What you need to know about Labor's new super tax
Currently, earnings from super in the accumulation phase (the time when people are still working and contributing to their balance) are taxed at a discounted rate of up to 15 per cent. This will be unchanged for superannuation accounts with balances of less than $3 million.
But people with superannuation funds of more than $3 million will face an additional 15 per cent tax on any investment returns (including interest, dividends or capital gains) they earn on the amount above this threshold.
For example, someone with a $3.5 million super balance will continue to be taxed the discounted rate of 15 per cent on everything they earn on the first $3 million of their balance. Investment returns on the additional $500,000 will be taxed at 30 per cent.
What are unrealised gains?
A controversial element of Labor's tax reform is that the super tax would also apply to 'unrealised gains', which refers to the growth in the value of an asset or investment that an investor holds but hasn't yet cashed in.
Loading
For example, an investor could hold property or shares that increase (and decrease) in value over time. However, unless they sell these assets, any rise or fall in their value is seen as 'paper profits' because they have not yet been converted into cash and locked in.
Generally, earnings are not taxed until they hit your pocket. But Labor's tax on unrealised gains would mean Australians with superannuation balances of more than $3 million – while relatively wealthy – would receive a tax bill even if they hadn't actually earned any income (potentially forcing them to sell assets to pay that bill, and reduce the total amount of money in the nation's super pool, affecting returns for all super members).
If a person records an unrealised loss one year – where their super balance falls due, for example, to a market downturn – that unrealised loss will be used to offset the tax on earnings from their super balance in future years.
The final tax bill is generally paid directly by your super fund to the Australian Tax Office. For self-managed super funds, the tax amount is usually paid through BPAY or using a debit or credit card.
What is indexing?
Indexation of the super tax – or lack thereof – is another aspect that some people have criticised.
Indexing refers to the practice of increasing a threshold or entitlement to change in line with another measure such as inflation, wages or tax.
In the case of the super tax, Labor has not promised to tie the threshold for the 30 per cent tax rate to changes in price growth. This is a problem because $3 million this year will not have the same purchasing power as the same amount in 20 years' time.
Assuming an inflation rate of 2.5 per cent, an indexed threshold would capture funds with more than $5 million in 2045.
While the proposed tax only affects about one in 200 Australians now, it would apply to many more if not indexed. Independent MP Monique Ryan, for example, has criticised the lack of indexation, saying it means the tax could affect all of Gen Z by the time they turn 60.
What does the treasurer say?
Treasurer Jim Chalmers has stood by the new tax, first announced by Labor in early 2023.
Chalmers, speaking on a podcast with Michelle Grattan this week, maintained it was a 'modest change' that still gave concessional treatment – although slightly less so – to people with large super balances.
'This will help us fund our priorities, whether it's Medicare, the tax cuts and other priorities in our budget repair,' he said, noting he had consulted widely on the changes and that the controversial inclusion of unrealised gains was 'the best, simplest way to go about it' according to advice from Treasury.
Chalmers also said it was wrong to assume the $3 million threshold would never change.
'There are so many instances in the tax system where thresholds aren't indexed, and from time to time, governments take decisions to raise those thresholds,' he said. 'I'm anticipating that that's what would happen here.'
Who is talking about it?
Several prominent figures have chipped into the conversation around the super change: among them, former treasury secretary (and author of the Henry Tax Review) Ken Henry and former RBA governor Phil Lowe.
Loading
In an article in The Australian, Lowe said the change was not an example of good public policy design, saying the government should explore alternatives.
In the same article, Henry said the system needed to be more equitable. 'To do that, you do not need to tax unrealised capital gains,' he said, pointing to suggestions in his more-than-decade-old review.
What happens next?
Chalmers told The Conversation in a podcast that he was yet to start talks with the Senate crossbench. Labor will likely need support from the Greens to get the proposal turned into law.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

AU Financial Review
an hour ago
- AU Financial Review
Budget, ferries, AFL stadium could crash Tasmanian government
Tasmanian Premier Jeremy Rockliff has threatened to send voters back to the polls for an early election after Labor secured enough support to pass a no-confidence motion on the Liberal leader's management of the state's finances. Opposition Leader Dean Winter tabled the motion in state parliament on Wednesday morning, bringing to a head an intense political dispute about Rockliff's handling of the budget, the bungled rollout of new Spirit of Tasmania ferries, privatisation of assets and a proposed new AFL stadium.

The Age
2 hours ago
- The Age
Chalmers goes on the attack over super tax ‘lies'
Treasurer Jim Chalmers has brushed away criticism of his proposal to tax paper profits for wealthy superannuant, claiming media reporting on the issue does not indicate Australians are genuinely concerned and accusing the Coalition of lying. Since Labor's election win, scrutiny has grown on the government's plan to raise the earnings tax from July 1 on superannuation balances above $3 million from 15 per cent to 30 per cent. Labor announced the policy more than two years ago, but it has yet to go through the Senate. Chalmers pushed back at suggestions the government could win support for the change from the Liberal and National parties, saying the Coalition – which has opposed the proposal – was not serious about negotiating. 'I think we should resist the temptation to think that because overwhelmingly, two media outlets don't like this change, to assume that the concern is kind of broadly and deeply felt in the Australian community,' Chalmers said in a press conference in Canberra on Wednesday, in his firmest defence of his policy to date. Reporting on the policy, projected to about $2.7 billion per year initially, has been led by The Australian, owned by News Corp, and the Australian Financial Review, owned by this masthead's owner Nine Entertainment. Loading The most controversial element of the policy is that unrealised capital gains on assets held in super, such as property or farms, will be valued and taxed each year. The unorthodox practice has raised questions about the principle of asking superannuant to settle a tax bill for assets from which they have not yet banked an actual gain. Chalmers said tax concessions for super account holders remained generous, and claimed Coalition MPs were lying when they claimed politicians on defined benefits pension schemes, such as Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, would not be captured by the tax. He said under existing law, long-serving MPs such as Albanese could not pay for any extra tax liability out of their super until they reached pension age. But they would be charged interest on their deferred tax.

Sydney Morning Herald
2 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Chalmers goes on the attack over super tax ‘lies'
Treasurer Jim Chalmers has brushed away criticism of his proposal to tax paper profits for wealthy superannuant, claiming media reporting on the issue does not indicate Australians are genuinely concerned and accusing the Coalition of lying. Since Labor's election win, scrutiny has grown on the government's plan to raise the earnings tax from July 1 on superannuation balances above $3 million from 15 per cent to 30 per cent. Labor announced the policy more than two years ago, but it has yet to go through the Senate. Chalmers pushed back at suggestions the government could win support for the change from the Liberal and National parties, saying the Coalition – which has opposed the proposal – was not serious about negotiating. 'I think we should resist the temptation to think that because overwhelmingly, two media outlets don't like this change, to assume that the concern is kind of broadly and deeply felt in the Australian community,' Chalmers said in a press conference in Canberra on Wednesday, in his firmest defence of his policy to date. Reporting on the policy, projected to about $2.7 billion per year initially, has been led by The Australian, owned by News Corp, and the Australian Financial Review, owned by this masthead's owner Nine Entertainment. Loading The most controversial element of the policy is that unrealised capital gains on assets held in super, such as property or farms, will be valued and taxed each year. The unorthodox practice has raised questions about the principle of asking superannuant to settle a tax bill for assets from which they have not yet banked an actual gain. Chalmers said tax concessions for super account holders remained generous, and claimed Coalition MPs were lying when they claimed politicians on defined benefits pension schemes, such as Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, would not be captured by the tax. He said under existing law, long-serving MPs such as Albanese could not pay for any extra tax liability out of their super until they reached pension age. But they would be charged interest on their deferred tax.