
Whither climate tech? What is the future of the sustainability sector in a changed market environment?
Back in 2022, the climate tech sector was booming in North America and Europe. Companies in the sector raised $82bn across 3,000 deals (a 20% increase compared to 2021) and accounting for 25% of all venture capital investments. Buoyed by government legislation—including the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) in the U.S. and a commitment from politicians at national, state, and city levels to achieve ambitious net zero goals—the sector was on an upward trajectory and, alongside AI, was at the top of the agenda for major tech conferences.
A lot has changed since then, and 2022 proved to be the peak for startups and fundraising in this sector. Real or perceived pushback from the electorate on the cost of climate policies led to many politicians on both sides of the Atlantic rolling back on their carbon reduction plans. While the IRA remains in place, the new administration in the U.S. has doubled down on energy production from fossil fuels and signaled clearly to the private sector that environmental concerns are secondary to maximizing returns to shareholders.
Climate tech investment experienced a significant downturn in 2024, with fundraising falling for its third consecutive year to $51 billion across 1,200 deals, and AI being the undisputed priority for all deals. Many VCs even jettisoned sustainability, thinking it had become a politically charged term with potentially negative connotations. It became a horizontal, and not a vertical, and where they focused on the application (energy, infrastructure, etc.) rather than listing it as a standalone or just bundled into 'future tech' or another bucket.
So, where does the climate sector stand in 2025? Will it wither on the vine or are there green shoots that will continue to grow resiliently even in a more challenging climate?
FOCUS ON THE APPLICATION
On closer examination, the outlook for the sustainability sector is more mixed than it may appear. In 2024, there was a 36% decline in investment in green mobility companies while startups focused on industrial decarbonization in areas such as cement, steel, and sustainable infrastructure dropped 29%. However, green energy continues to grow with a 12% increase and several large rounds, including Intersect Power, who raised more than $800m to deliver clean energy projects for data centers and address the insatiable energy demands of data centers.
Overall, while the number of deals decreased, the average value size rose by 14% to $28m. This suggests both maturity in the sector and a flight to quality now that the market environment is more challenging. Fresh, new ideas at startups may struggle to attract attention, but proven market-ready and revenue-generating companies will still be able to raise funds. Across clean energy and storage, battery technology, agrifood and regenerative agriculture, circular economy, and climate fintech, there are examples of companies that continue to scale and thrive in the U.S.
It's also worth remembering that despite the rollback at the federal level, environmental protection rules remain at many state and local levels in the U.S., and many large corporates remain committed to ESG goals, so the demand for innovative solutions to help address the climate crisis remains.
FIND THE FERTILE SOIL
While many sustainability companies continue to thrive in the U.S., many are assessing the changes in the political and funding climates, and diversifying their efforts to include locations where their ideas may find a more receptive audience.
It's too soon to provide data behind the shift in 2025, but anecdotally, I'm being told by founders in the sustainability space that they will 'follow the science' and refocus their efforts on markets where funding and a commitment from government feels more secure. Cities across Europe are aware of this trend and are working hard to lure these companies, and the innovation and jobs that come with them, away from the U.S.
There is a clear value proposition. Using London and the UK as an example, fundraising in climate tech bucked the global trend and grew by 24% in 2024 to £2.4bn, according to figures from PWC. Notable examples include London-based CIRTEC (waste-to-fuel and circular chemicals) which raised €150m, and Notpla (sustainable packing) which raised $20m and launched on the NASDAQ. This has attracted the attention of U.S. VCs such as TDK Ventures, who opened a London office to tap into the innovation taking place in sustainability.
Similarly, U.S. innovators, including the Denver-based energy-as-a-service unicorn Redaptive, opened a location in London in 2024 while the climate tech accelerator London GreenCity recently launched in Fulham, offering a home to world-changing scale-ups from around the world.
The London Growth Plan launched in March 2025 and outlined its vision for growing London's economy for the next ten years, and frontier innovation in sustainability is a key priority. The plan states in a bold mission statement that 'by embedding climate action at the heart of our growth priorities, we can not only help tackle the climate and ecological emergency, but also create thousands of new jobs, cement London's position as a global leader in sustainability, and attract investment in the industries of the future.'
The message is clear: Being good to the environment is good for business. London also remains committed to its goal of being carbon neutral net zero by 2030. The city also needs to take advantage of innovation from around the world to achieve this.
2022 may have been a peak for fundraising in the sustainability startups, but the sector has matured since then and continues to thrive in both the U.S. and in Europe. Cities that position themselves as welcoming homes for climate tech will reap the benefits of the innovation and high-value jobs it creates, while also doing what's right for the planet in addressing the climate crisis.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
US senator stuns with politically risky opinion piece in local newspaper: 'It's time for Congress to act'
The junior U.S. senator for Utah has turned heads with a surprising op-ed in favor of retaining some Biden-era renewable-energy tax credits. Writing in Deseret News, John Curtis urged his Republican colleagues not to "pull the rug out from under American innovators" who "have already made billions in long-term investments based on these policies." When then-President Joe Biden signed the Inflation Reduction Act into law in 2022, it included the U.S. government's largest-ever investment in clean-energy technology, according to law firm Baker Tilly. The law contained billions of dollars in tax credits and other incentives aimed at spurring investment in everything from massive renewable-energy power plants to electric vehicles. Now these programs are under threat as Congress considers President Donald Trump's so-called "Big Beautiful Bill," a version of which has passed the House of Representatives and is under consideration by the Senate. Under the version passed by the Republican-led House, the investment in America's renewable-energy future has been significantly curtailed. Gone at the end of 2025 would be the IRA's Clean Hydrogen Production Tax Credit, tax credits for clean vehicles, and a number of tax credits aimed at making homes more energy efficient, according to law firm Pierson Ferdinand. The programs originally were scheduled to last at least until 2032. This context makes the timing of Senator Curtis' op-ed all the more significant. "Some conservatives understandably want to end the energy tax credits created by the Inflation Reduction Act," Curtis wrote. "But we must be wise — we simply cannot afford to treat good policy ideas as guilty by political association." Curtis has long had an open mind about money-saving, efficient appliances, not falling into the trap of letting them be politicized; in 2023, he showed The Cool Down some of the ones he installed in his own home, including solar panels and top-tier insulation. The IRA represented a historic investment in transitioning our energy economy away from dirty fuels such as oil, coal, and gas that release heat-trapping pollution and toward a renewable-energy future. While the impact of many IRA-based investments, such as those in clean-energy power plants, would not be felt for years, others, such as the consumer tax credits, were having an immediate impact. Do you think the federal government should give us tax breaks to improve our homes? Definitely Only for certain upgrades Let each state decide instead No way Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Per the IRS, under the Energy Efficient Home Improvement Tax Credit, homeowners can recover 30% of the cost of installing energy-saving windows, exterior doors, and skylights, up to $1,200 annually. The same goes for the cost of new, energy-efficient central air conditioners, water heaters, furnaces, boilers, and heat pumps. Similarly, the IRA's clean vehicle tax credits allow individuals to recover up to $7,500 on the cost of a new electric vehicle or up to $4,000 on a used EV. These tax credits have saved everyday Americans thousands of dollars, allowing families to upgrade their homes and vehicles while also reducing the amount of planet-warming pollution entering the atmosphere. Under the version of Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill" passed by the House of Representatives, all of these incentives would go away at the end of the year. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Americans have pumped 401(k) holdings to record levels — and been rewarded for their patience
Americans maintained high retirement savings rates despite stock market volatility this year. Fidelity reported a record 14.3% average 401(k) savings rate in Q1 2025. Staying invested during market downturns is a critical part of successful retirement planning. Despite stock market jitters, Americans stayed the course with their retirement savings, and their grit through a period of intense volatility has paid off. While retirement savers saw a drop in average 401(k), 403(b), and IRA balances due to market volatility, they continued to contribute to their retirement accounts at record rates. The average 401(k) savings rate hit a record 14.3% in the first quarter of 2025, according to Fidelity's latest retirement analysis of 17.3 million IRA accounts as of March 31, 2025. That number combines both employee and employer contributions and marks the highest collective savings rate ever tracked by the asset manager. The employee contribution rate was 9.5%, and the employer contribution rate was 4.8%. The 14.3% savings rate is the closest it's ever been to Fidelity's recommended savings rate of 15%. As markets gyrated amid trade war tensions earlier this year, it would be understandable to see many investors pause contributions or even pull money out of the market. Indeed, some retail investors did pull out and increase their allocations to cash. However, with tariff volatility now in the rear-view, staying invested has proven to be the best move. Since the end of March, the S&P 500 is up more than 6%, and the benchmark index is up 1.7% year-to-date. Those who stopped investing in response to market volatility would have missed out on the S&P 500's best May in 35 years. A chart from Fidelity shows outcomes for a starting balance of $100,000 invested in 70% stocks and the rest in bonds and cash between January 2022 and December 2024. In this scenario, the worst-performing strategy was to move to cash in July 2022, after the market dropped 20%, and stop contributing. The best-performing strategy was to stay the course and maintain the same asset mix, with annual contributions of $10,000. Even if you moved to cash and continued to contribute, the end result would still be worse than if you had remained invested. Stocks have historically experienced three downturns of 5% a year, one correction of 10% a year, and one 15% decline every three years, so drops in the market are common. Read the original article on Business Insider
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Americans have pumped 401(k) holdings to record levels — and been rewarded for their patience
Americans maintained high retirement savings rates despite stock market volatility this year. Fidelity reported a record 14.3% average 401(k) savings rate in Q1 2025. Staying invested during market downturns is a critical part of successful retirement planning. Despite stock market jitters, Americans stayed the course with their retirement savings, and their grit through a period of intense volatility has paid off. While retirement savers saw a drop in average 401(k), 403(b), and IRA balances due to market volatility, they continued to contribute to their retirement accounts at record rates. The average 401(k) savings rate hit a record 14.3% in the first quarter of 2025, according to Fidelity's latest retirement analysis of 17.3 million IRA accounts as of March 31, 2025. That number combines both employee and employer contributions and marks the highest collective savings rate ever tracked by the asset manager. The employee contribution rate was 9.5%, and the employer contribution rate was 4.8%. The 14.3% savings rate is the closest it's ever been to Fidelity's recommended savings rate of 15%. As markets gyrated amid trade war tensions earlier this year, it would be understandable to see many investors pause contributions or even pull money out of the market. Indeed, some retail investors did pull out and increase their allocations to cash. However, with tariff volatility now in the rear-view, staying invested has proven to be the best move. Since the end of March, the S&P 500 is up more than 6%, and the benchmark index is up 1.7% year-to-date. Those who stopped investing in response to market volatility would have missed out on the S&P 500's best May in 35 years. A chart from Fidelity shows outcomes for a starting balance of $100,000 invested in 70% stocks and the rest in bonds and cash between January 2022 and December 2024. In this scenario, the worst-performing strategy was to move to cash in July 2022, after the market dropped 20%, and stop contributing. The best-performing strategy was to stay the course and maintain the same asset mix, with annual contributions of $10,000. Even if you moved to cash and continued to contribute, the end result would still be worse than if you had remained invested. Stocks have historically experienced three downturns of 5% a year, one correction of 10% a year, and one 15% decline every three years, so drops in the market are common. Read the original article on Business Insider