China hits back at FBI director's ‘groundless assertions' in Wellington
'Transnational crime is a common challenge encountered by all countries requiring co-operation to tackle,' a spokesperson said.
'On the opening of a new FBI office in Wellington with a permanent Legat [legal attaché] position, we have taken note of the assertions by the American side, as well as the remarks by relevant New Zealand ministers in response to the media.
'We believe that relevant co-operation should not target any third party. And we strongly oppose any attempt to make groundless assertions or vilification against China out of the Cold War mentality. Such acts are against people's will and are doomed to fail.'
The Government has pushed back on suggestions that the FBI's new office in Wellington aimed to counter China.
Foreign Minister Winston Peters said China was not raised in his meeting with Patel, and the minister responsible for the spy agencies GCSB and NZSIS, Judith Collins, said it was up to Patel what he wanted to say.
The Chinese Embassy building in Wellington. Photo / Reece Baker, RNZ
'When we were talking, we never had raised that issue,' Peters said. 'We talked about the Pacific, what we could do to improve the law and order situation and the great concern that Pacific countries had and that they needed help, and that we need to be part of the solution.'
Collins said the US was 'very focused on fentanyl' and knew New Zealand was focused on disrupting the methamphetamine trade.
'We know that we do have international criminals ... let's just understand that our security agency is also involved in this. We're not going to single out any particular country.'
University of Otago lecturer Dr Peter Grace said drug and human trafficking was 'spiralling out of control' in the region, and New Zealand had limited resources to fight it.
'New Zealand is a small state, and we just don't have the kind of resources that are going to help solve these problems… So the fact that you've got somebody with much deeper pockets coming down and cooperating can be a particularly good thing.'
Opposition parties expressed surprise at the announcement, Labour saying it had come without explanation and Greens saying the office should not exist and New Zealand should exit the Five Eyes arrangement altogether.
- RNZ
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
4 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Watch live: Erica Stanford faces questions over plan to replace NCEA
Education Minister Erica Stanford is set to face questions after the government proposed to replace all levels of NCEA . Standford will be speaking shortly and will be livestreamed at the top of this page. Under the proposal, NCEA level 1 would be replaced with foundation literacy and numeracy tests . Levels 2 and 3 would be replaced with a New Zealand Certificate of Education and an Advanced Certificate. Students would be required to take five subjects and pass at least four to get each certificate. Marking would be out of 100 and grades would and range from A to E. Teachers' unions are cautiously optimistic the changes will work, provided they are implemented and resourced well. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
NZ Herald
34 minutes ago
- NZ Herald
Watch live: Education Minister Erica Stanford fronts press conference after mammoth NCEA announcement
Education Minister Erica Stanford will field questions from the site of her old high school following the Government's decision to radically overhaul New Zealand's main secondary school qualification. The press conference at Auckland's Rangitoto College will be live-streamed from the top of this article around 11.30am. Yesterday, the Government announced the decades-old NCEA scheme would be abolished completely and replaced with two new qualifications at Year 12 and 13. Under the new system, Year 11 students will face what is being called a 'Foundational Skills Award' with a focus on literacy and numeracy. English and mathematics will be required subjects for students at this year level. Year 12 and 13 students will seek to attain the New Zealand Certificate of Education (NZCE) and the New Zealand Advanced Certificate of Education (NZACE) respectively. Under the proposal, students currently doing NCEA continue. Students who are Year 8 today will be the first affected by the changes which begin in 2028. Students would do a mix of internal and external exams that add up to a mark out of 100, replacing the current achieved, merit and excellence rankings. That figure aligns to a letter grade such as A, B or C. For example, a student who received 85/100 in English would get an A while 50/100 in History would get them a C. Opposing political parties have been critical, saying the Government is rushing through the radical changes. Labour's education spokeswoman, Willow-Jean Prime, said 'rushing changes through now for political expediency isn't the answer'. She said schools and parents told her they were concerned about 'how hasty' the proposed changes were. 'Previous rushed overhauls have led to students being the guinea pigs for failed change – like national standards – so we must get this right." The Green Party's education spokesman, Lawrence Xu-Nan, said NCEA was not perfect but it recognised learning took place in different ways. 'Today's announcement is another classic case of the Government favouring one-size-fits-all approaches. Our education system is too important to be reduced to a single, rigid framework that will leave many behind. 'We haven't seen any clear case for the scrapping of NCEA - the Government has not made it. We remain entirely unconvinced this is what our school system needs. In fact, it risks throwing the baby out with the bathwater.'
NZ Herald
2 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Education Minister Erica Stanford says pupils sitting NCEA in final years not disadvantaged
She also told Herald NOW's Ryan Bridge that the new curriculum would not 'sacrifice' the needs of students who have learning challenges. 'We are keeping that flexibility of having and that balance of having internals and externals, which caters for lots of different learners. So it's not just exam-based, but we do want to make sure that children do sit their exams.' Stanford said we can not 'cotton wool our kids' and having 'rigour' sets students up for success. 'When you live your life, you have to sit a driver's [test]. 'If you're going into the trades, you'll need to sit your trades exams. There are always going to be those sorts of situations.' On raising the age to be able to leave from 16 to 17, Stanford said although she would like to see kids in school 'till the very end' it is not something they have considered at this point. She said it did feature in the proposal, but only because it is something they wish to address in the future. Labour leader Chris Hipkins said he was concerned about the disruption to students still sitting NCEA and whether or not they were supported through the transition. 'I think they're a bit anxious about this because they're sort of thinking, 'What does this mean for the qualification that I am going to get and that I'm going out into the world with?' 'I think we just need to always keep that in mind.' He told Bridge the 'devil will be in the details', and although this is a promising start, it was too soon to say if the changes would actually work. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Education Minister Erica Stanford at yesterday's qualifications announcement. The proposal, which is open for consultation until September before final decisions are made, represents the most significant update to secondary school assessments since NCEA was introduced more than two decades ago. Under the new scheme, Year 11 students will face what is being called a 'Foundational Skills Award' with a focus on literacy and numeracy. English and mathematics will be required subjects for students at this year level. The intent of removing the Year 11 qualification is to give students time 'to focus on deep learning of foundational skills and knowledge before undertaking high-stakes assessments in Years 12 and 13'. Year 12 and 13 students will seek to attain the New Zealand Certificate of Education (NZCE) and the New Zealand Advanced Certificate of Education (NZACE), respectively. This will replace the current standards-based assessment system with a structured approach that requires students to take five subjects and pass at least four to receive the Year 12 and 13 certificates. The assessments will have a clear 'out of 100' marking system alongside A to E letter grades that the Government hopes will make sense to parents and students. The Government will seek to implement the changes over the next five years alongside a refreshed curriculum. The Year 11 foundational award will be introduced from 2028, the Year 12 certificate in 2029, and the Year 13 certificate in 2030. The discussion document being released yesterday also posed the idea of potentially lifting the school leaving age from 16 to 17 if that is what is necessary to encourage students to get a school certificate. In the first instance, the Ministry of Education will consider targeted support to get students to stay until the end of Year 12.
