
China tariffs are no longer 145%, but for small businesses in the crossfire, ‘it's still awful'
President Donald Trump's decision to impose a steep tax on most goods that come into America has tested the mettle of small business owners whose companies are reliant on global trade.
And the fits and starts that have come along with Trump's tariff program are not just testing these business owners' patience, they're also threatening their very operations.
The latest, and perhaps biggest, curveball came last week when the US and China agreed to sharply lower their respective tariff rates for 90 days. The de-escalation brought the US tariffs on Chinese goods down to 30% from 145%.
Markets cheered the news, and recession forecasts lessened in intensity.
And that surely meant that small business owners who faced steep tariff bills — including Busy Baby founder Beth Fynbo Benike, whose next shipment of baby products was going to come with an additional $230,000 price tag — should be super grateful, right?
Fynbo Benike answered that question with some seething sarcasm and a dose of realism.
'The tariffs came down. 30%. Yay!' Fynbo Benike said on a TikTok video posted last week. 'That still sucks, by the way. That sucks for any small business owner … It's still going to cost me $48,000 more than this shipment would've cost me two months ago.'
'It's still awful,' she said.
Tariff update - down to 30%! We can ship our products!!!! It still sucks though! #tarifftalk Fynbo Benike has become an archetype for small business owners caught in the crossfire of a tumultuous trade regime.
The erratic nature of President Donald Trump's trade policies and the severity of newly imposed tariffs have wreaked havoc on small businesses in the US, causing costs to quickly skyrocket, unsettling longstanding supply chains, swiftly stifling growth and expansion plans — and threatening to kill American-bred businesses.
A 30% tariff for Chinese imports 'is still a step up, and that's not the only tariff we're looking at. We're looking at tariffs around the globe,' Elizabeth Renter, senior economist at NerdWallet, told CNN in an interview. 'That relief was necessary, but let's not kid ourselves. The impact of this trade war is going to be significant, and I think it's going to hit smaller businesses potentially the worst.'
To understand the plight of small businesses one needs to only look at the largest corporation of them all.
The chief executive officer of Walmart late last week said that tariffs were 'too high' for the world's largest retailer to absorb, and that it would raise prices in the coming weeks.
'Walmart is the best equipped to handle increased costs; they have probably some of the most complex supply chains, and they're going to multiple suppliers for all of their products,' Renter said. 'If some place like Walmart is signaling that they're going to be increasing prices, we know that the stress on smaller corporations and smaller businesses is going to be significant.'
Francine Farkas Sears, who 50 years ago was the first American businesswoman invited to China after President Richard Nixon opened trade relations, told CNN that the tariffs are threatening the viability of her business, which makes professional bags for women as well as accessories for the Girl Scouts of America and the Red Cross.
'Well, we might as well just make a lunch date, because I won't have a business; it's that serious,' she said.
The steep and shifting tariffs are threatening to unwind decades-forged relationships and make her business unsustainable, she said.
'It's an industry that we don't produce today here,' she said, noting that the costs to produce bags, as well as caps and the roller 'cookie carts' for scouts would skyrocket if they weren't made overseas.
'These families are scraping by to join the Girl Scouts for their daughters, and they can buy that cart now for $39,' she said. 'If I made it in this country, it would be $200.'
'These are areas where we have to realize that we have to shake hands,' she added, noting the volatility could be too much for her and other businesses to withstand. 'Whether you like him or not, it doesn't matter, [Trump is] one of the smartest negotiators ever: He basically throws everyone off balance, and then he brings them back.'
'It's a slap and a kiss,' she said.
Fynbo Benike, a US Army veteran, has long made efforts to manufacture the tethered baby place mats and other accessories on domestic soil; however, the US infrastructure remains costly, limited, or in some cases nonexistent. So, she and others have had to rely on imported goods and materials to grow their businesses.
And Busy Baby was indeed growing: The company got its products into several hundred Walmart and Target stores, and Fynbo Benike had just paid for her largest-ever order to help backfill inventory for her website and for Amazon.
In recent weeks, Busy Baby was busy pivoting. The company was formulating an international distribution plan, in which the vast majority of the sales would occur outside of the US.
The de-escalation of tariff rates with China means that Fynbo Benike can pull the trigger on shipping the order to the US. However, it will come at a steep cost to her and others — most of the funds to pay for the expected $48,000 import tax are coming from a GoFundMe.
'Now that the tariff has come down, it's enough to bridge the gap; so, we're going to ship the product as soon as possible,' Fynbo Benike told CNN in an interview last week. 'And then — this is where it's very, very risky — we're going to start production for our next line. I'm going to be hopeful that it's not going to get worse.'
In case it does, she said, she's modifying production of the baby mats to meet European Union standards.
And despite the détente with China, the outlook for companies like Busy Baby has only become increasingly volatile.
'I would say it's more and more (uncertain) and different and stronger,' Fynbo Benike said. 'Last time, the tariff was going up and up and up; and now, the tariff all of a sudden dropped significantly. And they say it's for 90 days, but is it for 90 days?'
'Because our administration is known to make sudden and drastic changes out of nowhere, and now that is happening in both directions,' she added.
Last month was meant to serve as a milestone for Katharine Burke's Purryfuls business, a startup that made self-care purring plushies for stressed-out Millennials and Gen Zers. After two years in development, the first Purryfuls line was meant to go into production.
The month of April, put lightly, 'was not fun,' Burke told CNN last week.
'My (company's) survival was in question all of April,' she said via email. 'I had my first-, second-, and third-ever panic attacks. I was trying to come up with backup plans as [the tariffs] dramatically changed my outlook for the year.'
By the first week of May, the Purryfuls products were being manufactured and scheduled to ship from China at the end of the month.
At that time, the tariffs were still 145%, and Burke didn't know if she'd be in a tight spot, or if she'd be OK.
A week later, the tariffs dropped to 30%, a levy that's significant for small businesses like hers to absorb. But 'it's survivable,' she said.
That's not to say it has been smooth.
For one, her customs broker is still poring through the hundreds and thousands of tariff codes to tabulate the exact import duty Purryfuls will have to pay.
And then there are new risks of not only higher shipping costs, but also potential delays for her order.
'Now that the tariffs have eased, all of the shipments are going out at once which could backup ocean freight and drive up pricing,' she wrote. 'I'm hearing from my manufacturer that canceled orders are being revived, which is great for them, but the backlog may mean that there is no space for me to place another order as everyone rushes to get ready for Christmas.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Veterans protest over federal cuts in La Jolla
SAN DIEGO (FOX 5/KUSI) — Veterans gathered at the edge of the UC San Diego Campus on D-Day to call on the Trump administration to fully fund the Jennifer Moreno Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center in La Jolla and all VAs across the nation. 'The Trump administration plans to fire 80,000 staff, further exacerbating a looming health care disaster,' said Karisa May, a former Marine reservist from the 4th Medical Battalion San Diego. Widow's of military vets are warning of the pending cuts to services. 'Those treatments that he received that extended his life may no longer be available to other vets at this facility and throughout the nation,' said Misty O'Healy, a surviving spouse of a Vietnam Vet. Veterans marched through the UC San Diego campus receiving support from drivers and calling on Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth to leave the glorious military achievements of minorities untouched. Veterans also called on the administration to bring back veterans who have been detained by Immigration and Customs officials. 'When it comes to military naturalization, we all count. Whether you were born here or not, when you raised your hand, you count,' said James Smith, 2nd Former Marine. Veterans groups say their next protest, No Kings Day, will be scheduled for June 14 at 10 a.m. at Civic Center Plaza in downtown San Diego. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
11.4% dividend yield and 17 years of growth — is there passive income potential in a lesser-known FTSE stock?
When searching for passive income stocks, it's easy to be swayed by high dividend yields. The higher the yield, the more the income, right? Technically, yes. However, relying solely on the yield can end in disaster if the company lacks a reliable dividend track record. That's why this lesser-known UK stock with an 11.4% yield and 17 years of uninterrupted dividend growth caught my attention. But is there more to the story? Henderson Far East Income's (LSE: HFEL) a British investment trust that isn't on the FTSE 100 or FTSE 250 yet. For that reason, it's flown under my radar for some time. As the name suggests, it invests in major East Asian companies such as TSMC, China Construction Bank and Alibaba. It invests mostly in financial services and technology, with 20% of assets in China, 15% in Hong Kong, 12% in South Korea and the rest spread across the region. The trust's commitment to delivering a high and growing income's evident in its consistent dividend policy, with payments fully covered by revenues. Recently, its revenue reserves have reached an all-time high, providing a cushion for future payouts. This reliability's particularly attractive for investors seeking a steady income. While HFEL's primary focus is income, it also aims for capital growth. In the year to October 2024, the trust achieved a 17.4% net asset value (NAV) return — a notable improvement on previous years. This is attributed to a strategic portfolio shift towards structural growth opportunities in markets like India and Indonesia, and reduced exposure to China. The trust's diversified approach across various sectors and countries positions it to capitalise on Asia's evolving economic landscape. The trust's impressive dividend policy is certainly reassuring, but there are still some areas of concern. For instance, its heavy focus on the Asia-Pacific region exposes it to geopolitical tensions, currency fluctuations and regulatory changes. In the past, economic challenges in China have impacted performance and may well do so again. Additionally, the use of gearing amplifies both potential gains and losses, adding another layer of risk. At times, it can run at a high premium to NAV, which can affect the long-term value of the investment. Unfortunately, the fund's price performance hasn't been spectacular, which weighs on total returns. Over the past 10 years, the share price is down 25%. However, when adjusting for dividends, it's returned around 42% to shareholders — equating to a rather weak annualised return of 3.57%. After being in a steady decline since late 2017, the price is now near a 15-year low. That means it could be a great entry point if Asian markets recover in the coming years. However, if it continues the same performance over the next decade, it's likely to return less than a simple FTSE 100 index tracker. Whether or not an investor wants to consider it would be based on their expectations in that regard. Yes, it may pan out to be a good opportunity, but for now, I'm keeping my sights set on dividend stocks with higher overall returns. The post 11.4% dividend yield and 17 years of growth — is there passive income potential in a lesser-known FTSE stock? appeared first on The Motley Fool UK. More reading 5 Stocks For Trying To Build Wealth After 50 One Top Growth Stock from the Motley Fool Mark Hartley has no position in any of the shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has recommended Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Motley Fool UK 2025 Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Dozens storm South Bay ICE office in defense of community migrants
The Brief The work week ended with demonstrators taking to the streets in protest after ICE agents detained several people for deportation. The removal of individuals and families has stoked a growing fear in the South Bay and beyond, according to advocates and community activists. San Jose District 5 Councilman Peter Ortiz introduced a memo requesting an additional $1 million in emergency funding be allocated to protect immigrant and undocumented communities. SAN JOSE, Calif. - The work week ended similar to how it began in the South Bay, with demonstrators taking to the streets protesting actions by ICE agents. The initial rally started outside the immigration office in the 400 block of Blossom Hill Road. Participants then marched east on Blossom Hill about a half mile and entered a building housing an ICE office. Anti-ICE chants of "shut ICE down!" echoed through the cramped hallways and stairways as the group made its way to an upper floor of the building in the 300 block of Blossom Hill. Dozens of community organizers and neighbors were determined to close a South San Jose Immigration and Customs Enforcement office. "There's 146 seniors that live here. We don't want them here. They just got here a couple of months ago," said neighbor Irene Madrid Morales, who lives in a senior center next door to the ICE office. Once the group reached its destination, to its surprise, the office was already closed. "We're still making a point to other neighboring offices, that we don't want them — ICE — to be present in the building, at all," said organizer Uriel Magdoleno. The loud vocal push back came after ICE agents had, during the week, detained several people for deportation. "We will defend our immigrant brothers and sisters. Our immigrant neighbors." – Joao Paulo Connolly, Silicon Valley Rising An emailed statement from the agency read, in part, "ICE has identified individuals with outstanding Final Orders of removal who may be removed from the United families came as a group illegally to the United States... Many of these same families have lost their case after being afforded due process. Accordingly, many are detained, pending removal." The removal of individuals and families has stoked a growing fear in the South Bay and beyond, according to advocates and community activists. "These raids are not about justice or security. They are about terrorizing our communities," said Leila, a member of the Silicon Valley Immigration Committee. Added San Jose District 2 Councilwoman Pamela Campos, "We know the Trump administration set out with the idea that immigrants in our community are criminals." San Jose District 5 Councilman Peter Ortiz on Friday introduced a memo requesting an additional $1 million in emergency funding be allocated to protect immigrant and undocumented communities. "It's the city's job to make sure that the people of the city of San Jose are safe, regardless of their citizenship," said Ortiz. Added Rapid Response Network founding member Richard Hobbs, "We are here today to build power, not panic, in the community." It was a patchwork of community groups, forged by the determination to protect their own, and push out an unwanted tenant — from the building in the 300 block of Blossom Hill Road and from the larger Bay Area. "We will defend our immigrant brothers and sisters. Our immigrant neighbors," said Joao Paulo Connolly of Silicon Valley Rising. Ortiz's office said the requested emergency funding would be added to Mayor Matt Mahan's overall budget. The mayor had already requested $500,000. A majority of the council members would need to approve the expenditure as early as June 10. Jesse Gary is a reporter based in the station's South Bay bureau. Follow him on the Instagram platform, @jessegontv and on Facebook, @JesseKTVU. The Source KTVU reporting