
With the Trade War on Pause, Here's What's Next for Fashion
Moments after news broke Monday morning that the US and China had reached a trade deal, Bogg founder Kim Vaccarella called her manufacturer in Dongguan, China and told them to start making her brand's colourful plastic beach bags again.
'We had a lot on hold and as of this morning, we've released 90 percent of our production orders,' Vaccarella said. She added that she's also slowing down on a frantic search for alternative factories in Vietnam and Sri Lanka. Bogg still plans to diversify its production, but the task is nowhere near as urgent as when the Trump administration's 145 percent tariffs on Chinese imports were still on.
Those levies were reduced to 30 percent under the terms of a 90-day agreement announced on Monday. China will cut duties on US goods from 125 percent to 10 percent.
The deal technically marks a pause in the trade war launched by US president Donald Trump on April 2, when he announced tariffs — also now on hold — against dozens of countries, as well as a 10 percent global levy, still in place. But investors and many in the fashion industry treated the news as their own version of Liberation Day.
The S&P 500 jumped more than 3 percent to above where it traded on April 2. A number of apparel and footwear stocks soared, with some of the biggest gains seen by companies such as Vans owner VF Corp. and Victoria's Secret that were hit hardest by the initial tariff plan.
Fashion isn't able to relax just yet, however. Industry sources described the deal as a step in the right direction, but also noted that it's only a temporary solution. And even Monday's pause leaves significantly higher tariffs on Chinese goods.
'While we're encouraged by the easing of tensions and the joint rhetoric coming out of both sides of the equation, our hope is that there continues to be a conversation that drives that 30-percent number lower,' said Matt Priest, president and chief executive of Footwear Distributors and Retailers of America. 'That's what we're focused on in the coming weeks and months.'
What's more, it's still uncertain whether similar deals will be made with Vietnam, Cambodia and other countries where brands have diverted their production in recent years. If Trump's reciprocal tariffs go into effect in July as scheduled, imports from Vietnam will be subject to a 46 percent duty, for instance.
'This is still very much in motion,' said Simeon Siegel, analyst at BMO Capital Markets. Just in time for the holidays
A tariff of 30 percent on Chinese goods coming into the US is much more manageable than 145 percent, which some economists said would have effectively halted vast swaths of trade between the two countries. When that tariff was still in play, importing from China would have been so costly that companies were canceling orders, diverting them to other countries and slowing shipments destined for the US.
Apparel imports saw double-digit weekly drops, while the National Retail Federation estimates that, in May, total import cargoes at US ports will fall for the first time since 2023.
The new tariff rate, by contrast, is at least one that companies will be more conceivably able to offset or absorb. For a brand such as Steve Madden, which has been moving aggressively to shift production out of China but still sourced most of its products there at the start of the year, the deal is a lifeline. Last week, it pulled its sales and profit outlooks for the year.
The temporary agreement also means that retailers can now place their orders for the holiday season with a bit more clarity on their costs as well as consumer demand, which will no longer be hit quite as hard by rising prices stemming from the tariffs.
Though given that it's only a three-month window, it's possible those orders will reach US shores just as tariffs ramp back up again, according to Spencer Hewett, founder of inventory visibility startup Radar.
'You could also argue that it would be cheaper if they wait,' Hewett said. 'It's still not enough certainty.'
Steve Lamar, president and CEO of the American Apparel & Footwear Association, pointed out that the tariff applies on top of any previous tariffs still in place as well as the regular customs duties products incur. (To give one example, Priest said the total duties on a typical sneaker could come to 50 percent.) Fashion tends to be a low-margin business, so even the lower rate could be prohibitive for certain products, or for small brands that don't have the wherewithal to handle the costs. Companies that do import goods at the new rate are likely to pass the costs onto consumers as price hikes.
'This is really going to create a situation that is inflationary,' Lamar said. No relief for fast fashion
The agreement did not address the end of the de minimis exemption, a tax loophole popular with Shein, Temu and other retailers that allowed them to ship packages worth under $800 directly from Chinese factories to US customers duty free. The loophole closed on May 2, forcing immediate, dramatic changes to how many retailers operated. Temu, for instance, said it would only sell locally available goods in the US for the foreseeable future.
There's currently no reason to believe that the US is reconsidering, but Shein and Temu could still use the 90-day window to ship products in bulk to US warehouses, Yao Jin, an associate professor of supply chain management at Miami University of Ohio, told Reuters. No end to the uncertainty
The new agreement doesn't fully solve one of the thorniest problems for fashion in the trade war, which is the uncertainty of the situation.
'The next few weeks, months, or even years could be filled with policy twists and turns between the two countries, and the high level of uncertainty facing fashion companies and their suppliers is likely to persist,' said Sheng Lu, a professor of fashion and apparel studies at the University of Delaware. 'This means that US fashion companies will continue to struggle to manage their inventory and will prioritise flexibility and agility in their sourcing.'
The lack of clarity makes it difficult for brands to invest as well, Lamar noted.
Additionally, if companies rush to resume shipments of fall and holiday merchandise they had put on pause, it could create a cargo capacity crunch that sends freight rates up. The surge in demand for production could also overwhelm manufacturers, Hewett said.
All the while, retailers must also account for low consumer confidence and slower economic growth projected for 2025. Access to reasonably priced goods isn't the only factor for returning to business as usual; inventory without matching demand only creates further strain on cash flow. Potential for new trade deals
The fact that the US and China came to an agreement does at least provide some hope that the country could soon reach deals with other nations, too, including manufacturing hubs like Vietnam and Cambodia. FDRA's Priest said it also offers some sense of what other deals could look like.
'The 30 percent number for China becomes a benchmark for the other countries, in the sense that it's hard to imagine a trade policy from the US government where you have some of these other nations, particularly in Southeast Asia, that have a higher tariff rate than China,' Priest said. 'So will we see a 46 percent duty on goods out of Vietnam? I don't think so.'
But there are still plenty of questions that remain. Lamar of AAFA said it's unclear if talks with other countries could be delayed or paused while the US focuses on the complex negotiations with China. It's a matter of how much bandwidth is available. It's also possible that any new bargains could be like the China deal — temporary, and with the purpose of working out a future deal later. Based on the Trump administration's deals with China and the UK, the one safe bet is that some level of tariffs will remain in place for other countries as well.
But for now, a 90-day reprieve on the most severe China tariffs is a welcome update for brands like Bogg.
'Let's hope that they can come with a reasonable agreement after the 90 days, but while we're in the 90 days, we're going to be happy and enjoy this time until they make some other crazy announcement,' said Vaccarella.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Insider
20 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Top U.S. Automaker Rare Earth Suppliers Receive Export Licenses from China
Last week, President Trump accused China of violating its preliminary trade deal reached with the U.S. These violations included the continued restriction of rare earth element exports, which are critical in the development of semiconductors, cars, and planes. Now, China has responded in favor of the U.S. Confident Investing Starts Here: Easily unpack a company's performance with TipRanks' new KPI Data for smart investment decisions Receive undervalued, market resilient stocks right to your inbox with TipRanks' Smart Value Newsletter China has provided temporary rare earth export licenses to suppliers of three top U.S. automaker brands, General Motors (GM), Ford (F), and Stellantis (STLA), per Reuters. This comes after Beijing imposed rare earth export restrictions in April as a response to Trump's tariffs, although the restrictions didn't apply just to the U.S. Automakers around the world had previously warned of supply chain disruptions if China continued to restrict the elements. China Eases Rare Earth Exports to Top U.S. Automakers The export licenses will be in effect for six months, with the timeline possibly set in order to respond to U.S.-China trade developments. Reuters ' sources didn't mention the quantity or exact rare earths covered through the export licenses. China holds a near-monopoly on rare earths and produces about 90% of them across the globe.


CNBC
24 minutes ago
- CNBC
Trump says China's Xi agreed to let rare earth minerals flow to U.S.
U.S. President Donald Trump said on Friday that Chinese President Xi Jinping agreed to let rare earth minerals and magnets flow to the United States, a move that could lower tensions between the world's biggest economies. Asked by a reporter aboard Air Force One whether Xi had agreed to do so, Trump replied: "Yes, he did." The Chinese embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Trump's comment came one day after a rare call with Xi aimed at resolving trade tensions that have been brewing over the topic for weeks. At that time, Trump said there had been "a very positive conclusion" to the talks, adding that "there should no longer be any questions respecting the complexity of Rare Earth products." In another sign of easing tensions over the issue, China has granted temporary export licenses to rare-earth suppliers of the top three U.S. automakers, two sources familiar with the matter said. The U.S. president's top aides are set to meet their Chinese counterparts in London on Monday for further talks. "We're very far advanced on the China deal," Trump told reporters on Friday. The countries struck an agreement on May 12 in Geneva, Switzerland, to roll back for 90 days most of the triple-digit, tit-for-tat tariffs they had placed on each other since Trump's January inauguration. Financial markets that had worried about trade disruptions rallied on the news. But China's decision in April to suspend exports of a wide range of critical minerals and magnets has continued to disrupt supplies needed by automakers, computer chip manufacturers and military contractors around the world. Trump had accused China of violating the Geneva agreement and ordered curbs on chip-design software and other shipments to China. Beijing rejected the claim and threatened counter measures. Rare earths and other critical minerals are a source of leverage for China as Trump could come under domestic political pressure if economic growth sags because companies cannot make mineral-powered products. Since returning to the White House in January, Trump has repeatedly threatened an array of punitive measures on trading partners, only to revoke some of them at the last minute. The on-again, off-again approach has baffled world leaders and spooked business executives.


Atlantic
28 minutes ago
- Atlantic
Kilmar Abrego Garcia Was Never Coming Back. Then He Did.
After insisting again and again that they would not bring Kilmar Abrego Garcia back to the United States, Trump-administration officials flew the 29-year-old Maryland man back from El Salvador today to face a grand-jury criminal indictment in Tennessee. Abrego Garcia's return doesn't mean he can go free. He now faces federal charges for human trafficking, according to the indictment unsealed today, and the Trump administration will get its opportunity to prove what it has long alleged about Abrego Garcia's membership in the gang MS-13. Even if prosecutors fail to convict him, the government could attempt to deport him to a third country—just not back to El Salvador. But by bringing him back to the United States, the Trump administration has climbed down from the court-defying pedestal where Vice President J. D. Vance, the adviser Stephen Miller, and Cabinet officials perched for months, claiming that Abrego Garcia's deportation was not, in fact, a mistake, and that he would never be allowed to set foot in the country again. Their obstinacy led to warnings of a constitutional crisis. Abrego Garcia's wife, a U.S. citizen, sued the government in March after he was deported to his native country in violation of a 2019 court order protecting him from being sent back to face likely harm. U.S. officials initially acknowledged that they'd made an 'administrative error,' then shrugged and said that the matter was out of their hands. White House officials remained dug in even as the Supreme Court ordered the administration to facilitate Abrego Garcia's return. 'There is no scenario where Abrego Garcia will be in the United States again,' Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem testified to lawmakers last month. Now, by bringing Abrego Garcia back to face criminal charges, the administration can quiet the constitutional concerns about his due-process rights and lay out the evidence it claims to possess showing that he is not a benign sheet-metal worker and devoted father but a gang leader and human trafficker. Attorney General Pam Bondi told reporters that Abrego Garcia 'played a significant role in an alien-smuggling ring.' The criminal charges, filed in the Middle District of Tennessee, allege that Abrego Garcia participated in a nine-year conspiracy that moved thousands of people to destinations across the United States and totaled more than 100 trips. The indictment also accuses him of gun running and drug smuggling. According to ABC News, which first reported on Abrego Garcia's return and the trafficking charges, the chief of the criminal division in the U.S. attorney's office in Nashville resigned after the indictment was filed. The attorney, Ben Schrader, declined to comment when I reached out to him this evening. Senator Chris Van Hollen, who traveled to El Salvador in April and was allowed by the country's authorities to meet with Abrego Garcia, said in a statement that the administration has 'finally relented to our demands for compliance with court orders and with the due process rights afforded to everyone in the United States.' 'As I have repeatedly said, this is not about the man, it's about his constitutional rights—and the rights of all,' Van Hollen said in the statement. 'The Administration will now have to make its case in the court of law, as it should have all along.' This is the second time in a week that Trump officials have relented on one of the cases in which federal judges ordered the government to bring back a deportee removed from the country without due process. A gay Guatemalan asylum seeker known in court documents as O.C.G., who was wrongly deported to Mexico, was allowed to return and pursue his protection claim on Wednesday. The Trump administration remains defiant elsewhere, however, holding a group of men from Laos, Vietnam, Cuba, and other nations in a shipping container on a U.S. military base in Djibouti while it attempts to deport them to South Sudan. Simon Sandoval-Mosenberg, an attorney for Abrego Garcia, told me the administration's decision to bring his client back is a sign that 'they were playing games with the court all along.' Standard legal procedure would entail filing criminal charges against an alleged perpetrator and convicting them prior to a deportation—not the other way around, as the Trump administration is now attempting, Sandoval-Mosenberg said. 'Due process means the chance to defend yourself before you're punished, not after,' he said. 'This is an abuse of power, not justice. The government should put him on trial, yes—but in front of the same immigration judge who heard his case in 2019, which is the ordinary manner of doing things.' After Abrego Garcia's return, government attorneys told U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis that they intend to file a motion to dismiss the case challenging his unlawful deportation. Abrego Garcia was stopped for speeding by Tennessee state troopers in December 2022 while driving a Chevy Suburban with nine male passengers, none of whom carried identification, according to the indictment. Abrego Garcia was cited for an expired license, but he was not arrested or charged with a crime, even though troopers flagged the incident as a potential trafficking case. Abrego Garcia told officers that he'd been sent by his employer to pick up the men for a construction job, and his family has said that he would sometimes drive workers between job sites. They have denied the government's claims that Abrego Garcia was an MS-13 member. Driving passengers for money wouldn't be a crime unless the government can prove that Abrego Garcia knew he was transporting passengers who were unlawfully present, Andrew Rankin, an immigration attorney in Memphis, told me. Participating in a criminal conspiracy to bring them across the U.S.-Mexico border, as the government alleges, would bring severer penalties. 'What did he know? Did he have actual knowledge? What was the discussion between each person and Abrego?' Rankin said. 'And if these people were in violation of the law, the government could offer immunity to testify against him.' The indictment identifies six unnamed co-conspirators and says that Abrego Garcia transported MS-13 gang members on the trips. One of the co-conspirators told investigators that Abrego Garcia 'abused some of the female undocumented aliens' and was ordered to stop because it was 'bad for business.' Rankin said it was highly unusual for the government to deport someone and then begin building a criminal indictment. 'Now that the government has had to essentially bend the knee to bring Mr. Abrego back, the government is upset, and they can't just let him go,' Rankin told me. 'They can't just let him out and just let him walk around like he did before.'