With Military Strike His Predecessors Avoided, Trump Takes a Huge Gamble
Over the past two decades, the United States has used sanctions, sabotage, cyberattacks and diplomatic negotiations to try to slow Iran's long march to a nuclear weapon.
At roughly 2:30 a.m. Sunday in Iran, President Trump unleashed a show of raw military might that each of his last four predecessors had deliberately avoided, for fear of plunging the United States into war in the Middle East.
After days of declaring that he could not take the risk that the mullahs and generals of Tehran who had survived Israel's strikes would make a final leap to a nuclear weapon, he ordered a fleet of B-2 bombers halfway around the world to drop the most powerful conventional bombs on the most critical sites in Iran's vast nuclear complexes.
The prime target was the deeply buried enrichment center at Fordo, which Israel was incapable of reaching.
For Mr. Trump, the decision to attack the nuclear infrastructure of a hostile nation represents the biggest — and potentially most dangerous — gamble of his second term.
He is betting that the United States can repel whatever retaliation Iran's leadership orders against more than 40,000 American troops spread over bases throughout the region. All are within range of Tehran's missile fleet, even after eight days of relentless attacks by Israel. And he is betting that he can deter a vastly debilitated Iran from using its familiar techniques — terrorism, hostage-taking and cyberattacks — as a more indirect line of attack to wreak revenge.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
20 minutes ago
Israel-Iran live updates: US attack 'outrageous,' Tehran says, vowing response
The United States struck three nuclear sites in Iran on Saturday, President Donald Trump announced. B-2 bombers dropped a number of Massive Ordnance Penetrator bombs -- known as "bunker busters" -- during the U.S. mission over Iran, a U.S. official confirmed. A number of Tomahawk cruise missiles were also fired at targets inside Iran from a U.S. Navy submarine, the official confirmed. Following the strikes, Trump addressed the nation, calling it a "spectacular military success." Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth will speak from the Pentagon at 8 a.m. on Sunday.
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why Trump's Decision To Bomb Iran Is A Personal Blow For Keir Starmer
Keir Starmer's response to Donald Trump's decision to bomb Iran was predictably diplomatic. 'Iran's nuclear programme is a grave threat to international security,' the prime minister said. 'Iran can never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon and the US has taken action to alleviate that threat. 'The situation in the Middle East remains volatile and stability in the region is a priority. We call on Iran to return to the negotiating table and reach a diplomatic solution to end this crisis.' But there is no doubt that the US air strikes are a personal blow, if not a humiliation, for the prime minister. Just three days ago, with speculation rife that Trump was preparing to give the green light to military action, a spokesman for Starmer urged the president to step back from the brink. 'Clearly de-escalation is the priority, and we would not want to see anything that ramps up the situation. 'That is our priority. We have been clear on that for a number of days now. De-escalation remains this government's priority.' Clearly, those pleas from No.10 fell on deaf ears. The US strikes also call into question Starmer's judgment, given the assessment he made of the crisis in the Middle East while at the G7 summit in Canada. Trump stunned the world by leaving the gathering a day early, triggering fresh speculation that American involvement in Israel's bombardment of Iran was imminent. The president also demanded Iran's 'unconditional surrender' and urged Tehran's 10 million residents to evacuate the city. But despite all of the evidence to the contrary, Starmer insisted that military action was not on Trump's mind. 'I don't think you should read into that that an American attack is imminent,' the PM told Sky News political editor Beth Rigby. That analysis has proved to be spectacularly wrong. As Starmer makes a forlorn call for 'stability' in the region, it is hard to escape the conclusion that the UK government is a helpless bystander to the rapidly unfolding crisis. 'Stability Is A Priority': Keir Starmer Responds To Trump's Strikes On Iran Donald Trump Confirms US Launched Strikes Against Iran In Major Escalation Of Middle Eastern War Iran-Israel Conflict: How The UK Could Become A 'Target' If It Helps America With The War
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Iran strikes mark Trump's biggest foreign policy gamble
With his unprecedented decision to bomb Iran's nuclear sites, directly joining Israel's air attack on its regional arch-foe, US President Donald Trump has done something he'd long vowed to avoid - intervene militarily in a major foreign war. The dramatic US strike, including the targeting of Iran's most heavily fortified nuclear installation deep underground, marks the biggest foreign policy gamble of Trump's two presidencies and one fraught with risks and unknowns. Trump insisted on Saturday that Iran must now make peace or face further attacks. But the strikes could provoke Tehran into retaliating by closing the Strait of Hormuz, the world's most important oil artery, attacking US military bases and allies in the Middle East, stepping up its missile barrage on Israel and activating proxy groups against US and Israeli interests worldwide, analysts said. Such moves evoke echoes of the "forever wars" the US fought in Iraq and Afghanistan, which Trump had derided as "stupid" and promised never to be dragged into. In the lead-up to the bombing, the US President had vacillated between threats of military action and appeals for renewed negotiation to persuade Iran to reach a deal to dismantle its nuclear program. A senior White House official said that once Trump was convinced that Tehran had no interest in reaching a nuclear agreement, he decided the strikes were "the right thing to do." Trump gave the go-ahead once he was assured of a "high probability of success," more than a week of Israeli air attacks on Iran's nuclear and military facilities had paved the way. But some experts suggested that while Iran's nuclear program may have been set back for many years, the threat may be far from over. Iran denies seeking a nuclear weapon, saying its program is for purely peaceful purposes. "In the long term, military action is likely to push Iran to determine nuclear weapons are necessary for deterrence and that Washington is not interested in diplomacy," the Arms Control Association, a non-partisan US-based organisation that advocates for arms control legislation, said in a statement. In the immediate aftermath of the US strikes, Iran showed little appetite for concessions. Iran's Atomic Energy Organisation said it would not allow development of its "national industry" to be stopped, and an Iranian state television commentator said every US citizen or military member in the region would now be legitimate targets. Some analysts suggested that Trump, whose administration has previously disavowed any aim of dislodging the Iranian leadership, could be drawn into seeking "regime change" if Tehran carries out major reprisals or moves to build a nuclear weapon. "Beware mission creep, aiming for regime change and democratisation campaigns," said Laura Blumenfeld, a Middle East analyst at the Johns Hopkins School for Advanced International Studies in Washington. "You'll find the bones of many failed US moral missions buried in Middle East sands." Jonathan Panikoff, a former US deputy intelligence officer for the Middle East, said Iran's leadership would quickly engage in "disproportionate attacks" if it felt its survival was imperilled. But Tehran will also have to be mindful of the consequences, he said. While actions such as closing the Strait of Hormuz would pose problems for Trump with the resulting higher oil prices and potential US inflationary impact, it would also hurt China, one of Iran's few powerful allies. At the same time, Trump is already facing strong push-back from congressional Democrats against the Iran attack and will also have to contend with opposition from the anti-interventionist wing of his Republican MAGA base. Trump's slogan of "peace through strength" will certainly be tested as never before, especially with his opening of a new military front after failing to meet his campaign promises to quickly end wars in Ukraine and Gaza.
