Some Zeeland neighbors want to block Mead Johnson expansion
Some neighbors say they hope the holdouts will help block the expansion, which they fear will destroy their neighborhood.
The Kleins have lived since 1973 in their home about 150 yards west of the baby formula plant — at the heart of the company's controversial expansion plans. They raised two kids there. Her parents lived there in the 1920s.
'We still walk on the hardwood floors that my parents did,' Margie Klein said on Friday.
In January, she answered a knock on her door. It was a stranger from Mead Johnson.
'He sat down on our couch and said, 'We want your property.' 'Really?' 'And all of this on both sides of you, and we want everything on Washington Avenue, also,'' she recalled.
Mead Johnson, now owned by a United Kingdom-based company, says it needs to modernize. Its $836 million plan calls for an expansion that would mean leveling several homes on the north side of East Main Street, including the Kleins'.
The company, which makes Enfamil, released renderings at a meeting this week. The plan requires the city to rezone some of the land from residential to industrial. A hearing is scheduled before the city's Planning Commission Thursday.
The company is the third-biggest taxpayer in Zeeland and employs 500 people.
'Mead Johnson Nutrition takes pride in our deep roots in the Zeeland community where we have been producing some of the nation's most trusted baby formula products for more than 100 years,' the company said in a statement released on Friday. 'This investment in modernizing our operations in Zeeland reflects our commitment to sustained job creation and economic growth here in our local community, while also ensuring we maintain industry-leading quality standards and remain a trusted partner in pediatric nutrition.'
'Mead Johnson is important to the community, we want to keep them here,' City Manager Timothy Klunder said. 'We certainly don't want to see a desire where they would have to leave, but we also want then to do it in the right way.'
Neighbors have planted signs and launched a website in opposition.
Already, the company has bought out most of the Kleins' closest neighbors: One said he sold his home for $600,000 and must be out by July 31. Property records show the company paid $1.5 million for a house and barn a few doors away with an assessed value of less than $300,000. Two properties around the corner went for a combined $3.7 million — about 10 times their assessed value.
The Kleins won't say exactly how much Mead Johnson has offered. It's somewhere between $500,000 and $1 million.
'We love our place, but we don't want to sell to Mead Johnson because they are pushy and demanding,' Klein said.
Asked if she was holding out for more money, she responded: 'Oh heavens, no.'
'This has nothing to do with the money,' she continued. 'It's the whole principle of the thing. We have lived here for decades. We are so involved in the city of Zeeland, chamber of commerce back in the day. We love this town.'
Jonathan Funckes lives on the south side of East Main Street. His home would face the expanded factory.
'I'll be looking at Industrial 2 (zoning),' he said. 'When we bought this, this was all residential.'
When Funckes moved in 16 years ago, he said, the neighborhood was mostly rentals, some marred by graffiti.
'We've all in the last dozen years really improved it and brought the neighborhood up and are doing things to improve and make it look better, only to have the city just destroy our property values,' he said.
Some neighbors said they fear city leaders have already decided.
'Why would you purchase these (properties) way above tax-assessed values if you didn't have some sort of promise?' Sue VandenBeldt, who lives a few doors away. 'My concern is that the city has sold our neighborhood out. I think my big concern is that we've lost trust in our officials we elected.'
As for Jonathan Funckes, 'We're going to be fighting it, but at this point I'm preparing to sell, because I've had enough.'
Perhaps, he said, the best hope is the Kleins not selling.
'That's the only saving grace at this point,' he said.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
2 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Marin-Sonoma rail corridor expansion faces ‘existential threat' from lawsuit
The long-planned expansion of a hiking and biking pathway parallel to the North Bay commuter rail is facing a legal challenge from landowners who aren't keen on the trail cutting through their backyards. Sonoma-Marin Area Regional Transit, or SMART, has already constructed more than 39 miles of trail alongside its commuter rail tracks. The agency's ultimate goal is a multi-use pathway that runs the 70-mile length of the entire SMART corridor, which winds north from Larkspur in Marin County. The train currently goes only as far north as Windsor; a station in Healdsburg is slated to open in 2028, followed later by Cloverdale, the planned end of the line. SMART says it provides a way for people to access its 14 stations without needing to use a car. When completed, the pathway would also form the southern leg of the Great Redwood Trail, which could someday connect San Francisco Bay and Humboldt Bay. More than 130 plaintiffs sued SMART in 2021, accusing the agency of building its pathway on their properties without permission, by overstepping a series of 19th century easement agreements which allowed predecessor railroads to use the land for 'railroad purposes' only. After a judge dismissed about 100 of those claims, SMART paid $612,000 to settle the lawsuit with the remaining plaintiffs early last year. Now, however, about 65 of the plaintiffs whose claims had been dismissed have moved to proceed with the litigation. These plaintiffs, who own land along planned or newly-constructed stretches of the trail, argue that they should be compensated as the pathway extends. SMART spokeswoman Julia Gonzalez said the agency was notified of the second lawsuit, which has not been previously reported, on May 27. 'That's a real kind of existential threat to the remaining path system for SMART going forward,' David Rabbitt, who sits on SMART's Board of Directors, said at a meeting of the Golden Gate Bridge Highway and Transportation District's board last month. The plaintiffs are represented by a Sacramento attorney, as well as a Kansas City-based law firm that specializes in securing compensation for 'landowners whose property is taken for recreational trails.' Those cases often pertain to the National Trails System Act, which created a program to convert abandoned rail corridors into public trails in 1983. Under that process, known as 'railbanking,' the responsibility for compensating eligible landowners falls to the federal government. But SMART isn't interested in railbanking because its rail corridor isn't abandoned — it's an active line, and the agency says pedestrian pathways are key to its services. 'SMART's rail corridor remains fully active for passenger and freight rail service and has been in continuous use since the District began service in 2017,' Gonzalez said. 'The pathway, located within SMART's existing, active rail corridor, is a public transit asset that integrates with rail operations and supports rather than replaces rail service.' Thomas Stewart, an attorney with the Kansas City practice Stewart, Wald and Smith, said the agency was trying to 'have their cake and eat it too' by applying its easement to both train and pedestrian services. 'If you're not using (the corridor) for railroad purposes and you're putting a totally different use on top of that railroad purposes easement, then you have, in essence, changed the use,' Stewart said. 'That's a violation of the terms of the original easement and you're responsible for whatever damages there are.' Stewart said the case could go to trial in February unless the plaintiffs secure a settlement. If a judge rules against SMART, the agency would still be able to complete its pathway, he said, but only after paying landowners a 's—load of money.' SMART maintains that its pathway serves the 'railroad purpose' required by the easement agreement — it provides 'critical first- and last-mile connections' by helping walkers and bikers bridge the gaps between stations. 'We believe this lawsuit is less about protecting property rights and more about seeking settlements from public agencies — with taxpayers ultimately bearing the cost,' Gonzalez said. 'Although SMART believes it has the right to construct the pathway within its rail corridor, to resolve the issue and avoid prolonged legal costs, SMART has initiated a process to clarify (the new plaintiffs') property title and, where appropriate, offer fair compensation for pathway use within SMART's existing active rail corridor.' Gonzalez declined to comment further on the open litigation, but she stressed that the agency would continue to prioritize pathway construction. Advocates, however, have concerns about what a compensation policy could mean for the ambitious expansion SMART has planned. Warren Wells, the policy and planning director of the Marin County Bicycle Coalition, wants to see the pathway completed promptly — and he worries that any strain on the project's funds could create additional delays. SMART's expansion has been cramped by cash constraints, especially after North Bay voters rejected a 2020 sales tax measure intended to give the agency a boost. The agency's reliance on grant funds has left gaps in the trail that frustrate bikers and pedestrians. 'Someone trying to get around by bicycle might have a stretch of really great multi-use path, and then all of a sudden you're riding on the shoulder of a busy four-lane road,' Wells said. 'Failure to deliver complete networks scares people out of riding bikes, pushes them into driving cars and adds more traffic. So I think SMART's goal of building a large and complete network is important.'
Los Angeles Times
2 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Culver City Plant-Based Food Manufacturer Daring Foods Acquired by Australian Firm
Daring Foods, a Culver City-based food manufacturer focused on plant-based meat substitutes, was acquired by Australian firm V2food for an undisclosed amount. The company had generated annual revenue of about $30 million from products sold in thousands of stores that include major grocers Whole Foods and Walmart. 'Daring has built an incredible, consumer-loved brand with strong reach across the U.S., and combining that with our food technology creates immediate opportunities to accelerate our mission to be one of the global leaders in plant-based protein,' said Tim York, chief executive of V2food, in a statement. The company was founded in 2018 and raised more than $120 million to develop and expand its product line. It reached a valuation of $329 million in 2021. Information for this article was sourced from V2food.
CNBC
2 hours ago
- CNBC
How Bezos-backed Slate Automotive plans to make US-built EV's affordable
Slate Automotive says its compact pickup truck has cracked the code to making affordable, U.S.-built EVs. The Detroit-based startup is led by veterans of Chrysler, Tesla and other major automakers, and backed by big investors such as Jeff Bezos. But its product might be niche, and the ending of the federal EV tax credit means the price has gone up. Slate received more than 100,000 reservations for its truck in two weeks. But will those reservations turn into sales now that the price is higher?
