Israel's ban on UNRWA in Jerusalem and the West Bank comes into effect
A ban preventing UNRWA, the UN Agency for Palestinian Refugees, from operating in Occupied East Jerusalem and Israel has come into force today.
The highly controversial move came into force after the Israeli Parliament , and after a legal challenge to pause the ban was rejected by the Israeli Supreme Court on Wednesday.
accuses UNRWA of having close links to Hamas in Gaza, which the organisation denies.
Nine UNRWA employees were sacked for taking part in the 7 October attacks.
Many donor countries initially suspended funding but most, including the UK, have since reinstated it.
"UNRWA equals Hamas," an Israeli government spokesman said yesterday. "Israel has made public irrefutable evidence UNRWA is riddled with Hamas operatives."
No evidence has been presented of those links existing in Jerusalem or the West Bank.
In the Shuafat refugee camp close to Jerusalem, Palestinian patients told us they were angry and concerned by the loss of vital services.
"I'm against this decision, we're all against it, the whole camp," said Amal. "Everyone has benefited from this clinic. Both West Bank and Jerusalem residents.
"I've been coming here ever since I was a little girl, we've gotten used to coming here. This really doesn't work for us."
Another patient, Mohammed, was carrying boxes of prescription medicine, paid for by UNRWA because he couldn't afford them himself.
"I have a chronic disease and I rely on a monthly prescription," he told us. "My children get treated here; their children get vaccinated.
"And all of this is for free. I could not afford this medicine otherwise."
Although the ban only concerns operations in Occupied East Jerusalem, Israel has also severed communication with the Agency and revoked the visas of international staff, making it extremely hard to continue services in Gaza and the West Bank.
Almost all of the two million residents of Gaza rely on UNRWA in some form. UNRWA has contacts on the ground that no other agency has or could replicate in the current crisis.
Read more:
Following the vote to ban UNRWA, the Head of the World Food Programme Cindy McCain described the agency as "indispensable" and tweeted that "the decision will have devastating consequences on food security."
UNRWA, which was established following the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, provides medical services to at least 70,000 Palestinians in Jerusalem and runs schools for thousands of pupils as well as maintaining streets and carrying out waste disposal.
Israel says those pupils will now be transferred to municipality schools but UNRWA says there has been little to no coordination around who will replace other services.
"We have not been given any indications of plans or indeed proposals by the Israeli authorities, not in East Jerusalem, also not in the West Bank," UNRWA's director of West Bank operations Roland Friedrich told Sky News.
He added: "It is very concerning because it doesn't allow us to basically coordinate, prepare and in fact, to try to see how things can be done going forward.
"The collapse of UNRWA in the West Bank and in fact also in the Gaza Strip cannot be in the interest of anybody, not of Israelis, not of Palestinians, not of neighbouring countries, and clearly also not for those who care about the ceasefire in the Gaza Strip."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
IAEA: No increased radiation after attack on Iran's Isfahan site
No increased radiation levels have been detected following the Israeli airstrike on the Iranian nuclear facility in Isfahan, according to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). In a post on X on Saturday, the IAEA said it remains in close contact with the Iranian authorities, following several strikes on facilities on Friday. Located in central Iran, 440 kilometres south of Tehran, Isfahan is widely suspected to be the primary location for Iran's secret nuclear weapon development programme. Among other things, uranium ore is prepared for enrichment in Isfahan. Several nuclear research facilities are located in and near the city of some 2.2 million inhabitants. Tehran repeatedly claims that its nuclear programme only serves peaceful purposes.
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Iran-Israel tensions remain high as conflict enters second day
Tensions between Israel and Iran remained high on the second day of open conflict on Saturday, with neither side showing willingness to back down despite mounting international pressure to de-escalate. Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz issued a sharp warning to Iran and its Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, threatening severe consequences if attacks on Israeli civilian areas continue. "If Khamenei continues to fire missiles at the Israeli civilian population, Tehran will burn," Katz said on Saturday in a statement. His comments came after overnight Iranian missile strikes reportedly killed at least three people and injured dozens in Israel. Iran's waves of ballistic missiles and drone strikes on Israel are viewed as retaliation for Israel's large-scale airstrikes on Friday, which targeted the country's nuclear sites, senior military officials and top scientists. On Saturday, Iranian officials confirmed the deaths of three more nuclear scientists and another two generals in the Israeli strikes. At least 78 people were killed in the strikes - including the scientists and senior military officials - and more than 320 people were injured, Iranian officials said. Iran has also issued warnings to Western powers Iranian media outlets, meanwhile, reported that Tehran has notified France, Britain and the United States of potential future strikes should they continue supporting Israel's defence efforts. Countries involved in Israel's defence against Iranian attacks would therefore have to expect attacks themselves, according to the Iranian leadership. Regional military bases of allied states and ships in the Persian Gulf and Red Sea were named as possible targets in the media reports. Iran shoots down drones near border with Azerbaijan and Turkey Iran's military reportedly shot down drones near its north-western border, according to state media on Saturday. The incident occurred close to the borders with Azerbaijan and Turkey, the report said. Several Iranian cities came under heavy shelling in overnight attacks. In central and north-eastern Tehran, explosions and sustained anti-aircraft fire were heard for hours, local media and eyewitnesses reported. The Israeli military said it had struck dozens of targets in Iran, including infrastructure related to surface-to-air missile systems. It said the strikes aimed to weaken Iranian air defences near Tehran, allowing Israeli aircraft greater operational freedom in the area. Explosions near Tel Aviv An Israeli military spokesperson said most Iranian missiles launched overnight were intercepted. Unconfirmed reports suggest US forces are assisting Israel with missile defence operations. Despite interceptions, missile debris caused damage in central Israel, including the Tel Aviv area, where several buildings were badly affected. On Saturday, the Israeli military reported another drone attack from Iran, triggering fresh air raid sirens and defensive responses. Israel said it would continue targeting Iranian positions.
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Grim Reality of the Conflict in Iran
A damaged residential building in Tehran, Iran, on June 13, 2025. Credit - Middle East Images—AFP/Getty In the early hours of Friday morning, Israel launched a sweeping military campaign against Iran. The ongoing operation, which was reportedly planned to unfold over several days, is targeting a list of nuclear and military facilities, as well as senior regime officials, that grows longer by the hour. Iran has thus far retaliated with drones and a substantial missile barrage that could see Israel expand its targeting further still. In a region that has seen endless bloodshed since Hamas's October 2023 attacks, the grim reality is that things may get much worse before they get even worse. Under the Islamic Republic that took power in 1979, enmity toward Israel has been a core ideological tenet of Iranian foreign policy and a key driver in its regional policy. Over decades, their rivalry played out mainly through indirect actions by Iran and by covert operations from Israel. That dynamic changed last year. In April and again in October, the two sides engaged in direct hostilities, with Iran twice launching massive missile salvoes largely repelled by Israeli and allied air defenses. After the second strike, which came shortly after Israel severely degraded the upper ranks of Hizbollah in Lebanon—the most powerful of Iran's proxies—Israel targeted Iranian air defences and missile production facilities, facing little resistance or response. But while Iran's regional power projection was diminishing and its arsenal of missiles and drones twice proved largely ineffective, a third concern—a nuclear threat which Israel considered existential—was still growing. Tehran had been steadily expanding the scale and scope of its nuclear activity ever since President Donald Trump withdrew from the Iran Nuclear Deal during his first term; President Joe Biden's Administration sought and failed to revive it. In March, Trump announced that he had reached out to Iran's leadership to negotiate a new deal, and his administration conducted five rounds of talks in Muscat and Rome in attempts to reach one. For Iran, which sought sanctions relief for its embattled economy, the success of negotiations with the U.S. hinged on concessions it has long opposed: Dismantling its nuclear program altogether or even ceasing the domestic enrichment of uranium. For Israel, eliminating, rather than merely restricting, the production of fissile material that could be used to fuel a weapon has been paramount. For President Trump, the prospect of a military strike by Israel seems a means of strengthening Washington's hand in a diplomatic agreement in which he still remains interested. But at the moment, the question may be less a matter of whether diplomacy can succeed than how grievously the situation could escalate. The worst-case scenarios are dire: A cycle of Israeli and Iranian counterstrikes that draw in the U.S., Iran's non-state allies, and regional states, cause grievous harm to civilians on all sides, and inject profound uncertainty into global markets. Over time, Iran's regime could attempt to reconstitute its nuclear activity from the rubble, only with an explicit aim of fashioning a weapon in the shortest possible time as a means of deterrence in the future. Another disastrous scenario is that the regime in Tehran falls and there is a protracted war for power and chaos or an even harder line regime armed with nuclear weapons. Is there a path out of this deepening crisis? Perhaps, though not a particularly promising one. Trump's stated objective—even as the fire is exchanged in two directions—remains a deal with Iran, and Tehran could offer concessions on the stipulation that it also involve an immediate cessation of hostilities with Israel. Were Iran to concede on its red lines in an effort to stave off greater destruction, perhaps Trump would be keen enough to avert a widening conflagration to also press Israel into ending the escalation cycle as well. Iran's government has previously demonstrated that when facing particularly inauspicious circumstances, especially those that might threaten the very foundations of the regime itself, it can make concessions necessary for its survival. But facing perhaps the gravest crisis it has faced since the eight-year-long war with Iraq in the 1980s, it may end up doubling down to the detriment of its people and the region. Contact us at letters@
