logo
Six Books That Will Make You Want to Touch Grass

Six Books That Will Make You Want to Touch Grass

The Atlantic01-05-2025

Reading has been unfairly maligned as an indoor activity for far too long, in my opinion. As a child, when nice weather came around, I was told to put down my book and go play outside: You can read any old day, adults would say, reminding me that sunshine can be fleeting. The warm days of spring, full of blooming flowers, are certainly worth savoring while you can. But why not bring a book along? Over years of reading outdoors—seated on a park bench, sprawled on a beach blanket—I've come to see reading as an experience that, rather than offering an escape from my surroundings, in fact supplements my appreciation of the setting. Turning pages can be an act of mental and sensory enhancement.
This kind of synergy can work two ways. Books can take readers to new places through vivid detail, allowing them to 'see' things that might not even exist. At the same time, reading can be a practice in slow, sustained attention, sharpening one's perception of the trees, the soil, the friends chattering at the next table in the beer garden. The books on this list employ both modes: Some offer intriguing glimpses into faraway places or striking journeys; others meditate on the beauty to be found in a backyard. Crucially, each makes its own case for leaving your reading nook and getting out into the world.
Carpentaria, by Alexis Wright
Great writing has the power to make a place you've never visited feel totally familiar. Carpentaria, Wright's brilliant, surprisingly funny novel, achieves that feat. Its setting, the town of Desperance, situated right below Australia's Gulf of Carpentaria, is the home of the Waanyi people to which Wright herself belongs. Her detailed attention to the environment—the smell of the sea at low tide, the sound of dingoes outside a cave, the feel of trudging through spinifex in the bush—grounds the book in a strong sense of place. Try listening to Carpentaria as an audiobook; the novel unfolds like an oral epic, more thematic than linear, slowly introducing its characters. We meet Normal Phantom, the gruff seagoing patriarch of the Westside Pricklebush people, and his beautiful, impetuous ex-wife, Angel Day, who seems to stir up trouble just by walking through town. Then there's Mozzie Fishman, keeper of Aboriginal history and tradition, and Will Phantom, a prodigal son who violently opposes the town's new mine. Over the span of 500 pages, these people come to feel intensely real, their stories becoming inextricable from their landscape. When I finished, I wasn't sure what I wanted to do more: visit Queensland myself or reread Carpentaria all over again.
The Living Mountain, by Nan Shepherd
'I am a mountain lover,' writes Shepherd, 'because my body is at its best in the rarer air of the heights and communicates its elation to the mind.' Many avid hikers would agree. Shepherd spent most of her life near the Cairngorm mountains of the Scottish highlands, exploring the flora and fauna of the rugged hills as often as possible. The Living Mountain is a compilation of her reflections from 'hillwalking.' Written in the 1940s, the manuscript sat in her desk drawer unpublished until 1977—just four years before her death—and it has recently been reissued for American readers. It's a treasure both as a piece of nature writing about the United Kingdom and as a record of Shepherd's almost mystical relationship with the landscape: She was not the type to make for the summit and then quickly turn home. Her reflections emerge from unbounded curiosity paired with deep knowledge of the place and its rhythms. Shepherd is a humble but knowledgeable guide, often looking at a familiar peak or loch for so long that she sees it anew. As she writes, 'Often the mountain gives itself most completely when I have no destination, when I reach nowhere in particular, but have gone out merely to be with the mountain as one visits a friend with no intention but to be with him.'
Among Flowers: A Walk in the Himalaya, by Jamaica Kincaid
Kincaid's account of her three-week trek in Nepal—undertaken to collect rare seeds with several botanist friends—is sure to make any reader appreciate their local flora. Kincaid views the Himalayas through the lens of her own home garden in Vermont, searching for plants she can cultivate in the North Bennington climate as her group climbs up through the mountains. I often paused as I read to look up the species she mentions, shocked to see some of the huge plants that grow naturally in alpine zones. She approaches the experience as a true amateur, always ready to learn something new, and her honest reflections on the trip's difficulties make the book intimate and amusing. Reading Among Flowers feels like traveling alongside Kincaid: You can experience the highs of the journey (gorgeous vistas, rare native-plant sightings, camaraderie and companionship) alongside the lows (leeches, arduous climbs, Maoist guerilla groups) without ever having to navigate the forbidding range yourself.
Pure Colour, by Sheila Heti
If I could give you one book to read in dappled sunshine, I'd hand you Pure Colour. Heti's writing is witty, reflective, and just bizarre enough to capture your interest even as people mill about in your peripheral vision. The book is more fable than novel, following a girl named Mira as she grows up, gets a job at a lamp store, and then goes to school to become an art critic, where she falls in love. But things get a bit weirder when Mira's father, with whom she was especially close, dies. While Mira is grieving, she visits a tree that they both liked, and there, the souls of Mira and her father become literally conjoined in a leaf. Her time in the leaf makes up a short but highly potent part of the novel: Mira and her father enter into a wordless conversation on life, death, grief, and art, until Mira must be coaxed out of the leaf and back into the human world. In Pure Colour, Heti creates a world strange and wild enough to make readers look at their own life with renewed wonder.
The Rings of Saturn, by W. G. Sebald
'In August 1992, when the dog days were drawing to an end, I set off to walk the county of Suffolk, in the hope of dispelling the emptiness that takes hold of me whenever I have completed a long stint of work,' the melancholic, semi-autobiographical narrator of Sebald's genre-defying novel tells the reader. The Rings of Saturn has a peripatetic form: Not only does it follow a man wandering through Suffolk, but the novel's action largely lies in the meandering, digressive nature of memory itself. As he crosses the landscape, the narrator finds unexpected connections between the path under his feet and Joseph Conrad's seafaring days, Dowager Empress Cixi, the silk industry in Norwich, and Rembrandt's The Anatomy Lesson of Dr. Nicolaes Tulp, among other remembered bits of culture. The Rings of Saturn twists and turns in surprising ways, a reminder that much of what we see around us has its own intricate history, whether remembered or lost.
Devotions, by Mary Oliver
Lots of poets write work that makes one want to go out for a ramble, but Oliver's poems are particularly motivating. Many of her compositions recount quiet, daily revelations from the biosphere, ones that are experienced through sitting still and looking closely. For Oliver, this is a posture of respect—every bird or small pond or sunset is worthy of acknowledgment and inquiry. She is never sentimental or trite about nature, often dwelling on the death or on the overwhelming darkness of the world. Devotions offers a wide selection of poems from across Oliver's career: It is a perfect introduction to her work for the uninitiated, but with enough deeper cuts to entertain those who have already memorized 'Wild Geese.' Tuck Devotions in a bag and tramp through a wetland or forest, taking a break to read when you're tired. Don't feel bad for getting distracted by the bugs or birds around you. As Oliver writes, 'When it's over, I want to say: all my life / I was a bride married to amazement. / I was the bridegroom, taking the world into my arms.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tense moments as German Shepherd leaps from vehicle to chase wolf in Yellowstone
Tense moments as German Shepherd leaps from vehicle to chase wolf in Yellowstone

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Tense moments as German Shepherd leaps from vehicle to chase wolf in Yellowstone

A group of tourists witnessed an extraordinary scene in Yellowstone National Park on Friday as a German Shepherd leaped from the back of a vehicle to chase a young wolf on the side of a road. Dogs are allowed in the park on the condition that their owners maintain "physical control" over them at all times, and this incident underscores the reasoning for that rule. MacNeil Lyons of Yellowstone Insight described what happened via Instagram, explaining that the wolf had been trying to access an animal carcass across the highway despite a large presence of tourists who were observing the wolf from the highway. 'There was a carcass hidden to one side of the roadway and the wolf was trying to navigate a safe road crossing, through the people and traffic, to the food source,' Lyons explained. 'Many people were already out of their vehicles and this smart wolf began walking off the road edge, paralleling it, just to get past people. 'The car with the dog was driving slowly, assessing the situation. I am not sure if the dog stepped on the back window button to open it, or if the window was already open. 'As the car passed the wolf, the dog leaped out from the car and ran full sprint towards the wolf. Once the wolf saw the Shepherd, it began loping away which switched to a faster gait down the road.' Ultimately, the wolf stopped and faced the German Shepherd, which subsequently stopped. They were in a standoff about 15 feet apart before the driver of the vehicle reversed to where he could call and collect his dog. Lyons added: 'The yearling gray wolf seemed a bit shook up, but quickly kept on its mission to circumnavigate the people and eventually swim the Yellowstone River to obtain its breakfast.' According to park regulations, tourists must stay at least 100 yards from wolves and bears if they're outside their vehicles. This article originally appeared on For The Win: Tense moments in Yellowstone as dog leaps from vehicle to chase wolf

Where Is the Safest Place to Sit on a Plane? Experts Answer
Where Is the Safest Place to Sit on a Plane? Experts Answer

Yahoo

time4 days ago

  • Yahoo

Where Is the Safest Place to Sit on a Plane? Experts Answer

An airplane aisle providing a view of passengers in their seats. Credit - Constantine Johnny—Getty Images It's the age-old question of passengers—where is the safest place one can sit on a plane? While people often prioritize leg-room or proximity to the bathroom when it comes to air travel, others may think a little more deeply when it comes to their seat selection. This rings especially true when you consider how one man—Viswashkumar Ramesh—was the sole survivor of an Air India flight crash that resulted in the deaths of the other 241 people on board. Ramesh, who was travelling with his brother, was seated in 11a on the journey from Ahmedabad to London. His survival has reignited conversations about air travel and seat selections. The general consensus has been that sitting in the middle or at the rear of a plane is statistically safer. A 2017 National Transportation Safety Board study that investigated 20 plane crashes since 1971 found that those sitting in the back of the plane had a higher chance of staying alive than those in the front. Additionally, those placed nearby the wing also had a better chances of survival. Meanwhile, a study conducted by TIME in 2015 found that the middle seats in the back of the aircraft were those with the lowest fatality rates, the worst-faring seats were on the aisle in the middle third of the cabin. Read More: What to Know About the Air India Crash and the 'Miracle' of Its Sole Survivor But how does that account for Ramesh sitting near the front of the plane and being the sole survivor? Steve Wright, a former systems and software engineer in the commercial aerospace industry and a former associate professor of avionics and aircraft systems at UWE Bristol, has often pondered on the "safest seat" question. For Wright, the Air India survival story was 'unusual' for a number of reasons. He says that although sitting towards the front of an aircraft can typically be 'dodgy' in terms of survival chances, the accident in India was 'atypical.' 'When an aircraft goes [down], it's usually nose first, which is, of course, why seat 11a would be [among] the first to [feel the impact],' Wright says. But the Air India flight 'sunk' into the ground with 'the nose up.' Wright attributes Ramesh's survival to being 'ironically, partly because he was at the front.' Whereas the traditional instances where a plane goes nose first, the front of the airplane is known to act "as a shock absorber," according to John Hansman, an aeronautics and astronautics professor at MIT. Wright says usually, though, the safest place on the airplane is near the wings of the plane, where there is more 'structural support' to protect a passenger in case of an emergency. Jim Braucle, an aviation attorney with Motley Rice Law firm, says that from diagrams he has seen, Ramesh's seat was right next to an emergency exit and in front of the plane's wing. This seat, next to a window, was just behind the business class section on the Boeing 787. 'Structurally on the airplane, the strongest part is obviously where the wings come in,' Braucle says. 'And he was close to an exit—I know he didn't exit because he was behind some rubble, but those areas are reinforced so that, in the case of an accident, the door doesn't get deformed, so people can escape.' In an exit row, Braucle says, the additional space provided could save lives, as well. 'As stuff starts collapsing and falling or people fall back in their seats... I know it's not much, but I think those inches count,' he notes. In agreement, Wright points out that being near an emergency exit is pertinent, considering most emergencies he knows of are not related to crashes, but rather the result of incidents on the tarmac. 'The most likely danger you will [face] on an aircraft is on the tarmac when something has gone wrong, potentially a fire,' Wright says. 'It kind of doesn't matter which exit it is, in that sense, but essentially, you want to get off that plane as quickly as possible.' Read More: Boeing's 787 Dreamliner Has a Long History of Safety Concerns Wright also argues that though life vests are mandated on aircrafts, smoke hoods should also be included, to protect passengers in the event of an emergency. Mary Schiavo, an aviation lawyer and the former Inspector General of the Department of Transportation, says that after years of working with people who have survived plane crashes—and after writing a book on how to fly safe—she now always attempts to get a seat in the exit row. She also makes an effort to have a smoke hood as part of her carry-on, and tries to wear long sleeves and pants. 'The people I've worked with who have had to fight their way out of plane crashes have said they wish they had more protection on,' she explains. Schiavo always makes sure she knows how to open the emergency door of the plane, taking into account that different aircraft may have varying emergency exit mechanisms. If she cannot get a seat in an exit row, she tries to get a seat in the immediate rows behind, since her studies have shown that in the event of an emergency, passengers will push forward towards an exit. 'If you do sit in an exit row, you need to take it seriously,' Schiavo says, emphasizing that being able to reach an exit or find your way through a crack during an emergency can make all the difference. Every airplane emergency, though, unfolds differently. If Ramesh's story shows anything, it is that survival in a plane crash can be less about where one sits, and more about how exactly the plane crashes—something no passenger can predict. Should a door get ripped off mid-flight, the exit row might not be as safe of a place as previously described. What's safest in this instance is different from what would be safest in an emergency water landing. This is why the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) advises passengers to listen to their crew and pilot, and in the case of an emergency, locate and utilize exit rows. Passengers should also take the time to review and familiarize themselves with the passenger safety cards before takeoff. Contact us at letters@

The Safest Place to Sit on a Plane, According to Experts
The Safest Place to Sit on a Plane, According to Experts

Time​ Magazine

time4 days ago

  • Time​ Magazine

The Safest Place to Sit on a Plane, According to Experts

It's the age-old question of passengers—where is the safest place one can sit on a plane? While people often prioritize leg-room or proximity to the bathroom when it comes to air travel, others may think a little more deeply when it comes to their seat selection. This rings especially true when you consider how one man—Viswashkumar Ramesh— was the sole survivor of an Air India flight crash that resulted in the deaths of the other 241 people on board. Ramesh, who was travelling with his brother, was seated in 11a on the journey from Ahmedabad to London. His survival has reignited conversations about air travel and seat selections. The general consensus has been that sitting in the middle or at the rear of a plane is statistically safer. A 2017 National Transportation Safety Board study that investigated 20 plane crashes since 1971 found that those sitting in the back of the plane had a higher chance of staying alive than those in the front. Additionally, those placed nearby the wing also had a better chances of survival. Meanwhile, a study conducted by TIME in 2015 found that the middle seats in the back of the aircraft were those with the lowest fatality rates, the worst-faring seats were on the aisle in the middle third of the cabin. But how does that account for Ramesh sitting near the front of the plane and being the sole survivor? Here's what expects have to say about the safest place to sit on a plane Steve Wright, a former systems and software engineer in the commercial aerospace industry and a former associate professor of avionics and aircraft systems at UWE Bristol, has often pondered on the "safest seat" question. For Wright, the Air India survival story was 'unusual' for a number of reasons. He says that although sitting towards the front of an aircraft can typically be 'dodgy' in terms of survival chances, the accident in India was 'atypical.' 'When an aircraft goes [down], it's usually nose first, which is, of course, why seat 11a would be [among] the first to [feel the impact],' Wright says. But the Air India flight 'sunk' into the ground with 'the nose up.' Wright attributes Ramesh's survival to being 'ironically, partly because he was at the front.' Whereas the traditional instances where a plane goes nose first, the front of the airplane is known to act " as a shock absorber," according to John Hansman, an aeronautics and astronautics professor at MIT. Wright says usually, though, the safest place on the airplane is near the wings of the plane, where there is more 'structural support' to protect a passenger in case of an emergency. Jim Braucle, an aviation attorney with Motley Rice Law firm, says that from diagrams he has seen, Ramesh's seat was right next to an emergency exit and in front of the plane's wing. This seat, next to a window, was just behind the business class section on the Boeing 787. 'Structurally on the airplane, the strongest part is obviously where the wings come in,' Braucle says. 'And he was close to an exit—I know he didn't exit because he was behind some rubble, but those areas are reinforced so that, in the case of an accident, the door doesn't get deformed, so people can escape.' In an exit row, Braucle says, the additional space provided could save lives, as well. 'As stuff starts collapsing and falling or people fall back in their seats... I know it's not much, but I think those inches count,' he notes. In agreement, Wright points out that being near an emergency exit is pertinent, considering most emergencies he knows of are not related to crashes, but rather the result of incidents on the tarmac. 'The most likely danger you will [face] on an aircraft is on the tarmac when something has gone wrong, potentially a fire,' Wright says. 'It kind of doesn't matter which exit it is, in that sense, but essentially, you want to get off that plane as quickly as possible.' How else can you attempt to have a safe flight? Wright also argues that though life vests are mandated on aircrafts, smoke hoods should also be included, to protect passengers in the event of an emergency. Mary Schiavo, an aviation lawyer and the former Inspector General of the Department of Transportation, says that after years of working with people who have survived plane crashes—and after writing a book on how to fly safe—she now always attempts to get a seat in the exit row. She also makes an effort to have a smoke hood as part of her carry-on, and tries to wear long sleeves and pants. 'The people I've worked with who have had to fight their way out of plane crashes have said they wish they had more protection on,' she explains. Schiavo always makes sure she knows how to open the emergency door of the plane, taking into account that different aircraft may have varying emergency exit mechanisms. If she cannot get a seat in an exit row, she tries to get a seat in the immediate rows behind, since her studies have shown that in the event of an emergency, passengers will push forward towards an exit. 'If you do sit in an exit row, you need to take it seriously,' Schiavo says, emphasizing that being able to reach an exit or find your way through a crack during an emergency can make all the difference. Every airplane emergency, though, unfolds differently. If Ramesh's story shows anything, it is that survival in a plane crash can be less about where one sits, and more about how exactly the plane crashes—something no passenger can predict. Should a door get ripped off mid-flight, the exit row might not be as safe of a place as previously described. What's safest in this instance is different from what would be safest in an emergency water landing. This is why the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) advises passengers to listen to their crew and pilot, and in the case of an emergency, locate and utilize exit rows. Passengers should also take the time to review and familiarize themselves with the passenger safety cards before takeoff.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store