Sault Ste. Marie Police Service recognized with national award for imposing a transparency tax on public records
"This is a transparency tax, plain and simple," said Brent Jolly, president of the Canadian Association of Journalists (CAJ). "This is a weaponization of fees to prevent people from gaining access to records. Public information should not be turned into a revenue stream by a publicly-funded body."
According to the Sault Star, the fee increase will apply to all sorts of documents, ranging from court subpoenas to officers' notes. The police board will also introduce fees for several new services, including police body-worn camera and in-car camera footage, and will charge for redactions to remove sensitive information.
Requests for information under the Municipal Freedom of Information law will incur a $15 fee for every 15 minutes of staff time. The police board said the fee increase, the first since 2011, is needed to offset increased labour costs.
"The math just doesn't add up," Jolly said. "The public is paying a dollar a minute for staff time to access information, but the staff accessing those records are paid less than a dollar per minute."
The Code of Silence Awards are presented annually by the CAJ, the Centre for Free Expression at Toronto Metropolitan University (CFE), and the Canadian Journalists for Free Expression (CJFE). The awards call public attention to government or publicly-funded agencies that work hard to hide information to which the public has a right to under access to information legislation.
Previous winners in the law enforcement category include: The Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) and the Toronto Police Service.
The law enforcement award completes this year's Code of Silence Awards program. In addition to the Sault Ste. Marie Police Service, other 'winners' in this year's program included Canada's federal government for its ongoing fight with Indigenous groups seeking access to records surrounding residential schools; Doug Ford's Ontario government; and Vancouver Coastal Health.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Global News
a minute ago
- Global News
Canadians divided on Indigenous rights in what B.C. leader calls ‘harmful' poll
A new poll has found that Canadians are divided on Indigenous rights. The poll, commissioned by the Angus Reid Institute, found that while a slight majority of Canadians feel that Indigenous Peoples have a unique status in Canada (55 per cent), and the vast majority of Indigenous-identifying individuals agree (68 per cent), others push back (45 per cent), saying Indigenous Peoples should have the same status as others living in modern Canada, including two in three Conservative party voters (68 pre cent). 'I would say, we're asking Canadians whether or not they felt to, take kind of two sides or one of two sides on a couple of different statements,' Jon Roe, research associate at the Angus Reid Institute, told Global News. 'So whether or not they believe that Indigenous Peoples have an inherently unique status or whether they should not have a special status that other Canadians have.' Story continues below advertisement The poll found that most Canadians are divided on many of the issues. Three in 10 of those polled said that the federal government is offering too much funding to First Nations communities, but the same number, 27 per cent, felt the current funding is too little. One in five, 21 per cent, of those polled said that based on what they know, the funding level is about right. 'On the issue of whether or not they should be integrating more into broader Canadian society, 45 per cent said yeah, Indigenous people should be doing that, but there are more Canadians who say that they should strengthen their own culture and traditions at 55 per cent,' Roe said. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy 'But when it comes to the idea of moving towards more independence and control of their own affairs, 40 per cent of Canadians say that, whereas 60 per cent say they want them to be Indigenous Peoples, to be governed by the same systems and rules as other Canadians.' 2:13 New poll on attitudes towards Canadian immigration Terry Teegee, Regional Chief of the British Columbia Assembly of First Nations, said he found the poll disappointing. Story continues below advertisement 'I'm not surprised that this is coming from the right and from a Conservative point of view,' he said. 'Matter of fact, I think it's creating more harm than good.' Teegee said that First Nations people lead the statistics on many social issues, including housing and addiction, and those need to be addressed. 'When you bring in a poll that looks at the funding that we receive, there's not enough information to make an informed decision by any person in the public, or whether they're Conservative or otherwise,' he said. 'There's a lot of information missing in terms of these types of polls, and it makes it look like that First Nations are really not reporting on the funding we received, that we're not doing the work that we're supposed to be doing, it's creating more harm than good. And, you know, this creates problems.' When asked whether their province is giving too much attention to Indigenous communities, an average of 24 per cent in the country said yes, but that number climbed to 37 per cent in B.C. 'It is a bit higher of people saying maybe they do spend more time here than other parts of the country,' Roe said. 3:03 Poll shows Canadians support more education on Air India bombings Teegee said there are many assumptions about Indigenous Peoples across Canada Story continues below advertisement 'I think that it's very harmful to many First Nations and Indigenous Peoples here in British Columbia because it really stokes the fire of racism in terms of looking at the First Nations here in B.C.,' he said. 'What should be addressed here is education, the understanding of many First Nations of what we experience in this day and age.' Methodology: The Angus Reid Institute conducted an online survey from July 24 – 29, 2025, among a randomized sample of 2,508 Canadian adults who are members of Angus Reid Forum. The sample was weighted to be representative of adults nationwide according to region, gender, age, household income, and education, based on the Canadian census. For comparison purposes only, a probability sample of this size would carry a margin of error of +/- 1.5 percentage points, 19 times out of 20. Discrepancies in or between totals are due to rounding. The survey was self-commissioned and paid for by ARI.
Toronto Sun
2 hours ago
- Toronto Sun
MANDEL: Hit man who killed Eddie Melo wins new parole hearing
Charles Gagné killed former boxing champ Eddie Melo and his pal Joao Pavao in Mississauga in 2001. The hit man who killed boxer Eddie Melo has won an appeal and will get a new parole hearing due to 'unfairness' — so he'll get another chance to argue the board didn't properly consider his newly-discovered Indigenous roots when they revoked his release. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account It makes Melo's daughter absolutely furious. 'It's mind-blowing, just absolutely mind-blowing,' says Jess Melo, from her home in British Columbia. 'He just found out from or something that he's 1.2% Indigenous so now he's playing that card so he can play the system some more.' Charles Gagne, 51, is serving a life sentence with no eligibility for parole for 12 years for the mob hit of her beloved dad, the former Canadian middleweight champion who turned enforcer for the Cotroni crime family. On April 6, 2001, Melo, 40, was talking to childhood friend Joao 'Johnny' Pavao, 42, outside Amici Sport Cafe in the Cliffway Plaza parking lot in Mississauga when Gagne opened fire. ' Mr. Melo tried to press the gas. I shot him twice in the head, ' he told the judge. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. With ambitions of moving up in the underworld, the longtime criminal had jumped at the $75,000 contract to kill Melo. Pavao was simply in the wrong place at the wrong time. Gagne shot both men in the head at close range — all while being on day parole for an armed robbery conviction and returning to his halfway house in Ottawa in time for curfew. Also while on parole, he shot another man in the stomach while trying to collect on a drug debt. A poster boy for reform. Originally charged with two counts of first-degree murder, the hit man was given a sweetheart deal in 2003 and allowed to plead to second-degree in 2003 in return for his — albeit unsuccessful — testimony against his co- accused Manuel 'Mike' DaSilva, who was ultimately acquitted. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Despite the best efforts of Melo's daughter, Gagne was granted day parole in 2023. It was revoked just a year later over concerns he was violating numerous conditions such as leaving his geographic boundaries, consorting with sex workers and failing to disclose he'd spent thousands of borrowed dollars on crypto investments. In January, Melo's daughter travelled to Joyceville prison where a hearing was held to determine if Gagne could return to day parole or whether the revocation should hold. 'He broke every possible condition imaginable,' says the mother of three. Jessica Melo is pictured in this supplied photo. The board found he'd misused a weekend pass to visit family to consort with a woman he hadn't reported to his probation officer, didn't disclose a very risky investment that placed him in serious debt or that he was visiting his uncle despite being prohibited from doing so. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Gagne insisted he'd learned his lesson. But he'd protested the same before being released on day parole in 2001 — when he went on to murder two people. Recommended video The board had his number and officially revoked his parole: 'You have shown yourself to be an effective and cunning manipulator of the system. You yourself admitted in past hearings to 'playing the game' and parroting back program language.' In March, Gagne appealed with a long list of complaints. The appeal division ordered a new review after finding the decision was based on new information that hadn't been disclosed to Gagne in advance. Former boxer-turned-mob-enforcer Eddie Melo is pictured in this Postmedia file photo Melo had left the January hearing believing she wouldn't have to hear from her father's killer again until late next year. Instead, she'll be flying across the country this October to present yet another victim impact statement. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. 'We're 24 years into this and I still don't get a break,' she sighs. Three weeks ago, she and her kids celebrated the birthday of the grandfather they never met — sending wishes to heaven tied to balloons. Despite his ferocity in the ring, Melo describes her dad as a gentle soul with a big heart and it kills her that her children will never know the man stolen away from all of them. So she has made a vow to his killer. 'I told him I will never stop coming for him until he's removed from an institution in a black garbage bag like the piece of trash that he is. I told him that straight to his face,' she says fiercely. 'I'm not ever going to stop.' mmandel@ Columnists Toronto & GTA Editorials Toronto & GTA Ontario
Vancouver Sun
2 hours ago
- Vancouver Sun
B.C. NDP sticking to secretive ways, if replies to complaints over shíshálh deal are any indication
VICTORIA — This time last year the New Democrats signed a secret deal with the shíshálh Nation on the Sunshine Coast, providing $104 million over five years, six square kilometres of public land and other far-reaching terms. The agreement was withheld from the public until well after Oct. 19 provincial election. When the terms were finally announced on Jan. 29 of this year, the New Democrats tried to portray the news as a mere update on an agreement from 2018. But the money, land transfer, and commitments to negotiate Aboriginal title and exclusive decision-making for the Indigenous nation went beyond the earlier terms. The 44-page text was also redacted in parts, raising suspicions. A daily roundup of Opinion pieces from the Sun and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Informed Opinion will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. Not until an online public information session on March 20 did the New Democrats acknowledge the coverup. The telling admission came from Randene Neill, cabinet minister for water, land and resource stewardship and the new NDP MLA for Powell River- Sunshine Coast. 'I was not aware of the agreement when I was a candidate,' the former journalist confessed. She learned about it after Premier David Eby appointed her to cabinet in December. 'One reason I got into politics included the feeling that you haven't been heard,' Neill told her community. The belated release of the terms had contributed to 'mistrust.' At the same session, the deputy minister of Indigenous relations and reconciliation, Tom McCarthy, claimed 'we simply ran out of time.' The agreement was signed Aug. 16, 2024. In the five-week gap before the government moved to caretaker mode for the election, the New Democrats put out 200 positive news releases to boost their re-election chances. But they also withheld news of a cash and land transfer negotiated in complete secrecy, without a moment of public consultation. 'We should have found a way to get this out the door before the election,' the deputy minister conceded. 'We have to do better than that. We will do better.' By the time he said that, the damage was done. Government staffers pulled together the public feedback from March 20 and a followup session on March 31. Even after they edited out 'disrespectful and derogatory language,' the surviving comments and questions were blistering. • 'How come you kept your talks a secret till after the election?' • 'You really do insult our intelligence by saying you ran out of time, absolutely no one believes you.' • 'The provincial government has clearly prioritized reconciliation between the shíshálh Nation and itself over residents.' • 'Remember that you also represent the non-First Nations people that live on the Coast.' Yet there was little sign of contrition from Indigenous Relations Minister Christine Boyle when she was challenged over the belated release of the shishalh agreement during debate on her budget April 30. The agreement was announced 'as soon as we could after ministers were sworn in and briefed and we could prepare a joint announcement and shared celebration,' she claimed. Boyle did concede that 'we could have found a way to announce the renewal before the election. My commitment is to provide more timely information about these types of agreements to support public confidence in the work that we're doing together.' But when pressed for details of what the government signed a year ago, she disclosed little beyond the $104 million in funding for economic development, a cultural centre and housing, and related provisions announced Jan. 29. As for the six square kilometres of public land, those had yet to be identified. When they were, the province and the First Nation 'will engage with local governments and interest holders in the area and consider other nations, groups and the public.' That's a lot of acreage, observed Conservative MLA Scott McInnis. Would the government also disclose the market value of the land, so the public knows what was being handed over on its behalf? Probably not, said Boyle. 'These land transfer agreements don't typically include the assessed value of the land, but they do include detailed maps.' The MLA asked how government negotiators determine the mix of land and dollars included in such agreements. 'We're spending public money here — tens of millions of dollars, hundreds of millions of dollars in some cases — and transferring vast amounts of public land,' said McInnis. 'Did they just kind of pull numbers out of somewhere and present offers to nations?' There was a mix of considerations replied Boyle and every First Nation is different. 'I feel like the minister is avoiding this,' said McInnis. 'Is it publicly available that people can see how these agreements are formed and based on what criteria?' 'The simple answer is no,' replied the minister, slamming the door on further disclosures. 'The agreements are public. But our negotiation mandates are confidential to protect the public interest.' Boyle has since been shuffled to the housing ministry and replaced in Indigenous Relations by Spencer Chandra Herbert. But Boyle was and is one of the best-connected members of the cabinet. I have no doubt that she was speaking for a premier and cabinet inclined to disclose as little as possible about the deals they make with Indigenous nations. vpalmer@
