NC House advances bill to mandate labeling of meat alternatives
The North Carolina House is advancing a bill that would mandate specific labeling for meat substitute products. (Photo: https://beef.ces.ncsu.edu/)
The North Carolina House Agriculture and Environment Committee approved on Wednesday a bill to regulate labels for meat alternatives, moving it to the House Rules Committee.
HB 134, 'Prohibit Misbranding of Certain Food Products,' requires manufacturers to mark alternative protein products differently from meat.
Specifically, a label for a 'manufactured-protein food product' with an 'identifying meat term' would be required to have an 'appropriate qualifying term' such as 'cell-cultured,' 'fake,' 'lab-grown,' or 'grown in a lab' in 20-point or greater font.
Meat products refer to foods made wholly or partially from meat — for example, cattle, sheep, swine, goats, bison, or deer — and excludes products that contain very small amounts of meat or have not traditionally been considered meat. Poultry products would be marketed separately.
'What we want is the consumer informed, and to the best of our ability, that's what this bill does,' Rep. Jimmy Dixon (R-Duplin, Wayne), the primary sponsor and committee chair, said. 'Properly label it.'
Rep. Sarah Crawford (D-Wake) asked about the 20-point font requirement.
Chris Saunders, a legislative analyst, clarified the label would need to be in either 20-point font or the size of the surrounding text, whichever is greater.
'Twenty-point font is about half an inch tall,' he said. 'Most product labels are probably going to default to the surrounding text.'
Rep. Deb Butler (D-New Hanover) mentioned how moving towards self-cultured meat is likely inevitable in the future.
She noted that it has the potential to reduce greenhouse emissions, cure hunger, and increase the humane treatment of animals and other creatures.
But with it being new, Butler described it as a 'disruption' in the same way Uber served as a disruption to the transportation industry.
Butler said she isn't opposed to accurately labeling food products, but she's concerned about the bill's implications.
'It feels like we are trying to stifle competition. It feels like we are trying to crush an industry before it gets started,' she said. 'I'm concerned that we are creating a regulatory barrier here, trying to stifle innovation rather than accurately labeling.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
3 bills to watch as Rhode Island lawmakers prepare for big FY2026 budget reveal
The Rhode Island House Committee on Finance is scheduled to receive and vote on lawmakers' fiscal 2026 spending plan as early as Tuesday night. (Photo by Nancy Lavin/Rhode Island Current) Lawmakers are frantically finishing number-crunching and negotiating ahead of a fiscal 2026 budget reveal tentatively Tuesday night. Equally frenzied are advocates looking to make a final push for their causes by hosting a State House rally or press conference. Demand for rooms is quickly exceeding availability. 'At this point in the session, it's hard to break through the noise,' Jed Thorp, advocacy director for Save the Bay, said. Last Thursday, Thorp managed to join lawmakers and environmentalists for a press conference in the House Lounge to push for passage of the hotly debated bottle bill. Down the hall, Attorney General Peter Neronha simultaneously pushed for raising Medicaid rates for primary care providers, while gun safety advocates converged on the House of Representatives leading up to a vote on an assault weapons ban. Ahead of the much-anticipated climax in the legislative session, here are three bills to watch as the Rhode Island General Assembly races toward the finish line: The longstanding push to raise taxes on high-income residents has gained new attention this year, with organizers hitching their wagon to striking Butler Hospital workers, whose cries for better pay, among other demands, could be met with the revenue generated from a tax on the top 1% of earners. 'For both SEIU leadership and for the workers, they see a direct connection between [Butler President and COO] Mary Marran not hammering out an agreement on what is fair, and the funding of the system overall that could be helped by passing a wealth tax,' said Zack Mezera, political director for the Rhode Island Working Families Party. Both SEIU 1199 and the Working Families Party through its legislative arm, Working Families Power, are advocates for the wealth tax. Doreen Gagivan, a spokesperson for Care New England, which owns Butler, said the proposed income tax was unrelated to the labor dispute. 'Throughout Butler's negotiations with SEIU 1199 NE, the Hospital has remained committed to reaching a fair agreement that supports our dedicated caregivers by offering meaningful improvements in staffing, safety, wages, benefits, and retirement security,' Gavigan said in an emailed statement Monday. But Mezera hopes the attention on the plight of Butler workers might put the wealth tax higher on this year's legislative agenda. It helps, too, that the proposal would bring in an extra $190 million a year to state coffers, according to estimates by Economic Progress Institute — sorely needed as lawmakers grapple with a projected $185 million deficit for fiscal 2026 and potentially devastating federal funding cuts. 'In past years, we've said things like, 'We really have to get this done or else the cuts are going to happen,' Mezera said. 'This coming year, we're talking about it in much clearer terms: a third of RIPTA routes being gone, the closing of full hospitals. It's a pretty dire situation.' And while opposition from business groups like the Rhode Island Public Expenditure Council and Greater Providence Chamber of Commerce remains, Mezera feels like their countermovement has dwindled. There are no traditional advertisements put out by opposition this year, for example, to plug their message that raising taxes on the rich will hurt businesses and the economy. Meanwhile, the Revenue for Rhode Islanders coalition has hosted at least a dozen State House events since the session began in January, garnering support from other groups including transit riders, child care workers and health care providers. One potential wrinkle: There are more groups clamoring for money than the wealth tax would generate in a single year. The legislation as drafted does not specify how the state could spend the additional revenue from a wealth tax. 'We are kind of just taking that concern and swallowing it, and saying we'll worry about that later,' Mezera said. 'There are some very, very smart people in the State House so we hope they will put that money toward RIPTA, and Medicaid and early education in a way that makes sense.' House Speaker K. Joseph Shekarchi and Senate President Valarie Lawson have remained noncommittal, though Lawson and Senate Majority Leader Frank Ciccone are cosponsors of the Senate version of the wealth tax bill. Health care providers have for years decried Rhode Island's lower rates, compared with neighboring states and with commercial insurers — it's hard to attract and keep doctors, nurses and other critical health care professionals if they can make more money somewhere else. And unlike other longstanding debates on Smith Hill, there's little opposition, at least in theory. The biggest barrier to more sweeping rate hikes: price. When lawmakers agreed to include the $160 million cost in fiscal 2025 to raise Medicaid rates for behavioral, community and at-home care providers, the state was still flush with federal pandemic aid cash to spend. That money is mostly no longer available, but the asks for rate hikes kept coming. The Hospital Association of Rhode Island has thrown its weight behind a joint resolution asking for $90 million to increase Medicaid payments to physicians and advanced practice providers. Rhode Island Attorney General Peter Neronha came out with his own, more targeted proposal on May 28, which would increase Medicaid payments to primary care providers to match Medicare rates, for an estimated $50 million cost. Neronha hosted a second press conference on the Medicaid rate proposal at the State House on June 5. In a later interview, Neronha said he tried to hone in on a smaller group of the most critical health care workers — for a lower cost — to increase chances for success. 'We were looking at what was possible, not an aspiration,' he said in an interview. Even that might be too costly. Sen. Pam Lauria, a Barrington Democrat and a nurse practitioner, has proposed a third option, increasing Medicaid patients to 130% of Medicare payments for pediatricians. For Lauria, the $7 million cost to raise rates for primary care providers for children, along with funding to prop up Rhode Island's federally qualified health centers for uninsured and underserved residents, were the most important priorities of the session. 'There's a lot of need out there,' Lauria said. 'We just can't help all of primary care at once. So when we think about rate review, I think we need to look at which groups are the most vulnerable.' Lauria also supports Gov. Dan McKee's plan to speed up the states' review of Medicaid rates for other primary care providers, mandating a September 2026 completion date rather than the following year. Neronha, a vocal adversary and critic of McKee, disagreed. 'I don't think we need to study rates further,' he said. 'Most people would agree with that, including people working in health care.' More broadly, Neronha said the governor and lawmakers have failed to correctly prioritize health care in initial budget discussions rather than in the final revisions at the end of the session, when money is scarce and requests are many. 'It's like a family budget,' he said. 'You budget for the most important things first, not last. It's only now dawning on people that health care should be the center of the family budget — meaning the state budget — not at the end of it.' Medicaid rate reimbursements for providers will likely be incorporated into the state budget, rather than as standalone bills, said Greg Paré and Larry Berman, spokespeople for Lawson and Shekarchi, respectively. Amid disagreement between environmentalists and beverage industry representatives over the mechanics of a bottle bill, lawmakers kicked the can down the road in 2023 by punting the issue to a legislative study commission. But after the 20-member panel came back with recommendations, forming the basis for a trio of bills introduced in April, consensus proved elusive. As advocates pressed for lawmakers to finally pass the proposed 10-cent bottle-deposit refund program, beverage manufacturers and retailers stepped up their opposition, repurposing a website formerly used to oppose a tax on sugary drinks to market their opposition to the bottle bill. The Stop the Rhode Island Bottle Tax Coalition also released a survey funded by the American Beverage Association showing a majority of residents don't support a bottle bill. The poll directly contradicted the findings of another commissioned by Save the Bay several months prior showing support for a 10-cent deposit on recyclable containers based on environmental concerns. Thorp with Save the Bay claimed opponents misrepresented the legislation, which was modified significantly to assuage industry concerns. In legislative hearings last month, some retailers referenced provisions no longer in the bill, Thorp said. Among them: Retailers would no longer be required to take empty containers, a task now handed to a nonprofit contractor hired by the beverage industry to set up and run redemption centers to take back empties. Opponents refer to the proposed 10 cents deposit on recyclable bottles and cans as a 'tax.' Thorp calls that 'intentionally misleading' because the upfront fee would be returned to customers who bring back their empty bottles and cans. Christopher Hunter, a spokesperson for the Stop the Bottle Tax group, countered that the proposal would 'significantly' increase the costs of beverages sold in Rhode Island. 'Most Rhode Islanders already pay for convenient curbside recycling and will choose not to lug bags of cans and bottles back to a store to wait in line and feed them into a machine one at a time, not to mention the seniors and people with limited mobility who will have difficulty doing it,' Hunter said in an emailed statement. 'For all those people, who are likely the majority of Rhode Islanders, the bottle bill is a new, high-priced tax.' The many groups and interests affected by a deposit-refund program, not to mention the complexities of how to run it — evidenced by the 57 page piece of legislation — makes it a tough political sell, Thorp acknowledged. But one boon for proponents: Setting up the program doesn't require dipping into state coffers at all. This also means any version of a bottle recycling program won't be part of the final fiscal 2026 budget, but, if approved, as standalone legislation. All three versions of the program remained held for further study in their respective chambers' committees as of Monday. However, Lawson is a cosponsor on two of the proposals in the Senate side, suggesting preliminary support. 'The commission worked for almost two years to research and put forward thoughtful legislation to address this issue, which impacts every Rhode Island,' Lawson said in a statement. 'I believe it is a very important conversation we are having in the Senate this session.' Shekarchi favored his standard response that he was 'reviewing all the options.' But he also noted he would receive input from his recently tapped advisor, Janet Coit, who formerly worked for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and before that, as director of the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
CBS News
3 days ago
- CBS News
Vance says Musk's attacks on Trump were a "huge mistake" but tries to downplay spat
Vice President JD Vance said Elon Musk was making a "huge mistake" going after President Trump in a storm of bitter and inflammatory social media posts after a falling out between the two men. But the vice president, in an interview released Friday after the very public blow-up between the world's richest man and arguably the world's most powerful, also tried to downplay Musk's blistering attacks as an "emotional guy" who got frustrated. Musk attacked Mr. Trump in a torrent of social media posts, first criticizing the president's spending package and then targeting him with more direct attacks. Mr. Trump then portrayed Musk as disgruntled and "CRAZY" and threatened to cut the government contracts held by Musk's businesses. Trump ally Steve Bannon called for an investigation into Musk's immigration status and alleged drug use. During an interview with comedian Theo Von, Vance said he hopes that "eventually Elon comes back into the fold," but said it might not be "possible now because he's gone so nuclear." The interview was taped on Thursday as Musk's posts were unfurling on X, the social media network the billionaire owns. "Look, it happens to everybody," Vance said in the interview. "I've flown off the handle way worse than Elon Musk did in the last 24 hours." Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance attend a campaign event, Oct. 5, 2024, in Butler, Pa. Alex Brandon / AP The vice president told Von that as Musk for days was calling on social media for Congress to kill Mr. Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill," the president was "getting a little frustrated, feeling like some of the criticisms were unfair coming from Elon, but I think has been very restrained because the president doesn't think that he needs to be in a blood feud with Elon Musk." "I actually think if Elon chilled out a little bit, everything would be fine," he added. Vance's comments come as other Republicans in recent days have urged the two men to mend fences. Just weeks ago, Mr. Trump and Musk were close allies, spending significant time together while the billionaire served as a special advisor to the president and led the "Department of Government Efficiency," or DOGE. Vance called Musk an "incredible entrepreneur," and said that DOGE, which sought to cut government spending and laid off or pushed out thousands of workers, was "really good." Vance defends Trump against Epstein allegations Musk, who runs electric vehicle maker Tesla, internet company Starlink and rocket company SpaceX, also claimed without evidence that the government was concealing information about the president's association with infamous pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. During the interview, Von showed the vice president Musk's claim that the Trump administration hasn't released all the records related to sex abuser Epstein because Mr. Trump is mentioned in them. Vance responded to that, saying, "Absolutely not. Donald Trump didn't do anything wrong with Jeffrey Epstein." Mr. Trump's name has been found in court documents related to Epstein's case, but his appearance in the documents is not evidence of wrongdoing. CBS News has previously covered Mr. Trump's presence in those documents. In February, the Department of Justice gave a group of right-wing influencers binders labeled "The Epstein Files: Phase 1," but the influencers later said that there was little new information in the files. Attorney General Pam Bondi later shared the documents widely and said the first phase "largely contains documents that have been previously leaked but never released in a formal capacity by the U.S. Government." She said more documents would be forthcoming, but there have been no other releases since. Musk appeared by Saturday morning to have deleted his posts about Epstein. "The president is doing a good job" Musk also shared a post calling for Mr. Trump to be impeached and replaced with Vance. He also called for the formation of a new political party. The vice president said comments like those were "just not helpful." "It's totally insane. The president is doing a good job," Vance told Von. The vice president also defended the bill that has drawn Musk's ire, and said its central goal was not to cut spending but to extend the 2017 tax cuts approved in Trump's first term. The bill would slash spending but also leave some 10.9 million more people without health insurance and spike deficits by $2.4 trillion over the decade, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. Musk has warned that the bill will increase the federal deficit and called it a "disgusting abomination." Elon Musk and Vice President JD Vance listen as President Donald Trump speaks at a campaign rally, Oct. 5, 2024, in Butler, Pa. Evan Vucci / AP "It's a good bill," Vance said. "It's not a perfect bill." Vance also said it was ridiculous for some House Republicans who voted for the bill but later found parts objectionable to claim they hadn't had time to read it. The vice president said the text of the bill had been available for weeks. "The idea that people haven't had an opportunity to actually read it is ridiculous," Vance said.
Fox News
4 days ago
- Fox News
Trump-Musk feud: Who deserves the most credit for president's resounding 2024 White House win?
As the war of words between President Donald Trump and Elon Musk rages, it's sparked a new debate over how decisive the world's richest person was in helping Trump recapture the White House in the 2024 election. The president, speaking with reporters, argued, "I think I would have won" even without Musk's help on the campaign trail last year. Musk, firing back, argued that "without me, Trump would have lost the election." While the once-strong alliance between Trump and Musk rapidly disintegrated on Thursday as the two traded barbs over the president's "big, beautiful" tax cuts and spending bill, the zingers also extended to other topics, including last year's presidential election. Musk, the CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, went all in for Trump last summer and autumn. He endorsed the GOP presidential nominee in July right after the assassination attempt against Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania. Musk became the top donor of the 2024 election cycle, dishing out nearly $300 million in support of Trump's bid through America PAC, a Trump-aligned super PAC. Much of the money was used for get-out-the-vote efforts and ads in the crucial battleground states as Trump and Kamala Harris faced off for the presidency. Musk concentrated much of his efforts on Pennsylvania. He joined Trump for the first time on the campaign trail at an Oct. 5 rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, then held five town halls in the Keystone State later in October. And Musk set up a war room of sorts in Pittsburgh. Trump, mentioning how Musk campaigned for him in Pennsylvania, pointed to his White House chief of staff, Susie Wiles, who was co-chair of Trump's 2024 campaign. The president noted that "Susie would say I would have won Pennsylvania easily anyway." Musk, apparently watching Trump's comments in real time, quickly fired back on X, which Musk renamed after buying Twitter. "Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate," Musk wrote. "Such ingratitude." Veteran Republican strategist John Brabender, who served as a media consultant to the 2024 Trump campaign, told Fox News Digital that "Elon and many others played an important role in helping the president win states all across America." "But the bottom line is there's only one constant and one person who is most responsible, by far, and that's President Trump. That's who people voted for," Brabender added. Longtime Republican consultant Dave Carney, a veteran of numerous GOP presidential campaigns over the past few decades, said the president and Musk are both right. Carney, who steered Preserve America, another top-spending Trump-aligned super PAC, told Fox News that Trump "might have won without the help, but you can't underestimate how important that help was." Pointing to Preserve America, Musk's America PAC and MAGA Inc, which was the main Trump-aligned super PAC, Carney said they all deserved "a tremendous amount of credit" and "just made it easier" for Trump to sweep all seven battleground states and win the White House. Carney also highlighted the Musk-aligned super PAC's "unprecedented field effort, mail and other communications … to turn out these low-propensity Trump voters." Tom Eddy, the GOP chairman in Erie County, a longtime crucial swing county in the northwestern corner of battleground Pennsylvania, told Fox News that Musk "helped Trump significantly. I really think so. He had money, and he had a name." But Eddy added that "my gut feeling would be that Trump is basically saying, 'Look. I won the election. These people helped me, but I won.' That's what he's trying to bring across." In battleground Michigan, veteran Republican strategist Dennis Lennox pointed to Musk's comments and told Fox News "it's incredibly arrogant to say that, but it's probably true."
