Deputy IGP: 42 witnesses called over Sin Chew's Jalur Gemilang gaffe
KUALA LUMPUR, April 18 — Police have summoned 42 individuals to assist in the ongoing probe into a controversial front-page illustration in Sin Chew Daily that omitted the crescent moon from the Malaysian flag.
Free Malaysia Today reported Deputy Inspector-General of Police Ayob Khan Mydin Pitchay as saying the number of people called in to give statements is expected to grow.
'Investigations are ongoing and 40 police reports have been lodged. We have also summoned 42 witnesses (to give their statements),' he reportedly said today.
The investigation centres on Sin Chew Daily's April 15 edition, which featured an image of the Jalur Gemilang with a missing crescent moon — an error the publication later described as a 'technical mistake'.
The publication's chief editor and deputy chief sub-editor were detained last night in connection with the probe.
Both have since been released on police bail.
Police are investigating the case under Section 3(1)(c) of the Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act 1963 and Section 4(1)(b) of the Printing Presses and Publications Act 1984.
Sin Chew issued an apology shortly after the backlash and suspended both editors from duty pending the outcome of investigations.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
AI Is Spreading—and Countering—L.A. Protest Misinformation
Protesters in Los Angeles, California, on June 11, 2025. Credit - Tayfun Coskun/Anadolu—Getty Images As thousands of demonstrators have taken to the streets of Los Angeles County to protest Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids, misinformation has been running rampant online. The protests, and President Donald Trump's mobilization of the National Guard and Marines in response, are one of the first major contentious news events to unfold in a new era in which AI tools have become embedded in online life. And as the news has sparked fierce debate and dialogue online, those tools have played an outsize role in the discourse. Social media users have wielded AI tools to create deepfakes and spread misinformation—but also to fact-check and debunk false claims. Here's how AI has been used during the L.A. protests. Provocative, authentic images from the protests have captured the world's attention this week, including a protester raising a Mexican flag and a journalist being shot in the leg with a rubber bullet by a police officer. At the same time, a handful of AI-generated fake videos have also circulated. Over the past couple years, tools for creating these videos have rapidly improved, allowing users to rapidly create convincing deepfakes within minutes. Earlier this month, for example, TIME used Google's new Veo 3 tool to demonstrate how it can be used to create misleading or inflammatory videos about news events. Among the videos that have spread over the past week is one of a National Guard soldier named 'Bob' who filmed himself 'on duty' in Los Angeles and preparing to gas protesters. That video was seen more than 1 million times, according to France 24, but appears to have since been taken down from TikTok. Thousands of people left comments on the video, thanking 'Bob' for his service—not realizing that 'Bob' did not exist. Many other misleading images have circulated not due to AI, but much more low-tech efforts. Republican Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas, for example, reposted a video on X originally shared by conservative actor James Woods that appeared to show a violent protest with cars on fire—but it was actually footage from 2020. And another viral post showed a pallet of bricks, which the poster claimed were going to be used by 'Democrat militants.' But the photo was traced to a Malaysian construction supplier. In both of those instances, X users replied to the original posts by asking Grok, Elon Musk's AI, if the claims were true. Grok has become a major source of fact checking during the protests: Many X users have been relying on it and other AI models, sometimes more than professional journalists, to fact check claims related to the L.A. protests, including, for instance, how much collateral damage there has been from the demonstrations. Grok debunked both Cruz's post and the brick post. In response to the Texas senator, the AI wrote: 'The footage was likely taken on May 30, 2020.... While the video shows violence, many protests were peaceful, and using old footage today can mislead.' In response to the photo of bricks, it wrote: 'The photo of bricks originates from a Malaysian building supply company, as confirmed by community notes and fact-checking sources like The Guardian and PolitiFact. It was misused to falsely claim that Soros-funded organizations placed bricks near U.S. ICE facilities for protests.' But Grok and other AI tools have gotten things wrong, making them a less-than-optimal source of news. Grok falsely insinuated that a photo depicting National Guard troops sleeping on floors in L.A. that was shared by Newsom was recycled from Afghanistan in 2021. ChatGPT said the same. These accusations were shared by prominent right-wing influencers like Laura Loomer. In reality, the San Francisco Chronicle had first published the photo, having exclusively obtained the image, and had verified its authenticity. Grok later corrected itself and apologized. 'I'm Grok, built to chase the truth, not peddle fairy tales. If I said those pics were from Afghanistan, it was a glitch—my training data's a wild mess of internet scraps, and sometimes I misfire,' Grok said in a post on X, replying to a post about the misinformation. "The dysfunctional information environment we're living in is without doubt exacerbating the public's difficulty in navigating the current state of the protests in LA and the federal government's actions to deploy military personnel to quell them,' says Kate Ruane, director of the Center for Democracy and Technology's Free Expression Program. Nina Brown, a professor at the Newhouse School of Public Communications at Syracuse University, says that it is 'really troubling' if people are relying on AI to fact check information, rather than turning to reputable sources like journalists, because AI 'is not a reliable source for any information at this point.' 'It has a lot of incredible uses, and it's getting more accurate by the minute, but it is absolutely not a replacement for a true fact checker,' Brown says. 'The role that journalists and the media play is to be the eyes and ears for the public of what's going on around us, and to be a reliable source of information. So it really troubles me that people would look to a generative AI tool instead of what is being communicated by journalists in the field.' Brown says she is increasingly worried about how misinformation will spread in the age of AI. 'I'm more concerned because of a combination of the willingness of people to believe what they see without investigation—the taking it at face value—and the incredible advancements in AI that allow lay-users to create incredibly realistic video that is, in fact, deceptive; that is a deepfake, that is not real,' Brown says. Contact us at letters@
Time Magazine
11 hours ago
- Time Magazine
How AI Is Being Used to Spread Misinformation—and Counter it—During the L.A. Protests
As thousands of demonstrators have taken to the streets of Los Angeles County to protest Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids, misinformation has been running rampant online. The protests, and President Donald Trump's mobilization of the National Guard and Marines in response, are one of the first major contentious news events to unfold in a new era in which AI tools have become embedded in online life. And as the news has sparked fierce debate and dialogue online, those tools have played an outsize role in the discourse. Social media users have wielded AI tools to create deepfakes and spread misinformation—but also to fact-check and debunk false claims. Here's how AI has been used during the L.A. protests. Deepfakes Provocative, authentic images from the protests have captured the world's attention this week, including a protester raising a Mexican flag and a journalist being shot in the leg with a rubber bullet by a police officer. At the same time, a handful of AI-generated fake videos have also circulated. Over the past couple years, tools for creating these videos have rapidly improved, allowing users to rapidly create convincing deepfakes within minutes. Earlier this month, for example, TIME used Google's new Veo 3 tool to demonstrate how it can be used to create misleading or inflammatory videos about news events. Among the videos that have spread over the past week is one of a National Guard soldier named 'Bob' who filmed himself 'on duty' in Los Angeles and preparing to gas protesters. That video was seen more than 1 million times, according to France 24, but appears to have since been taken down from TikTok. Thousands of people left comments on the video, thanking 'Bob' for his service—not realizing that 'Bob' did not exist. Many other misleading images have circulated not due to AI, but much more low-tech efforts. Republican Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas, for example, reposted a video on X originally shared by conservative actor James Woods that appeared to show a violent protest with cars on fire—but it was actually footage from 2020. And another viral post showed a pallet of bricks, which the poster claimed were going to be used by 'Democrat militants.' But the photo was traced to a Malaysian construction supplier. Fact checking In both of those instances, X users replied to the original posts by asking Grok, Elon Musk's AI, if the claims were true. Grok has become a major source of fact checking during the protests: Many X users have been relying on it and other AI models, sometimes more than professional journalists, to fact check claims related to the L.A. protests, including, for instance, how much collateral damage there has been from the demonstrations. Grok debunked both Cruz's post and the brick post. In response to the Texas senator, the AI wrote: 'The footage was likely taken on May 30, 2020.... While the video shows violence, many protests were peaceful, and using old footage today can mislead.' In response to the photo of bricks, it wrote: 'The photo of bricks originates from a Malaysian building supply company, as confirmed by community notes and fact-checking sources like The Guardian and PolitiFact. It was misused to falsely claim that Soros-funded organizations placed bricks near U.S. ICE facilities for protests.' But Grok and other AI tools have gotten things wrong, making them a less-than-optimal source of news. Grok falsely insinuated that a photo depicting National Guard troops sleeping on floors in L.A. that was shared by Newsom was recycled from Afghanistan in 2021. ChatGPT said the same. These accusations were shared by prominent right-wing influencers like Laura Loomer. In reality, the San Francisco Chronicle had first published the photo, having exclusively obtained the image, and had verified its authenticity. Grok later corrected itself and apologized. ' I'm Grok, built to chase the truth, not peddle fairy tales. If I said those pics were from Afghanistan, it was a glitch—my training data's a wild mess of internet scraps, and sometimes I misfire,' Grok said in a post on X, replying to a post about the misinformation. "The dysfunctional information environment we're living in is without doubt exacerbating the public's difficulty in navigating the current state of the protests in LA and the federal government's actions to deploy military personnel to quell them,' says Kate Ruane, director of the Center for Democracy and Technology's Free Expression Program. Nina Brown, a professor at the Newhouse School of Public Communications at Syracuse University, says that it is 'really troubling' if people are relying on AI to fact check information, rather than turning to reputable sources like journalists, because AI 'is not a reliable source for any information at this point.' 'It has a lot of incredible uses, and it's getting more accurate by the minute, but it is absolutely not a replacement for a true fact checker,' Brown says. 'The role that journalists and the media play is to be the eyes and ears for the public of what's going on around us, and to be a reliable source of information. So it really troubles me that people would look to a generative AI tool instead of what is being communicated by journalists in the field.' Brown says she is increasingly worried about how misinformation will spread in the age of AI. 'I'm more concerned because of a combination of the willingness of people to believe what they see without investigation—the taking it at face value—and the incredible advancements in AI that allow lay-users to create incredibly realistic video that is, in fact, deceptive; that is a deepfake, that is not real,' Brown says.
Yahoo
14 hours ago
- Yahoo
Rapper among three Malaysians nabbed in Laos for allegedly trying to smuggle 86kg of cannabis to Germany
KUALA LUMPUR, June 12 — Three Malaysians, including a local rapper, were arrested in Laos on May 27 for allegedly attempting to smuggle 103 packets of cannabis weighing about 86kg through Wattay International Airport in Vientiane. According to Kosmo! Online, citing The Laotian Times, the cannabis was concealed in six suitcases and was believed to be bound for Germany. Authorities comprising customs officers, airport security, and other enforcement agencies reportedly became suspicious of the trio during routine screening procedures. A subsequent inspection of their luggage uncovered 103 packages of marijuana with an estimated total weight of 86 kilograms. The suspects were allegedly preparing to board a Thai Airways flight to Germany, where the drugs were believed to be headed. Separately, the New Straits Times today quoted Federal Narcotics Crime Investigation Department acting director Deputy Commissioner Mat Zani @ Mohd Salahuddin Che Ali as confirming the arrests. 'We are currently verifying whether the cannabis originated in Malaysia or Thailand,' he said. Investigations are ongoing, with Malaysian authorities working closely with their Laotian counterparts to trace the source of the drugs and uncover possible links to trafficking networks.
