CLAT 2025 UG result to be revised on court orders, fresh list in 4 weeks
The CLAT UG 2025 results are set for a revision. On Wednesday, the Delhi High Court directed the Consortium of National Law Universities (CNLUs) to revise the CLAT UG 2025 marksheets and release a new merit list within four weeks.The ruling came after a series of petitions flagged errors in the CLAT UG 2025 question paper, which was held on December 1, 2024, with results announced on December 7.advertisementCOURT ACCEPTS SOME OBJECTIONS FROM STUDENTSA bench of Chief Justice DK Upadhyaya and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela accepted certain objections raised by the petitioners but rejected others. A detailed order explaining the decision is still awaited.
The matter was first heard on April 9, where the court listened to both the students' lawyers and CNLU representatives. After wrapping up the hearing, the court reserved its order -- which has now resulted in this directive for a fresh result.CLAT PG OBJECTIONS STILL PENDINGWhile this ruling concerns the undergraduate results, the court has not yet taken up petitions related to CLAT PG 2025. Those challenges are still pending.Earlier this year, multiple students had filed pleas across different high courts, pointing out that several questions were incorrect in the exam. The Supreme Court later moved all the cases to Delhi High Court to ensure a uniform decision.advertisementCLAT is the gateway for admission into five-year LLB and LLM programmes at National Law Universities (NLUs) across India. Students affected by the current verdict can expect a new list within four weeks, as per the court's order.(With PTI inputs)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
Encroachers can't claim right to continue occupying public land: Delhi High Court
The Delhi High Court has held that encroachers cannot claim a right to continue occupying public land till their rehabilitation claims are not resolved, as this would unduly impede public projects. The high court made the observation while granting liberty to the DDA to proceed with the demolition action at Bhoomiheen Camp in South Delhi's Kalkaji in accordance with law. Justice Dharmesh Sharma said the writ petitions were not only flawed due to the misjoinder of multiple parties with multiple causes of action, but also failed to meet the essential threshold provided by the Delhi Slum and JJ Rehabilitation and Relocation Policy for being considered eligible for relocation and rehabilitation. "None of the petitioners have any legal right to continue occupying the JJ cluster incessantly, to the detriment of the public at large," the court said in its order passed on June 6. The court passed the judgment on a batch of petitions, involving around 1,200 people, seeking direction to the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) to suspend any further demolition activity, maintain the status quo at the site, and refrain from physically evicting the petitioners from their respective 'jhuggi jhopri' clusters. Live Events The petitioners also sought a direction to the DUSIB to conduct a proper and comprehensive survey of the affected residents and rehabilitate them in accordance with the 2015 policy. The high court said there can be no gainsaying that the petitioners have no vested right to seek rehabilitation, as it is not an absolute constitutional entitlement available to encroachers such as themselves. "The right to rehabilitation arises solely from the prevailing policy that binds them. The determination of eligibility for rehabilitation is a separate process from the removal of encroachers from public land. "Encroachers cannot claim a right to continue occupying public land pending the resolution of their rehabilitation claims under the applicable policy, as this would unduly impede public projects," it said. The court, however, allowed rehabilitation of some of them and directed the DDA to allocate the EWS category flats. The nearly three-decades-old slum cluster at Bhoomiheen Camp was home to migrants from Uttar Pradesh , Bihar, and West Bengal , among others.
News18
43 minutes ago
- News18
Encroachers can't claim right to continue occupying public land: Delhi HC
New Delhi, Jun 8 (PTI) The Delhi High Court has held that encroachers cannot claim a right to continue occupying public land till their rehabilitation claims are not resolved, as this would unduly impede public projects. The high court made the observation while granting liberty to the DDA to proceed with the demolition action at Bhoomiheen Camp in South Delhi's Kalkaji in accordance with law. Justice Dharmesh Sharma said the writ petitions were not only flawed due to the misjoinder of multiple parties with multiple causes of action, but also failed to meet the essential threshold provided by the Delhi Slum and JJ Rehabilitation and Relocation Policy for being considered eligible for relocation and rehabilitation. 'None of the petitioners have any legal right to continue occupying the JJ cluster incessantly, to the detriment of the public at large," the court said in its order passed on June 6. The court passed the judgment on a batch of petitions, involving around 1,200 people, seeking direction to the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) to suspend any further demolition activity, maintain the status quo at the site, and refrain from physically evicting the petitioners from their respective 'jhuggi jhopri' clusters. The petitioners also sought a direction to the DUSIB to conduct a proper and comprehensive survey of the affected residents and rehabilitate them in accordance with the 2015 policy. The high court said there can be no gainsaying that the petitioners have no vested right to seek rehabilitation, as it is not an absolute constitutional entitlement available to encroachers such as themselves. 'The right to rehabilitation arises solely from the prevailing policy that binds them. The determination of eligibility for rehabilitation is a separate process from the removal of encroachers from public land. 'Encroachers cannot claim a right to continue occupying public land pending the resolution of their rehabilitation claims under the applicable policy, as this would unduly impede public projects," it said. The court, however, allowed rehabilitation of some of them and directed the DDA to allocate the EWS category flats. The nearly three-decades-old slum cluster at Bhoomiheen Camp was home to migrants from Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, and West Bengal, among others. PTI SKV RHL First Published: June 08, 2025, 15:00 IST
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Encroachers can't claim right to continue occupying public land: Delhi HC
New Delhi, The Delhi High Court has held that encroachers cannot claim a right to continue occupying public land till their rehabilitation claims are not resolved, as this would unduly impede public projects. The high court made the observation while granting liberty to the DDA to proceed with the demolition action at Bhoomiheen Camp in South Delhi's Kalkaji in accordance with law. Justice Dharmesh Sharma said the writ petitions were not only flawed due to the misjoinder of multiple parties with multiple causes of action, but also failed to meet the essential threshold provided by the Delhi Slum and JJ Rehabilitation and Relocation Policy for being considered eligible for relocation and rehabilitation. "None of the petitioners have any legal right to continue occupying the JJ cluster incessantly, to the detriment of the public at large," the court said in its order passed on June 6. The court passed the judgment on a batch of petitions, involving around 1,200 people, seeking direction to the Delhi Development Authority to suspend any further demolition activity, maintain the status quo at the site, and refrain from physically evicting the petitioners from their respective 'jhuggi jhopri' clusters. The petitioners also sought a direction to the DUSIB to conduct a proper and comprehensive survey of the affected residents and rehabilitate them in accordance with the 2015 policy. The high court said there can be no gainsaying that the petitioners have no vested right to seek rehabilitation, as it is not an absolute constitutional entitlement available to encroachers such as themselves. "The right to rehabilitation arises solely from the prevailing policy that binds them. The determination of eligibility for rehabilitation is a separate process from the removal of encroachers from public land. "Encroachers cannot claim a right to continue occupying public land pending the resolution of their rehabilitation claims under the applicable policy, as this would unduly impede public projects," it said. The court, however, allowed rehabilitation of some of them and directed the DDA to allocate the EWS category flats. The nearly three-decades-old slum cluster at Bhoomiheen Camp was home to migrants from Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, and West Bengal, among others.
