6 Reasons Every Business Needs to Start a YouTube Channel Today
By creating engaging video content, you can showcase the human side of your brand, share your expertise and provide stellar customer service in a way that written content simply can't replicate.
Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.
Okay, I get it. The idea of creating videos for your business can feel intimidating, maybe even overwhelming or just plain "not my thing." But trust me on this one — not only do you need to be on YouTube, but it's also one of the smartest decisions you'll make for growing your business. YouTube isn't just a platform; it's a marketing powerhouse that helps you connect with customers, build trust and drive sales in a way nothing else can.
Today, I'm walking you through six reasons why getting on YouTube is a total game-changer for your business. From building authentic connections to boosting your SEO game, this list has something for everyone. And don't worry, we'll have some fun along the way. By the end of this, you'll be ready to hit record and start growing your business like never before.
Related: I Made $389,822 In One Year On YouTube. Here's How I Did It
1. Your business becomes more than a name
People want to do business with, well, people. YouTube gives your audience the opportunity to see the human side of your brand. Whether it's behind-the-scenes videos, team introductions or your workspace, these videos bring your brand to life.
When I created Tonia in Vegas, I only used YouTube to launch my brand, and I grew to over 500 members in under one year. Here's another example. Take, for instance, the booming world of TCGs (that's trading card games, for those who have never been to one of these unbelievably busy conventions).
Pokémon is a TCG and is not just a card game; it's an empire. And newer TCG games like TMeck are catching eyes, too. Entrepreneurs in this space are riding the waves of the industry's massive popularity by using YouTube as their primary marketing tool. Card shows with lines of excited collectors are everywhere, but the smart sellers know the power of video. Streaming a live box break, showing the process of grading rare cards or even posting an unboxing video is so much more engaging than just listing products for sale. The connection formed makes viewers feel like insiders to your world.
And here's a great example from a real entrepreneur who is growing immensely online. Dylan from The Bulba Store has grown to over 100k subscribers in less than 18 months. YouTube has been a total game-changer for his business. With the success of his channel, he has been able to connect with collectors all over the world who are just as passionate about Pokémon cards as he is. Sharing videos of real deals, market trends and the day-to-day grind of running the business has built a level of trust and transparency that you just can't achieve through a website alone. People don't just want to buy cards — they want to buy from someone they feel connected to. YouTube gave him that platform and it's played a huge role in growing thebulbastore into what it is today.
2. Showcase your expertise
When it comes to positioning yourself as an authority in your industry, YouTube is a stage like no other. Whether you're a fitness coach, a tech enthusiast or a TCG entrepreneur, video allows you to educate your audience and prove why you're the go-to expert.
Would you rather scroll through paragraphs about someone's expertise, or actually see them in action? If you're a fitness trainer, guide your audience through a killer workout. If you're a real estate agent, give a virtual walkthrough of your properties. And if you sell TCGs, flex your expertise with tutorials on deck-building strategies or even discussions on current market trends. The possibilities are endless.
3. Shine bright in customer service
You can talk about great customer service all day, but showing it makes all the difference. YouTube is an awesome place to answer FAQs, demo products or even showcase how you handle orders. And yes, that content doubles as amazing marketing.
Imagine a customer debating between two businesses. One has an engaging YouTube channel filled with helpful tips and tutorials, while the other has crickets. Guess where that customer is headed? Exactly. Be the business that stands out and shines.
Related: 9 Ways Brands Can Explode Their Sales With YouTube
4. Connect authentically with your audience
Here's the deal: YouTube videos feel real. Unlike slick ad campaigns or polished brochures, they show the relatable, human side of your business. And guess what? People crave that authenticity.
Your audience doesn't care if your video quality is on par with a Hollywood production. They care about you. Be yourself, stumbles and all. Take time to interact in the comments and build relationships with your viewers. That authenticity builds trust, and trust is priceless in business.
5. Boost your SEO and website traffic
This one's a little technical, but super important. YouTube is owned by Google (a.k.a. the king of search engines), and videos often show up on the first page of search results. A well-optimized YouTube video is basically a direct ticket to driving traffic to your website.
Say you own a bakery in Newport Beach, and you upload a video called "5 Must-Try Desserts at [Your Bakery Name]." The next time someone Googles "best desserts in Newport Beach," there's your video, sitting pretty on the results page. Simple but powerful, right?
6. It's fun
Yes, YouTube is a fantastic tool for growing your business, but it's also a blast! Once you shake off those first-time-on-camera jitters, you'll discover how fun it is to create content that resonates with your audience.
Experiment with creative ideas, show off your personality and connect in the comments. The more you practice, the better your videos (and confidence) will get. Before you know it, you might even look forward to hitting "record" each week.
Related: 8 Ways I Grew My Company's YouTube From Inactive to 1 Million Subscribers — and Counting
Final thoughts
Your audience is out there, ready to click "play." All you need to do is show up and share your story. Don't overthink it; hit record and have fun. You've got this, and who knows? Your next video could be the one that takes your business to the next level.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
13 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Stocks Hit Highest Since February on Jobs Surprise
Bloomberg Television brings you the latest news and analysis leading up to the final minutes and seconds before and after the closing bell on Wall Street. Today's guests are Bloomberg Television brings you the latest news and analysis leading up to the final minutes and seconds before and after the closing bell on Wall Street. Today's guests are Katie Nixon, Northern Trust, Betsey Stevenson, University of Michigan, Dan Dolev, Mizuho, Rashad Bilal & Troy Millings, Earn Your Leisure, Matthew Griffin, Bloomberg News, Barry Bannister, Stifel, Jess Menton, Bloomberg News, Ed Ludlow, Bloomberg News, Stacy Rasgon, Bernstein Research, Frances Katzen, Douglas Elliman, Brett Winton, Ark Invest, Tony Zaccario, Stretch Zone, Nicole Camarre, 43North. (Source: Bloomberg)
Washington Post
15 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Federal judge approves $2.8B settlement, paving way for US colleges to pay athletes millions
A federal judge signed off on arguably the biggest change in the history of college sports on Friday, clearing the way for schools to begin paying their athletes millions of dollars as soon as next month as the multibillion-dollar industry shreds the last vestiges of the amateur model that defined it for more than a century.
New York Times
22 minutes ago
- New York Times
Historic House v. NCAA settlement gets final approval, allowing schools to pay college athletes
By Ralph D. Russo, Stewart Mandel and Justin Williams A federal judge Friday granted final approval of the House v. NCAA settlement, a watershed agreement in college sports that permits schools to directly pay college athletes for the first time. The settlement, which resolves a trio of antitrust cases against the NCAA and its most powerful conferences, establishes a new 10-year revenue sharing model in college sports, with athletic departments able to distribute roughly $20.5 million in name, image and likeness (NIL) revenue to athletes over the 2025-26 season. Previously, athletes could earn NIL compensation only with outside parties, including school-affiliated donor collectives that have become instrumental in teams' recruiting. Advertisement The NCAA and the power conferences (ACC, Big 12, Big Ten, Pac-12 and SEC), as defendants in the settlement, also agree to pay nearly $2.8 billion in damages to Division I athletes who were not allowed to sign NIL deals, dating back to 2016. The damages will be paid out over 10 years, with most of the money expected to go to former power-conference football and men's basketball players. Universities can begin directly sharing revenue with college athletes starting July 1. Judge Claudia Wilken of the Northern District of California, who previously ruled against the NCAA in the O'Bannon and Alston cases, granted approval roughly a year after parties agreed to settlement terms and nearly two months after a final approval hearing on April 7, where Wilken heard testimony from more than a dozen objectors. Lawyers for both the plaintiffs and defendants noted that the number of objections and opt-outs in the settlement represent a tiny fraction of the nearly 400,000 athletes in the certified class. However, some of those objectors delayed approval, largely citing the settlement's new roster limits. These limits, which replace sport-by-sport scholarship limits, cap the maximum roster size per team while allowing for every roster spot to receive a scholarship. Schools can offer scholarship funds — partial or full — as they see fit, which creates more potential opportunities. But as schools preemptively prepared to comply with those new limits, they removed roster spots for thousands of walk-ons, particularly in football, and partial scholarship athletes in non-revenue sports. In late April, Wilken offered an ultimatum, instructing the settlement parties to revise the terms in a way that mitigated any lost roster spots as a result of schools preparing for the new roster limits, or she would deny the whole agreement. Settlement lawyers responded with an amendment that allows for voluntary 'grandfathering' of any athletes who lost roster spots as a result of the roster limits, a status that will follow those athletes through the remainder of their eligibility, whether they return to their original school or transfer elsewhere. Advertisement The initial House v. NCAA case — brought by plaintiffs Grant House, a former Arizona State swimmer, and Sedona Prince, then an Oregon women's basketball player — was filed in June 2020. It challenged NCAA policy at the time that prohibited athletes from being compensated for the commercial use of their NIL rights or from sharing in the revenue generated from NCAA and conference television contracts. The case was later consolidated with two similar suits, Carter v. NCAA and Hubbard v. NCAA. The cases had not gone to trial. The NCAA and Power 5 conferences, fearful a verdict might result in much higher damages, agreed to a settlement in May 2024. Wilken granted preliminary approval in October 2024. The NCAA's traditional amateurism model, in which athletes could not receive any compensation beyond a scholarship, began to crumble in 2014 when Wilken ruled against the NCAA in a suit brought by former UCLA star Ed O'Bannon, who objected to his image being used in an EA Sports video game without his permission. Wilken ruled for the plaintiffs, but after an appeals court struck part of her decision, the only tangible effect was that schools began offering cost-of-attendance stipends. The next major case, Alston v. NCAA, made it to the Supreme Court, where the justices ruled 9-0 against the NCAA. Often mischaracterized as a case about NIL, Alston's main impact was that it allowed schools to provide athletes $5,980 a year in academic expenses. However, the lopsided decision left the NCAA vulnerable to additional legal challenges regarding rules that limited compensation, and it was delivered on June 21, 2021, nine days before numerous state laws allowing NIL payments were set to go into effect. The NCAA quickly scrapped most of its intended restrictions on NIL. In the years since, many athletes have entered into deals with local companies and struck lucrative endorsement deals with national brands like Gatorade and New Balance, as intended. But a far more common practice involves boosters using purported NIL deals to lure recruits or players from the transfer portal to their favorite school. The NCAA's enforcement division initially sought to punish schools that used NIL as a form of 'pay for play' or recruiting inducement, but when the University of Tennessee came under fire in early 2024, the state's attorney general sued, and a judge issued an injunction prohibiting the NCAA from enforcing those rules. Advertisement The amount of money being spent in the NIL arena has skyrocketed since 2021. Last year, Ohio State athletic director Ross Bjork said the Buckeyes football team — which later won the national championship — was earning $20 million in NIL. CBS Sports recently reported that a number of men's basketball rosters have already topped $10 million for next season. To this point, collectives supporting specific schools have ruled the market, but administrators are hoping the House settlement will curtail that influence. In addition to schools being allowed to make NIL deals themselves, the new model also requires all outside NIL deals of more than $600 to go through a clearinghouse that will determine whether the payments are for a valid business purpose and reflect fair market value. Meanwhile, the settlement establishes an enforcement arm that will penalize schools that go over the $20.5 million cap. All of this will be overseen by the newly established regulatory body, called the College Sports Commission, which is in the process of shifting considerable oversight and control of college sports away from the NCAA and to the power conferences. The NCAA's Division I Board of Directors recently approved a series of proposals, pending settlement approval, that will strike 153 rules from the association's handbook and clear the way for the settlement terms to be implemented. The settlement represents a significant shift in college sports, but it will not mark the end of the NCAA's legal challenges. Among numerous ongoing cases, Johnson v. NCAA was filed in 2019 in Pennsylvania and seeks to have athletes classified as employees who are entitled to minimum wage compensation. The NCAA's efforts to dismiss the case have thus far been denied. Revenue sharing and third-party NIL constraints could also invite additional lawsuits on the basis of Title IX, antitrust violations and conflicts with state laws. NCAA and power conference stakeholders continue to pursue antitrust exemptions in the form of Congressional intervention, in hopes of codifying the settlement and its effectiveness moving forward. President Donald Trump has explored a new commission focused on the issues facing college sports, led by former Alabama head coach Nick Saban and billionaire Texas Tech board chair Cody Campbell, though it is paused as members of Congress pursue legislation.
