Motherboard Market to Witness AI Integration & AMD Gaming Surge by 2029 - Get Free Report
Major Factors
Integration of AI-optimized processing features into consumer and commercial motherboards.
Shift in gaming preference toward AMD platforms, pushing brands to diversify their offerings.
Rising demand for environmentally sustainable and energy-efficient motherboard designs.
Growth of content creation and professional workstation use cases, leading to premium motherboard upgrades.
Increasing preference for mini-ITX and compact form factor boards, especially in urban setups.
Claim Your Free Report: https://reports.valuates.com/request/sample/MICR-Othe-0J9/Global_Motherboard_Market
TRENDS INFLUENCING THE GROWTH OF THE GLOBAL MOTHERBOARD MARKET 2025 - 2029
The integration of artificial intelligence into personal computing has started shaping motherboard design and functionality. New motherboards are now being developed to support AI-specific processing units, NPU compatibility, and higher data transfer capacities. This shift toward AI-accelerated workloads is expected to redefine standard motherboard specifications, thus encouraging broader market adoption in both consumer and enterprise segments.
The gaming segment continues to be a cornerstone of motherboard demand. With the release of next-generation games and increasing adoption of high-performance GPUs, gamers are upgrading to motherboards with improved thermal performance, support for higher RAM frequencies, and faster data lanes. The shift from legacy platforms to AMD-based systems among gamers is also creating a dynamic change in motherboard selection trends.
Enterprise demand is projected to remain strong due to ongoing PC refresh cycles in commercial and educational institutions. Organizations are prioritizing infrastructure modernization, particularly in regions shifting to hybrid work models. This drives demand for motherboards tailored to stability, power efficiency, and longer lifecycle support, particularly from OEM vendors.
A strong contributor to motherboard market expansion has been the growing enthusiasm among consumers for custom-built desktop systems. Enthusiasts and hobbyists continue to drive demand for motherboards that offer flexibility, enhanced overclocking capabilities, and modular compatibility. This trend has not only revived aftermarket component sales but also pushed manufacturers to release more consumer-focused variants across mid-range and premium segments.
The market has seen a sharp response to the introduction of new-generation processors from key semiconductor players. These launches compel users to upgrade their motherboard to ensure compatibility with newer chipsets, PCIe versions, and RAM standards. In turn, this compatibility requirement has played a vital role in fueling upgrade cycles, especially among gamers, developers, and performance users.
The return of cryptocurrency mining activities has significantly influenced motherboard consumption. Mining setups often require multiple GPU support and high-durability motherboards, prompting the development and uptake of products optimized for sustained high-load performance. This renewed demand from crypto-miners has temporarily reshaped buying behavior and encouraged motherboard manufacturers to cater to niche mining requirements.
Unlock Insights: View Full Report Now! https://reports.valuates.com/market-reports/MICR-Othe-0J9/global-motherboard
MOTHERBOARD MARKET SHARE
Asia-Pacific continues to remain the dominant region in terms of motherboard demand, driven by manufacturing hubs, tech-savvy consumers, and a strong PC-building culture. North America and Europe follow, with demand linked to gaming, AI PC deployment, and enterprise refresh cycles. Meanwhile, Southeast Asia is emerging as a high-growth region due to expanding digital infrastructure and rising disposable incomes, drawing greater attention from global motherboard brands aiming to localize production and marketing strategies.
Claim Yours Now! https://reports.valuates.com/api/directpaytoken?rcode=MICR-Othe-0J9&lic=single-user
Companies in Market and Their Potential Market Share
Intel remains a central player through its chipset and processor compatibility ecosystems, especially in the commercial and entry-level markets. The company's strong OEM partnerships ensure continued relevance across various user segments.
AMD, benefiting from its increasing adoption in gaming and creator communities, is steadily expanding its motherboard influence, particularly through support for high-performance gaming and multitasking workloads.
NVIDIA, although not a direct motherboard manufacturer, plays a crucial role in influencing motherboard designs through its GPU requirements. Motherboards optimized for high-end NVIDIA GPUs continue to be in demand, making the company's hardware roadmap a significant market driver.
What this Report Offers:
This report provides an in-depth analysis of the global motherboard market, covering a comprehensive range of data and insights to support strategic decision-making.
It includes detailed coverage of worldwide motherboard shipment volumes from 2021 to 2029, quarterly shipment trends from 1Q23 to 4Q25, and the ratio of motherboard shipments to desktop PC shipments during the same period.
The report also presents regional shipment volumes and shares from 2021 to 2025, along with expert intelligence insights, clearly defined research scope, and terminology explanations.
In addition to our standard offerings, we provide customized reporting services tailored to your unique business needs. These project-based solutions deliver data-driven insights aligned with your strategic objectives, helping you make informed decisions with precision.
Purchase Chapters: https://reports.valuates.com/request/chaptercost/MICR-Othe-0J9/Global_Motherboard_Market
SUBSCRIPTION
We have introduced a tailor-made subscription for our customers. Please leave a note in the Comment Section to know about our subscription plans.
DISCOVER MORE INSIGHTS: EXPLORE SIMILAR REPORTS!
- The global market for Server Motherboard was estimated to be worth US$ 48910 million in 2023 and is forecast to a readjusted size of US$ 61680 million by 2030 with a CAGR of 3.3% during the forecast period 2024-2030.- Notebook Motherboard Market- The global market for PCIe 4.0 Protocol Computer Motherboard was estimated to be worth US$ 10210 million in 2023 and is forecast to a readjusted size of US$ 14460 million by 2030 with a CAGR of 5.1% during the forecast period 2024-2030.- Server System and Server Motherboard Market- The global market for Industrial Robot Embedded Motherboard was valued at US$ 143 million in the year 2024 and is projected to reach a revised size of US$ 266 million by 2031, growing at a CAGR of 9.3% during the forecast period.- Motherboard Sound Card Market
DISCOVER OUR VISION: VISIT ABOUT US!
Valuates offers in-depth market insights into various industries. Our extensive report repository is constantly updated to meet your changing industry analysis needs.
Our team of market analysts can help you select the best report covering your industry. We understand your niche region-specific requirements and that's why we offer customization of reports. With our customization in place, you can request for any particular information from a report that meets your market analysis needs.
To achieve a consistent view of the market, data is gathered from various primary and secondary sources, at each step, data triangulation methodologies are applied to reduce deviance and find a consistent view of the market. Each sample we share contains a detailed research methodology employed to generate the report. Please also reach our sales team to get the complete list of our data sources.
GET A FREE QUOTE
Valuates Reportssales@valuates.comFor U.S. Toll-Free Call 1-(315)-215-3225WhatsApp: +91-9945648335
Website: https://reports.valuates.com
Blog: https://valuatestrends.blogspot.com/Pinterest: https://in.pinterest.com/valuatesreports/Twitter: https://twitter.com/valuatesreportsFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/valuatesreports/YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@valuatesreports6753
https://www.facebook.com/valuateskorean https://www.facebook.com/valuatesspanish https://www.facebook.com/valuatesjapanese https://valuatesreportspanish.blogspot.com/ https://valuateskorean.blogspot.com/ https://valuatesgerman.blogspot.com/ https://valuatesreportjapanese.blogspot.com/
Logo: https://mma.prnewswire.com/media/1082232/Valuates_Reports_Logo.jpg
View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/motherboard-market-to-witness-ai-integration--amd-gaming-surge-by-2029--get-free-report--valuates-reports-302459307.html
SOURCE Valuates Reports
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Epoch Times
an hour ago
- Epoch Times
‘Failing My Way to Success': A Bumpy Road to Business Glory
The most obvious question that can be asked to a person who scored significant professional achievements is: 'What is the secret to your success?' A great answer to that inquiry can be found in 'Failing My Way to Success: Lessons from Forty-Two Years of Winning (and Losing) in Business,' a nifty autobiography by Phillip Cantrell. Cantrell, a Nashville-based real estate industry executive, self-identifies as having founded or controlled 10 different companies during four decades while also partnering in multiple joint ventures. Cantrell may not be a household name, but he's a gregarious raconteur with a fun story to tell. Indeed, his life's journey has given him unique insight into what is required to achieve professional accomplishments and move beyond embarrassing stumbles without sacrificing self-respect.
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
NYC mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani's financial disclosure filings filled with discrepancies
Socialist NYC mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani has scored nearly $10 million in public matching funds for his campaign, despite having serious discrepancies in his mandatory financial disclosure filings, The Post has learned. Mamdani, the frontrunner heading into November's general election, claimed in a recent filing to the city's Conflicts of Interest Board reporting his finances for last year that he has owned vacant land in Jinja, Uganda, valued at $100,000 to $250,000 since March 14, 2016, records show. Mamdani, who earns $131,000 annually as a Queens-based state assemblyman, also noted owning interest in two stocks valued at a combined $5,000 to $55,000 – MiTec and PBC – and having a retirement plan worth another $1,000 to $5,000. Advertisement 3 Mamdani received his matching funds despite the apparent discrepancy in his financial disclosure forms. Janet Mayer/ However, in annual financial disclosure statements for 2020 through 2024 filed with the state Legislative Ethics Commission, Mamdani, 33, said he took full ownership of the Uganda site four years earlier – in 2012. He also didn't list any stocks, instead claiming the only the securities he owned were valued at less than $2,000 from a retirement plan with the social-justice organization Chhaya where he worked in 2019. Advertisement The revelation that Mamdani's state filings contradict his city filings come while two of his top competitors, Mayor Eric Adams and ex-Gov. Andrew Cuomo, have been denied millions of dollars in matching funds by the city's Campaign Finance Board after being flagged for various violations. 'Every time you scratch the surface with this guy, more red flags emerge,' said defense lawyer Jim Walden, who is running for mayor as an Independent. 'Here, the obvious concern is that he is understating his wealth. He should come clean. If he can't be honest, add that to the growing list of disqualifiers.' A rep for the Campaign Finance Board declined comment. Advertisement Lisa Partelow Reid, executive director of the state Legislative Ethics Commission, said elected officials who knowingly make false statements to the commission could face fines of up to $40,000. If amendments are needed 'the assumption' typically is 'an inadvertent error' occurred, she said. 3 Mayor Adams was not given matching funds for his reelection campaign. Derek French/SOPA Images/Shutterstock There are no records of Mamdani amending his filings. Reid declined to discuss Mamdani repeating the same information on his stocks and land ownership in five straight annual state filings – but then providing different information in his COIB filing. Advertisement 3 Heavy security and phone jammers marked a recent three-day celebration at Mamdani's Ugandan compound. New York Post COIB Executive Director Carolyn Miller deferred questions about matching funds to the Campaign Finance Board but said 'filers regularly and routinely amend their annual disclosure reports to resolve discrepancies.' Hank Sheinkopf, a longtime Democratic political consultant, questioned whether the state and city entities — which are designed to be independent and apolitical — are ignoring Mamdani's discrepancies because they're worried about being accused of Islamophobia. 'It's hypocritical at best,' he said. Mamdani did not return messages. Additional reporting by Gabrielle Fahmy
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump's unprecedented, potentially unconstitutional deal with Nvidia and AMD, explained: Alexander Hamilton would approve
'We negotiated a little deal,' President Donald Trump told reporters on August 11, about the developing situation with leading chip makers Nvidia and AMD continuing to do business in China. He explained that he originally wanted a 20% cut of Nvidia's sales in exchange for the company obtaining export licenses to sell H20 chip to China, but he was persuaded to settle at 15%. The H20 chip is 'obsolete,' Trump added … 'he's selling a essentially old chip.' The chips do appear to be quite significant to China, considering that the Cyberspace Administration of China held discussions with Nvidia over security concerns that the H20 chips may be tracked and turned off remotely, according to a disclosure on its website. The deal, which lifted an export ban on Nvidia's H20 AI chips and AMD's MI308, and followed heated negotiations, was widely described as unusual and also still theoretical at this point, with the legal details still being ironed out by the Department of Commerce. Legal experts have questioned whether the eventual deal would constitute an unconstitutional export tax, as the U.S. Constitution prohibits duties on exports. This has come to be known as the 'export clause' of the constitution. Indeed, it's hard to find much precedent for it anywhere in the history of the U.S. government's dealings with the corporate sector. Erik Jensen, a law professor at Case Western Reserve University who has studied the history of the export clause, told Fortune he was not aware of anything like this in history. In the 1990s, he added, the Supreme Court struck down two attempted taxes on export clause grounds (cases known as IBM and U.S. Shoe). Jensen said tax practitioners were surprised that the court took up the cases: 'if only because most pay no attention to constitutional limitations, and the Court hadn't heard any export clause cases in about 70 years.' The takeaway was clear, Jensen said: 'The export clause matters.' Columbia University professor Eric Talley agreed with Jensen, telling Fortune that while the federal government has previously applied subsidies to exports, he's not aware of other historical cases imposing taxes on selected exporters. Talley also cited the export clause as the usual grounds for finding such arrangements unconstitutional. Rather than downplaying the uniqueness of the arrangement, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has been leaning into it. In a Bloomberg television interview, he said: 'I think you know, right now, this is unique. But now that we have the model and the beta test, why not expand it? I think we could see it in other industries over time.' Bessent and the White House insist there are 'no national security concerns,' since only less-advanced chips are being sold to China. Instead, officials have touted the deal as a creative solution to balance trade, technology, and national policy. How rare is this? The arrangement has drawn sharp reaction from business leaders, legal experts, and trade analysts. Julia Powles, director of UCLA's Institute for Technology, Law & Policy, told the Los Angeles Times: 'It ties the fate of this chip manufacturer in a very particular way to this administration, which is quite rare.' Experts warned that if replicated, this template could pressure other firms—not just tech giants—into similar arrangements with the government. Already, several unprecedented arrangements have been struck between the Trump administration and the corporate sector, ranging from the 'golden share' in U.S. Steel negotiated as part of its takeover by Japan's Nippon Steel to the federal government reportedly discussing buying a stake in chipmaker Intel. Nvidia and AMD have declined to comment on specifics. When contacted by Fortune for comment, Nvidia reiterated its statement that it follows rules the U.S. government sets for its participation in worldwide markets. 'While we haven't shipped H20 to China for months, we hope export control rules will let America compete in China and worldwide. America cannot repeat 5G and lose telecommunication leadership. America's AI tech stack can be the world's standard if we race.' The White House declined to comment about the potential deal. AMD did not respond to a request for comment. While Washington has often intervened in business—especially in times of crisis—the mechanism and magnitude of the Nvidia/AMD deal are virtually unprecedented in recent history. The federal government appears to have never previously claimed a percentage of corporate revenue from export sales as a precondition for market access. Instead, previous actions took the form of temporary nationalization, regulatory control, subsidies, or bailouts—often during war or economic emergency. Examples of this include the seizure of coal mines (1946) and steel mills (1952) during labor strikes, as well as the 2008 financial crisis bailouts, where the government took equity stakes in large corporations including two of Detroit's Big three and most of Wall Street's key banks. During World War I, the War Industries Board regulated prices, production, and business conduct for the war effort. Congress has previously created export incentives and tax-deferral strategies (such as the Domestic International Sales Corporation and Foreign Sales Corporation Acts), but these measures incentivized sales rather than directly diverting a fixed share of export revenue to the government. Legal scholars stress that such arrangements were subjected to global trade rules and later modified after international complaints. Global lack of precedent The U.S. prohibition on export taxes dates back to the birth of the nation. Case Western's Jensen has written that some delegates of the Constitutional Convention of 1787, such as New York's Alexander Hamilton, were in favor of the government being able to tax revenue sources such as imports and exports, but the 'staple states' in the southern U.S. were fiercely opposed, given their agricultural bent, especially the importance of cotton at that point. Still, many other countries currently have export taxes on the books, though they are generally imposed across all exporters, rather than as one-off arrangements that remove barriers to a specific market. And many of the nations with export taxes are developing countries who tax agricultural or resource commodities. In several cases (Uganda, Malaya, Sudan, Nigeria, Haiti, Thailand), export taxes made up 10% to 40% of total government tax revenue in the 1960s and 1970s, according to an IMF staff paper. Globally, most countries tax profits generated within their borders ('source-based corporate taxes'), but rarely as a direct percentage of export sales as a market access precondition. The standard model is taxation of locally earned profits, regardless of export destination; licensing fees and tariffs may be applied, but not usually as a fixed percent of export revenue as a pre-negotiated entry fee. Although the Nvidia/AMD deal doesn't take the usual form of a tax, Case Western's Jensen added. 'I don't see what else it could be characterized as.' It's clearly not a 'user fee,' which he said is the usual triable issue of law in export clause cases. For instance, if goods or services are being provided by the government in exchange for the charge, such as docking fees at a governmentally operated port, then that charge isn't a tax or duty and the Export Clause is irrelevant. 'I just don't see how the charges that will be levied in the chip cases could possibly be characterized in that way.' Players have been known to 'game' the different legal treatments of subsidies and taxes, Columbia's Talley added. He cited the example of a government imposing a uniform, across-the-board tax on all producers, but then providing a subsidy to sellers who sell to domestic markets. 'The net effect would be the same as a tax on exports, but indirectly.' He was unaware of this happening in the U.S. but cited several international examples including Argentina, India, and even the EU. One famous example of a canny international tax strategy was Apple's domicile in Ireland, along with so many other multinationals keeping their international profits offshore in affiliates in order to avoid paying U.S. tax, which at the time applied to all worldwide income upon repatriation. Talley said much of this went away after the 2018 tax reforms, which moved the U.S. away from a worldwide corporate tax, with some exceptions. The protection racket comparison If Trump's chip export tax is an anomaly in the annals of U.S. international trade, the deal structure has some parallels in another corner of the business world: organized crime, where 'protection rackets' have a long history. Businesses bound by such deals must pay a cut of their revenues to a criminal organization (or parallel government), effectively as the cost for being allowed to operate or to avoid harm. The China chip export tax and the protection rackets extract revenue as a condition for market access, use the threat of exclusion or punishment for non-payment, and both may be justified as 'protection' or 'guaranteed access,' but are not freely negotiated by the business. 'It certainly has the smell of a governmental shakedown in certain respects,' Columbia's Talley told Fortune, considering that the 'underlying threat was an outright export ban, which makes a 15% surcharge seem palatable by comparison.' Talley noted some nuances, such as the generally established broad statutory and constitutional support for national-security-based export bans on various goods and services sold to enumerated countries, which have been imposed with legal authority on China, North Korea, Iraq, Russia, Cuba, and others. 'From an economic perspective, a ban on an exported good is tantamount to a tax of 'infinity percent' on the good,' Talley said, meaning it effectively shuts down the export market for that good. 'Viewed in that light, a 15% levy is less (and not more) extreme than a ban.' Still, there's the matter, similar to Trump's tariff regime, of making a legal challenge to an ostensibly blatantly illegal policy actually hold up in court. 'A serious question with the chips tax,' Case Western's Jensen told Fortune, 'is who, if anyone, would have standing to challenge the tax?' In other words, it may be unconstitutional, but who's actually going to compel the federal government to obey the constitution? This story was originally featured on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
