Trump Officials Give Harvard 30 Days to Rebut Foreign Student Ban
The Trump administration has given Harvard 30 days to respond with evidence showing why the administration should not make good on its threat to bar it from enrolling international students, according to a notice that was filed in federal court ahead of a hearing on Thursday.
A judge had already temporarily stopped the federal government from cutting off international students from Harvard, and the sides were taking part in a hearing on Thursday morning in an Boston courtroom after Harvard asked for an extension.
The administration's filing appears to be a legal maneuver to delay, if not change, the ultimate outcome in the case. Any halt to the admission of international students threatens to rock Harvard, where international students make up about a quarter of the student body.
The filing appeared to address a procedural claim that the administration had not followed the proper method of notification when it abruptly announced it would bar Harvard from a program that allows it to admit international students, said David Super, an administrative law expert at Georgetown University. 'An obvious violation like this procedural one is going to be a simple way for the court to rule against the government, and the government wanted to remove that,' he said.
But the 30-day delay does little to address the core questions in the case, on which the judge may ultimately have to rule.
The Trump administration has sought extensive documentation from Harvard, requesting, among other things, coursework for every international student and information on any student visa holder involved in misconduct or illegal activity.
Citing Harvard's failure to fully comply, the administration moved last week to revoke its ability to host international students. It also has accused Harvard of fostering a culture of antisemitism, among other allegations.
It is now giving Harvard 30 calendar days to provide written documentation and other evidence 'to rebut the alleged grounds for withdrawal.'
International students are core to Harvard's efforts to attract global talent, and they make up an especially high share of the university's graduate programs. At the Kennedy School of Government, more than half of students are international. At the Chan School of Public Health, about 40 percent of students are international students.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
34 minutes ago
- Forbes
Senate Confirms Billy Long As The Next IRS Commissioner
WASHINGTON, DC - MAY 20: Former Rep. Billy Long (R-MO), U.S. President Donald Trump's nominee to be Internal Revenue Service Commissioner, speaks during a Senate Finance Committee nomination hearing on Capitol Hill on May 20, 2025 in Washington, DC. (Photo by) Getty Images The Senate has confirmed former U.S. Representative Billy Long of Missouri as the next commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). The vote was 53-44 along party lines, with all Republicans in the Senate voting yes—all of the no votes came from Democrats. The vote puts a period on a process that had grown contentious at times. President Donald Trump announced Long's nomination in December of 2024, even though Danny Werfel was then serving a term as IRS Commissioner that would normally run until late in 2027. Werfel subsequently announced his resignation, effective January 20, 2025. Since Long had not yet been confirmed at that time, Werfel was replaced by Doug O'Donnell, who had served as Acting Commissioner following Werfel's departure. O'Donnell left his position on February 28, 2025 and was replaced by then IRS Chief Operating Officer Melanie Krause. Krause announced her departure in April 2025, following the tax agency's agreement to share immigrant tax data with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Michael Faulkender joined the revolving doors at the IRS as the Acting Commissioner on April 18, 2025—he has been in the position since that time. Long will now officially take the reins at the tax agency. Long does not have any formal training in tax, law, or accounting, does not have a college degree, and never served in Congress on a tax writing committee. He dropped out of the University of Missouri before returning to school—this time, to an auction training program at the Missouri Auction School. He was told, he explained to Auctioneer Magazine, that it was the "Harvard of auctioneering schools.' There, he earned his Certified Auctioneer designation. Once he made the career switch to auctioneering, Long says he averaged about 200 auctions per year for 20 years. Today, he is in the National Auction Association Hall of Fame. In 2010, Long was elected as the U.S. Representative of Missouri's 7th Congressional District, serving until 2023. He subsequently ran for the U.S. Senate in 2022 but lost in the Republican primary. While in the House, Long served on the Committee on Energy and Commerce, the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, the Committee on Homeland Security, and the Republican Steering Committee. He did not serve on any tax or finance committees. However, he was awarded the "Tax Fighter Award" by the National Tax Limitation Committee (the organization appears to no longer exist—its former website now points to a Thai gambling site). IRS Commissioners are appointed for a five-year term that runs from the date of appointment (as opposed to the date of Senate confirmation). Before Trump's announcement, Werfel had previously indicated that he intended to serve out his term, which was slated to expire in 2027. Before Werfel, Charles Rettig, a tax lawyer and Trump appointee, served as Commissioner. Rettig left office on November 12, 2022, at the end of his term, which began on October 1, 2018, after he was confirmed. Long was confirmed despite concerns about his ties to companies that promoted controversial tax credits, including a nonexistent 'tribal tax credit and the employee retention tax credit (ERC). Senator Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), the Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Committee on Finance, pulled no punches at Long's May 20 confirmation hearing, saying, 'Congressman Long's experience with tax issues came after he left Congress, when he dove headlong into the tax scam industry.' Democrats also expressed concern that Long might allow political interference from the White House at the tax agency, an issue that has been in the spotlight more since Trump threatened to revoke Harvard University's tax-exempt status. Long has reposted social media posts critical of Harvard, Columbia, and other tax-exempt organizations. When questioned about the issue by Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Long initially suggested that he would seek legal advice to determine whether it would be appropriate for the president to direct the IRS to conduct an investigation or audit. Long replied, 'I'm gonna follow the law, and if that's the law, yes.' Warren confirmed that it was the law, reading aloud part of the statute (Section 7217), which she had sent to him in advance. Since Long is serving out the remainder of Werfel's term, he is expected to serve through November 12, 2027.
New York Times
35 minutes ago
- New York Times
What's the Deal? Nippon's Bid for U.S. Steel Becomes Merger Mystery.
The mystery around a $14 billion deal between U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel continued to deepen, as President Donald Trump said this week that the United States would have a 'golden share' in the iconic American metal manufacturer, a move that would potentially give the federal government an unusually substantial amount of control over corporate decisions. 'We have a golden stock. We have a golden share, which I control, or the president controls,' Trump told reporters in the East Room of the White House on Thursday. 'Now I'm a little concerned, whoever the President might be, but that gives you total control.' The comments, which echo those made last month by a Republican Senator in U.S. Steel's home state of Pennsylvania, suggest that Mr. Trump is insisting on having expansive influence over the steel company as a condition for allowing the deal to close. Yet details of how a 'golden share' would work remain murky, as U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel scramble to finalize their deal, which Mr. Trump announced in a surprise social media post last month. Neither Mr. Trump, nor the companies, have confirmed whether the deal is a takeover of U.S. Steel by Nippon, a partnership between the two companies or some new form of government-backed venture. Last week, the powerful United Steelworkers union, which had long opposed a sale to Nippon, sent an information request to U.S. Steel, pushing for more information about the deal. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Fox News
35 minutes ago
- Fox News
DAVID MARCUS: Noem, Padilla and the scary message Democrats are sending to supporters
Everyone, myself included, who was watching Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem's Los Angeles press conference live on Thursday afternoon saw the same thing. What appeared to be some kind of lunatic agitator started advancing and yelling at her and was removed by her security detail. This is precisely what happened. And, to the naked eye, it looked like an example of Code Pink activism, but the man, in this case, was Democrat and California Sen. Alex Padilla. The senator and many of his Democratic colleagues in the upper house are now blatantly lying about this incident that is as clear as the summer sun, and it couldn't be more shameful. Padilla claims that he was standing in the room as Noem spoke and that he got angry at her statements about California's leadership, then he falsely claims he introduced himself as a U.S. Senator before attempting to ask a question. The video, and the accounts of everyone in the room, show that Padilla is just flat out lying about this. There is no question that he moved towards Noem, while yelling a question, and did not identify himself until the Secret Service were already removing him. This has led to quite plausible speculation that Padilla was intentionally trying to make a scene, a made-for-TV moment that his staff could film of him being manhandled, but as bad as that is, it's not the worst part of this. The worst part is the position he put law enforcement in. Imagine being Noem's detail. The first thing you hear them say is "Hands up, Hands up," because they had no idea if Padilla was armed. Let's not forget the very federal building where this happened had been under attack for days. What were they supposed to do? Were they supposed to say to themselves, we better not act? Maybe this is a U.S. senator nobody told us would be here? It's completely ridiculous. And this is not the first time that Congressional Democrats have menaced cops, just last month three Democrat House members stormed an ICE facility in Newark, New Jersey, also starting a physical altercation with police. In fact, Democrat Rep. LaMonica McIver is facing charges for the incident. It must be forcefully stated that it is never OK to antagonize law enforcement, much less put hands on them, especially for sitting members of Congress. Those officers are there to keep the peace, not to chaperone cringeworthy political theater. It is truly disgusting to watch these Democrats throw good law enforcement officers under the bus for finishing fights that these political clowns started. They really just don't seem to care who they smear in their pursuit of power. Thankfully, the Trump administration has the backs of these good cops. FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino posted to X, "With regard to the incident in LA this afternoon, the Senator in question was not wearing a security pin and physically resisted law enforcement when confronted. Our FBI personnel acted completely appropriately while assisting Secret Service and we are grateful for their professionalism and service." Likewise, with almost no exceptions, Republican lawmakers have condemned Padilla's dangerous PR stunt, as well they should. Democrats in Congress are sending a message to their supporters that it is OK to resist and even assault law enforcement if your cause is really, really important. If they don't stop it's going to get people killed. At the very least, Padilla owes an apology to the cops he harassed on Thursday. There is no excuse for it, no matter how angry he was, and honestly, the Senate should seriously consider censure. This despicable incident comes out of a playbook we have seen before. When border patrol agents were erroneously accused of whipping Haitian migrants a few years back, it was obvious in minutes that they had not whipped anybody, but that didn't stop the Democrats from making outlandish claims. For months these innocent agents were called racists by top Democrats, including Noem's predecessor, then-Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas. They never got an apology. And neither will the officers who Padilla abused yesterday. It is obvious why some Democrats might think that sowing chaos in our nation right now will help them politically, but they are quite literally playing with fire, as the anti-ICE riots in LA this week have shown. The lying Democrats in the Senate want people to believe that Secret Service thugs attacked a senator for no good reason, that this is a clear sign we have plunged into authoritarianism, that it is cause to take to the streets! But it's all a disgraceful lie. Americans have eyes and aren't stupid. They will watch this video and know Padilla was squarely in the wrong, and hopefully, Democrats can get it through their thick skulls that they need to stop attacking police.
