&w=3840&q=100)
Who was Eli Cohen? Israel recovers items of legendary spy, 60 years after his execution in Syria
In this undated photo released by the Israeli Prime Minister's Office, identity documents of Eli Cohen are displayed. AP
Some 2,500 items, including personal belongings and documents, of famous Israeli spy, Eli Cohen, have been recovered by Israel from Syria. The Israeli Prime Minister's Office made the announcement on Sunday, which marks the 60th anniversary of Cohen's execution in Damascus in May 1965.
According to the PM's office, these items form the entirety of the Syrian records linked to Eli Cohen. He was one of Israel's most famous spies who infiltrated the political echelon in Syria.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'We conducted a special operation by the Mossad, by the State of Israel, to bring his (Eli Cohen's) archive, which had been in the safes of the Syrian intelligence for 60 years,' Netanyahu told Nadia Cohen, Eli Cohen's wife, on Sunday in Jerusalem.
Here is all you need to know about the spy and the operation.
Who was Eli Cohen?
Eli Cohen, an intelligence operative for Israel, carried out a deep-infiltration mission in Syria during the 1960s, an operation widely regarded as one of the most extraordinary instances of espionage in modern history.
Born in Egypt in 1924 to parents of Jewish faith, Cohen was expelled from the country at the end of the 1956 War, when Israel occupied the Sinai. He subsequently immigrated to Israel in 1957, according to the Jewish Virtual Library.
At 29, he offered to join the Israeli Intelligence Services but was turned down twice. However, he was placed in a reserve Israeli Air Force formation as a logistics clerk. He took up an accounting job later.
However, in 1960, the Israeli intelligence was ready to take a look at him again. This was a time when tensions along the border with Syria were rising. Possessing knowledge of the Arabic language and a profound understanding of Middle Eastern culture, Cohen would be an asset.
At first, he turned down the opportunity. However, when he lost his accounting job and the intelligence approached him for the second time, he said yes.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
He underwent extensive training, from high-speed evasive driving techniques to weapons use and sabotage. His most challenging task was to learn the intricate and unmistakable phonetic tune of Syrian Arabic, says the article on Jewish Virtual Library.
A new identity was created for Cohen. He was Kamal Amin Ta'abet (also called Tabas in some sources), who was born in Beirut, Lebanon, to Syrian Muslim parents.
In early 1961, Chaim Herzog, chief of military intelligence, who later went on to become the president of Israel, signed the document authorising Cohen's use as a spy.
Why was Eli Cohen sent to Syria?
Cohen posed as a wealthy Arab businessman returning from Argentina to invest in Syria under his new alias Ta'abet. He quickly gained access to Syria's political and military elite through charm, generosity and patriotism, ultimately rising to become a top adviser to Syria's defence minister. He provided invaluable intelligence to Israel, including details about military installations, troop movements and even future attack plans.
Cohen's most renowned contribution to Israeli intelligence was the relay of detailed information concerning Syrian military fortifications situated on the Golan Heights . The exceptional precision of the intelligence he provided played a critical and instrumental role in Israel's swift and decisive military victory during the Six-Day War of 1967.
Elie Cohen, far left, head of an Israeli spy ring, listens as he is sentenced to death by a special military court in Damascus, Syria, May 8, 1965. AP
However, in a tragic turn of events, Cohen's cover was blown when Syrian counterintelligence detected unusual radio transmissions. He was caught sharing information with Israel in 1965. Following his arrest, he was subjected to torture and brought to trial. Despite numerous international appeals for clemency, Cohen was publicly executed by hanging in Damascus on May 18, 1965.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
His remains have yet to be returned to Israel, where he is regarded as a national hero.
What belongings has the Israeli government brought back?
On Sunday, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu shared some of the 2,500 items from the Syrian archive relating to Eli Cohen with his widow.
The items include his passport, documents, recordings, photographs and materials gathered by Syrian intelligence following his capture in January 1965, handwritten correspondence to his family residing in Israel, photographic documentation of his activities during his operational mission in Syria and personal effects confiscated from his residence after his apprehension.
Furthermore, the collection features numerous personal belongings of Cohen, notably the keys to his apartment in Damascus, which were confiscated by Syrian intelligence at the time of his arrest.
Cohen's original will, drafted just hours before he was hanged, was also recovered, reported the Times of Israel, quoting the Prime Minister's Office.
Mossad Chief David Barnea indicated that the retrieval of the archive constitutes 'another step in advancing the investigation to locate the burial place of our man in Damascus.' He further stated, 'We will continue to work to locate and return all the missing, the fallen, and the kidnapped.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The PMO attributed the success of the operation to decades-long efforts by the Mossad 'to locate every piece of information about Eli Cohen in an attempt to shed light on his fate and burial place', the report said.
Ahead of viewing the items, Nadia Cohen told Netanyahu that the most important thing was to bring back Cohen's body. Netanyahu said Israel was continuing to work on locating Cohen's body.
'Eli is an Israeli legend. He's the greatest agent Israeli intelligence has had in the years the state has existed. There was no one like him,' Netanyahu said.
With inputs from AP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
9 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Trump administration wants to end U.N. peacekeeping in Lebanon; Europe pushing back
The future of U.N. peacekeepers in Lebanon has split the United States and its European allies, raising implications for security in the Middle East and becoming the latest snag to vex relations between the U.S. and key partners like France, Britain and Italy. At issue is the peacekeeping operation known as UNIFIL, whose mandate expires at the end of August and will need to be renewed by the U.N. Security Council to continue. It was created to oversee the withdrawal of Israeli troops from southern Lebanon after Israel's 1978 invasion, and its mission was expanded following the month-long 2006 war between Israel and the militant group Hezbollah. The multinational force has played a significant role in monitoring the security situation in southern Lebanon for decades, including during the Israel-Hezbollah war last year, but has drawn criticism from both sides and numerous U.S. lawmakers, some of whom now hold prominent roles in President Donald Trump's administration or wield new influence with the White House. Trump administration political appointees came into office this year with the aim of shutting down UNIFIL as soon as possible. They regard the operation as an ineffectual waste of money that is merely delaying the goal of eliminating Hezbollah's influence and restoring full security control to the Lebanese Armed Forces that the government says it is not yet capable of doing. After securing major cuts in U.S. funding to the peacekeeping force, Secretary of State Marco Rubio signed off early last week on a plan that would wind down and end UNIFIL in the next six months, according to Trump administration officials and congressional aides familiar with the discussions. It's another step as the Trump administration drastically pares back its foreign affairs priorities and budget, including expressing scepticism of international alliances and cutting funding to U.N. agencies and missions. The transatlantic divide also has been apparent on issues ranging from Israel's war against Hamas in Gaza and the Russia-Ukraine conflict to trade, technology and free speech issues. Europeans push back against a quick end to U.N. peacekeeping in Lebanon Israel has for years sought an end to UNIFIL's mandate, and renewal votes have often come after weeks of political wrangling. Now, the stakes are particularly high after last year's war and more vigorous opposition in Washington. European nations, notably France and Italy, have objected to winding down UNIFIL. With the support of Tom Barrack, U.S. ambassador to Turkiye and envoy to Lebanon, they successfully lobbied Rubio and others to support a one-year extension of the peacekeeping mandate followed by a time-certain wind-down period of six months, according to the administration officials and congressional aides, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss private diplomatic negotiations. Israel also reluctantly agreed to an extension, they said. The European argument was that prematurely ending UNIFIL before the Lebanese army is able to fully secure the border area would create a vacuum that Hezbollah could easily exploit. The French noted that when a U.N. peacekeeping mission in Mali was terminated before government troops were ready to deal with security threats, Islamic extremists moved in. With the U.S. easing off, the issue ahead of the U.N. vote expected at the end of August now appears to be resistance by France and others to setting a firm deadline for the operation to end after the one-year extension, according to the officials and congressional aides. French officials did not respond to requests for comment The final French draft resolution, obtained by The Associated Press, does not include a date for UNIFIL's withdrawal, which U.S. officials say is required for their support. Instead, it would extend the peacekeeping mission for one year and indicates the U.N. Security Council's 'intention to work on a withdrawal.' But even if the mandate is renewed, the peacekeeping mission might be scaled down for financial reasons, with the U.N. system likely facing drastic budget cuts, said a U.N. official, who was not authorised to comment to the media and spoke on condition of anonymity. One of the U.S. officials said an option being considered was reducing UNIFIL's numbers while boosting its technological means to monitor the situation on the ground. The peacekeeping force has faced criticism There are about 10,000 peacekeepers in southern Lebanon, while the Lebanese army has around 6,000 soldiers, a number that is supposed to increase to 10,000. Hezbollah supporters in Lebanon have frequently accused the U.N. mission of collusion with Israel and sometimes attacked peacekeepers on patrol. Israel, meanwhile, has accused the peacekeepers of turning a blind eye to Hezbollah's military activities in southern Lebanon and lobbied for its mandate to end. Sarit Zehavi, a former Israeli military intelligence analyst and founder of the Israeli think tank Alma Research and Education Center, said UNIFIL has played a 'damaging role with regard to the mission of disarming Hezbollah in south Lebanon.' She pointed to the discovery of Hezbollah tunnels and weapons caches close to UNIFIL facilities during and after last year's Israel-Hezbollah war, when much of the militant group's senior leadership was killed and much of its arsenal destroyed. Hezbollah is now under increasing pressure to give up the rest of its weapons. U.N. spokesman Stephane Dujarric said UNIFIL continues to discover unauthorised weapons, including rocket launchers, mortar rounds and bomb fuses, this week, which it reported to the Lebanese army. Under the U.S.- and France-brokered ceasefire, Israel and Hezbollah were to withdraw from southern Lebanon, with the Lebanese army taking control in conjunction with UNIFIL. Israel has continued to occupy five strategic points on the Lebanese side and carry out near-daily airstrikes that it says aim to stop Hezbollah from regrouping. Lebanon supports keeping U.N. peacekeepers Lebanese officials have called for UNIFIL to remain, saying the country's cash-strapped and overstretched army is not yet able to patrol the full area on its own until it. Retired Lebanese Army Gen. Khalil Helou said that if UNIFIL's mandate were to abruptly end, soldiers would need to be pulled away from the porous border with Syria, where smuggling is rife, or from other areas inside of Lebanon — 'and this could have consequences for the stability' of the country. UNIFIL 'is maybe not fulfilling 100% what the Western powers or Israel desire. But for Lebanon, their presence is important,' he said. The United Nations also calls the peacekeepers critical to regional stability, Mr. Dujarric said. UNIFIL spokesperson Andrea Tenenti said deciding on the renewal of the mandate is the prerogative of the U.N. Security Council. 'We are here to assist the parties in implementation of the mission's mandate and we're waiting for the final decision,' he said.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
39 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Trump faces setbacks in Putin diplomacy as no ceasefire agreed at Alaska
Trump was the one who stood down, dropping his demand for a ceasefire in favour of pursuing a full peace accord a position that aligns with Putin's AP New York President Donald Trump walked into a summit with Russia's Vladimir Putin pressing for a ceasefire deal and threatening severe consequences and tough new sanctions if the Kremlin leader failed to agree to halt the fighting in Ukraine. Instead, Trump was the one who stood down, dropping his demand for a ceasefire in favour of pursuing a full peace accord a position that aligns with Putin's. After calls with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and European leaders, Trump wrote as he flew home from Friday's meeting in Alaska that it had been determined by all that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a Peace Agreement, which would end the war, and not a mere Ceasefire Agreement, which often times do not hold up. It was a dramatic reversal that laid bare the challenges of dealing with Putin, a cunning adversary, as well as the complexities of a conflict that Trump had repeatedly boasted during his campaign that he could solve within 24 hours. Trump's position after the summit with Putin Few details have emerged about what the two leaders discussed or what constituted the progress they both touted. The White House did not respond to messages seeking comment Saturday. While European leaders were relieved that Trump did not agree to a deal that ceded territory or otherwise favoured Moscow, the summit allowed Putin to reclaim his place on the world stage and may have bought Russia more time to push forward with its offensive in Ukraine. We're back to where we were before without him having gone to Alaska, said Fiona Hill, who served as Trump's senior adviser on Russia at the National Security Council during his first term, including when he last met Putin in Helsinki in 2018. In an interview, Hill argued that Trump had emerged from the meeting in a weaker position on the world stage because of his reversal. Other leaders, she said, might now look at the US president and think he's not the big guy that he thinks he is and certainly not the dealmaking genius. All the way along, Trump was convinced he has incredible forces of persuasion, she said, but he came out of the meeting without a ceasefire the one thing he had been pushing for, even after he gave the Russian leader the red carpet treatment." Trump has run up against a rock in the form of Putin, who doesn't want anything from him apart from Ukraine," she said. Democrats call for consequences for Putin At home, Democrats expressed alarm at what at times seemed like a day of deference, with Trump clapping for Putin as he walked down a red carpet during an elaborate ceremony welcoming him to US soil for the first time in a decade. The two rode together in the presidential limousine and exchanged compliments. Trump seemed to revel in particular in Putin echoing his oft-repeated assertion that Russia never would have invaded Ukraine if Trump had been in office instead of Democrat Joe Biden at the time. Before news cameras, Trump did not use the opportunity to castigate Putin for launching the largest ground invasion in Europe since World War II or human rights abuses he's been accused of committing. Instead, Putin was the one who spoke first, and invited Trump to join him in Moscow next. President Trump appears to have been played yet again by Vladimir Putin," said Democratic Sen. Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire, ranking member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. The President rolled out a red carpet and warmly greeted a murderous dictator on American soil and reports indicate he got nothing concrete in return. Enough is enough," she went on. If President Trump won't act, Congress must do so decisively by passing crushing sanctions when we return in the coming weeks. Sen. Jack Reed, a Rhode Island Democrat who is the ranking member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, said he supports diplomacy but peacemaking must be done responsibly. Instead of caving to Putin, the US should join our allies in levying tough, targeted new sanctions on Russia to intensify the economic pressure, he said. Republicans and Trump allies offer little response so far In Washington, the summit was met by little response from Trump's allies. Republican lawmakers who spoke out were largely reserved and generally called for continued talks and constructive actions from the Trump administration. Sen. Lisa Murkowski, an Alaska Republican, wrote on social media after the summit that while the press conference offered few details about their meeting" she was "cautiously optimistic about the signals that some level of progress was made." Murkowski said it was also encouraging to hear both presidents reference future meetings" but that Ukraine must be part of any negotiated settlement and must freely agree to its terms. Sen. Lindsey Graham, a South Carolina Republican and close Trump ally, offered that he was very proud of Trump for having had the face-to-face meeting and was cautiously optimistic that the war might end well before Christmas if a trilateral meeting between Trump, Zelenskyy and Putin transpires. I have all the confidence in the world that Donald Trump will make it clear to Putin this war will never start again. If it does, you're going to pay a heavy price, he said on Fox News. For some Trump allies, the very act of him meeting with Putin was success enough: conservative activist and podcaster Charlie Kirk called it a great thing. Some see a Putin win and a Trump loss But in Europe, the summit was seen as a major diplomatic coup for Putin, who has been eager to emerge from geopolitical isolation. Former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, deputy head of Russia's Security Council, praised the summit as a breakthrough in restoring high-level dialogue between Moscow and Washington, describing the talks as calm, without ultimatums and threats. Former Swedish Prime Minister Carl Bildt said the summit was a distinct win for Putin. He didn't yield an inch but was also a distinct setback for Trump. No ceasefire in sight. What the world sees is a weak and wobbling America, Bildt posted on X.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
39 minutes ago
- First Post
This Week in Explainers: Did Putin convince Trump not to slap additional tariffs on India?
United States President Donald Trump held talks with his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, in Alaska in a momentous summit in Alaska. After the meeting, Trump hinted that he may not impose additional secondary tariffs on countries purchasing Russian crude oil, which includes India. All this and more in our weekly roundup from around the globe US President Donald Trump looks on next to Russian President Vladimir Putin during a press conference following their meeting to negotiate an end to the war in Ukraine, at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, in Anchorage, Alaska. Reuters The world witnessed the much-awaited summit between United States President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on August 15. All eyes, including India's, were on the meeting as the two leaders discussed the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Pakistan has ramped up its nuclear threats against India. After the country's Army Chief Asim Munir, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and former Foreign Minister Bilawal Bhutto warned New Delhi over the suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty following the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump's announcement of additional 25 per cent tariffs on India for purchasing Russian oil stands in stark contrast to his handling of China, which is among the top buyers of crude from Russia. What explains the different treatment? Here's all this and much more in our weekly wrap from the world. 1. US President Trump hosted his Russian counterpart at the American military's Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska. This was Putin's first visit to the US in a decade, as well as the first-ever visit of a Russian leader to Alaska. Ahead of the high-stakes summit, Trump had described it as a 'feel-out' meeting and threatened Moscow with 'serious consequences' if Putin did not agree to a ceasefire. The two leaders met to find common ground to ensure a lasting ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine after a three-year-long war, albeit in the absence of President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. So what came out of it? This story explains. 2. The world was glued to the high-stakes summit, which held a special interest for India. On Friday, Donald Trump claimed that Russia lost India as one of its oil clients. But after meeting Putin, the US president indicated that he may not impose secondary tariffs on countries like India that procure crude oil from Russia. Here is what this could mean for New Delhi. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD US President Donald Trump walks to shake the hand of Russia's Vladimir Putin during a joint press conference at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska, on Friday. After a three-hour meeting, Trump said 'we didn't get there' on a Ukraine deal. AP 3. Pakistan is back at its war rhetoric against India. After Pakistan Army chief Munir's nuclear threat to India on US soil, PM Sharif and politician Bilawal Bhutto also issued warnings to New Delhi. Targeting India for pausing the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT), Sharif said that Pakistan will teach a 'lesson' to the 'enemy' that 'you will never forget.' Bilawal Bhutto also threatened India with war if New Delhi continues making changes to the decades-old pact with Islamabad. Do these threats hold weight, or are they hollow? Read our story to know more. 4. Trump has earlier publicly hit out at India for buying Russian crude oil even as trade talks continue between Washington and New Delhi. He has also imposed 25 per cent tariffs on Indian imports to the US, while threatening an additional 25 per cent levy (which he says he may now reconsider). The discussions to reach a bilateral trade agreement have hit a stalemate over India's reluctance to open its markets to US agriculture and dairy products. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Moreover, the US president has not attacked China, similarly, for purchasing Russian oil. Instead, this week, he granted a 90-day extension to the existing tariff pause between Washington and Beijing. What's behind Trump's starkly different approaches toward two of America's largest trading partners? We explain here. 5. Israel killed Al Jazeera correspondent Anas al-Sharif, along with four other journalists, while they were resting inside a tent for the press outside Al-Shifa Hospital's main gate in Gaza. Al Jazeera journalist Anas Al Sharif was killed by a targeted Israeli airstrike. Image Courtesy: Al Jazeera/X After the strike, the Israeli military claimed Anas was a 'terrorist' and 'served as the head of a terrorist cell in Hamas'. Al Jazeera vehemently rejected these claims, calling their reporter 'one of Gaza's bravest journalists.' So, was he a 'terrorist' or a journalist? Here's our story. 6. The young, unemployed people in China are paying to pretend to have jobs. Like any regular worker, they get up in the morning, dress up and leave for their 'offices'. However, no one is paying them, and they don't have to produce any results. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD There has been a rise in companies offering a 'pretend to work' service in China. Some say they prefer this popular trend to being stuck at home until they get a job. However, others have called it 'escapism'. Why are the young, jobless Chinese paying to pretend to be employed? We take a look here. 7. A video has gone viral on social media of a killer whale purportedly attacking and killing a marine trainer named Jessica Radcliffe during a live show. The incident sparked a flood of reactions online, with netizens expressing shock, outrage, and grief. I have jessica radcliffe video orca, jessica radcliffe orca attack video, video jessica accident orque!! 6 minutes video 👇 — Burhan Khizer (@MeerKp20450) August 11, 2025 STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD However, here's the twist: none of it was real. The video was all an elaborate hoax. Read our story to find out the truth behind the viral clip. This is all we have for you this week. If you like how we explain the news, you can bookmark this page to stay informed.
