Florida bill could block communities from rebuilding stronger after hurricanes
Florida communities could be blocked from rebuilding stronger after a hurricane, and more than 44,000 Floridians could see higher flood insurance costs this year if Gov. Ron DeSantis signs into law a new bill designed to help the state respond to storms.
Senate Bill 180, which passed with nearly unanimous support in the House and Senate, includes some provisions to help storm-weary Floridians, like a streamlined permitting system for rebuilding homes after a hurricane and additional training for emergency management officials.
But it also would weaken local efforts to build stronger structures after hurricanes — freezing any tougher rules for at least two years, potentially allowing developers to rebuild homes under the same codes that had failed to protect property.
Another provision would mean a bump upwards in flood insurance rates for tens of thousands of Floridians in twelve communities across the state, including Hialeah and Hollywood.
But it's the building code freeze that has drawn the most criticism, including from local leaders in Manatee County and other coastal communities — a measure that would potentially block efforts to make homes more resilient and reduce storm damage.
'It's short-sighted,' said Kim Dinkins of 1000 Friends of Florida, a nonprofit planning advocacy group. 'We said that we want to be more resilient. When is the time going to be to do that if you can't do anything right after a storm?'
'It takes a long time to develop these types of policies.'
The bill's House sponsor, Rep. Fiona McFarland, R-Sarasota, says the bill is meant to prevent local governments from over regulating in response to a storm.
'When there's a tragedy, people demand action. Lawmakers and policymakers sometimes feel that they need to pass a law to prevent this from ever happening again.'
McFarland says the bill has a fix: 'For one year after a disaster, let's take a pause,' McFarland said. 'That's what the thinking was.'
Critics say bill could prevent building back better after storms
Under the proposed law, local governments across Florida could see sweeping new restrictions on their ability to control how and where development occurs — and how they build back after storms.
One part of the bill prevents cities and counties listed in federal disaster declarations for Hurricanes Debby, Helene and Milton — a majority of the state — from adopting tougher development rules until October 2027. The ban is retroactive to August 2024, also threatening to undo any recent rule changes.
Another part of the bill calls for a similar one-year ban anytime a local government is listed in a federal disaster declaration and lies within 100 miles of a hurricane's path. It could renew each time a storm strikes Florida's coast, a regular occurrence for the storm-plagued state.
But most worrying to some local governments is a line that explicitly allows developers, or anyone, to sue a local government if it finds any changes 'burdensome or restrictive.'
'Every single developer in the state benefits from this language,' said Manatee County Commission Chairman George Kruse.
Local governments, including New Smyrna Beach, Polk County, and Volusia County, all say the bill would block them from implementing already-approved updates to the drainage plans to keep their communities dry.
Rep. Linda Chaney, R-Pinellas, one of the lone representatives who voted against the bill, said in a committee hearing that Lee County had already raised concerns to her about the unintended consequences of this bill.
'Charlotte County also contacted me, saying it's prohibiting them from addressing flooding, sea level rise, resiliency issues,' she said.
The fight is already playing out in Manatee
Manatee County is a case study for how the bill's freeze on local development regulations could play out across Florida, and one of the bill's sponsors directly cites it as inspiration for the provision.
When county leaders recently tried to reinstate local wetland protections meant to prevent flooding and environmental damage caused by development, state agencies claimed that the move would violate a 2023 law known as Senate Bill 250. The law bans 10 counties impacted by Hurricane Ian from passing 'more burdensome or restrictive' development rules until October 2026.
'Clearly, wetlands are important when you're getting flooded all over the place,' Kruse said. But under fear of legal action due to Senate Bill 250, commissioners voted to delay passing the environmental protections.
Now, Senate Bill 180 could expand such restrictions onto local governments statewide.
Kruse argues the legislation goes too far in limiting how communities decide to build back after storms. He also said it gives the state power to 'supersede and take over control' of community planning.
'Finally, Tallahassee was passing a bill that made sense for once. And then you sneak this in under the cover of darkness … you destroyed a bill,' Kruse said.
Manatee County residents voted in a majority of the county's board on campaign promises to rein in development and restore local environmental protections.
But as they try to make those changes, county leaders are facing opposition from state agencies and local developers who say they'd be violating state law.
Four state agencies pointed to Senate Bill 250 in letters opposing the county's recent move to restore wetland protections. And an attorney representing local developers cited the law in objection to the county's move to prevent thousands of new homes from being built beyond the county's development boundary.
Legislators defend Senate Bill 180
'That language was in the bill from the very moment I filed it,' she said. 'We worked on it, we amended it. We heard from the League of Cities and the Association of Counties. I worked with them super closely on the bill. I was surprised that suddenly people seem to have an issue with it.'
Specifically, DiCeglie points to Manatee County and St. Pete Beach as the inspiration for this portion of the bill. Both places considered a moratorium on development for a short period, but neither ultimately passed one.
'What I don't want to see is those local jurisdictions use a natural disaster as an excuse for a development moratorium,' he said. 'These moratoriums paralyze recovery.'
Both sponsors waved away concerns that the provision would have 'unintended consequences' beyond barring the moratoriums it was designed to stop. McFarland said she was not aware of how similar language in Senate Bill 250 has proved to be a roadblock for counties like Manatee that are trying to make local planning changes unrelated to storm recovery.
'That's interesting,' McFarland said.
When asked about New Smyrna Beach, where city officials said the proposed bill would block their much-needed drainage improvements after a previous hurricane, DeCeglie said he didn't see how it would impact stormwater regulations and said he'd need to learn more about it.
DeSantis has yet to sign the bill into law or veto it, as some local governments have asked. DiCeglie said he worked with the governor's office to develop the bill, as well as alongside the state's emergency management department.
'I can't imagine the governor wouldn't want to support this,' he said.
Is your flood insurance going up?
Another provision of the bill would raise flood insurance rates for tens of thousands of Floridians and make it easier for residents to avoid doing what disaster experts say the state desperately needs to do — elevate more homes.
It bans a practice that adds to the already complicated formula for deciding if someone with a storm-ravaged home can simply rebuild as-is or tear it all down and start over. It brings the state back to the bare minimum required by FEMA and the Florida Building Code, which says that a home with storm damage totaling more than 50% of the value of the home must raze and rebuild.
'If we can keep one more person in their home to keep them out of the 50% rule, that's one person that does not have to deal with the incredibly stressful situation of tearing down their home and elevating,' said DiCeglie.
It's a long-standing practice in some coastal communities, where experts say it forces people to rebuild stronger — and higher — to face the next storm by lowering the threshold where people have to elevate their properties. Banning the practice would result in fewer elevated homes, said Del Schwalls, a floodplain management consultant who works for many communities in Florida.
'It's really frustrating. It prevents anybody from trying to fix this flood, repair, flood, repair cycle,' he said.
But, after three hurricanes flooded tens of thousands of homes on the Gulf Coast last year, exposing more people to the practice, the tide turned. The state conducted a study of the practice, which found that it 'constrains renovation activity' and does not necessarily lead to more people purchasing flood insurance in those communities.
If DeSantis signs the bill into law, it would bar communities from using this cumulative practice. Of the 122 communities that use it, state data show 44 communities would lose points toward discounts on flood insurance premiums. And 12 of those communities would lose enough points that they would no longer qualify for their current level of discount.
Per the state study, the communities are: Bay County, Leon County, Orange County, Dania Beach, Jupiter Beach, Palm Springs, Estero, Lake Mary, Hialeah, Bonita Springs, Hollywood and the Pensacola Beach Santa Rosa Island Authority.
That would drop about 8,600 Hollywood residents from a 20% discount to a 15% discount, an increase of about $38 for the average policyholder with a premium of $737 a year, according to the study.
Statewide, the study found, this change would affect about 44,000 people and raise the cost of flood insurance by $1.6 million statewide, or an average of $36 per person, per year.
It's unclear how long it would take from the time the bill is signed until residents face higher flood insurance prices, but it could occur in October, when the agency reviews discounts in all communities. A FEMA spokesperson said the agency does not comment on pending legislation, 'and determinations about CRS retrogrades are made in consultation with local and state officials.'
Those communities could go after other policy changes to regain points and re-attain the discount, but it could take months or years to pass those policies through city or county commissions, as well as earn state approval, Schwalls said.
'It's not as easy as just go get more points,' he said. 'It could take a while.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
28 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump orders probe of Biden mental state, executive actions in office
President Trump on Wednesday ordered an investigation into actions taken by then-President Biden, citing questions about Biden's cognitive state toward the end of his term. Trump directed the counsel to the president, in consultation with Attorney General Pam Bondi, to probe 'whether certain individuals conspired to deceive the public about Biden's mental state and unconstitutionally exercise the authorities and responsibilities of the President.' The investigation will focus specifically on actions Biden signed using the 'autopen,' which has become a fixation of those on the right as they levy accusations about Biden's ability to carry out his duties. Trump's order cites Biden's appointment of more than 200 judges to the federal bench, the issuance of thousands of acts of clemency and the issuance of more than 1,000 presidential documents during his term. Biden and his aides have repeatedly denied that the former president was unable to carry out his duties while in office. A Biden spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment about Trump's latest order. New books, including 'Original Sin: President Biden's Decline, Its Cover-Up, and His Disastrous Choice to Run Again,' have reignited debate about Biden's mental acuity while in office and whether he experienced cognitive decline. Since President Trump took office, the GOP has taken a number of steps focusing on Biden. The White House confirmed Tuesday that pardon attorney Ed Martin would be reviewing Biden's pardons for his family members, as well as some other clemencies granted during his final days in office. House Republicans have reached out to former Biden aides as part of a probe into the former president's mental acuity. And the Justice Department last month released the full tapes of Biden's interview with special counsel Robert Hur, one in which the attorney said Biden appeared to have memory lapses. While president, Biden released the full transcript of the conversation.
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Another $1.6M SNAP benefits stolen as ‘big beautiful bill' looks to save
(WGN) — Food benefits are on the chopping block as part of a bill dubbed by President Trump as 'One Big Beautiful Bill.' It passed the House and is now in the hands of the Senate. Critics argue it doesn't address a problem with the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program or SNAP that could save millions of dollars. WGN Investigates: Investigating public corruption, crime & fraud In Illinois, about 15% of the population relies on food benefits. The proposed legislation would, among other things, shift some of the cost to states and expand work requirements for recipients. One SNAP recipient who was featured in a recent WGN Investigates story about stolen benefits says she wants to see the bill address the millions of dollars stolen using skimming devices instead of looking for ways to make cuts. Previous Coverage: Stolen SNAP dollars will no longer be replaced WGN Investigates search of state and federal data portals reveal another $1.6 million in stolen benefits were reported to the IL. Department of Human Services in the first three months of this year. In all – Illinois has reported $24 million in stolen benefits over the last few years. Nationwide – the federal government has replaced $322 million in stolen benefits. Brandon Duke with the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities says, 'I don't see much here on enhancing the technology behind the SNAP program and those sorts of things. But instead cutting benefits in one way or another for families trying to get by.' It's possible that other bills could tackle ways to protect the food benefit cards by implementing better technology. Later this year Illinois is expected to be part of a pilot program that would equip cards with chips, making them harder to tap into. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'Big Beautiful Bill' Falters as Musk Ramps up Bid to ‘Kill' It
Elon Musk attends President Donald Trump's address to a joint session of Congress in the US Capitol in Washington, DC, on March 4, 2025. Credit - Saul Loeb—AFP via Getty Images President Donald Trump's sprawling tax-and-spending proposal—touted as the centerpiece of his second-term agenda—is facing intensifying resistance in the Senate, as fresh concerns about its impact on the deficit and a ramped-up campaign by Elon Musk to torpedo the entire package threaten to derail the legislation's fragile path to passage. At the center of the turmoil on Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' is a sobering new assessment from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, which reported Wednesday that the bill would add $2.4 trillion to federal deficits over the next decade while stripping health coverage from nearly 11 million Americans, largely through deep Medicaid cuts and the imposition of new work requirements. That analysis sparked alarm among some Senate Republicans, several of whom are demanding substantial changes. 'I think Congress is sort of like a bad behaving teenager when it comes to spending,' Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, one of the Republicans threatening to vote against the bill, told TIME on Wednesday. 'If you had a teenager that you were giving $100 a week and they wasted all of it on gambling or on booze, would you give them $200?' White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt and other prominent Republicans tried to dismiss the CBO's projections by arguing its analysis was flawed or biased. But fiscal hawks in the Senate remained dug in, buoyed by former Trump advisor Elon Musk, who extended his all-out offensive against the bill. A day after using his vast social media reach to brand the bill a 'disgusting abomination,' he posted more than two dozen messages on X on Wednesday attacking the legislation, as well as urging his followers to call Congress and 'KILL the BILL.' Musk's ire appears especially focused on how the bill's expansion of the deficit would erase the cost-cutting he hoped to accomplish with the Department of Government Efficiency, which he led under the Trump Administration. He has also expressed concerns with provisions in the House-passed bill that would terminate clean energy tax credits and electric vehicle subsidies established under the Inflation Reduction Act. Tesla Energy, Musk's solar and battery company, has warned that ending those credits 'would threaten America's energy independence and the reliability of our grid.' The sharp reversal has blindsided some Republicans, who were counting on Musk's tacit support. House Speaker Mike Johnson, who has spearheaded the bill's passage, tried to stem the fallout by reaching out to Musk directly. 'I hope he comes around,' Johnson said Wednesday, though he added that Musk has not returned his call. Inside the Senate, Johnson's broader strategy—pushing through House priorities quickly and with minimal changes—is beginning to unravel. Senate Majority Leader John Thune of South Dakota acknowledged that significant changes to the bill are now unavoidable. 'We'll make some modifications to it, strengthen and improve it,' Thune said Tuesday. 'But at the end of the day, the math is simple—51 in the Senate, 218 in the House. That's what we're working toward.' One potential modification Thune has expressed interest in is scaling back the $40,000 state and local tax (SALT) deduction cap in the House version of the bill, an increase from the current $10,000 cap that House Republicans from high-tax states secured as a concession. But not all Republicans agree with the additional spending: 'There really isn't a single Republican senator who cares much about the SALT issue,' Thune told reporters as he departed a meeting with Trump and Senate Republicans on Wednesday evening, saying that they discussed ways to dial that money back. It's a move that could alienate House Republicans from New York and New Jersey, who say their support is contingent on the SALT provision. "Let's be clear — no SALT, no deal," New York Republican Mike Lawler said Wednesday in a post on X. Additionally, the bill's sweeping changes to Medicaid, such as imposing new work requirements, are a sticking point. Republican Senators Josh Hawley of Missouri and Jim Justice of West Virginia have raised red flags over a provision that would eliminate provider taxes—mechanisms that states use to fund Medicaid—which they argue could shutter rural hospitals. Hawley is also opposed to a so-called 'sick tax' in the bill, which would impose new charges on low-income patients for medical visits. Other Republican Senators, including Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, may also put up roadblocks over potential cuts to Medicaid. Trump has personally intervened, holding calls with Sens. Hawley, Paul, and Scott. But there is little evidence he has swayed skeptics. Paul, a libertarian-leaning lawmaker who has vocally pushed back on many Trump Administration policies, told TIME that he plans to vote against the bill over its provision to raise the debt ceiling by trillions of dollars. 'Congress has been acting irresponsibly for decades,' he said. 'We spend $2 trillion more than to come in. They should have a very narrow leash. The only debt ceiling they get should be very, very narrow in time and very, very small in amount. And the more we vote on the debt ceiling, the better. I'd vote on it every three months.' Trump, meanwhile, renewed his calls on Wednesday for scrapping the debt ceiling altogether. The growing litany of disputes has created a daunting legislative gauntlet for Trump's signature bill. Senate committees are now beginning to draft their own version, starting with less controversial sections and leaving the most divisive elements—Medicaid, energy, taxes—for later. Should the Senate approve any amended version, it must still clear the House once again—no small task given the narrow margins and the emboldened dissent among House Republicans. The stakes are high not just for Trump, but for Republicans heading into a contentious midterm season. Failure to extend Trump's 2017 tax cuts would translate into a tax increase for many Americans. Trump's legislation would also boost spending on defense and border security, while reducing spending on Medicaid and food stamps. Write to Nik Popli at