Civil servants spent £3k on away day at Oval cricket ground
Department of Health staff spent £3,150 on hiring a function room for a 'professional development day' in September last year.
2
Their head office is only a mile-and-a-half away over the River Thames in Whitehall.
Sources said they did not watch a cricket match.
William Yarwood, media campaign manager at the TaxPayers' Alliance said: 'Taxpayers will be baffled that officials thought it was reasonable to shell out over £3,000 for an away day just a stone's throw from their own offices.
"Even if no cricket was watched, there's no excuse for this kind of wasteful spending when budgets are tight.
"The government was right to clamp down on government credit cards, but must remain vigilant to make sure civil servants don't revert back to old habits."
2
A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: "Since this spending occurred, we have restricted spending on away days at external venues and all departments and public bodies have been told to freeze nearly all government credit cards, with tough new rules introduced for civil servants looking to reapply.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
16 minutes ago
- The Sun
Prince Harry criticised over row that risks damaging his charity's reputation
PRINCE Harry was blasted last night for letting a boardroom battle damage his charity Sentebale. A watchdog said the public row risked undermining trust in good causes generally. 2 The Charity Commission said chances were missed to settle differences at Sentebale, set up by Harry and Lesotho's Prince Seeiso in 2006 for young people and kids living with HIV and Aids. It launched a probe when they stood down as patrons in support of trustees who quit in a dispute with Dr Sophie Chandauka over a fundraising strategy. Board of trustees chair Dr Chandauka said the 'toxicity' of Harry's brand since his move to live in the US had seen a drop in donors. She accused the Duke of Sussex, 40, of involvement in a 'cover-up' of a probe into bullying and harassment. Last night, she said the 'adverse media campaign' launched by those who resigned 'caused incalculable damage' to the charity. The Times reported a source close to Harry blasted the report and said the prince was 'devastated the chair had been allowed to succeed with a hostile takeover'. His spokesman said those who rely on Sentebale would bear the 'consequences of her actions'. The Charity Commission said the public airing of the row harmed Sentebale's reputation and risked overshadowing its achievements. The regulator, which cannot investigate individual allegations of bullying, found no evidence of systemic bullying or harassment, including misogyny or misogynoir at the charity but acknowledged 'the strong perception of ill treatment' felt by some involved. David Holdsworth, chief executive of the Charity Commission, said: 'Passion for a cause is the bedrock of volunteering and charity, delivering positive impact for millions of people here at home and abroad every day. Harry QUITTING his own charity is utterly humiliating - misogyny row will hurt him deeply 'However, in the rare cases when things go wrong, it is often because that very passion has become a weakness rather than a strength. 'Sentebale's problems played out in the public eye, enabling a damaging dispute to harm the charity's reputation, risk overshadowing its many achievements, and jeopardising the charity's ability to deliver for the very beneficiaries it was created to serve.' 2
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Nationwide leads new calls for change to protect domestic abuse survivors
Nationwide Building Society has partnered with Refuge, the UK's largest domestic abuse charity, in a bid to both bring about change and help protect survivors of abuse. The partnership is aiming to extend existing support for victims, as well as remove barriers which can prevent survivors from taking back control of their lives. A key part of the reform being asked for is for the Individual Insolvency Register (IIR) to be made private, protecting survivors' details, while also removing the £308 fee currently due. 'Nationwide and Refuge have signed Money Wellness's campaign to get the g overnment to make the IIR private – protecting the addresses of survivors who have become insolvent through bankruptcy, for example,' a statement read. 'Domestic abuse survivors often struggle to pay for this protection order because abusers typically exercise full financial control, leaving survivors with little or no personal funds. This comes in addition to the increased risk survivors face when having to list their details on the register.' Earlier this year, Nationwide and Refuge partnered with The Independent on the Brick by Brick campaign, with a second safe haven built for women fleeing domestic abuse, completed in July. Office for National Statistics records show 2.3 million adults in England and Wales experienced domestic abuse across 2023-24, including 1.6 million women. Women are more than twice as likely to be affected. In addition, specialist support staff will be able to refer people to Refuge via telephone, while Nationwide – as well as other financial institutions– offer safe spaces within branches where at-risk individuals can call family or sort through financial issues. Staff are also trained to help spot signs of domestic abuse. Emma Pickering, head of technology-facilitated abuse at Refuge, said: 'One in four women will experience domestic abuse in their lifetime, and cases are continuing to grow in both quantity and complexity. Thanks to Nationwide Building Society, Refuge will be able to expand its support for survivors of abuse. 'Our partnership has never been more needed. With Nationwide's support, Refuge's expert team will empower survivors with practical advice and emotional support, helping them to rebuild their lives. No survivor should have to navigate domestic abuse alone, and Nationwide's commitment means we will be able to ensure even more survivors receive the support they deserve.' It's not too late to support Refuge and to help more survivors find their freedom. Donations will be spent on Refuge's lifesaving work housing survivors of domestic abuse.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Zara published photos of models who appeared to be ‘unhealthily thin'
Fashion giant Zara published 'socially irresponsible' photos of models who appeared to be unhealthily thin, the advertising watchdog has ruled. The two product listings on the Zara website in May featured an image of a model wearing an oversize pocket shirt and another of a model wearing a voluminous combined short dress. The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) received one complaint that the ads were irresponsible because the models appeared to be unhealthily thin. Zara said the models had worked for well-known and reputable fashion brands and confirmed that both models had medical certification which proved they were in good health. They said that none of the images had been modified, beyond very minor lighting and colouring edits. Zara confirmed that it had amended the product listings after receiving the complaint and removed the specific images. The ASA said the low-cut design of the shirt in the first ad drew attention to the model's upper chest area, creating a focal point around her collarbone, which was protruding. In addition, the positioning of her arms, while wearing a baggy shirt, created the impression that her arms, shoulders and chest were very slim. The ASA said: 'Overall, we considered that the pose of the model and the choice of clothing in the ad created the impression that the model was unhealthily thin.' The watchdog said the styling and lighting of the second image and the choice of clothing meant the ad created the impression that the model was unhealthily thin. The ASA said: 'For the above reasons, we concluded that the models… appeared unhealthily thin and that the ads were irresponsible.' A Zara UK spokesman said: 'We note the ASA's decision following an individual complaint regarding two images on our website which we removed when the ASA made us aware. 'We are committed to responsible content and follow stringent guidelines and controls in the selection and photographing of models, as well as in the selection of images.'
