Mothers with their kids, trans dhol tasha pathak mark Pune pride march
Deciding to take her 12-year-old son to the Pune Pride 202 on Sunday, city resident Ojas knew this would let him understand what the LGBTAQ community is all about. 'This is the best exposure possible for him. As an ally, this is my way to ensure the next generation gets the best possible education,' she said as she explained the basics of sexual orientation and gender to him.
For Pune's LGBTAQ community, this was the first Pride organised after issues like companies withdrawing their diversity, equality and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives and scrapping funding have affected the community. This was also the first time that the Pride was organised by a collective of organisations. MIST LGBTQ Trust, Manthan Foundation, Jeevika, Pune Queer Sports Club, Qutcast Shikhandi – the transgender dhol tasha Pathak, NHRD and Muktaaa Charitable Foundation joined hands to organise the pride.
Apart from members of the community, several allies — including mothers with their children — walked at the pride this year. A mother, who brought both her children said she decided to bring them to the march to sensitise them about the community. 'Across social media, we have seen a lot of hateful content against the community. The pride parade is the best exposure they can get to break their misconceptions. First hand information is always better,' she said. Suraj Raut, director of MIST Foundation, brought his young nephew to the march. Raut, said the nephew wanted to come for the Pride after he saw pictures of Thane Pride which was held on Saturday. 'He had a good time and even made a poster for me,' he said.
Shikhandi — the dhol tasha Pathak — was the highlight of the march.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
4 hours ago
- Indian Express
This Pride Month, let all colours of the rainbow shine equally bright
Written by Samata Biswas On Sunday, one of the most widely circulated Bengali newspapers carried a literary supplement cover dedicated to the many contentions regarding human sexual orientations, penned by a Sahitya Akademi-winning author. Best known for his novel documenting the lives of trans women in Bengal, this article, on the occasion of Pride Month, was, however, riddled with inaccuracies and prejudices, prompting many Bengalis to ask again: What does 'Pride' mean, and whose voices were systematically erased to create human HIStory? It is, by now, well known that the uprising against governmental persecution and police brutality of sexual minorities in the neighbourhood of New York's Stonewall Inn, on June 28, 1969, is now commemorated across the world as Pride Month. In India, with the recent decriminalisation of sexual 'acts against nature', corporates and institutions have begun to celebrate Pride Month with a vengeance, offering consumer choices as the freedom to choose one's partner. It is also ironic that the United States now both celebrates Pride and undermines the rights of transgender persons, cashing in on the Stonewall uprising led by prominent Black trans women activists like Marsha P Johnson, Sylvia Rivera and many others. Recent US legislation has gone back to claiming that there are only 'two sexes'. The illustrious author chose to ignore the word queer in his discussion of LGBTQ people, and placed bisexuals in the same category as paedophiles. Paedophilia, childhood trauma and grooming have long been used to discredit marginalised sexual orientations; it was a shock to find similar sentiments repeated in an article purportedly celebrating Pride. The word queer, with its long history of being a term of shame attributed to people whose sexual orientation was suspect, has been reclaimed by the community for more than 30 years now. It is now the most widely accepted umbrella term to describe a plethora of genders, sexual orientations and identities. The academic field of queer studies recognises diversity while also recovering hidden and submerged voices from before. Think of, for example, the recent book Queer Cambridge, in which Simon Goldhill describes a hidden community of gay men who lived and worked in close proximity to each other (in fact, along the same staircase in Cambridge) in the early 20th century, shaping much of what is today known as British culture. While the contributions of these individuals (including Rupert Brooke, Alan Turing and E M Forster) are well known, Queer Cambridge uncovers the queer connections and community that they forged and strengthened, creating new bonds across generations. Queer pride should also be, and often is, about uncovering such voices and connections. Mainstream, heteronormative society usually marginalises and hides such stories, histories, loves and events. Trans men are often infantilised, trans women made subjects of violence, lesbians made to hide in the shadow of friendship, while bisexual people are simply not recognised. For bisexuals, the author reserved his harshest condemnation: bisexual people can love both men and women, they do not care about the gender identity of their partners, and may even be attracted to trans women for a brief period before moving on and ruining their lives. Between Sigmund Freud's invocation of an anatomical or physical component of bisexuality to this author's association of bisexuality with disaster, the bisexual identity is in general maligned or unrecognised. One reason, of course, is the general belief that bisexual people have it easier, 'passing' for straight in a heterosexual world. Passing is often the only line that saves queer people from violence. Passing as straight, or cisgender (for trans persons), in a homophobic or transphobic atmosphere may potentially keep harm at bay, while also undermining queer and trans expressions of sexuality and gender. The suspicion and distrust of bisexuals encompass the belief that they can summon straight privilege at will, disown their queer identities and partners on a whim, and abandon queer causes. While literature and culture celebrate dazzling bisexual figures like Virginia Woolf, Frida Kahlo and Billie Holiday, and books like Sally Rooney's Conversations with Friends become runaway hits, the bisexual experience continues to be denied legitimacy due to its disavowal of any kind of fixity. This Pride Month, let all colours of the rainbow — and the ever-evolving Pride flag — shine equally bright, and none at the expense of the others. The writer teaches English at The Sanskrit College and University
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
5 hours ago
- Business Standard
Trump's attack on DEI hits UK as corporate sponsors abandon LGBTQ pride
The Trump administration's attack on US diversity, equity and inclusion policies is reverberating across the Atlantic, with corporations abandoning sponsorships of Britain's Pride festivals, threatening key funding for events this summer. Three quarters of more than 100 Pride organizers have seen a decline in corporate partnerships this year and a quarter of them have seen funding from sponsorships drop over 50 per cent, according to exclusive data from the UK Pride Organisers Network (UKPON). That's hit smaller parades particularly hard, with several canceling events that were planned for Pride Month, which is celebrated globally each June in memory of the Stonewall protests. Sponsorship withdrawals have been particularly pronounced from American businesses, according to Pride in London. The UK's biggest LGBTQ parade relies on corporate sponsors to cover the £1.7 million ($2.3 million) it costs to host more than 1.6 million attendees during its July 5 festival. But this year, longtime sponsors have stepped away, said Christopher Joell-Deshields, chief executive officer of Pride in London. 'Across the Pride movement, there is a very different feel this year,' Joell-Deshields said. 'Some of our sponsors are global partners and we're seeing the effect of those who are based in the US who have seen the roll back of DEI. We're having to push harder in terms of sponsors and getting them to understand the importance of the Pride platform.' Companies doing business in the US have rushed to appear politically neutral after President Donald Trump signed executive orders demanding the end of what he calls 'illegal DEI.' The order was a culmination of a broader blowback against what some US conservatives have dubbed 'woke capitalism,' with activists calling for boycotts against firms that give money to causes like LGBTQ rights and racial-equity programs. The pullback in LGBTQ support is a trend already documented in the US, where a survey of corporate executives revealed that two in five were scaling back Pride Month engagement this year, leaving organizers scrambling for funds. Earlier in May, New York City Pride announced it was looking at a $750,000 budget shortfall and launched a community fundraising campaign to keep the event free to attend. Still, it's not all the Trump effect, according to Jamie Love, the marketing director for Pride in Edinburgh. The UK's intensifying debate over transgender rights, with the Supreme Court recently ruling that the legal definition of a woman is based on biological sex, has caused some brands to sidestep Pride partnerships altogether to avoid controversy, he said. 'The ones that want to engage, want to engage really meaningfully, but there are fewer of them,' said Love, adding that this is proving to be 'the driest year' for sponsorships. The website for the festival in the Scottish capital now displays just five partners, including German supermarket brand Lidl and the UK's Tesco Plc. Last year, the site boasted 13 sponsors. The page for the London festival has recently been updated with a list of 2025 sponsors and advocates, among them is headline sponsor Pridepay, a UK-based payment processing platform for the LGBTQ community. However, other brands that have featured repeatedly in recent years are missing this year. Still, the biggest impact has been on smaller festivals. Some Pride events were canceled in Southampton, Hereford and Taunton, while Plymouth's official parade has been replaced by a community-led one. Looking forward, Pride organizations may have to diversify their revenue streams, seeking more grant funding from councils or turning free parades into ticketed events, said Dee Llewellyn, the chair of UKPON. In the interim, LGBTQ+ organizations will have to adapt to the new environment, said Ian Howley, CEO of health and wellbeing charity LGBT HERO. Even if larger brands ask to sponsor events again once the dust settles, he said the community won't easily forgive firms for abandoning them this year. 'The damage is already done and we don't forget,' Howley said. 'We will remember that they weren't there when we needed them the most.'
Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
Historic first: Florida board rejects UF president pick, Santa Ono, in move with national implications for US academia
In an unprecedented decision on June 3, 2025, the Florida Board of Governors (BOG) rejected the appointment of Dr. Santa Ono as the next president of the University of Florida (UF), marking the first time in its history that the board overturned a university's presidential selection. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The vote, which failed 6–10 with one member absent, stunned UF leadership and sent ripples through academic circles across the US. Dr. Ono, a distinguished academic leader who previously served as president of the University of Michigan and the University of British Columbia, had been unanimously approved by UF's Board of Trustees on May 27, 2025. He was the sole finalist presented by UF's Presidential Search Committee. The decision by the state's higher education board has now forced UF to restart its presidential search process entirely. A clash over ideology and past leadership During a nearly three-hour hearing in Orlando, board members sharply questioned Ono about his views and leadership record. As reported by Mass Live, much of the scrutiny focused on Ono's past support for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs, his position on race-based versus merit-based admissions, gender-affirming care, climate change policies, and his response to the Covid-19 pandemic during his time at Michigan. B Tired of too many ads? go ad free now oard Vice-Chair Alan Levine questioned Ono for nearly 40 minutes, raising concerns about his handling of the October 7, 2023 Hamas attack and his stance on antisemitism. According to Mass Live, Ono defended his record, stating, "What happened on Oct. 7 deeply affected the members of my community and me personally, and so at UF I would be consistently focused on making sure antisemitism does not rear its head again. " BOG member Paul Renner, a Republican and former Florida House speaker, led a particularly aggressive line of questioning on DEI and race-based admissions. As reported by Mass Live, Renner cited a binder of past statements and articles and repeatedly pressed Ono on the timeline of his remarks. At one point, Renner interrupted Ono's clarification, saying, "I appreciate the answer, but I didn't ask about DEI." Concerns over fairness and political pressure Several board members raised concerns about the fairness of the process. As quoted by Mass Live, Charles Lydecker, a BOG member and part of UF's presidential search committee, said, "We have never used this as a forum to interrogate… candidly, this process does not feel fair to me." Board Chair Brian Lamb also acknowledged that it would have been more appropriate for Ono to receive the documents Renner referenced in advance. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, while not publicly opposing Ono, has long been critical of DEI initiatives in public institutions. In 2023, he signed legislation banning such programs from Florida's public colleges. On May 29, 2025, he said during a press event that some of Ono's previous statements made him "cringe," but that the final decision was left to the BOG, most of whom were his appointees. A costly leadership setback Dr. Ono had been expected to sign a five-year contract with a base salary of $1.5 million annually, with bonuses potentially bringing the total to $15 million. This would have made him one of the highest-paid public university presidents in the country. Mori Hosseini, chair of UF's Board of Trustees, expressed disappointment during the hearing. As quoted by Mass Live, he called the questioning "heartbreaking" and noted, "You all decided today is the day we're going to take somebody down." He also revealed that Paul Renner had previously inquired about the UF presidency before joining the BOG in April 2025. Renner acknowledged this but claimed he would not have accepted the position. What's next for UF and US academia With Ono's rejection, UF must begin its search for a new president from scratch. It remains unclear whether other candidates from the original process will be reconsidered. The incident has sparked debate nationwide about the politicization of higher education and the growing tension between university autonomy and state oversight. The ramifications of this historic rejection are expected to be felt beyond Florida, as universities across the US watch closely how political influence is reshaping public education leadership.
