Conclave Update: Vatican Conservatives Face Potential Blow Over Next Pope
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Confusion surrounding the birthdate of Cardinal Philippe Ouédraogo, a conservative cardinal from Burkina Faso, may cost him his spot at the upcoming papal conclave.
Only cardinals under the age of 80 can participate in a conclave, a rule established by Pope Paul VI in 1970 and reaffirmed in subsequent papal decrees.
But it is unclear whether Ouédraogo is 79 or 80, as he has different birth dates listed in Vatican yearbooks for 2024 and 2025.
Newsweek has contacted the Vatican, via email, for comment.
Cardinal Philippe Ouedraogo holds his skull cap as he arrives for the afternoon session of the Synod of bishops, at the Vatican, Thursday, Oct. 22, 2015.
Cardinal Philippe Ouedraogo holds his skull cap as he arrives for the afternoon session of the Synod of bishops, at the Vatican, Thursday, Oct. 22, 2015.
AP
Why It Matters
Ouédraogo is known as a theological conservative, meaning his vote could be important for traditionalists who want to roll back some of Pope Francis' more progressive stances—such as blessing same-sex unions—influencing the ideological trajectory of the next papacy.
What To Know
Last year, Ouédraogo, was listed by the Vatican as being born on January 25, 1945, which would make him 80.
But, this year the Vatican now records his birthdate as December 31, 1945, leaving him just within the voting age threshold.
He was interviewed about this by Dutch newspaper Nederlands Dagblad, when he said: "In my village, there were neither hospitals nor schools. I was born at home and was not given a birthdate."
Ouédraogo said he had randomly selected January 25 when he joined the seminary for bureaucratic reasons, but the December 31 date appears in both his passport and the country's national registry.
When asked why the date was only changed this year, just ahead of his 80th birthday, Ouédraogo answered: "In Africa, birthdays don't matter. We celebrate community events, not individual ones. A birthday has little influence on social life."
This is according to a translation by La Croix, a French Roman Catholic newspaper.
It quoted Burkina Faso's ambassador to the Holy See as saying: "It is common practice for governments to assign Dec. 31 as a birthdate when the actual date of birth is unknown."
Newsweek has contacted Burkina Faso's Embassy to the Holy See, via email, for comment.
Two cardinals—Kenya's John Njue and Spain's Antonio Cañizares Llovera—have already withdrawn from the conclave for health reasons, reducing the number of electors.
Should Ouédraogo be excluded, only 132 cardinals will cast votes, most of whom were appointed by Pope Francis. To be elected the next pontiff, a candidate requires a two-thirds majority.
What People Are Saying
Speaking to reporters ahead of his trip to Michigan, President Donald Trump was asked about the upcoming conclave process and whom he would like to see as the next pope.
"I'd like to be pope," the president quipped. "That would be my number one choice. No, I don't know, I have no preference...I must say we have a cardinal [Timothy Dolan, who has been the archbishop of New York since 2009] that happens to be out of a place called New York who's very good. So, we'll see what happens."
What Happens Next
The conclave is set to begin on May 7. There are currently four frontrunners in the race to become the next pope and decide the future path of the Church.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
14 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Today in History: June 16, Valentina Tereshkova becomes first woman in space
Advertisement In 1903, the Ford Motor Company was incorporated in Detroit, Mich. In 1963, the world's first female space traveler, Valentina Tereshkova, 26, was launched into orbit by the Soviet Union aboard Vostok 6. Tereshkova spent 71 hours in flight, circling the Earth 48 times before returning safely. In 1976, thousands of Black students in Johannesburg's Soweto township demonstrated against the imposition of the Dutch-based Afrikaans language in schools; police opened fire on the students, killing at least 176 and as many as 700. In 1978, President Jimmy Carter and Panamanian leader Omar Torrijos signed the instruments of ratification for the Panama Canal treaties during a ceremony in Panama City. In 2015, real estate mogul President Trump launched his successful campaign for the presidency of the United States with a speech at Trump Tower in Manhattan, N.Y. Advertisement In 2016, Walt Disney Co. opened Shanghai Disneyland, its first theme park in mainland China. In 2022, witnesses testified to the Jan. 6 committee that President Trump's closest advisers viewed his last-ditch efforts to pressure Vice President Mike Pence to reject the tally of state electors and overturn the 2020 election as 'nuts,' 'crazy,' and even likely to incite riots.
CNBC
27 minutes ago
- CNBC
Europe is trying to woo Southeast Asia — but it won't win it over the U.S. or China
European leaders are looking to Southeast Asia with renewed interest amid Washington's aggressive tariff agenda, but experts warn that the state of regional trade ties makes it challenging to disrupt the U.S. or China's hold. Southeast Asia is in a predicament: its ally China is ramping up its advances in the South China Sea, with state-of-the-art Chinese bomber planes. spotted in the disputed Paracel Islands in the region late last month as tensions flare with the Philippines. Meanwhile, its other ally, the U.S., hangs the threat of tariffs over the world, with uncertainty mounting as a 90-day reprieve is set to expire in July. Europe is now seizing the opportunity to surface as an alternative ally to emerging Asian nations, with French President Emmanuel Macron calling for stronger ties between the blocs at the 2025 Shangri-La Dialogue that wrapped up earlier this month. Southeast Asia brings Europe the opportunity to access another market for its defense sector, according to Bob Herrera-Lim, managing director at Teneo. Ifri's Pajon adds that the region could also provide Europe a diversified supply chain to hedge against economic reliance on the U.S. or China and significant raw material reserves essential for the EU's green and digital transition. Europe is ambitious in its hopes for emerging Asia, but analysts nevertheless doubt it can overtake the U.S. or China's influence in the region. "Europe, on its own, can offer Southeast Asia a valuable option to hedge against the risks of overdependence on either China or the United States," Céline Pajon, head of Japan and Indo-Pacific Research at Ifri's Center for Asian Studies, told CNBC by email. While ties span more than half a century, Southeast Asian and European relations have been mired in various challenges that Teneo's Herrera-Lim attributes to factors such as geographic distance and diverging views over politics or the environment. In his keynote speech at the 2025 Shangri-La Dialogue, Macron called for stronger ties between Europe and the Indo-Pacific's "new special relationship." He stressed that both blocs are facing the "potential erosion of long-time alliances" and the threat of countries vying for control or resorting to force, drawing direct parallels between China's advances in the South-China Sea and Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Yet similar experiences alone might not be enough to sway emerging Asia away from the U.S. or China, according to Herrera-Lim. "Form follows function in Southeast Asia," he told CNBC in a call, "Relationships are built on economic ties in Southeast Asia, more than anything else." While the EU has trade ties with Singapore and Vietnam, talks for other bilateral deals or an EU-ASEAN wide free trade agreements (FTA) have been stalled for years, and Ifri's Pajon said that the bloc "still has progress to make" in increasing its presence and investment in the region. Meanwhile, Beijing remains the Southeast Asia's largest trading partner since 2009, with total goods in trade reaching $982.3 billion in 2024. The U.S. follows behind in second place, with an estimated $476.8 billion goods in trade last year. The EU trails behind in third place, with roughly 258.7 billion euros ($299.7 billion) of goods in trade over the same period. Without any meaningful reform or the promise of increased trade in the future, Herrera-Lim said that it will be difficult for Europe to compete against the bloc's established trading partners. "If in the next week or next month, China says, 'We're doing reforms so that domestic markets are opened up in China for Southeast Asian goods,' [then] Southeast Asian countries would line up to get access to the Chinese market. Independent of their politics around many of these issues," he said. While Europe might not be able to replace the U.S. or China in emerging Asia, it can nevertheless offer transparent, reliable partnerships that aren't about zero-sum competition, Lizza Bomassi Research Analyst at the European Union Institute for Security Studies (EUISS), told CNBC by email. "Europe's value proposition lies in being a reliable partner in critical areas like energy security, green infrastructure, and digital governance," she said, "These are areas where Southeast Asian countries want to diversify and build resilience, especially given concerns about overdependence." Ifri's Pajon said that strengthening ties with Europe would allow Southeast Asia to diversify its strategic partnerships and enhance their capacity to resist hegemonic pressures. "The presence of more partners, including Europe, raises the diplomatic and reputational costs for China to escalate [territorial disputes in the region], particularly given Beijing's emphasis on a 'peaceful rise'," Bomassi said. "In this context, the EU-ASEAN partnership isn't about hard military deterrence, but it serves as a crucial symbolic defence mechanism. It reinforces that Southeast Asia isn't isolated and has multiple partners, making the region more resilient to coercion," she added.
Newsweek
31 minutes ago
- Newsweek
How Texas Is Transforming Education
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The education landscape in Texas is undergoing a massive transformation, with changes set to impact students from K-12 to college. The state will soon implement a $1 billion school voucher program—one of the largest in the country—that will use public dollars to fund private school tuition, which critics have warned will direct resources away from public schools and exclude those with disabilities and low-income households. Earlier this month, lawmakers approved Senate Bill 37, which will give governing boards appointed by the governor new powers to control the curriculum at public higher education institutions and eliminate some degree programs. The legislation marks the latest effort to increase political control of public higher education institutions in Texas, where a ban on diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives took effect in January last year. Also this month, a federal judge blocked a Texas law that had given college students without legal residency access to reduced in-state tuition. "This was maybe the most consequential session for public education in the history of Texas, or certainly one of the most consequential sessions," Vivek Datla, regional education policy fellow at the Intercultural Development Research Association, told Newsweek. Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Getty/Canva $1 Billion Voucher Program The voucher program that Governor Greg Abbott signed into law last month will allow Texas families from the 2026 school year to receive $10,000 per year to help pay for students' private school tuition. Children with disabilities can qualify for up to $30,000 a year. Advocates champion vouchers as a way to put parents in control of their children's education, with Abbott saying that it will ensure that Texas families "whose children can no longer be served by the public school assigned to them, have the choice to take their money and find the school that is right for them." But opponents argue that it will drain money from public school and mainly benefit children from wealthier families since voucher payments rarely cover the full cost of sending children to private schools. They also say that unlike public schools, which must accept all students, private schools can be selective about which students they admit, meaning the most vulnerable students are likely to be excluded from taking advantage of the program. Critics have also slammed Texas lawmakers for approving the voucher program while failing to act on a separate bill that would invest $7.7 billion in public education over the next two years. Earlier in the year, lawmakers had pledged that passage of a school voucher bill and public school funding legislation would happen in tandem. "Schools have been dealing with a lack of investment for over six years," Jaime Puente, the director of Economic Opportunity for Every Texan, told Newsweek. "School districts across the state are currently dealing with closures, they're dealing with reduced services. "That lack of investment has been exacerbated and will be exacerbated by the introduction of a third system of education that is entirely unequal, through the voucher program." 'Huge Shift' In How Universities Are Governed Senate Bill 37 shifts some responsibilities traditionally held by professors to political appointees on university governing boards at public colleges and universities. The governing boards will be tasked with reviewing general education curriculum requirements to ensure that courses are necessary to prepare students for civic and professional life, equip them for participation in the workforce and worth the cost. The boards will also have the authority to eliminate courses with low enrolment. The legislation also creates a state ombudsman's office, which will have the power to investigate complaints against institutions and threaten funding if they don't comply with the law. It was approved by the Texas Legislature earlier in June and Abbott has until June 22 to sign it into law. Republican state Representative Matt Shaheen, who co-sponsored the legislation, said the aim was to "provide consistency with respect to our curriculum and the degrees we're offering our students." But the legislation "represents a huge, huge shift in the way that universities are governed and how curriculum decisions and general academic policies will be made" in universities, Datla said. "By shifting curricular authority away from faculty and towards these politically appointed boards, students could lose access to diverse, rigorous and thought-provoking courses," he said. Limiting what can be taught "undermines students' ability to think critically" and "ultimately receive a truly comprehensive education," he said. "Their academic experiences may increasingly reflect political or economic agendas rather than scholarly or student-centered priorities." Cameron Samuels, the executive director of Students Engaged in Advancing Texas who will start a graduate program at the University of Texas next year, told Newsweek that Senate Bill 37 will make students question whether it will worth pursuing higher education in Texas. "Texas is home. It's a place I care about. It's a place I want to thrive in," Samuels said. But legislation Senate Bill 37 "deters people from wanting a Texas education." Others have warned that the legislation could lead to a "brain drain" of students, faculty and researchers—along with their grant funding—from Texas institutions. The Texas American Federation of Teachers reported earlier this month that among the union's membership alone, 40 faculty members have reported leaving Texas because of "legislative attacks." "Hundreds of faculty and students testified to the expected catastrophic impacts of this legislation, from the exodus of top teaching talent to the waning of Texas higher educational institutions' prestige," Zeph Capo, president of the Texas AFT, has said. This bill "represents a fundamental shift in the very things that made our universities attractive," Datla said. "And there's a lot of fear from professors and a lot of fear from students about whether or not they want to continue their work or continue their education here." Striking Down The Texas Dream Act On June 4, U.S. District Judge Reed O'Connor struck down the Texas Dream Act, which for more than two decades had given college students without legal residency—"Dreamers"—access to reduced in-state tuition. The ruling came days after the end of the Texas legislative session, during which a repeal bill pushed by group of Republicans was considered but ultimately did not come up for a vote. The Department of Justice sued to block the policy and Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton filed a motion agreeing that it should not be enforced, clearing the way for O'Connor to issue an injunction. "Ending this discriminatory and un-American provision is a major victory for Texas," Paxton said following the judge's ruling. The policy was initially passed by sweeping majorities in the state Legislature in 2001 and signed into law by then-Governor Rick Perry, a Republican. But it soon came under fire as debates over illegal immigration ramped up. Still, legislative efforts to repeal the law have repeatedly failed. In the legislative session that ended in early June, a bill to repeal the law did not even get a vote. Supporters of the policy say the ruling will lock many students out of higher education and ultimately harm the state's economy. Research from the American Immigration Council estimates that Texas will lose roughly $461 million annually if the Texas Dream Act is repealed. The Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, which on Wednesday filed a motion to intervene in the lawsuit, says that the repeal of the law would prohibit many students from continuing their education. In some cases, tuition costs could increase from $50 per semester credit hour to $455. Texas has about 57,000 undocumented students enrolled in its public universities and colleges, according to the Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, a nonpartisan nonprofit of university leaders focused on immigration policy. These students "are part of Texas' future workforce, contributing over $80 million annually to our higher education system and poised to fill critical roles in key sectors like healthcare, education, and technology," said J.R. Gonzales of the Texas Association of Mexican American Chambers of Commerce, one of more than 80 organizations that have urged Paxton to reverse course. "Removing their access to affordable education will reduce college enrollment, shrink our talent pool, and weaken our state's long-term competitiveness." Datla noted that even the Republican-controlled Texas Legislature did not have the political will to repeal the law. "They understood the economic benefits of the Dream Act," he said. "And yet closed-door negotiations happened to strike that law bad for the many students who wish to pursue their dreams here, and bad for our state economy as a whole." Puente also noted that many of the students that benefited from the law are now public school teachers in Texas. "We know that these students and these people, not only do they produce economically and they are able to buy homes and create businesses and things like that, but in a very real sense, they are subsidizing our public education system with their labor," he said. Datla said that the Texas Legislature could in its next session seek to further control what is taught in universities, noting that a provision that restricted how professors could teach about certain subjects, including race and identity, had been removed from Senate Bill 37. "There's definitely a strong potential that in the next legislative session, we see a reemergence of that, not only that attempt to control structures, but continuing of attempts to control content," he said. The changes in the education landscape efforts to "socially engineer who we are as a state," Puente said. "It's being done in a way that singles out and targets particular people, whether its teachers in defenseless high school students who are just trying to get a college degree. All of this is being done in a very particular and targeted way to eliminate the kinds of dissent that would prevent these actions from happening."
