United Nations (UN) expert urges Saudi Arabia to halt imminent execution of 26 Egyptian nationals for drug-related offences
'The Government's claim that applying the death penalty for offences such as smuggling, receiving and distributing narcotic substances under the Narcotics and Psychotropic Substances Act complies with international law is incompatible with its legal obligations under International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,' said Morris Tidball-Binz, the Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions.
'The right not to be arbitrarily deprived of life is a fundamental tenet of international law, from which no derogation is permitted,' Tidball-Binz said.
The 26 Egyptian nationals, currently held on death row in Tabouk prison, have reportedly been informed that their executions will take place shortly after the Eid al-Adha holidays. This follows the execution of two other Egyptians from the same group, carried out on 24 and 25 May respectively, without prior notification to their families.
UN experts previously raised these cases with the Government of Saudi Arabia in a formal communication, to which the Government responded.
'The death penalty for drug-related offences fails to meet the threshold of the 'most serious crimes, and lacks conclusive evidence of serving as an effective deterrent,' the expert said.
According to court documents reviewed by the expert, some of the Egyptian prisoners were denied legal representation, while others were convicted based on self-incriminating statements which they later retracted in court, claiming that they were made under coercion.
'The right to effective legal representation must be ensured at all stages of criminal proceedings – during interrogations, preliminary hearings, trial, and appeal – and constitutes an effective safeguard against torture and other forms of ill-treatment,' the expert said. 'Violations of fair trial guarantees leading to the imposition of the death penalty render such sentences arbitrary and unlawful,' he added.
Since the beginning of 2025, Saudi Arabia has reportedly executed 141 individuals, approximately 68 of whom were foreign nationals. The vast majority were reportedly executed for non-lethal drug offences, in clear violation of international law.
Imposing death sentences and carrying out executions for such offences significantly increases the number of people worldwide subjected to punishments fundamentally incompatible with human rights norms, and amounting to arbitrary deprivation of life.
'I urgently call on the Government of Saudi Arabia to halt the planned executions of the 26 Egyptian nationals, to abolish the death penalty for drug-related offences, and to ensure that its drug control policies fully comply with its international human rights obligations, notably the right to life,' the expert said.
Distributed by APO Group on behalf of United Nations: Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR).
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Tahawul Tech
11 hours ago
- Tahawul Tech
UAE health sector targeted in sophisticated ransomware attack, says Sophos official
Mayuresh Kothari of Sophos explains how a Conti offshoot is exploiting healthcare networks — and why proactive incident response is essential. Recent cyberattacks on the UAE's health sector have exposed the growing threat posed by ransomware groups targeting critical infrastructure. The latest incident, linked to the emerging Gunra group—believed to be a reconstitution of the dismantled Conti gang—used double extortion tactics involving the theft and encryption of sensitive personal and medical data. According to Mayuresh Kothari, Advisory Solution Principal at Sophos, the attackers exploited legitimate administrative tools to evade detection and launch a highly disruptive campaign. In this interview with Kothari explores the threat landscape, the importance of engaging expert incident response teams, and why proactive cybersecurity planning is essential. He also outlines how Sophos is helping organisations in the Middle East improve readiness through integrated solutions and local investment. Interview Excerpts: Could you provide an overview of the recent cyberattacks targeting the UAE health sector? Based on publicly available information from X (formerly Twitter) and claims made by the threat group on leak sites, this incident appears to be a form of double extortion. The threat actor was able to first circumvent the security controls to establish presence in the network before starting to identify critical data, exfiltrate it out and lastly, encrypt. Since the threat actor claims to have stolen millions of records containing PII, PCI, and healthcare data, the potential consequences of this exposure are serious. The ransom demand includes payment for both data decryption and to prevent the public release of the stolen information. Can you share more information about the threat group responsible? The threat actor group known as Gunra has been active since early this year. Indicators suggest that this group has emerged from the remains of the Conti ransomware group, which was recently disrupted by law enforcement agencies. At Secureworks, we have classified Conti under the codename Gold Ulrick. Their modus operandi involves leveraging windows administrator tools to hide malicious activities prior to conducting extortion operations. What actions should organisations under attack take to effectively mitigate the impact of incidents like these? This is a complex issue without a simple solution. To begin with, impacted organisations should engage professional incident response (IR) teams with comprehensive expertise in all aspects of managing such incidents. For instance, Secureworks, now part of Sophos, offers specialised services tailored to these needs. When an organization engages us during an active incident, we begin by identifying the root cause or patient zero of the attack and then remove the threat actor and any associated artifacts. We also provide guidance to prevent future attacks. Our support extends to ransom negotiation, regulatory and communication advice around disclosure or with regulators, and establishing a long-term response program. Is this the only approach, or are there preventative measures organisations can implement today to proactively defend against such threats? Cybersecurity is a multi-faceted discipline that organisations must approach as an ongoing program, one that is regularly reviewed, tested, improved, and repeated. Numerous frameworks today help assess the maturity and effectiveness of such programs. However, cybersecurity is always a team effort. It cannot be done in isolation. The foundation begins with strong preventative and policy enforcement controls. Take Sophos Endpoint Protection and Firewalls, for example. With nearly 40 years of experience delivering cutting-edge security controls, our approach known as Synchronised Security provides integrated, highly efficient protection. However, prevention is just the starting point. We must always hope for the best but prepare for the worst. That's where detection-based mechanisms become essential such as Vulnerability Management, Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR), and Managed Detection and Response (MDR). And even then, the process isn't complete. 'Cybersecurity must be treated as a continuous program. This is where our Proactive Incident Response services lead the way, ensuring organisations are not just reacting to threats, but actively preparing for them.' What do you mean by Proactive Incident Response? Isn't incident response typically a reactive process?Incident Response (IR) is not just the act of responding to a threat after it occurs. It also involves preparing for potential incidents in advance. This means having plans in place, conducting regular testing, and clearly defining the initial steps to be taken in the event of an attack. To put it into perspective, think of how emergency response works in the real world. Many workplaces designate first responders who wear high visibility jackets and helmets so they can be easily identified during an emergency. These individuals are trained to use fire extinguishers, guide people to exits, and manage the initial response to a crisis. Cyber IR functions in the same way. Proactive services often delivered through a retainer focuses on this preparedness. It involves training internal first response teams on the actions to take during an incident: how to contain the threat, prevent its spread, and reduce the risk of data exfiltration. Beyond training, proactive retainers help organisations establish and review their incident response plans, define industry-specific playbooks, and conduct both technical and non-technical exercises. These activities help security teams identify gaps in their current processes and improve their overall readiness. How does Sophos differentiate itself from other vendors offering similar solutions? We are uniquely positioned to provide end-to-end solutions with tried and test capabilities across endpoint, network, cloud and services. Our secure by design and practice approach has consistently delivered results, and we remain committed to supporting the region through continued investment. Our latest initiative is the launch of a dedicated data center in the UAE, which will enable us to meet local data residency requirements while continuing to provide world-class security solutions tailored to our customers' needs.
The National
14 hours ago
- The National
Marco Rubio says US halted visas for Gazans after Congress concerns over Hamas ties
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the decision to suspend visitor visas for Gazans, even those seeking medical treatment after being injured in Israel's war on the enclave, was made after inquiries from members of Congress. Mr Rubio told CBS on Sunday that the State Department was warned by lawmakers that some of the non-government organisations assisting Gazans with the visas had connections to Hamas. "We won't be in partnership with groups that have links or sympathy to Hamas," he said when asked about the abrupt decision to halt the visas. Mr Rubio was also asked about many of the children in Gaza who received visas to undergo urgent medical treatment. "A small number are issued with children, but they come with adults," he said, suggesting he had concerns about Palestinians who accompanied the injured children. He repeated his belief that evidence presented to the State Department prompted the decision to halt the visas on Saturday morning. "All visitor visas for individuals from Gaza are being stopped while we conduct a full and thorough review of the process and procedures used to issue a small number of temporary medical-humanitarian visas in recent days," the State Department posted on X. Washington faced swift backlash after announcing the decision. Among the groups to criticise the American authorities was HEAL Palestine, a US registered non-profit group that aims to provide "urgent relief and long-term support to Palestinian children and families". It said it was "distressed by the State Department's decision". Another prominent organisation, the Palestine Children's Relief Fund, said the move "will have a devastating and irreversible impact on our ability to bring injured and critically ill children from Gaza to the United States for life-saving medical treatment". The group urged the US to reverse its decision. Shortly after Mr Rubio's interview with CBS, Jason Crow, a Democratic member of the House of Representatives, said claims that some NGOs had links to Hamas "concerning". " Hamas is a brutal terrorist organisation, they should not be travelling anywhere and if that's happening it should be stopped immediately," he added. Some speculated that the State Department's decision was motivated by criticism from Laura Loomer, a far-right activist with close ties to President Donald Trump. Ms Loomer decried the visa system and called on Washington to "shut this abomination down". She said Gazans who arrived in the US were "pro-Hamas ... affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood", without providing any evidence. She criticised HEAL Palestine specifically. "This is a medical treatment programme, not a refugee resettlement programme," HEAL Palestine's said in response. "Our mission gives children a renewed chance at life, whether through life-saving surgery or the ability to walk again ... US taxpayers do not fund this treatment." Israel's ongoing campaign in Gaza – which followed the 2023 attacks by Hamas-led fighters that resulted in the deaths of about 1,200 people and the capture of 240 hostages – has killed more than 61,900 people and injured about 155,800.
Khaleej Times
15 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
Watch: Sharjah Police share video of car hitting man, remind pedestrians to cross safely
UAE authorities have time and again called on pedestrians to cross at designated areas, introduced strict penalties for jaywalking, and tightened laws on road safety. Yet, some individuals can be seen running across roads in an attempt to get to the other side quicker. Sharjah police released a video of an accident where a man is seen running across the pedestrian crossing as a car approaches, resulting in the collision between the two, and the loss of a life. Although the man is crossing at a designated area, it appears as though he is crossing while the signal indicates green for vehicles. Authorities reminded the public that "almost every report [of an accident] starts with the same cause — unsafe crossing." When crossing in a reckless manner to save a few seconds or minutes, the pedestrian endangers their life and of others on the roads. When accidents occur, they affect not just the victim, but their loved ones, authorities reminded. Watch a video, shared by Sharjah Police, here: A new traffic law which came into effect on March 29 introduced hefty fines and even jail time for jaywalking across the UAE, which refers to crossing from unauthorised areas. Before March, the penalty for jaywalking was Dh400. However, under the new law, jaywalkers could face imprisonment and a fine of Dh5,000 to Dh10,000 if the offence results in a traffic accident. In addition, those who cross from undesignated areas on roads with a speed limit of 80kmph or more will face higher penalties. For such a violation, fines start at Dh10,000 and the individual will be punished with imprisonment for a period of not less than three months, or by one of these two penalties.
