Green Forward Conference 2025 to Propel Lebanon's Green and Circular Economy Transition
Organized by the Business Incubation Association in Tripoli (BIAT), in partnership with the international, non-governmental organization SPARK, and with the financial support of the European Union, the conference was a central component of the Green Forward programme in Lebanon and a key platform for shaping the country's green economy transition.
The conference brought together more than 150 participants, including Business Support Organizations (BSOs), SMEs, policymakers, and experts from Lebanon, the European Union, and the wider Southern Neighborhood, as well as many stakeholders engaged in Lebanon's economic and environmental development. It served as a platform for knowledge exchange, the development of partnerships, and the creation of a national roadmap to guide Lebanon's transition to a green and circular economy.
The Green Forward programme, funded by the European Union, aims to foster a green and circular economy in the Southern Neighbourhood region, which includes countries in the Middle East and North Africa. The programme operates at three levels: macro, meso, and micro, implemented respectively by a consortium comprising Expertise France, SPARK, and UNIDO.
The programme's meso-level component is implemented by SPARK in collaboration with partners across seven countries: Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Libya, Morocco, Palestine, and Tunisia. In Lebanon and across the Southern Mediterranean region, the programme's aim is to enhance the capacity of business support organisations (BSOs) to serve as ecosystem enablers, bridging the gap between policy and practice. Green Forward does this by addressing the practical needs of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in adopting sustainable and circular economy practices. By equipping BSOs with tools, training, and opportunities for regional collaboration, the programme commits to fostering job creation, economic opportunity, and alignment with the principles of the European Green Deal in Lebanon and beyond.
Through its intervention in Lebanon, the Green Forward programme is set to deliver a range of strategic outputs to advance the green and circular economy. 10 Memorandums of Understanding (MoUs) will be signed between Business Support Organisations (BSOs) and key Lebanon-based stakeholders in the green and circular economy, as part of an international conference. 6 workshops and roundtables will be organized to encourage peer learning and partnerships, complemented by peer pod meetings held between sessions. 4 BSOs will benefit from capacity-building support to strengthen their role as green ecosystem enablers, while 3 green BSOs will receive specialized training on green and circular economy practices. A practical toolbox will be developed to assess the integration of sustainability and the circular economy, with 30 SMEs engaged to test it.
The programme will also support the development of a national roadmap for a green business network and launch an awareness campaign to highlight the impact and opportunities of the green and circular economy in Lebanon. To build on these efforts, a networking working group of 24 public and private stakeholders, including 3 green BSOs, will be established to foster multi?stakeholder collaboration. This group will convene annually to validate progress and outputs, ultimately leading to the formulation of one policy recommendation.
'Through the Green Forward programme, we are reinforcing the institutional capacity of business support organisations to serve as key enablers of the green and circular transition across the region. This approach ensures long-term impact by equipping local actors to drive sustainable entrepreneurship, green job creation, and low-carbon innovation.'— Afef Ajengui, Regional Programme Manager of the Green Forward programme at SPARK.
'This initiative aims to build the capacity of Business Support Organizations (BSOs) to become vital ecosystem enablers, closing the gap between policy frameworks and the real needs of SMEs. By fostering innovation, encouraging sustainability, and promoting collaboration, the program drives the shift toward an inclusive and resilient green economy.'– Mr. Nasri Mouawad, Chairman of BIAT.
The conference featured expert discussions on green business models, ESG practices, and circular economy strategies, along with interactive sessions to facilitate meaningful collaboration across sectors.
Two dedicated panels moderated by Maurice Matta enriched the program: the first panel titled 'Building a Green Business Ecosystem in Lebanon', featured H.E. Dr. Nasser Yassin, former Minister of Environment in Lebanon, Ghada El-Armali, International Green Economy & Sustainable Growth Expert, and Dr. Hasan Youness, Entrepreneur, Academician, Exec. Committee Ecoswitch Coalition; the second panel titled 'Green Businesses – Success Stories', included Omar Itani, founder of 'FabricAid', Batoul Hakim, founder of 'Savvy Element', Ziad Abi Chaker, founder of 'Cedar Environmental', and Khalil Haykal, EBRD Representative.
The conference led to multiple partnership agreements and a shared vision for a vibrant green business network in Lebanon.
This initiative aligns with the broader goals of the European Green Deal and seeks to foster economic resilience through sustainability. By empowering local actors and fostering innovation, the Green Forward programme positions Lebanon as an active participant in regional efforts to build a greener, more circular future.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Etihad
9 hours ago
- Al Etihad
Early wins for US, but dynamics of EU alliance is changing
4 Aug 2025 23:55 SULTAN KHALIFA AL RUBAEI*Tariffs have once again taken centre stage in US and international trade, following the August deadline set by United States President Donald Trump for countries to present trade agreement proposals or face steep tariffs. The US administration secured deals with several of its trading partners, most notably the European Union (EU) and the United Kingdom. However, the global trade landscape now appears to be bracing for profound changes in trade rules that go beyond the post-World War II US agreement with the EU included a 15% tariff on European goods (significantly lower than the 30% previously threatened by the US president), an exemption for pharmaceutical products, and limited exceptions for aircraft and medical equipment. In return, the EU committed to purchasing $750 billion worth of US energy products and investing approximately $600 billion in the US. This agreement secured substantial additional revenue for the American 'America First' policy pursued by the United States in its dealings with both partners and non-partners pushes it toward manoeuvring economic policies. But beyond the deals and manoeuvres lies US-European relations, particularly with the EU, the foundation of which is no longer only partnership, but also competition, or rather, the partnership is taking a backseat in the face of competition. This shift may be attributed to internal divisions among the EU's 27 member states, the multiple challenges facing the ageing continent, and the heavy reliance on the United States when it comes to defence forces. At this time, none of the EU countries can afford the economic strain of a trade the American side, the current administration has shown little regard for the mutual trust in the transatlantic free trade relations, nor for the existing rules of international trade. As a result, there is a possibility that other global actors may adopt similar protectionist policies, posing a threat to the stability of international markets, particularly in light of the tensions that the current environment may create at the level of international trade the changes and uncertainty, the EU chose to stay aligned with America, albeit at a high cost. The newly imposed tariffs place a heavy financial burden on EU-based companies, forcing them to bear additional billions in expenses. While EU member states acknowledge the agreement's potential harm to their economies, they have viewed it as the best possible option under the current circumstances. It may mark the beginning of a longer negotiation process rather than the end, given the limited options available. Without formal trade agreements with Washington, the EU risks being subjected to US terms, leading to imbalanced deals or potential trade United States emerged as the winner in the agreement with the EU. However, the outcome also places a burden on American consumers, who are likely to face higher prices for imported goods as companies pass on the additional costs. This is particularly significant given that Germany is one of the largest exporters to the US, with exports exceeding €161 billion in 2024. Ireland's exports to the US reached €72 billion and Italy's €64 billion in the same year, according to Eurostat, the EU's statistical office. In total, 20% of the EU's goods exports are directed to the United States. This makes the agreement the least damaging option for Europe to avoid a trade confrontation between two allies who together account for nearly one-third of global trade. The effects of this deal may become visible in the US market in the coming this agreement, the US aims to achieve economic balance and address its trade deficit with the EU, which reached $235.6 billion in 2024. Although the deal helps avoid a trade war, it shows that the dynamics of old alliances are shifting, international trade is being reshaped amid global economic uncertainty, and competition for each country to achieve huge gains has become a defining feature of today's international economic and trade relations. *The columnist is a researcher with the think-tank firm, TRENDS Research & Advisory
Khaleej Times
15 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
As AI regulation tightens, legal foresight will define success
The clock is ticking for organisations that build, deploy, or rely on AI systems. With phase two of the European Union's AI Act fast approaching, the world's first binding AI regulation is ushering in a new era of enforceable AI governance. The act introduces strict requirements to ensure transparency, safety, and human oversight, grouping AI systems into four risk tiers that define how they are governed. Phase one, which came into force on February 2, 2025, banned AI systems deemed to pose unacceptable risk and required organisations operating in the EU to improve AI literacy among employees. The next phase places new obligations on general-purpose AI, including models such as ChatGPT, Claude, DALL·E, Midjourney, Anthropic, Meta, and Google BERT. These requirements mandate greater transparency, the creation of detailed technical documentation, and the disclosure of copyrighted materials used during training. European companies have already called for a pause on these measures, which the EU has rejected. From my perspective, this signals two realities. The first is that the era of enforceable AI regulation has arrived and will only continue to evolve. And the second, is that while responsible AI frameworks have been discussed for years, many businesses are still working out how to get prepared. Legal foresight as a strategic advantage Treating AI compliance as a reactive exercise has never been sustainable. But today, with the pace at which the regulatory landscape relating to AI and responsible and ethical AI, is evolving, legal foresight is more essential than ever. It must be embedded into how AI systems are built, deployed, and scaled from the outset. This is especially critical for general-purpose models, which are complex, fast-evolving, and capable of broad downstream impact. Integrating compliance into the development process, rather than retrofitting it later, helps reduce operational risk while strengthening trust with customers, partners, and regulators. This proactive approach is already being embraced in forward-looking jurisdictions such as the UAE, where regulation is positioned as a catalyst for innovation. In recent years, the UAE has formalised its AI governance through initiatives like the Artificial Intelligence and Advanced Technology Council (AIATC) and the UAE AI Charter, both of which emphasise ethics, transparency, and public interest. These efforts underscore the importance of co-design between government and industry to ensure that emerging technologies are not only cutting-edge, but also responsibly deployed. The co-regulation imperative No single organisation can navigate this evolving regulatory landscape alone. Engaging with industry peers, policymakers, and technology providers is essential. Co-regulation, where governments, private companies, and civil society collaborate to shape rules and guardrails which promote progress, is emerging as the most effective approach. The UAE's partnership with the World Economic Forum through the Global Regulatory Innovation Platform (GRIP) is a prime example. GRIP provides shared frameworks, benchmarking tools, and collaborative mechanisms that transform regulation from a constraint into an enabling model, aligning speed, inclusivity, and ethical standards. This collaborative mindset also shapes how Core42 designs its infrastructure. We embed regulatory and sovereignty requirements directly into our platforms to ensure compliance is not an afterthought. Our Sovereign Public Cloud, built on Microsoft Azure and supported by our sovereign controls platform Insight, addresses the complex challenges of data sovereignty and compliance for governments and regulated industries while still enabling public cloud innovation. With built-in sovereign control sets, comprehensive audit capabilities, and streamlined compliance management, organisations can manage sensitive data with confidence while benefiting from hyperscale agility and security. For customers requiring fully isolated environments for classified workloads, our Signature Private Cloud extends the same principles by combining the scalability of cloud with the control and assurance of on-premises systems. Preparing for the next frontier As governments worldwide move toward more comprehensive oversight through the regulation of AI, the organisations that thrive will be those that invest in proactive legal strategies today and seek to ensure their perspectives are tabled during the co regulation phase. In the Middle East, we are already seeing this next frontier take shape. The launch of the Responsible AI Foundation by G42 and Microsoft, in collaboration with MBZUAI, is establishing region-specific standards for fairness, transparency, and accountability. Additionally, G42's 2024 report on Sovereign AI Ecosystems highlights the growing importance of robust data governance frameworks as demand for data, storage, and computational power accelerates with AI advancements. As such, future regulations are likely to set clear parameters for data sovereignty, cross-border flows, and the accountability of AI systems operating on national infrastructure, addressing both technical integrity and the socio-cultural considerations unique to the region. In addition, continuous risk assessments, real-time auditing, and sector-specific governance will soon become standard practice. To prepare, legal teams must build cross-functional expertise, be creative and immersed in the dynamism of the environment in which the world is operating and work closely with engineers, product owners and data scientists to anticipate the regulatory landscape that will apply to what they are building rather than react to it. For companies developing or deploying AI, success will not hinge solely on technological breakthroughs but on the ability to navigate an increasingly complex legal environment. Those who approach this with foresight and integrity will be best positioned to earn public trust and capture long-term value.
Al Etihad
2 days ago
- Al Etihad
US trade advisor says Trump tariff rates unlikely to change
3 Aug 2025 20:22 WASHINGTON (AFP) New US tariff rates are "pretty much set" with little immediate room for negotiation, Donald Trump's trade advisor said in remarks aired who has wielded tariffs as a tool of American economic might, has set tariff rates for dozens of economies, including the European Union, at between 10 and 41 percent, come August 7, his new hard deadline for the a pre-taped interview broadcast Sunday on CBS's "Face the Nation," US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said "the coming days" are not likely to see changes in the tariff rates."A lot of these are set rates pursuant to deals. Some of these deals are announced, some are not, others depend on the level of the trade deficit or surplus we may have with the country," Greer said."These tariff rates are pretty much set."Undoubtedly, some trade ministers "want to talk more and see how they can work in a different way with the United States," he "we're seeing truly the contours of the president's tariff plan right now with these rates."Last Thursday, the former real estate developer announced hiked tariff rates on dozens of US trade will kick in on August 7 instead of August 1, which had previously been touted as a hard deadline. Meanwhile, White House economic advisor Kevin Hassett said that while talks are expected to continue over the next week with some US trade partners, he concurred with Greer's tariffs assessment in that the bulk of the rates "are more or less locked in."
