Faces of the Afghans murdered by Taliban since ‘kill list' leak
Their names were compiled by independent caseworkers highlighting the plight of Afghans who worked with British and US forces.
But a court order imposed by a senior judge prevents The Telegraph from reporting whether the dead had first appeared on the Ministry of Defence (MoD) list accidentally made public in February 2022.
The Taliban claims the MoD list came into its possession in 2022 and that it has been hunting down those identified in it ever since.
The Telegraph can disclose that a unit of the Taliban's special forces – known as Yarmok 60 – has been assigned to locate them.
The list recorded applicants to an asylum scheme run by the MoD that was intended, following the fall of Kabul in 2021, to give sanctuary to Afghans who had worked with British troops.
It remains unclear how many of those on the list were subsequently identified by the Taliban, tracked down and murdered as a consequence.
John Healey, the Defence Secretary, admitted on Wednesday that he was 'unable to say for sure' whether anyone had been killed as a result of the data breach.
But he insisted that three years on from the leak, it was 'highly unlikely' that being on the list would now increase the risk of being targeted by the Taliban.
A super-injunction was lifted by the High Court on Tuesday, allowing the leak to be reported for the first time.
But a court order remains in place that prevents using the database to reveal the identities of Afghans who may have been targeted as a result.
Assassinated special forces
Among the former Afghan special forces soldiers who have been killed by the Taliban since the list was leaked are young and middle-aged men who were assassinated by the new regime in different parts of the country and some with their family members.
Col Toorjan, a police commander in southern Helmand, was killed with several family members when he was leaving a mosque on June 24 last year. One month later, Taliban forces shot and killed another former government army officer in the eastern Khost province.
The Taliban executed Hamidullah Khosti on July 23 in the Alishar district. He had arrived there the previous day to attend a wedding ceremony.
Despite a general amnesty declared by Hibatullah Akhundzada, the Taliban supreme leader, the group has continued to arrest and kill former government military personnel and employees for nearly four years.
Another former government army officer was shot and killed by Taliban forces in Kapisa province in July 2022, five months after the list was leaked. Muzamil Nejrabi was killed at night in Arbab Khil village in the Nejrab district of Kapisa province.
The young man had left his home at 10.30pm to irrigate his agricultural fields when he was shot by soldiers from the Taliban's Fifth Battalion, First Brigade stationed in Kapisa. He died on the way to the hospital.
Friends of Muzamil said he was a newly-wed, married three months before his assassination.
In February last year, the bloody corpse of Hayatullah Nizami, former operations commander of the third security zone in northern Taloqan city, was discovered in the Bishkapa area near the Taliban army brigade of the city in Takhar province.
According to a local source, Nizami, who was previously a member of the security forces, had been working as an employee at a company which collaborates with the Taloqan municipality, following the fall of the Western-backed government.
He disappeared with his vehicle the night before and his dismembered body was found the following day.
Local sources reported that after the body was discovered, the Taliban named him as Hamidullah, a municipality employee, in order to conceal his military background.
On August 21 last year, Taliban fighters dragged Abdul Rahman Delawar, the former security commander of Shekhel district, from his home and killed him, according to local media.
Mr Delawar had fled to Iran following the fall of Kabul and had recently returned to his ancestral village where he was living a normal life.
Sabaoon Omar, another former national police officer, was killed by the Taliban in October 2022.
His killing added to a growing number of reported executions of former government security personnel by Taliban forces, despite the group's declared general amnesty for former officials.
The dossier of 200 Afghans killed since the leak was put together by the independent caseworker – known only as Person A – who first raised the alarm over the data breach.
She sent an email to James Heappey, the armed forces minister at the time, in which she warned 'how severe the negligence has been in terms of data security'.
She added: 'The Taliban may well now have a 33,000-long kill list – essentially provided to them by the UK Government.'
She sent the email on Aug 15 2023, after an anonymous user on Facebook threatened to publish the leaked data.
It had been accidentally released 18 months earlier by a British soldier tasked with vetting Afghans seeking asylum under the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (Arap).
Person A was subsequently subject to the super-injunction in September 2023, which prevented her – along with newspapers – from even mentioning its existence.
The dossier compiled by Person A and other caseworkers was passed to The Telegraph after the super-injunction was lifted, to serve as a snapshot of Afghans who worked with coalition troops and who it is believed have subsequently been targeted by the Taliban.
The identities of those killed were gleaned from posts in local Afghan press and on social media as well as through contacts on the ground.
The Telegraph has been unable to verify independently the names contained in the dossier of those killed and the circumstances in which they died.
Person A said that Afghans may have applied to the Arap scheme – even if they had not worked with British troops – as a means to securing a safe haven.
But it also means Afghans who had no association with the UK military may have been put in danger simply by applying to the Arap scheme.
Person A said: 'The issue we have is we have no way of knowing whether the people in our dossier had applied for the Arap scheme or not. There are an awful lot of people who didn't comply with Arap but applied through Arap.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Spike Lee, Adam McKay and over 2,000 writers decry Trump's ‘un-American' actions in open letter
More than 2,300 members of the Writers Guild of America, including Spike Lee and Adam McKay, have signed an open letter decrying the actions of Donald Trump's administration that represent 'an unprecedented, authoritarian assault' on free speech. The letter, a combined effort from the WGA East and West branches, cites the US president's 'baseless lawsuits' against news organizations that have 'published stories he does not like and leveraged them into payoffs'. It specifically references Paramount's decision to pay Trump $16m to settle a 'meritless lawsuit' about a 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris. The letter notes that Trump 'retaliated against publications reporting factually on the White House and threatened broadcasters' licenses', and has repeatedly called for the cancellation of programs which criticize him. Additionally, the letter blasts Republicans in congress who 'collaborated' with the Trump administration to defund the Corporation for Public Broadcasting 'in order to silence PBS and NPR'. And it says the FCC, led by Trump-appointed chairperson Brendan Carr, 'openly conditioned its approval of the Skydance-Paramount merger on assurances that CBS would make 'significant changes' to the purported ideological viewpoint of its journalism and entertainment programming. 'These are un-American attempts to restrict the kinds of stories and jokes that may be told, to silence criticism and dissent,' the letter reads. 'We don't have a king, we have a president. And the president doesn't get to pick what's on television, in movie theaters, on stage, on our bookshelves, or in the news.' Signees include Tony Gilroy, David Simon, Mike Schur, Ilana Glazer, Lilly Wachowski, Celine Song, Justin Kuritzkes, Desus Nice, Gillian Flynn, John Waters, Liz Meriwether, Kenneth Lonergan, Alfonso Cuarón, Shawn Ryan and many other prominent names in film and television. The letter, released on Tuesday, calls on elected representatives and industry leaders to 'resist this overreach', as well as their audiences to 'fight for a free and democratic future' and 'raise their voice'. The Corporation for Public Broadcasting announced last Friday that it would shut down after 57 years in operation, following the decision by the Republican-controlled House last month to eliminate $1.1bn in CPB funding over two years, part of a $9bn reduction to public media and foreign aid programs. The corporation, established by Congress in 1967 to ensure educational and cultural programming remained accessible to all Americans, distributed more than $500m annually to PBS, NPR and 1,500 local stations nationwide. Despite the federal grants, stations mostly relied on viewer donations, corporate sponsorships and local government funds to stay afloat. The Trump administration has also filed a lawsuit against three CPB board members who refused to leave their positions after Trump attempted to remove them. 'This is certainly not the first time that free speech has come under assault in this country, but free speech remains our right because generation after generation of Americans have dedicated themselves to its protection,' the letter concludes. 'Now and always, when writers come under attack, our collective power as a union allows us to fight back. This period in American life will not last forever, and when it's over the world will remember who had the courage to speak out.'
The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
America's Most Wanted: Texas senator calls on FBI director Kash Patel to hunt down ‘fleeing' Democrats
Republican Senator John Cornyn is calling on the FBI to track down and arrest Texas Democrats who left the state to derail a vote on new congressional districts explicitly designed to elect more Republicans to Congress. In a letter to FBI Director Kash Patel on Tuesday, Cornyn requested the agency's help to 'locate the out-of-state Texas legislators who are potentially acting in violation of the law.' 'The FBI has tools to aid state law enforcement when parties cross state lines, including to avoid testifying or fleeing a scene of a crime,' he added. Democrats did not break the law by denying the Texas House of Representatives a quorum. Texas House rules allow lawmakers to issue civil arrest warrants to force members back to the capitol, but leaving the chambers is not a criminal offense, and federal law enforcement does not have authority to compel lawmakers to come back to Texas. But Cornyn, echoing claims from Texas Republicans, has accused Texas Democrats of 'potential criminal acts' — including bribery or 'other public corruption offenses' — for allegedly receiving monetary support to leave the state until the end of a 30-day legislative session. The senator's allegations have escalated law enforcement threats against Texas lawmakers who are protesting a GOP plan, requested by Donald Trump, to redraw political boundaries in the hopes of electing five more Texas Republicans into the House of Representatives in next year's midterm elections. Trump on Tuesday claimed he is 'entitled' to those seats. The office of Governor Greg Abbott, who launched the legislative session to explicitly approve the new congressional maps before 2026 midterm elections, said he supports Cornyn's move. The governor has said that the use of campaign funds to help pay for hefty fines for 'truancy' amounts to bribery. On Monday, he called on the Texas Rangers to investigate his allegations as well as 'potential legal violations connected to their refusal to appear for a quorum, conduct business, and cast votes.' Abbot 'fully supports using all necessary tools to discover potential legal violations connected to their refusal to appear for a quorum, conduct business, and cast votes,' his office said in a statement. Texas Republicans failed to reach a quorum a second day in a row on Tuesday while more than 50 Texas Democrats remain in Illinois, New York and elsewhere. 'This is not a decision we make lightly, but it is one we make with absolute moral clarity,' Democratic state Rep. Gene Wu said from Illinois on Sunday night after leaving the state with several other Democrats. On Monday, state Republicans voted in favor of their arrest. Republican House Speaker Dustin Burrows said he would immediately sign civil warrants for those missing Democratic members, giving the greenlight to the chamber's sergeant-at-arms and state troopers to make arrests and bring them to the state Capitol. The warrants only apply within state lines, making the legislative threats a largely symbolic maneuver. The House met for roughly five minutes on Tuesday before adjourning. 'It is evident to the chair that [the Department of Public Safety] will need some time to work, and we will try again to make quorum on Friday,' Burrows said. Burrows met with state law enforcement officials on Tuesday morning to discuss how to enforce the warrants. 'The Texas Constitution requires members of the Legislature to show up, and Texans expect us to do our jobs,' Burrows wrote on X. 'I remain fully committed to obtaining a quorum and resuming the business of the Texas House.' Following Monday's vote, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said he is 'prepared to do everything in my power to hold them accountable because these liberal lawmakers are not above the law.' 'It's imperative that they be swiftly arrested, punished, and face the full force of the law for turning their backs on the people of Texas,' he said. Texas Democrats had similarly left the state in 2021 to protest Republican-backed voting restrictions. After nearly five weeks on the road, enough lawmakers returned home to establish a quorum, and the measure passed. Republican lawmakers had similarly tried to force back missing Democrats at the time, though they obtained a court-ordered injunction blocking their arrest. The state's Supreme Court later struck down the injunction, finding that while the state Constitution 'enables 'quorum-breaking' by a minority faction of the legislature, it likewise authorizes 'quorum-forcing' by the remaining members.'
Telegraph
4 hours ago
- Telegraph
Our complicit elite is to blame for every sexual assault by an illegal migrant
I was having coffee in the garden with John, the lovely man who comes to help me with all the jobs I can't manage (a temperamental pond pump and rampant blanket weed among them), when conversation turned to John's concern for his daughter. Kirstie's journey to college takes her past a former RAF base now occupied by illegal migrants who crossed the Channel in small boats. Their ranks have swollen recently to several hundred as the Government struggles to fulfil its promise to empty asylum hotels by the end of this Parliament. Not by deporting the legions of undocumented young males from Africa and the Middle East – of course not, silly! – but by secretly redistributing a majority of those migrants from hotels into HMOs (houses in multiple occupation) and military facilities, presumably in the hope that the public will be less likely to notice and kick off. But girls like Kirstie cannot fail to notice. Not when the foreign males who leer and hiss at them, as if they were living in Egypt not Essex, now outnumber the population of their village. Not when it is girls who were born here who are advised to change their behaviour to accommodate the culture of the new arrivals by being less provocative, and walking a different way to school. Lately John, like a lot of fathers I suspect, has started fearing the worst. 'We were talking in the pub the other night and we decided that, in the end, it's men like us who will have to go down and defend our southern border,' he said to me that day in the garden. The bees went about their buzzy business in the hollyhocks, there was a gentle trickle of water in the pond, its pump just mended by this good and reliable man. It was a quintessential English summer's day, temperate and benign as the people of these islands tend to be until roused, yet there we were, drinking our coffee and picturing thousands, maybe tens of thousands, of Johns, the backbone of our country, the sturdy yeomen who have always come to the rescue in centuries past, marching to the beaches of Kent to protect us against invasion. To protect their women and children. That may sound alarmist, apocalyptic even, but is it really? When men like John are discussing in Wetherspoons what normal people can clearly see is a national emergency, no online Starmer-Stasi snoopers can stop them much, though a panic-stricken, authoritarian government would like to shut down free speech. Things that we would once have thought unimaginable, indeed completely bonkers, now feel like weekly, almost hourly, occurrences. Over 25,000 migrants, mostly young males, have already broken into Britain this year (49 per cent more than at the same point last year), and the nation that launched the D-Day landings against a mighty foe is now reliant on a spell of bad weather to keep the numbers down. Or on the latest doomed government 'one-in-one-out' scheme, beginning today, in which France generously allows herself to be bribed at British taxpayers' expense to take back maybe one of the 700 migrants who make the crossing in a single day, only to send the UK a substitute asylum seeker. Probably not a brain surgeon, to take a wild guess. Not only will such a tiny chance of being deported fail to act as a deterrent, it allows Labour to slyly open up a legal route into the UK while pretending it's a benefit to us. What would those who gave their lives in 1944 think of us – from Operation Overlord to Operation Over-Run in 80 years? Since the 2015-2016 New Years's Eve celebrations in Cologne, when around 1,200 women were raped or sexually assaulted by gangs of foreign men, I have warned repeatedly of the consequences of admitting young males from backward, misogynist cultures into a liberal, Western society. Naturally, telling the truth got me called 'racist' and I earned a coveted place on an Islamophobia list. But the pretence that a farmer from Afghanistan suddenly turns into Hugh Grant the minute his trainers hit the shingle at Dover was always a progressive fantasy. Sex-starved lads raised to regard women as livestock (Afghan women are no longer allowed to speak outside the home let alone go to school) are poor candidates for integration. They were always going to take gross liberties with our liberty. And so here we are. In leafy Nuneaton, a 12-year-old girl was allegedly raped by two Afghan asylum seekers. Despite Warwickshire Police's best (make that worst) attempts to conceal their identity, Ahmad Mulakhil, 23, was charged last week with rape, while Mohammad Kabir, 23, was charged with kidnap, strangulation and aiding and abetting rape. The police explained they did not wish to reveal the suspects' immigration status for fear of exacerbating our old friend 'community tensions'. In this case, community tensions is code for furious parents who strangely don't want their daughters abducted, their innocence torn from them by barbarians who shouldn't be here in the first place. In another incident on July 13, a Sudanese man who was living in a three-star asylum hotel in the upmarket Cheshire suburb of Wilmslow allegedly tried to lure away a girl aged 10 while she was with her father. Epping, meanwhile, has seen fierce protests after an Ethiopian, who had only come ashore eight days earlier and was being put up at the Bell Hotel, was charged with the sexual assault of a 14-year-old girl. These alleged attacks are not an aberration; they are exactly what you would expect if you were to drop a gang of marauding vikings into a high-school prom at an all-girls' school. That has, effectively, been the policy of successive British governments. Our political class prefers to burnish their reputation among 'our international partners' by remaining in the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), making deportations almost impossible, while young girls – catcalled, groped, raped, strangled, abducted – are just thought of as unfortunate collateral damage. If they think about them at all. When it was disclosed recently that a superinjunction had been taken out by the last Conservative government to cover up importing thousands of Afghans into the UK, following a leak of names, I was berated on X by former defence minister Ben Wallace for daring to suggest that that underhand humanitarian mission could raise the level of risk for British women and girls. Mr Wallace thought the noble purpose of extricating men who may (or may not) have aided our armed forces was what mattered. I disagreed, foreseeing ever more rapes and cultural disintegration. A fate also predicted with some urgency, I notice, by US vice president JD Vance who last week accused Europe of 'engaging in civilisational suicide'. Coincidentally, a reader in Wiltshire got in touch to report how all those Afghans resettled in a local army camp are getting on. 'It's horrific, Allison,' she said. 'The behaviour of the Afghans in Larkhill – loitering around children's playgrounds, lads 'messing' with girls on school buses, human faeces regularly found on dog walks in camp. The GP practice is closed to soldiers one day a week to allow the migrants exclusive access. The reception staff have been handed crib sheets on how to greet Afghans in their own language. They are incensed. 'Why aren't the immigrants given crib sheets on how to address us in our own language?' ' My source says the Afghan families have been allocated most of the large houses, while soldiers who are entitled to bigger quarters are told 'there isn't a three-bed house in the whole of Wiltshire'. It's no surprise to learn that 'resentment is massive. The Afghans get free food – the truck goes round at least twice a day. 'If you drive through the camp you'd think you were in Kabul – groups of several men walking ahead of the women all covered in head-to-toe niqabs. Since the news of the superinjunction broke, they've been put under curfew. All the lads were warned that if they spoke out they'd be put on a charge.' See how the state acts to cover up its crimes against the British people. Whether it's silencing squaddies deprived of their rightful quarters or threatening with arrest those marvellous mums and grandmothers in raucously defiant pink who performed the Hokey-Cokey before staging a sit-in outside the Britannia Hotel asylum centre in Canary Wharf. It is politicians and senior civil servants who should be arrested, I reckon. They waste stupefying amounts of our money on people unlikely to ever make a net contribution to Britain and call it compassion. For whom? The National Audit Office has just predicted that, within 10 years, the cost of asylum accommodation will reach £15.3bn. It is intolerable. Imagine all the good such a sum could do to help struggling businesses and boost employment for our young people. Even when the popular sense of anger is palpable, as it is right now, the ability of our ruling class and much of the media to deny any adverse consequences of immigration is astonishing. I listened with mounting anger to Radio 4's PM programme on Monday (Sorry, mea culpa. I know you've told me to ditch the BBC!) where a reporter was trying to discredit data which showed that 40 per cent of sexual crimes in London were committed by foreign nationals. That, he explained, was only because migrants tend to be younger, and young men are most likely to commit those offences. I'm sure that will be a huge comfort to the traumatised women. All credit to Nigel Farage and Robert Jenrick for causing consternation among the Open Borders fanatics by making the link between out-of-control migration and soaring rape figures. Compare the response of our woefully weak Prime Minister who wants to 'put pressure' on police chiefs to be 'as transparent as possible' about the ethnic background and immigration status of those charged with crimes such as rape and sexual assault. Even though it is the Crown Prosecution Service, which Sir Keir Starmer once ran, that refuses to keep track of the number of sexual offences by asylum seekers. We know why, don't we? Government sources said they hoped greater transparency would 'help rebuild the public trust'. As if. That's the same government which is mounting unprecedented and sinister surveillance to keep track of 'anti-migrant' opinion. Fifty million people will shortly be helping the police with their enquiries. 'If you come here illegally on a small boat you will face return,' Sir Keir Starmer warbled at migrants yesterday. Not, 'You will be deported immediately' but 'you will face return.' Or, let's face it and far more likely, 'You will be handed a free phone and free accommodation which we will pinch from a soldier's family if we have to.' Compare with Greece, which has set up secure camps to detain all illegal migrants for three months, all of them denied the ability to claim asylum. Emergency legislation is allowing Greeks to circumvent the ECHR. Denmark, another ECHR member, has practically closed the borders and is using gated detention camps, some housing up to 2,000 migrants who are allowed out for just two hours a day and cannot work. If a government wants to put its citizens first, it can. Ours doesn't. From now on, I suggest we put the blame for every rape, abduction and strangling by an illegal migrant squarely where it belongs – on the Government, Home Office civil servants and complicit media class. We don't want a one-in-one-out scheme, thanks all the same. We want a 50,000-in-50,000-out scheme. We want Kirstie and every girl like her to be able to walk unmolested to school, not to be hissed at by men who lack all respect for our values and our women. If our leaders are too weak to act, lovely John and the yeomen of Britain will go to the border, and they will do what needs to be done.
