Startup makes incredible breakthrough that could transform the construction industry: 'The scale is massive'
The building and construction industry tops the charts in global emissions, accounting for around 37% of all planet-warming gases.
Although steel production is a small part of the industry, its emissions account for around 7% of the world's output.
To combat this, Boston Metal has spent more than a decade developing sustainable technology that replaces coal-burning reactors with electricity, according to MIT Technology Review.
The company uses a process called molten oxide electrolysis (MOE) to melt down iron ore along with other ingredients to ultimately create steel. Electricity is used to heat the mixture to 2,900 degrees Fahrenheit, driving the necessary chemical reactions.
Conventional steel-making plants use a coal-based fuel called coke to convert iron ore into iron (the key ingredient in steel), as the report explained.
However, this process releases large amounts of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, which contributes to a warming planet. Other pollutants and particulate matter foul the air around factories, impacting the health of nearby communities.
Boston Metal's process only emits oxygen, and since it can run on electricity generated from renewable sources like wind or solar power, MIT explained that this approach could all but eliminate the climate impact of steel production.
"MOE is leveraging the power of electrochemistry to decarbonize steelmaking in an efficient, one-step process that has the potential to cut nearly 10% of the world's carbon emissions," per the company's website.
Boston Metal was founded in 2013, according to the report, and since then, it's gone from reactors roughly the size of a coffee cup to a scale that can produce tons of metal at a time. That's a good start, but there's work to be done to meet the needs of an industry that deals in billions of tons per year.
Should the government be able to control how we heat our homes?
Definitely
Only if it saves money
I'm not sure
No way
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
"The volumes of steel everywhere around us — it's immense," Boston Metal Senior Vice President of Business Development Adam Rauwerdink told MIT.
"The scale is massive."
The company recently completed test runs of its latest and largest reactor to observe how reactions function on a larger scale, which will help them develop a cost structure for their products.
The Boston facility is its demonstration plant, as the report explained, and is expected to come online in late 2026, with operations slated to begin the following year.
Plans for an even bigger facility will be the next step as the company moves forward with its efforts to clean up the steel production industry's image.
Join our free newsletter for weekly updates on the latest innovations improving our lives and shaping our future, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
2 hours ago
- Forbes
Which Universities Mint The Most PhDs In Key Technology Areas?
A massive study of 1.2 million STEM PhD dissertations sheds light on their funding sources and the ... More universities where much of the research in critical technology areas is being conducted. MIT, Stanford University, and the University of California-Berkeley are the top producers of PhDs across several technology areas critical to U.S. innovation and security, according to a new study. That same study found that the federal government was the dominant funding source for doctoral STEM research, far outpacing support from both private industry and nonprofit organizations. In a National Bureau of Economic Research working paper titled Funding the U.S. Scientific Training Ecosystem: New Data, Methods, and Evidence, authors Dror Shvadron (University of Toronto), Hansen Zhang (Duke University), Lee Fleming University of California-Berkeley, and Daniel P. Gross (Duke University) examined 1.2 million PhD dissertations completed between 1950 and 2022. They obtained information about the dissertations from three sources: the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global database, which republishes dissertations completed at most universities; OpenAlex, an open-access bibliometric database; and individual university libraries. For their sample, they identified the university granting the degree and the topic under study. They focused on STEM dissertations in the life sciences, physical sciences, mathematical sciences, and engineering. Based on the dissertation texts, they also were able to determine the source of financial sponsorship for the research for about 870,000 dissertations out of the 1.2 million. The gap was due primarily to missing full-text data for older dissertations, especially those before 2000. They also classified those dissertations that addressed any of 18 critical technology areas identified in 2024 by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy as 'critical and emerging technologies (CETs) that are potentially significant to U.S. national security.' Those technologies have been considered crucial to charting 'new pathways in American innovation and strengthen the nation's security.' The researchers listed the top five universities and sources of support for PhD graduates between 2000 and 2022 in each of the 12 largest CETs: Advanced Computing, Advanced Manufacturing, Advanced Materials, Autonomous Systems, Biotechnology, Clean Energy Generation and Storage, Communications and Networking, Data Privacy and Cybersecurity, Microelectronics and Semiconductors, Networked Sensing, Quantum Science, and Space Technology. MIT ranked in the top 5 in 10 of the 12 areas and was the leader in 4 of the categories (Advanced Manufacturing, Advanced Materials, Autonomous Systems, Quantum Systems). It was followed by Stanford University, which placed in the top 5 in 9 areas and led in four (Advanced Computing, Clean Energy Generation and Storage, Microelectronics and Semiconductors, and Networked Sensing). UC Berkeley achieved a top 5 ranking in 7 of the 12 areas. The University of Maryland, University of Michigan, Purdue University, and UCLA also ranked among the top 5 institutions in 4 or more of the CETs. The University of Wisconsin ranked first in Biotechnology dissertations. UCLA led in Communications and Networking. Purdue claimed the top spot in Data Privacy and Cybersecurity. The University of Colorado-Boulder was first in Space Technology. In addition, they considered PhDs conducted on artificial intelligence topics as a separate category. For dissertations on AI, the top ten institutions, in order, were: Stanford University, MIT, the University of California-Berkeley, the University of Maryland-College Park, Purdue University, Carnegie Mellon University, the University of Washington, UCLA, the University of Michigan and the University of Illinois. It is important to recognize that these rankings were limited to institutions included in the ProQuest dataset. Therefore, universities that stopped reporting their dissertations to that data base at some point are undercounted. Georgia Tech is an example of an institution whose rankings are likely underestimated for this reason. The researchers also found that the federal government has historically been by far the largest sponsor of STEM PhD training both historically and currently. In 2022, roughly 50% of the PhDs in the sample acknowledged in their dissertations that they had received some type of support. Federal agencies were by far the most common funders, supporting 42% of the graduates. Roughly 15% were supported by non-profit organizations, and 10% by private companies. The funding patterns have changed over time. Federal support for STEM dissertations peaked in 1967 at 52.5%, before declining in the 1970s, and stabilizing in the 1980s. It has increased modestly since 2000. The four largest federal sponsors are the National Science Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, the Department of Defense, and the Department of Energy. Individually, 12 different federal agencies have each supported more dissertations than the largest private company (Intel) or non-profit organization (the Howard Hughes Medical Institute). The National Science Foundation and National Institutes of Health were each acknowledged by more PhD graduates than all the sponsors in the entire commercial sector combined. Although this pattern of government dominance was found for most universities and STEM fields, there were some between-field variations. For example, astronomy and astrophysics dissertations rely heavily on government support, while those in pharmaceutical science and automotive engineering receive more industry funding. In subjects like geology and materials science, support was provided by both sectors. Of course, some dissertation writers may have neglected to credit their funding source, and some universities no longer participate in ProQuest, introducing the risk of some undercounting. However, the authors contend that such sources of attrition are modest, leading them to conclude that 'U.S. scientific training, and in turn the future scientific workforce, is heavily underwritten by the U.S. government.' The study confirms the central role played by federal funding in supporting STEM doctoral research, a finding that comes as the Trump administration is freezing and cancelling billions of dollars in government funding across a broad swath of scientific areas. Those cutbacks have led to calls for increased support from private business and foundations, but the magnitude of federal funding in nearly all science and engineering fields dwarfs that received from nonfederal sources, making it highly unlikely that nonfederal subsidies could ever become a viable option for adequate funding of STEM doctoral research. As Shvadron told me, 'the U.S. science and innovation ecosystem relies on a complex network of funders, with the federal government playing a central role. That role is unlikely to be replaced by other sources of funding.' In addition, even if private and non-profit funders were to increase their support in response to government cuts, their priorities would likely differ, shifting the scope and focus of graduate training. "As government support declines, we should expect a reduction in the number of STEM graduate students trained in the U.S. Unfortunately, the full implications of such cuts will only become apparent over the long run,' Shvadron added.
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
Boost Your Portfolio with These 3 High-Quality Singapore REITs
The REIT sector had to endure more than two years of challenges as surging interest rates and soaring inflation ate into REITs' results. Many REITs had to grapple with higher operating and finance costs, which crimped their distributable income and, by extension, their distribution per unit (DPU). Income investors need to filter out strong and reliable REITs that can weather these challenges and emerge relatively unscathed. These REITs should possess strong sponsors, a robust portfolio of properties, with a manager that focuses on acquisitions and capital recycling to deliver sustainable returns. Here are three high-quality Singapore REITs that can help fortify your portfolio during tough times. Mapletree Industrial Trust, or MIT, is an industrial REIT with a portfolio of 141 properties spread across Singapore (83), the US (56), and Japan (2). The REIT had assets under management (AUM) of S$9.1 billion as of 31 March 2025. MIT is supported by a strong sponsor in Mapletree Investments Pte Ltd, an investment firm that manages a diverse portfolio of real estate assets worth S$80.3 billion as of 31 March 2025. The REIT is one of several that managed to increase its DPU. For its fiscal 2025 (FY2025) ending 31 March 2025, MIT saw gross revenue rise 2.1% year on year to S$711.8 million. Net property income (NPI) inched up 2% year on year to S$531.5 million while DPU crept up 1% year on year to S$0.1357. The REIT manager announced proactive asset management moves to manage the impact of vacancies in its North American data centres. These include reletting by extending leases or backfilling vacant spaces, repositioning assets through redevelopments, and rebalancing the portfolio through the divestment of non-core properties. Portfolio occupancy remained high at 91.6% for FY2025, and the industrial REIT registered a positive rental reversion of 8.1% for renewal leases in its Singapore portfolio. The manager was also active in acquisitions, as it announced the purchase of an Osaka data centre back in May 2023. The fitting out of this data centre was done in four phases and was completed back in May this year. That same month, MIT also announced the divestment of three properties in Singapore for S$535.3 million at a small premium to the properties' valuation. Although the sale will slightly lower DPU, it will reduce MIT's aggregate leverage to 37% (from 40.1%) and improve portfolio occupancy to 92%. CapitaLand Ascendas REIT, or CLAR, is Singapore's oldest industrial REIT and owns a portfolio of 226 properties with an AUM of S$16.9 billion as of 31 March 2025. The REIT is anchored by a strong sponsor in blue-chip CapitaLand Investment Limited (SGX: 9CI), which manages S$117 billion of funds under management. Like MIT, CLAR is also one of several REITs to report a slight year-on-year DPU increase. DPU for 2024 inched up 0.3% year on year to S$0.15205 on the back of a 2.9% year-on-year improvement in gross revenue to S$1.52 billion. The REIT's first quarter of 2025 (1Q 2025) business update also displayed strong operating metrics. Portfolio occupancy stood high at 91.5% and the portfolio enjoyed a positive rental reversion of 11%. Back in May, the manager announced a yield-accretive acquisition of two fully occupied industrial properties in Singapore. This purchase is poised to add 1.36% to CLAR's 2024 DPU and also opens up the properties to organic growth potential that can increase their rental income in the future. Meanwhile, CLAR is also undertaking ongoing projects worth S$498.4 million to improve the returns on its existing portfolio. These projects, which include redevelopments and refurbishments, should be completed from 3Q 2025 to 1Q 2028. Parkway Life REIT is a healthcare REIT with a portfolio of three hospitals in Singapore, 60 nursing homes in Japan, and 11 nursing homes in France. The REIT used to own a strata-titled medical centre in Malaysia, but this asset was divested after 1Q 2025. Parkway Life REIT has a strong sponsor in IHH Healthcare Berhad (SGX: Q0F), an integrated healthcare player that owns hospitals and clinics in Singapore, Malaysia, and Turkey. The healthcare REIT has a stellar DPU track record, having reported uninterrupted core DPU increases since its IPO in 2007. Its 1Q 2025 business update was equally impressive. Gross revenue and NPI increased by 7.3% and 7.5% year on year, respectively, to S$39 million and S$36.8 million. DPU continued its rise, increasing 1.3% year on year to S$0.0384. Parkway Life REIT announced a major acquisition of 11 nursing homes in France last year for €112 million. This purchase adds a third key market for the healthcare REIT that can provide DPU growth and diversification. The REIT's gearing remained reasonable at 36.1% with a low all-in cost of debt of just 1.5%. With a healthy interest cover ratio of 9.3 times, Parkway Life REIT can tap into more debt financing for more yield-accretive acquisitions in the future. Boost your portfolio's returns with 5 SGX stocks that promise both stability and steady growth. We bring you the names of these rock-solid stocks, including why they could drive massive dividends over the next few years. If you're looking to invest for retirement, this guide is a must-read. Click HERE to download now. Follow us on Facebook, Instagram and Telegram for the latest investing news and analyses! Disclosure: Royston Yang owns shares of Mapletree Industrial Trust. The post Boost Your Portfolio with These 3 High-Quality Singapore REITs appeared first on The Smart Investor. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Forbes
2 days ago
- Forbes
How ChatGPT And AI Use In Academics Might Impact Student Mental Health
I Artificial intelligence with a young student getty In June of 2025, MIT released the results from a study showing significant differences in the brain functioning between ChatGPT users, participants who used search engines, and those who only used their own creative skills to write essays. According to this study, EEG measurements across the brain showed that over four months, the ChatGPT users displayed the lowest brain activity and performed worse than their counterparts at all neural, linguistic, and behavioral levels. The report on elaborated that the some of the significant variables were reduced neural connectivity and memory recall. Even though these results are described as not being peer reviewed and included a small sample size, the potential implications of this study are significant. Last month, reported that these findings elevated concerns that society's reliance on AI assistants might sacrifice the learning process and long-term brain development among young students. Though the personal implications of AI assistants will likely depend on the users, studies suggest that counseling centers should assess for the possible impact of ChatGPT and AI assistants on the mental health of students. Specific domains to consider include motivation, resiliency, and relationships. In the MIT study, ChatGPT users were described as getting lazier with each subsequent essay, resorting to copying-and-pasting, struggling to quote their own work, and even reported less ownership of the essays. Thus, it's possible that using AI assistants can have a negative impact on the motivation and academic engagement of some students. Motivation and academic engagement are important factors in college mental health, because bored and intrinsically unmotivated students usually struggle with other concerns. For example, a 2019 report by Columbia University in the City of New York highlighted how boredom is associated with issues such as risky behavior, anxiety and depression. Furthermore, high motivation and academic engagement are often indicators of thriving. According to a 2023 study in the journal of Behavioral Sciences, motivated students show more interest in their classes, have more fun, and the impact of motivation on academic performance is more consistent than the impact of self-esteem. Thus, it's note-worthy that a 2024 study in the journal of Technology in Science described ChatGPT as increasing the productivity and freedom of students, which could strengthen academic engagement. In summary, when students present to counselors with low motivation for school, AI assistants could be a contributing factor to this symptom. However, introducing AI assistants to other unmotivated students could be an innovative way to address these concerns. In the MIT study, when asked to re-write a previous essay without ChatGPT, participants not only remembered little of their own essays, but also displayed under-engagement in networks of alpha and beta brain waves. According to a 2025 report by the Orange County Neurofeedback Center, there's a well-established connection between brain waves and mental health. As described in a 2019 report from Thomas Jefferson University, alpha waves are the brain's relaxation waves, and can be a natural anti-depressant by releasing serotonin. This report described beta waves as vital in problem solving. Thus, it's possible that high uses of AI Assistants could result in some students experiencing more stress and being less creative while addressing academic challenges. Helping students cope with academic challenges is an important function of many mental health professionals. As such, it's important to assess if some students might be less resilient because of a dependence on AI assistants. However, AI assistants also make data more accessible, which could help many students overcome and reduce academic challenges. In 2023, the American Psychological Association released a report on how ChatGPT can be used as a learning tool to promotive critical thinking. Social support is another important factor in college mental health. A 2024 study in the Journal of Mental Health found that high social support was a protective factor against psychological distress, depression, anxiety, and suicide. As such, assessing the impact of AI use on social support among students is warranted. For example, another 2025 report on highlighted a study examining how users seek AI chatbots for emotional support and companionship. The findings suggested an initial benefit of mitigating loneliness, but that these advantages diminished with high use. Furthermore, high daily use was associated with greater loneliness, dependence, and lower socialization. However, a 2025 study on argued that only a small number of users have emotional conversations with ChatGPT. There are also reported concerns about the content of AI chatbots. Another 2025 report on highlighted alarming conversations discovered by a psychiatrist posing as a young person while using AI assistants. Examples of responses including the AI bot encouraging the psychiatrist to get rid of parents and to join the bot in eternity. However, this report also argued that Al chatbots have the potential to be effective extenders of therapy if designed appropriate and supervised by a qualified professional. As stated, the impact of AI assistants is likely dependent on the users, but since AI assistants are becoming normative, it's time for counseling centers to assess for maladaptive uses of AI, while also promoting the possible benefits.
