logo
Finance Sector Union demands Commonwealth Bank of Australia justify job cuts after posting multi-billion dollar profit

Finance Sector Union demands Commonwealth Bank of Australia justify job cuts after posting multi-billion dollar profit

Sky News AU19-05-2025
The Finance Sector Union (FSU) has torn into Commonwealth Bank of Australia for slashing more than 150 roles just days after revealing a $2.6 billion quarterly profit in the latest skirmish between the major union and Australia's largest bank.
CBA told workers 163 positions at the company will go, with 105 coming from the company's main arm and 58 from its Western Australia-based subsidiary Bankwest.
The FSU said the bank told staffers about the cuts within days of revealing a six per cent profit increase in the March quarter over the same quarter last year.
Of the 105 CBA jobs lost, 90 are located in New South Wales, while the remainder are in Victoria, Tasmania, Western Australia and Queensland.
Jason Hall, the FSU's National Assistant Secretary, said the recent job losses brings the total cuts across CBA and Bankwest in the past year to almost 800.
'While CBA's profits have swollen in the past year, they have sacked almost 800 workers in piecemeal announcements, no doubt in the hopes that these smaller job numbers wouldn't be widely noticed,' Mr Hall said in a statement.
'CBA has provided insufficient detail about the latest job cuts to enable genuine consultation. The FSU has written to the bank seeking more information on the rationale for the cuts and the impact on remaining teams.
'CBA and Bankwest workers deserve job security but with announcements of job cuts every couple of months, they are instead wondering when and where the next axe will fall.'
Mr Hall said the latest cuts are mainly in customer service roles and the job losses at Bankwest are 'particularly concerning' after CBA committed to 500 new roles in WA.
'Now these latest round of Bankwest cuts mean CBA has slashed almost 150 Bankwest jobs since the start of the year,' he said.
'CBA must explain to its workers and customers how it can justify these actions after another quarter of hefty profits.'
A CBA spokesperson said the major bank has hired almost 3,000 people since the start of the year and is investing more than $2b this financial year in the bank's operations.
'Like many organisations, we regularly review how we are organised to deliver the best experiences and outcomes for our customers,' the CBA spokesperson said.
'That means some roles and work can change. Our priority is always to redeploy or reskill for a new role or opportunity wherever possible.'
The fresh sackings follows the FSU demanding answers from CBA over the axing of 164 jobs from the bank's technology division.
Just weeks after this, the FSU hit out over plans to axe 90 roles at Bankwest.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Star seals deal to sell Queen's Wharf casino to HK partners
Star seals deal to sell Queen's Wharf casino to HK partners

Sydney Morning Herald

time10 minutes ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Star seals deal to sell Queen's Wharf casino to HK partners

Struggling casino operator Star Entertainment has rescued a deal to offload its troubled Brisbane resort to the Hong Kong-based business partners in this venture. The publicly listed company has been locked in negotiations over plans to sell its 50 per cent stake in Brisbane's Queen's Wharf casino to Chow Tai Fook Enterprises and Far East Consortium, as it scrambles to reduce debt and survive a financial crunch. Star had been unable reach an agreement with the parties before a key deadline two weeks ago, but on Tuesday it said it had entered into a $53 million binding deal. The deal will see Star sell its share of Brisbane's Queen's Wharf casino to Chow Tai Fook Enterprises and Far East Consortium and hand Star ownership of properties at the Gold Coast casino. Star is also selling a Brisbane hotel and car park at its Treasury complex, and a 50 per cent stake in a car park in Charlotte Street, Brisbane. Loading The transaction means Star will not be required to fund any equity contributions to the Queens Wharf project. If it had not entered the deal, it expected these contributions would have been at least $212 million. Star will also be released from its guarantee over a 50 per cent share of the project's debt facility. The gaming giant said it had received consent from the US casino group Bally's that took a major stake in Star earlier this year.

Star seals deal to sell Queen's Wharf casino to HK partners
Star seals deal to sell Queen's Wharf casino to HK partners

The Age

time10 minutes ago

  • The Age

Star seals deal to sell Queen's Wharf casino to HK partners

Struggling casino operator Star Entertainment has rescued a deal to offload its troubled Brisbane resort to the Hong Kong-based business partners in this venture. The publicly listed company has been locked in negotiations over plans to sell its 50 per cent stake in Brisbane's Queen's Wharf casino to Chow Tai Fook Enterprises and Far East Consortium, as it scrambles to reduce debt and survive a financial crunch. Star had been unable reach an agreement with the parties before a key deadline two weeks ago, but on Tuesday it said it had entered into a $53 million binding deal. The deal will see Star sell its share of Brisbane's Queen's Wharf casino to Chow Tai Fook Enterprises and Far East Consortium and hand Star ownership of properties at the Gold Coast casino. Star is also selling a Brisbane hotel and car park at its Treasury complex, and a 50 per cent stake in a car park in Charlotte Street, Brisbane. Loading The transaction means Star will not be required to fund any equity contributions to the Queens Wharf project. If it had not entered the deal, it expected these contributions would have been at least $212 million. Star will also be released from its guarantee over a 50 per cent share of the project's debt facility. The gaming giant said it had received consent from the US casino group Bally's that took a major stake in Star earlier this year.

Hall and Oates business spat resolved, lawyers say
Hall and Oates business spat resolved, lawyers say

The Advertiser

time36 minutes ago

  • The Advertiser

Hall and Oates business spat resolved, lawyers say

Daryl Hall and John Oates have resolved their dispute over a Hall & Oates business partnership through arbitration, reaching a private ending after details of their rift went public in court documents filed in a 2023 lawsuit. In a status report, lawyers for Hall noted the case received a final judgment in arbitration and they filed a proposed order for the judge, Nashville Chancellor Russell Perkins, to dismiss the case. In mid-July, Perkins ordered Hall's lawyers to offer an update in the case, which had last seen a public filing in December 2023. It's unclear when the arbitration process was finalised. Details were not revealed about the arbitration outcome between the duo who made music together for more than a half century, including hits in the 1970s and '80s such as Maneater, Rich Girl, Kiss on My List and I Can't Go for That (No Can Do). Robb Harvey, a lawyer for Hall, declined to comment. Representatives for Oates did not immediately respond to a request for comment. In 2023 filings in the case, Hall accused Oates of blindsiding and betraying him, saying their relationship and his trust in Oates have deteriorated. Oates replied that he was "deeply hurt" that Hall was making "inflammatory, outlandish, and inaccurate statements" about him. The judge had paused the sale of Oates' stake in Whole Oats Enterprises LLP to Primary Wave IP Investment Management LLC. Whole Oats includes valuable Hall & Oates materials such as trademarks, personal name and likeness rights, record royalty income and website and social media assets, a court declaration says. The dispute went public in November 2023, when Hall filed the lawsuit asking the judge to stop the sale by Oates so private arbitration could begin. Hall gave a scathing account of their relationship in early November 2023 during arbitration, and it was made public later in the month in the lawsuit. It alleges that Oates and his team engaged in the "ultimate partnership betrayal" by pushing to sell his share while telling Hall's associates that he wanted to maintain his ownership. In his own declaration, Oates expressed disappointment with his longtime partner's words, saying Hall's accusations that Oates went behind his back and breached their agreement aren't true. Oates declined to go into specifics, saying he's obligated to keep details private, even if Hall didn't. The Times asked Hall in February if the ship had sailed on mending the pair's relationship. "That ship has gone to the bottom of the ocean," Hall told the news outlet. "I've had a lot of surprises in my life, disappointments, betrayals, so I'm kind of used to it." Daryl Hall and John Oates have resolved their dispute over a Hall & Oates business partnership through arbitration, reaching a private ending after details of their rift went public in court documents filed in a 2023 lawsuit. In a status report, lawyers for Hall noted the case received a final judgment in arbitration and they filed a proposed order for the judge, Nashville Chancellor Russell Perkins, to dismiss the case. In mid-July, Perkins ordered Hall's lawyers to offer an update in the case, which had last seen a public filing in December 2023. It's unclear when the arbitration process was finalised. Details were not revealed about the arbitration outcome between the duo who made music together for more than a half century, including hits in the 1970s and '80s such as Maneater, Rich Girl, Kiss on My List and I Can't Go for That (No Can Do). Robb Harvey, a lawyer for Hall, declined to comment. Representatives for Oates did not immediately respond to a request for comment. In 2023 filings in the case, Hall accused Oates of blindsiding and betraying him, saying their relationship and his trust in Oates have deteriorated. Oates replied that he was "deeply hurt" that Hall was making "inflammatory, outlandish, and inaccurate statements" about him. The judge had paused the sale of Oates' stake in Whole Oats Enterprises LLP to Primary Wave IP Investment Management LLC. Whole Oats includes valuable Hall & Oates materials such as trademarks, personal name and likeness rights, record royalty income and website and social media assets, a court declaration says. The dispute went public in November 2023, when Hall filed the lawsuit asking the judge to stop the sale by Oates so private arbitration could begin. Hall gave a scathing account of their relationship in early November 2023 during arbitration, and it was made public later in the month in the lawsuit. It alleges that Oates and his team engaged in the "ultimate partnership betrayal" by pushing to sell his share while telling Hall's associates that he wanted to maintain his ownership. In his own declaration, Oates expressed disappointment with his longtime partner's words, saying Hall's accusations that Oates went behind his back and breached their agreement aren't true. Oates declined to go into specifics, saying he's obligated to keep details private, even if Hall didn't. The Times asked Hall in February if the ship had sailed on mending the pair's relationship. "That ship has gone to the bottom of the ocean," Hall told the news outlet. "I've had a lot of surprises in my life, disappointments, betrayals, so I'm kind of used to it." Daryl Hall and John Oates have resolved their dispute over a Hall & Oates business partnership through arbitration, reaching a private ending after details of their rift went public in court documents filed in a 2023 lawsuit. In a status report, lawyers for Hall noted the case received a final judgment in arbitration and they filed a proposed order for the judge, Nashville Chancellor Russell Perkins, to dismiss the case. In mid-July, Perkins ordered Hall's lawyers to offer an update in the case, which had last seen a public filing in December 2023. It's unclear when the arbitration process was finalised. Details were not revealed about the arbitration outcome between the duo who made music together for more than a half century, including hits in the 1970s and '80s such as Maneater, Rich Girl, Kiss on My List and I Can't Go for That (No Can Do). Robb Harvey, a lawyer for Hall, declined to comment. Representatives for Oates did not immediately respond to a request for comment. In 2023 filings in the case, Hall accused Oates of blindsiding and betraying him, saying their relationship and his trust in Oates have deteriorated. Oates replied that he was "deeply hurt" that Hall was making "inflammatory, outlandish, and inaccurate statements" about him. The judge had paused the sale of Oates' stake in Whole Oats Enterprises LLP to Primary Wave IP Investment Management LLC. Whole Oats includes valuable Hall & Oates materials such as trademarks, personal name and likeness rights, record royalty income and website and social media assets, a court declaration says. The dispute went public in November 2023, when Hall filed the lawsuit asking the judge to stop the sale by Oates so private arbitration could begin. Hall gave a scathing account of their relationship in early November 2023 during arbitration, and it was made public later in the month in the lawsuit. It alleges that Oates and his team engaged in the "ultimate partnership betrayal" by pushing to sell his share while telling Hall's associates that he wanted to maintain his ownership. In his own declaration, Oates expressed disappointment with his longtime partner's words, saying Hall's accusations that Oates went behind his back and breached their agreement aren't true. Oates declined to go into specifics, saying he's obligated to keep details private, even if Hall didn't. The Times asked Hall in February if the ship had sailed on mending the pair's relationship. "That ship has gone to the bottom of the ocean," Hall told the news outlet. "I've had a lot of surprises in my life, disappointments, betrayals, so I'm kind of used to it." Daryl Hall and John Oates have resolved their dispute over a Hall & Oates business partnership through arbitration, reaching a private ending after details of their rift went public in court documents filed in a 2023 lawsuit. In a status report, lawyers for Hall noted the case received a final judgment in arbitration and they filed a proposed order for the judge, Nashville Chancellor Russell Perkins, to dismiss the case. In mid-July, Perkins ordered Hall's lawyers to offer an update in the case, which had last seen a public filing in December 2023. It's unclear when the arbitration process was finalised. Details were not revealed about the arbitration outcome between the duo who made music together for more than a half century, including hits in the 1970s and '80s such as Maneater, Rich Girl, Kiss on My List and I Can't Go for That (No Can Do). Robb Harvey, a lawyer for Hall, declined to comment. Representatives for Oates did not immediately respond to a request for comment. In 2023 filings in the case, Hall accused Oates of blindsiding and betraying him, saying their relationship and his trust in Oates have deteriorated. Oates replied that he was "deeply hurt" that Hall was making "inflammatory, outlandish, and inaccurate statements" about him. The judge had paused the sale of Oates' stake in Whole Oats Enterprises LLP to Primary Wave IP Investment Management LLC. Whole Oats includes valuable Hall & Oates materials such as trademarks, personal name and likeness rights, record royalty income and website and social media assets, a court declaration says. The dispute went public in November 2023, when Hall filed the lawsuit asking the judge to stop the sale by Oates so private arbitration could begin. Hall gave a scathing account of their relationship in early November 2023 during arbitration, and it was made public later in the month in the lawsuit. It alleges that Oates and his team engaged in the "ultimate partnership betrayal" by pushing to sell his share while telling Hall's associates that he wanted to maintain his ownership. In his own declaration, Oates expressed disappointment with his longtime partner's words, saying Hall's accusations that Oates went behind his back and breached their agreement aren't true. Oates declined to go into specifics, saying he's obligated to keep details private, even if Hall didn't. The Times asked Hall in February if the ship had sailed on mending the pair's relationship. "That ship has gone to the bottom of the ocean," Hall told the news outlet. "I've had a lot of surprises in my life, disappointments, betrayals, so I'm kind of used to it."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store