowered the price target for CoreWeave stock to $168 from $185 and reiterated a Hold rating. The 4-star analyst noted that a 4% quarter-over-quarter rise in backlog, excluding the OpenAI deal, was somewhat disappointing, though it does not include a second announced expansion deal that will be included in Q3. Sills added that the company didn't provide much information about the status of the Core Scientific (CORZ) deal. He expects the speculation about regulatory scrutiny to remain an overhang on CRWV stock. Sills also expects the lock-up expiration to be an overhang on CoreWeave stock. That said, the analyst believes that CoreWeave remains well-positioned to benefit from a ramping AI infrastructure industry. Meanwhile, Morgan Stanley analyst Keith Weiss reiterated a Hold rating on CoreWeave stock with a price target of $91. The 4-star analyst stated that accruing and expanding large contracts from the most demanding generative AI users validate CoreWeave's strong positioning for the ramping graphics processing units (GPU) build-out. Weiss thinks that large contract wins from Microsoft (MSFT) and ChatGPT-maker OpenAI are 'enabling a top-line scaling function,' but present a double-edged sword. While on one side, these deals validate CRWV's strong technology from the most demanding AI customers, on the other hand, they bring in a level of customer concentration risk, setting a high bar for other customers to become meaningful to the overall story. Is CoreWeave Stock a Good Investment? Overall, Wall Street is sidelined on CoreWeave stock, with a Hold consensus rating based on 16 Holds, six Buys, and two Sell recommendations. The average CRWV stock price target of $115.29 indicates 15.3% upside potential from current levels.

Man Used AI to Generate a Custom Tune for His BMW 335i
Man Used AI to Generate a Custom Tune for His BMW 335i

Miami Herald

time5 hours ago

  • Miami Herald

Man Used AI to Generate a Custom Tune for His BMW 335i

TikTok creator wyattwebsterrr might have just pulled off one of the wildest DIY tuning experiments yet. He recently bought a 2007 BMW 335i for $1,500. Of course, for that price, it wasn't perfect. It sat on 240,000 miles and needed a new transmission, which he paid just $200 for. Other than a straight-pipe exhaust, the BMW was completely stock. Then, he asked ChatGPT to write a custom tune. The result is a beater that would outrun a brand-new BMW 3 Series. Wyatt started with a simple question for ChatGPT: "Can you give me a custom tune for my 335i?" He then supplied the AI with details such as his ECU version, the fact that it has a 6-speed automatic transmission, and the type of turbos it was equipped with. In return, ChatGPT handed over a full custom tune file. Wyatt then used the MHD Tuning app to load the AI's creation straight onto the E90's ECU. Usually, this process would take hours, if not days, when working with a reputable tuner. But thanks to modern technology, it took just a few minutes. People love modifying 335i models because of the N54 engine that lives under the hood. From the factory, the twin-turbo 3.0-liter straight-six sends 300 hp and 300 lb-ft of torque to the rear wheels. Although Wyatt has yet to release all the power figures, he posted a TikTok showing the tuned 335i's new driving experience. Boost pressure jumped to 19.3 psi. The exhaust, once relatively tame, now delivered loud burbles and pops that were impossible to ignore. The rear tyres broke traction much easier than before, and the BMW's 0 to 60 mph time dropped to just 5.17 seconds. That's a full second quicker than before, thanks to a tune written entirely by an AI. Professional tuners spend years learning how to safely squeeze more performance out of an engine, while accounting for wear and tear and long-term reliability. While ChatGPT might be able to make a high-mileage BMW faster, there's always the risk of something breaking. Still, for a cheap 335i and a viral TikTok clip, it is hard to argue that this wasn't worth the gamble. Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store