
Negri's policy on strays needs a rethink
THE decision by Negri Sembilan state assembly, endorsed by all 36 assemblymen, sanctioning the culling of street dogs has sparked concern among animal rights advocates and concerned citizens.
The voices of protest are louder than those in favour of the decision, and the state authorities ought to take heed of this.
Negri Sembilan Mentri Besar Datuk Seri Aminuddin Harun said his administration was left with no other option to address issues of disturbance and safety caused by the free-roaming canines.
The decision, he said, had to be taken as the issue had been repeatedly raised and that gave an impression that his team was not doing anything to address it.
Aminuddin promised that the stray dogs would only be euthanised if unclaimed from the pound after their capture.
Animal welfare groups, however, want the authorities to consider other options to better manage the stray population.
While acknowledging cases where aggressive animals pose risks to public safety, they said culling should not be an option.
With no proper SOP in place, activists fear the state government's decision would give enforcement agencies free rein to cull all strays.
They also claimed inconsistencies in Aminuddin's announcement as he had initially said only aggressive strays with a history of attacking the public would be put to sleep.
Animal rights groups said the Negri Sembilan government should shelve the move while waiting for the outcome of proposals submitted to Housing and Local Government Ministry on managing the stray dog population.
It should be noted that there are countries which have resorted to culling strays, particularly the animals that were known to have diseases such as rabies.
On the other hand, there are also countries that completely prohibit the killing of street dogs and have adopted more humane measures such as spaying and neutering, sheltering them in pounds and promoting adoption.
India, for example, has taken the fertility control route rather than culling, and its stray population has reduced.
In North America, fertility control has had similar effectiveness over a 20-year period.
These statistics, animal rights groups say, show that it is better to control than to kill.
Animal welfare groups are asking that they be allowed to manage the issue via the trap-neuter-release (TNR) programme which they claim is the most effective method.
They say it takes a minimum of five years for the programme to yield results and that non- governmental organisations should be given time to prove this.
It is learned that the TNR programme in Seremban was only launched in 2023.
The groups say they are also financially strained and depend heavily on public donations to cover expenses.
For example Furrykids Safehaven, which houses some 2,000 strays in Rantau, claims it needs an average RM130,000 a month to run the shelter.
More than half the expenses goes to buying 1,200 bags of kibbles − which cost some RM72,000 − for the dogs, followed by salaries for its 11 workers and veterinary bills, which come up to another RM50,000.
Volunteers help catch strays for the TNR programme and feed them after they are released, at no cost to the state.
To the people who have cared and continue to care for these voiceless animals, the decision by the authorities seems inhumane.
We should perhaps take a page from other nations.
The Netherlands, now virtually free of stray dogs, adopted a nationwide sterilisation programme in 1996.
Homes were found for more than a million dogs without a single one being put to sleep.
Another effective policy by the Dutch government was to impose heavy taxes on purchasing pets from stores, which eventually led people to adopt fur babies from shelters instead.
Remember Kopi, the playful stray dog shot dead in Besut, Terengganu, during a culling operation?
There are tens of thousands like Kopi all over Malaysia.
A society is judged not by how it treats its strongest, but by how it cares for those who cannot fight back.
The state government must return to the drawing board and come up with a policy that balances public health and safety with humane considerations.
Surely, man's best friend deserves better.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Express
an hour ago
- Daily Express
Court to hear Muhyiddin's reference bid on August 28
Published on: Wednesday, June 04, 2025 Published on: Wed, Jun 04, 2025 By: Ho Kit Yen, FMT Text Size: Former prime minister Muhyiddin Yassin is accused of making seditious statements during the Nenggiri by-election in Gua Musang, Kelantan, last year. (Bernama pic) Kuala Lumpur: The High Court here will hear Muhyiddin Yassin's bid to refer legal questions to the apex court on the validity of certain provisions under the Sedition Act on Aug 28. The former prime minister is accused of making seditious statements during the Nenggiri by-election in Gua Musang, Kelantan, last year. Justice Jamil Hussin fixed the date after lawyer Joshua Tay, appearing for Muhyiddin, told the court that the defence and prosecution had agreed on the date. The court then instructed the prosecution and defence to file their submissions by Aug 14. Deputy public prosecutor Razali Che Ani appeared for the prosecution. Muhyiddin allegedly said he was not invited by the then Yang di-Pertuan Agong to be sworn in as prime minister following the 2022 general election, despite having obtained the majority support of 115 MPs. If found guilty, the Perikatan Nasional chairman and Bersatu president will face a jail term that could extend to three years or a maximum fine of RM5,000. Muhyiddin was initially charged at the Gua Musang sessions court in August last year. On Nov 27, Justice Azmi Abdullah allowed his application to have the case transferred to the Kuala Lumpur High Court. * Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel and Telegram for breaking news alerts and key updates! * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available. Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia
![[UPDATED] High Court rejects Anwar's bid to refer constitutional questions to federal court [WATCH]](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.nst.com.my%2Fimages%2Farticles%2FPMXjudge_NSTfield_image_socialmedia.var_1749022242.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
![[UPDATED] High Court rejects Anwar's bid to refer constitutional questions to federal court [WATCH]](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.nst.com.my%2Fassets%2FNST-Logo%402x.png%3Fid%3Db37a17055cb1ffea01f5&w=48&q=75)
New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
[UPDATED] High Court rejects Anwar's bid to refer constitutional questions to federal court [WATCH]
KUALA LUMPUR: Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim has failed in his bid to refer eight constitutional questions to the Federal Court regarding the legal provisions on the immunity of a sitting prime minister. High Court Judge Roz Mawar Rozain dismissed the application, ruling that it did not meet the requirements under Section 84 of the Courts of Judicature Act (CJA). "Having considered the affidavits, the eight proposed questions, and submissions of all parties (both written and oral), this court is not satisfied that the statutory threshold under Section 84 of the CJA is met. "The questions posed are speculative, not necessary to the disposal of this case, and do not concern the interpretation or validity of any constitutional provision," she said in her decision. Anwar's application is linked to a sexual assault lawsuit filed against him four years ago by his former research officer, Muhammed Yusoff Rawther. The trial is scheduled to begin on June 16. Roz Mawar said the proposed constitutional questions failed to meet the statutory threshold under the section, and that not every question referencing the Federal Constitution warrants referral. "The Federal Court is not a forum for speculative advisory opinions. "Furthermore, the defendant (Anwar) has affirmed readiness to proceed with trial and there is no evidence that the suit impairs his ability to perform constitutional duties. "This court finds no special circumstances warranting a stay of proceedings," she said. Roz Mawar awarded RM20,000 in costs to Yusoff Rawther. She also ruled that the June 16 trial will proceed. After the proceedings, Anwar's lawyer Datuk Seri Rajasegaran Krishnan said they will file a notice of appeal at the Court of Appeal. On May 23, Anwar applied to the High Court to refer eight legal questions to the Federal Court, which included whether he possesses immunity from a civil suit filed by Yusoff. Anwar had sought the apex court to rule whether Articles 5,8, 39,40 and 43 of the constitution grant him qualified immunity from Yusoff's suit. Yusoff had filed the suit before Anwar became prime minister on Nov 24, 2022. Anwar had asked the court to decide whether Yusoff's suit would impair the effective discharge of his executive duties and undermine the constitutional separation of powers. Anwar had also requested the court to consider whether the lawsuit impacts his ability to carry out executive duties and undermines the principle of separation of powers guaranteed by the constitution. Previously, Anwar's senior political secretary Datuk Seri Shamsul Iskandar Mohd Akin had said there was no attempt in the application to seek absolute immunity. He said Anwar's application to the Federal Court is a lawful process to seek clarity from the court on his position in carrying out official duties when facing a civil suit based on claims that precede his appointment as prime minister. Shamsul Iskandar had said the issue is whether such civil action could interfere with the efficiency of a prime minister in carrying out the executive functions of the state. He had said it is a legitimate and lawful matter to be referred to the Federal Court, the highest judicial institution in the country, with the jurisdiction to interpret the constitution fairly and objectively.

The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Perak provides RM5,000 aid to families of FRU officers killed in accident
IPOH: The Perak government has announced a RM5,000 financial aid package for each family of the nine Federal Reserve Unit (FRU) personnel who died in a road accident on May 13. Menteri Besar Datuk Seri Saarani Mohamad noted that similar aid had been extended to the families of victims from a Royal Malaysian Navy helicopter crash previously and said the current assistance was approved at a state executive council meeting. "The RM5,000 contribution has been facilitated by Yayasan Bina Upaya (YBU) and delivered to the bereaved families," he told reporters after launching the Perak State Digital Economy Action Plan 2030 and the Smart City Blueprint 2040 here on Wednesday (June 4). Also present were State Housing and Local Government Committee chairman Sandrea Ng Shy Ching, and State Communications, Multimedia and Non-Governmental Organisations (NGO) Committee chairman Mohd Azlan Helmi. The fatal collision occurred at 8.50 am when an FRU lorry carrying 18 officers from Unit 5 in Sungai Senam collided with a stone-laden truck while returning from duties in Teluk Intan during the Chitrapournami festival. Nine officers were killed and nine others were injured. – Bernama