Canadian Flag Sales Surge after Trump Threats
The increase in sales comes ahead of Canada's national flag day on February 15, marking the 60th anniversary of the red and white maple leaf banner's debut in Ottawa.
Matt Skipp, co-owner of Flags Unlimited in Barrie, north of Toronto, attributes the spike in demand to threats from US President Donald Trump over Canadian sovereignty.
"It's a direct response to the political climate, with Canadians rallying behind their flag as a symbol of unity," Skipp said.
Canadian politicians have called on citizens to display the national flag this weekend to demonstrate that unity and their national pride.
Canadians have canceled trips south of the border, boycotted US products and even booed at sporting events after Trump announced 25% tariffs on most of Canada's goods on February 3, though he has since delayed the tariffs.
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau last week told a room of business leaders he thought Trump's talk about absorbing Canada as the 51st US state "is a real thing" and is linked to the country's rich natural resources, a government source said.
Flags Unlimited, which produces more than 500,000 flags annually, is considering additional shifts and sourcing extra materials to meet the surge in demand, Skipp said.
The company manufactures and assembles the flags in Ontario, though it imports some of its materials from overseas.
Mike Allen, who works in the auto parts industry, visited the store to buy a flag on Wednesday. Allen said he opposed US tariffs, due to concerns about the direct impact on his job.
The auto industry in North America is highly integrated, and companies have warned that tariffs would also raise costs for Americans.
"We're not the enemy. It's hard to understand why we're being attacked," Allen said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
32 minutes ago
- Al Arabiya
Trump's latest tariffs: What is changing and who is affected?
As of August 1, a range of new tariffs will be imposed on most of Washington's trading partners -- some of them heavy and some sector-specific, such as a 50 percent tariff on products made with copper. While South Korea has ultimately avoided the highest rates, countries such as Brazil and India now face significant new duties. AFP takes a look at the most recent developments: South Korea Trump announced Wednesday that Washington had reached a trade agreement with South Korea, under which a 15 percent tariff will apply to South Korean goods entering the United States. He added that Seoul had committed to investing $350 billion in the United States, as well as the purchase of '$100 billion worth' of liquefied natural gas (LNG) or other energy sources. The 15 percent rate is significantly below a 25 percent levy that Trump had threatened earlier, and is equivalent to levies determined from US trade deals with Japan and the European Union. Seoul's presidential office said tariffs on automobiles -- one of Seoul's key export items -- will also stay at 15 percent. Canada Trump warned of trade consequences for Canada after Prime Minister Mark Carney announced plans to recognize a Palestinian state at the UN General Assembly in September. The American president previously said he would increase tariffs to 35 percent on Canadian goods if no deal was reached by August 1. 'Wow! Canada has just announced that it is backing statehood for Palestine,' Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform. 'That will make it very hard for us to make a Trade Deal with them.' Brazil Trump's measures against Brazil are openly political, overriding centuries-old trade ties. He imposed sweeping 50-percent tariffs on Brazil and sanctioned the judge overseeing the trial of his far-right ally Jair Bolsonaro, who is accused of attempting a 'coup' in Latin America's largest economy. The tariffs marked Trump's follow-through on threats to use American economic power to punish Brazil-- and Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes -- for what he has called a 'witch hunt' against the former president. India On top of 25 percent tariffs on imports from India, Trump also announced on Wednesday an unspecified 'penalty' over New Delhi's purchases of Russian weapons and energy. 'I don't care what India does with Russia. They can take their dead economies down together, for all I care,' Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform. 'We have done very little business with India, their Tariffs are too high, among the highest in the World,' he added. The measures will kick in on Friday, Trump posted on his Truth Social platform, adding to a bevy of other tariff hikes -- some up to 50 percent -- set to take effect the same day. The 25 percent tariff on India would be marginally lower than the rate announced in April, but is higher than those of other Asian countries that have won. European Union EU exports are now set to face tariffs of 15 percent on most products -- higher than customs duties before Trump returned to the White House, but much lower than his threatened 30 percent. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said some agricultural products would be exempt under the agreement struck Sunday, though she did not specify which. France's President Emmanuel Macron said this week the European Union had not been 'feared' enough in negotiations with the United States towards a trade deal, pledging to be 'firm' in follow-up talks. 'It's not the end of it,' Macron told ministers during a cabinet meeting. 'Europe does not see itself enough as a power yet. To be free, you have to be feared. We were not feared enough.'
Arab News
2 hours ago
- Arab News
Russia hits Kyiv with missile and drone attack, killing 6 and injuring 52
KYIV: Russia attacked Ukraine's capital with missiles and drones overnight, killing at least six people including a 6-year-old boy, Ukrainian authorities said Thursday. Kyiv City Military Administration head Tymur Tkachenko said at least 52 other people were injured in the attacks, and that the number was likely to rise. A large part of a nine-story residential building collapsed after it was struck, Tkachenko added. Rescue teams were at the scene to rescue people trapped under the rubble. 'Missile strike. Directly on a residential building. People are under the rubble. All services are on site,' Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky wrote on his official Telegram. Images from the scene showed plumes of smoke emanating from a partially damaged building and debris strewn on the ground. At least 27 locations across Kyiv were hit by the attack, Tkachenko said, with the heaviest damage seen in the Solomianskyi and Sviatoshynskyi districts. US President Donald Trump said Tuesday he's giving Russian President Vladimir Putin a shorter deadline — Aug. 8 — for peace efforts to make progress or Washington will impose punitive sanctions and tariffs. Western leaders have accused Putin of dragging his feet in US-led peace efforts in an attempt to capture more Ukrainian land.
Saudi Gazette
4 hours ago
- Saudi Gazette
US allies break with Trump to force diplomatic shift on Gaza
NEW YORK — As Canada joins France and the UK in announcing plans to recognize a Palestinian state, the US is standing firmly with Israel — but does Trump have a long-term plan for Gaza's future? Of all history's declarations about the Middle East, one that may be less prominent in the global collective memory was in Tokyo in November 2023. Then-US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken laid out a series of principles for the "day after" the war in Gaza at a meeting of the G7, a group of the world's most powerful countries. He travelled there from Tel Aviv, after meeting Israel's leadership a month after the Hamas attacks on October 7, during the ensuing Israeli offensive on Gaza. Blinken listed what amounted to US conditions for Israel's military objectives and the wider conflict: No forcible displacement of Palestinians. No Israeli re-occupation of Gaza after the war ends. No attempt to blockade or besiege Gaza. A future governance that must be Palestinian-led, involving the internationally backed Palestinian Authority. No role for Hamas. The principles were intended to generate support from America's allies in Europe and parts of the Arab world — even if Israel objected to many of them. Few probably remember Blinken declaring his Tokyo Principles — least of all the Trump administration, which immediately jettisoned them. But the ideas are still supported by many US allies, who travelled to the United Nations in New York this week for a French-Saudi-led conference calling for a rekindling of the two-state solution. The conference made headlines as France, then the UK, committed to recognising a Palestinian state later this year under certain conditions. On Wednesday afternoon, Canada followed suit. But the Trump administration boycotted the meeting, viewing it as anti-Israel. "The United States will not participate in this insult but will continue to lead real-world efforts to end the fighting and deliver a permanent peace," said US State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce, deriding the conference as a "publicity stunt". Now, a chasm has opened up between the US and its traditional allies on the future of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. This raises a question: Does the Trump administration have a vision for the future governance of Gaza and longer-term permanent peace? It is becoming increasingly clear that it doesn't — at least not one of its own. Earlier this month, I asked Ms Bruce what the administration's vision was for the future governance of Gaza, beyond its requirement that Hamas cannot exist. She responded that "countries, our partners in the region" were working to implement "new ideas" the president had asked for. When I pressed her on what this involved she said: "I won't exactly tell you today." In February, President Trump declared that the US would take over the Gaza Strip and build a "riviera of the Middle East" in a plan that involved the forced displacement of Palestinians in the territory, which the US and Israel later tried to claim meant "voluntary" emigration. Whilst the idea was clearly unfeasible and would be in violation of international law, it appeared to be Trump's post-war plan. It would presumably have involved Israeli military occupation of the strip to facilitate it. It was not clear how any continuing insurgency by Hamas or aligned armed groups would have been defeated. Since then, the plan has been slowly, quietly dropped — at least in its fuller form. Asked on Tuesday about his plan to move Palestinians Trump described it as "a concept that was really embraced by a lot of people, but also some people didn't like it". The latter was probably a reference to rejection by Arab countries, including Saudi Arabia and other Gulf states, which Trump visited in May for a lavish trade tour to take in gilded palaces. The administration prefers to talk about the immediate issue: freeing hostages and getting a ceasefire. When Trump was again asked to look beyond that, during a recent White House visit from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, he immediately deferred to the Israeli leader to answer. It amounts to a growing evidence that the Trump administration's strategy on Gaza increasingly parallels that of its Israeli ally. Netanyahu rejects any involvement of the Palestinian Authority in future governance of Gaza, where his forces now control some two-thirds of the territory. The far-right flank of his coalition demands permanent military occupation, the expulsion of Palestinians and the building of Jewish settlements. Israel and the US have attempted to take control of the food supply for Palestinians, within militarised zones, while Israel also arms Palestinian militiamen who rival Hamas. The international body that monitors famine, the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC), said there is mounting evidence of widespread starvation, malnutrition and disease in Gaza. Israel has blamed Hamas and the UN for the crisis, but said it is facilitating more aid. Many European nations have watched aghast. UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy told me on Wednesday: "We have seen the most horrific scenes. The global community is deeply offended by children being shot and killed as they reach out for aid." Starvation appears to be an inflection point for European countries — a moral impetus to drive their divergent diplomacy. Domestic pressures in Britain and France also mounted to recognize a Palestinian state under certain conditions. Without a coherent, internationally backed plan for future governance, Gaza faces the prospect of increasing chaos. Blinken was aware of this risk from early in the war, and shuttled between Arab states trying to get them to sign up for a future plan involving parts of the Palestinians Authority and Arab countries providing security forces. He also intervened on at least three occasions, forcing Israel to allow more aid into Gaza, twice using the threat of restricting US weapons to make his point. There has been no such pressure by the Trump administration, which accelerated arms to Israel since January. The US has left what amounts to a strategic vacuum on Gaza's long-term plan. The Europeans, working with Gulf Arab counties, spent this week trying to fill it. For them, without effective aid, governance and a long-term peace plan, the impact on the ground will only deteriorate. They called this week for urgent aid intervention, backing the Palestinian Authority, and reviving work towards a two-state solution — even without the US signed up. It upends years of convention by which major Western powers would recognize a Palestinian state only at the end of negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians. Importantly, their combined statement meant Saudi Arabia, a leader of the Arab and Muslim world, was joining the condemnation of Hamas and call for its disarmament. Now they're hoping their move, supported by Arab countries, pressures Trump back towards a more established diplomatic process. But their conference — which will meet again in September — is working against all odds. The superpower seat is empty. — BBC
