
Disarming Hezbollah would spark 'bloodshed,' warns Qomati
After a meeting with the secretary-general of the Communist Party, Hanna Gharib, Qomati declared that "the Lebanese government will not be able to remove the weapons of the resistance, because it would be impossible without shedding blood, in the face of the external enemy," meaning Israel.
On Aug. 5, the Cabinet instructed the Lebanese Army to prepare by the end of August a plan to restore the monopoly of arms, with implementation expected by the end of the year.
On Aug. 7, the government adopted a proposal from U.S. envoy Tom Barrack consisting of 11 articles. It focuses primarily on ending the armed presence of all non-state factions in Lebanon and securing Israel's withdrawal from five positions it occupies in the south.
Call to 'correct course'
"The resistance is neither isolated nor besieged, but is part of a broad national front," added Qomati, adding that the Nawaf Salam government "sold out the homeland and handed a bad check to the foreign powers," as the international community, led by the U.S., pushes for Hezbollah's disarmament.
The cabinet "will not be able to achieve what it wants," insisted the former minister of state for parliamentary affairs, warning that "all the Lebanese people will oppose the government if it tries to implement its decision."
"The resistance was born from occupation, while the state was not able to protect citizens and deter aggression," recalled Qomati, calling on the government, "despite its failure," to "correct course and avoid decisions that harm Lebanon."
The vice president of Hezbollah's political council is not new to strongly criticizing the government's decision to remove Hezbollah's weapons. On Friday night, he said in an interview on Al-Jazeera that the cabinet's decision "will not lead to escalation or confrontation" internally in Lebanon, but that it constituted a "humiliation."
"We are studying our options regarding whether or not to remain in the government" He noted that three ministers from the Hezbollah-Amal coalition — walked out when the government began discussing the American proposal.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Nahar Net
3 hours ago
- Nahar Net
Report: Army chief refuses clash with Hezbollah as army prepares four-stage plan
by Naharnet Newsdesk 11 hours Army Commander General Rodolph Haykal has told Speaker Nabih Berri that he does not want to clash with Hezbollah, in a meeting Tuesday at Ain el-Tineh, pro-Hezbollah al-Akhbar newpaper reported. Al-Akhbar said Wednesday that it has learned from prominent sources that the meeting with Berri was "positive" and that Haykal has told both Berri and Hezbollah that Hezbollah's disarmament requires dialogue and understanding and that the disarmament plan "cannot be implemented by force." The Lebanese government had ordered the army to devise plans by the end of 2025 to disarm Hezbollah. "The problem is with the authority not with the army," Haykal reportedly told Berri, describing Hezbollah as a "fundamental Lebanese component." According to the daily's sources, the army has begun preparing a four-stage plan, targeting heavy missile weapons. This plan intersects with an American proposal of a four-stage plan starting from the area between the Litani and Awali rivers, followed by the Bekaa, Beirut's southern suburbs, and Greater Beirut, al-Akhbar said.


Nahar Net
4 hours ago
- Nahar Net
Larijani says US not Iran intervening in Lebanese affairs
by Naharnet Newsdesk 14 hours Iran's Supreme National Security Council chief Ali Larijani advised the Lebanese to preserve the resistance and accused the United States of "ordering" the Lebanese government to implement "a foreign plan", as he met Wednesday with President Joseph Aoun, Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, and Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri. Larijani's visit to Lebanon comes after the Lebanese government ordered the army to devise plans to disarm Hezbollah. Following his arrival in Beirut, Larijani vowed that his government would continue to provide support, after it expressed opposition to the disarmament plan. The senior Iranian official said his country rejected the plan and that any proposal to disarm Hezbollah should be part of an internal dialogue between the government and the Iran-backed group. He called on the Lebanese people to preserve "the resistance," saying that Iran will stand by Lebanon in case of any Israeli escalation and if Lebanon asks for help. "We respect any decision taken by the Lebanese government in coordination and cooperation with Lebanon's factions ... and consider Lebanon's unity to be very important but we don't support the foreign orders through which a certain timetable is specified," Larijani said after his meetings, in reference to a paper submitted by U.S. envoy Tom Barrack to Lebanese officials. The proposal includes a timetable for Hezbollah's disarmament. Larijani said that no foreign power should give orders to Lebanon, adding that it was not Iran but the United States that was intervening. Aoun had earlier told Larijani that he rejected any interference in the country's internal affairs, branding as "unconstructive" Iran's statements on plans to disarm Hezbollah. "The one who interferes in Lebanese affairs is the one who plans for you, gives you a timetable from thousands of kilometers away. We did not give you any plan," Larijani said. He added that Iran currently has "the best relations with Lebanon" and lauded the role that Aoun is playing "in bolstering national unity and unifying ranks inside all Lebanese sects and with all components."


L'Orient-Le Jour
7 hours ago
- L'Orient-Le Jour
5 things you should know about Lebanese-Iranian relations
A few years ago, an Iranian MP boasted that his country controlled four Arab capitals: Sanaa, Damascus, Baghdad and Beirut. Today, however, Tehran — recovering from a 12-Day War with Israel — finds itself in a delicate position. Its favored militia, Hezbollah, has emerged greatly weakened after 13 months of war with Israel in the wake of the Gaza a significant regional power, its influence on Lebanon through Hezbollah is no longer as strong, and Iran seems to be losing ground at a time when the Lebanese authorities — under pressure from Western powers — move to reclaim the arms monopoly they have long shared with Hezbollah. Missed this part? Hacking Lebanese Politics #13: Iran in Lebanon: How deep does the influence go? This shift comes after decades of Iranian efforts to arm, fund and train Hezbollah, even extending its...