Institutions Embrace Bitcoin While The UK Falls Behind
The UK has a proud history of excellence and innovation in both financial services and in computer science. But its regulatory approach to bitcoin, which sits at the intersection between these disciplines, is undermining that position. The Financial Conduct Authority has created uncertainty, driven businesses offshore, and is damaging the UK's competitiveness in digital finance.
Regulatory uncertainty, restrictive policies, and a risk-averse approach have put the UK at a disadvantage as institutions elsewhere move forward. While other jurisdictions recognize Bitcoin's role in institutional finance, UK regulators have created an environment that stifles progress.
The Bitcoin for Institutions event, held recently in London at The Law Society, brought together investors, policymakers, and industry leaders to assess bitcoin's growing significance. The consensus? The rest of the world is advancing while the UK remains stuck in bureaucratic inaction.
Bitcoin for Institutions at The Law Society.
Rob Shaw
Allen Farrington, co-founder of Axiom, a bitcoin-native investment firm focused on capital deployment in the bitcoin economy, captured the shift in institutional thinking. He described bitcoin as 'forming the basis of a viable institutional asset class.'
However, despite bitcoin being the best-performing asset of the decade, UK institutions remain hesitant. The FCA, tasked with ensuring financial stability, has instead become a barrier to innovation, and the result is that businesses have been driven out of the UK, driven out by regulatory hostility or simply deciding that the cost of compliance with poorly thought-out regulation is too high.
While the UK stalls, the U.S. moves fast. One message was repeated throughout the event. Ignoring bitcoin is now seen as a career risk.
https://x.com/Blockstream/status/1903109220393750840
In the U.S., pension funds, corporate treasuries, and asset managers are integrating bitcoin into their portfolios. In recent months, the largest buyers of bitcoin have not been retail investors or hedge funds, but institutional funds.
Andrew Hohns, founder and CEO of Newmarket Investment Management, described the contrast, 'Many U.S. companies have started incorporating bitcoin into their financial planning, and many others are well down the road. In the UK, institutional awareness of the benefits of bitcoin is more nascent, but the topic will move closer to center stage as corporate and sovereign game theory quickly take hold."
Dominic Frisby summed up the cost of inaction: "Given the potential of bitcoin, and its record, the risk is not so much owning bitcoin as not owning it."
In dialogue with Izabella Kaminska, Steve Baker, who served as Minister of State in the Cabinet Office until July 2024, commented on U.S. policymakers' proactive stance, stating, 'It's great that the US is governed by a group of people who understand this.'
In contrast, jurisdictions like the U.S., UAE, and Singapore are attracting capital by implementing frameworks that distinguish between bitcoin and speculative cryptoassets. The FCA has created a framework that treats bitcoin the same as speculative crypto tokens, ignoring its distinct characteristics as a decentralized monetary network.
Adrian Cannon from Musqet pointed out this fundamental mismatch, "Bitcoin is revolutionary in ideas and concepts and that doesn't fit within regulation and banking."
Beyond the FCA's misclassification of bitcoin, the UK's broader regulatory structure is also a barrier to institutional adoption. Baroness Claire Fox, who sits in the House of Lords, told the audience about a recent government initiative called the Regulatory Innovation Office, which was implemented with the intention of reining in regulators. However, the reality is a system of self-replicating bureaucracy, as she described a quango of regulators where no one has accountability.
This structure discourages innovation, shields regulators from scrutiny, and blocks new market entrants, creating a system that protects incumbents while deterring progress. While regulators insist their approach is about protecting investors, the reality is that businesses are being forced offshore, limiting choice and harming competitiveness.
Beyond regulatory concerns, institutional adoption has also been slowed by misconceptions about bitcoin's environmental impact. Discussions at the event highlighted how bitcoin is being used to stabilize energy grids, reduce waste, and improve sustainability.
One panel on social benefits discussed bitcoin's growing role in advancing financial inclusion and human rights - and the fintech products being built to enable this. In regions affected by financial repression, bitcoin is being used to bypass restrictions, support activist movements, and provide stable value transfer in fragile economies. In areas with poor access to banking, whether in sub-Saharan Africa, Afghanistan, or refugee communities, bitcoin offers a way to receive donations, store value, and operate independently from centralised financial institutions.
Recent data indicates that over 50% of bitcoin mining is now powered by renewable energy sources. Miners are increasingly co-locating with wind, solar, and hydro projects, acting as flexible demand-response partners and absorbing excess energy when supply outpaces demand and powering down during peak consumption to relieve pressure on the grid.
In the UK, this model could deliver substantial savings, especially given that electricity prices here are among the highest in the world. Reducing energy costs could offer a vital boost to both households and businesses facing mounting bills. According to the National Grid ESO, curtailment of wind power alone cost British consumers over £800 million in 2023, as renewable generators were paid to shut down during periods of oversupply, with the tab being picked up by households.
If this curtailed energy were redirected to bitcoin mining, an approach already implemented in parts of the U.S., Scandinavia, and Africa, it would reduce these costs and provide an additional revenue stream for renewable operators. Instead of paying producers to switch off, excess energy could be monetised in real-time, and customers would see immediate savings on their bills.
Bitcoin mining is also being used to capture vented methane from oil fields and repurpose landfill gas into electricity, turning environmental liabilities into economic opportunities. These developments challenge legacy thinking and position bitcoin as an energy solution.
The discussion repeatedly returned to one key issue, namely that the UK is falling behind.
While British firms continue debating whether bitcoin should be included in institutional portfolios, U.S. asset managers and corporate treasurers are already executing their bitcoin strategies. Dominic Frisby captured the financial risk of inaction, "The risk is not owning it."
At the same time, institutional investors in the U.S. and elsewhere are increasing their exposure. In recent months, institutional funds have been the largest single buyer of bitcoin. This shift was largely due to BlackRock and Fidelity launching U.S.-approved bitcoin ETFs in early 2024, an institutional milestone that the UK has yet to match. What's more, President Donald Trump signed an executive order in early March 2025 to establish a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, positioning bitcoin as a strategic asset within the U.S. financial system.
The tension between legacy finance and emerging alternatives was clear throughout the event, which was described as a clash between Wall Street and Main Street. The real risk for the UK is not that bitcoin will fail but that it will succeed elsewhere and leave the UK institutions scrambling to catch up. If the UK wants to remain a serious player in global finance, it needs to adapt before the next wave of innovation settles elsewhere.
Baroness Claire Fox offered a blunt assessment of the current state of affairs and the path to change, 'Rebellion is the way forward.'
The Bitcoin for Institutions event clearly demonstrated an unavoidable truth: that UK institutions must act.
Regulatory paralysis is not stopping bitcoin's adoption. It is simply pushing progress elsewhere. While the U.S., UAE, and Singapore create supportive policies, the UK remains locked in bureaucratic complexity. Without a course correction, UK financial firms will be left behind in the next phase of institutional finance.
Bitcoin is no longer an emerging trend, it is a financial transformation already in motion. And transformations do not wait for governments and regulators to catch up.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
About 78 percent of Americans say they're uncomfortable investing in Bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies. Here's why
Despite all the hype around cryptocurrency, the vast majority of Americans say they're uncomfortable investing in it, according to Bankrate's 2025 Long-Term Investment Survey. Nearly 4 in 5 Americans (78 percent) say they're not comfortable putting their investment dollars in crypto. So, what might be making Americans uncomfortable with cryptocurrency? And what are some other investments that have proven track records of attractive, long-term returns? Let's take a look. Bankrate's Long-Term Investment Survey indicated clearly that Americans largely feel uncomfortable investing in Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, and only a relatively small proportion were comfortable with them. Here's how the survey's results break down: Very comfortable — 5 percent Somewhat comfortable — 15 percent Not too comfortable — 28 percent Not at all comfortable — 49 percent Had not heard of it — 2 percent The 2025 results were similar to those of the same survey in 2022, when Bankrate last conducted it. In 2022, 21 percent of Americans were 'very' or 'somewhat' comfortable, compared to 75 percent who were either 'not too comfortable' or 'not at all comfortable.' Younger generations tend to be more comfortable with cryptocurrency. In the 2025 survey, about 28 percent of Gen Z said they were 'very comfortable' or 'somewhat comfortable' with it, compared to 30 percent of millennials, 21 percent of Gen X and 6 percent of boomers. While the Bankrate survey didn't ask respondents to say specifically why they were uncomfortable with investing in cryptocurrency, it did offer at least one clue. That is, the survey asked Americans why they didn't pick stocks as their top investment, and the top reason was their notable volatility. Volatility — the stomach-churning up and down of an investment — makes investing difficult for many traders. While stocks are well-known for their volatility, cryptocurrency has it in spades. 'Lacking traditional fundamentals such as cash flow, the movement in cryptocurrency prices are largely sentiment-driven,' says Greg McBride, CFA, Bankrate chief financial analyst. 'As sentiment shifts wildly, so, too, do crypto prices.' For example, during its lifetime of around 16 years, Bitcoin has lost 60 percent of its value or more in three different calendar years. This level of volatility scares investors, forcing them out of investments — after they've lost money — as the price of crypto yo-yos. It's also important to understand that cryptocurrency (in most cases) is not backed by the assets or cash flow of an underlying business, unlike traditional investments. The price of most cryptocurrencies is based solely on the sentiment of traders and whether they expect a crypto coin to rise or fall in value. If demand for a coin disappears, the coin can become literally worthless. So the only thing that keeps the price of a crypto rising is by drawing more money to it — that is, by hyping it and trying to generate more excitement. For example, many crypto analysts simply issue larger and larger price targets for popular coins such as Bitcoin, helping to keep up excitement that the crypto can rise in the future and drawing more investment dollars to it today. In this light, it's quite reasonable that Americans are uncomfortable investing in cryptocurrency. Many Americans — perhaps especially the young, who are most comfortable with crypto — may lack the knowledge and expertise to see the danger of investing in an asset based on nothing and without adequate regulation that requires minimum standards for raising money for one. While cryptocurrency has been around for a number of years, many people still don't know what it is or why some of the most popular cryptocurrencies seem to go up (and down). Whereas Bitcoin has seen its price go up many, many times, thousands of other cryptocurrencies have gone nowhere or have been outright frauds and blown up entirely, costing investors billions. The crypto market is effectively unregulated, meaning anyone can create a cryptocurrency and investors have few protections. Again, literally anyone can create a cryptocurrency and raise money, and more than 20,000 cryptocurrencies are traded on exchanges, according to many estimates, though some estimates put the number of existing cryptocurrencies in the millions. Cryptocurrency has also infamously been used by many criminals, allowing them to more easily commit crimes such as extortion and money laundering. The semi-anonymity of cryptocurrency and the finality of it — once you've sent the cryptocurrency, it's gone forever — make it easy for criminals to use crypto to transact their business. Americans have a number of proven alternative investments that have a strong record of returns, and, importantly, they are backed by assets, unlike most cryptocurrencies. Get started: Match with an advisor who can help you achieve your financial goals The stock market, as measured by the S&P 500 stock index, has delivered about 10 percent annual returns over time, making it one of the best long-term investments. In fact, in Bankrate's 2025 Long-Term Investment Survey, Americans picked the stock market as their top long-term investment for money that they don't need for a decade or more. 'With crypto, any return on investment is solely dependent on the price increasing from what you paid for it,' says McBride. 'But stocks represent ownership in real businesses and cash flow can be reinvested in the company, used to make acquisitions, or returned to shareholders through dividends and stock buybacks.' Stocks are fractional ownership of a company, and the stock's performance is driven over time by the performance of that business. Anyone can own a piece of successful companies such as Amazon (AMZN), Alphabet (GOOG, GOOGL) and Apple (AAPL) — and your long-term returns reflect their business success. Plus, if you need to generate income, you can invest in dividend stocks and enjoy the cash flow. 'Studies have shown that over long investment horizons, dividends comprised approximately 40 percent of an investor's total return,' says McBride. 'Not only does this allow you to make money in a flat market, but reinvesting those dividends is a further compounder of wealth.' Real estate is another popular investment, and it's regularly among Americans' most preferred investments, coming in second in Bankrate's survey. Real estate, whether it's a primary residence or an investment property, has delivered attractive returns over time, particularly to those who can hold on for decades and avoid the substantial transaction costs and taxes. Real estate can be a great way to generate income, too, offering you cash each month. An investment in real estate is backed by the property, unlike an investment in cryptocurrency. Bonds are a relatively safe type of asset that is also backed by the assets and cash flow of a business or government, unlike cryptocurrency. With bonds, you make an investment, earn interest during the life of the bond and then receive the bond's face value when it matures. Bonds are an attractive place if you need to generate income, for example, for retirees. While bonds aren't much known for appreciating in value, they're a proven long-term investment. Investment funds — whether they're mutual funds or exchange-traded funds (ETFs) — offer attractive long-term returns. These funds own stakes in stocks and bonds, and the funds' total return reflects the performance of their investments. Some of the best ETFs buy high-growth stocks and let them compound your wealth for years, and all you need to do is hold on. 'Individual investors have been well-served by regular contributions to broad-based, low-cost index funds that are held over many years with all distributions reinvested,' says McBride. Investment funds also own dozens, sometimes hundreds, of investments, reducing the risk of a single investment as well as lowering the volatility of the fund. These funds are backed by their investments, which are supported by the assets and cash flow of real underlying companies. 'Use this as your blueprint,' says McBride. 'You get instant diversification from the first dollar you invest, rock-bottom investment expenses, low or no minimum investment, and regular automatic contributions and reinvestment of all distributions enable you to build your position effortlessly over time.' Most Americans remain uncomfortable investing in cryptocurrency, and the risks of investing in it remain outrageously high, including the fact that it's not backed by anything at all. In contrast, Americans have a number of other investments with strong track records of proven returns. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
An Investor Who Took Out $150,000 In Loans To Buy Bitcoin Gives A Three-Year Update. But Everyone Just Wants To Know—How'd He Get 0% Loans?
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. Three years ago, one Reddit user made a high-risk decision: they borrowed $150,000 using a mix of personal loans and 0% APR credit card balance transfers to buy Bitcoin. As of June 4, they say that investment is paying off in a big way. The investor says they now own 4.75 Bitcoin, purchased at an average price of $35,000. With Bitcoin trading at around $105,000 at the time of the update, their holdings are worth roughly $498,750. After accounting for the $15,000 in interest paid and the original $150,000 in loans, they're sitting on an unrealized gain of over $330,000. Don't Miss: — no wallets, just price speculation and free paper trading to practice different strategies. Grow your IRA or 401(k) with Crypto – . 'I have no plans to sell any of it. Just buy and hold. Retire early,' they wrote. The remaining debt, now at about $40,000, comes from credit card balance transfers that carry 0% interest for the next six to 12 months. They admitted to recently taking out another $25,000 balance transfer to buy an additional 0.25 BTC when the price crossed $100,000, despite previously promising not to borrow more. 'I was down to just $20,000 remaining balance, but I simply couldn't resist.' When asked why they didn't just use earned income to slowly invest, the investor explained, 'If I only did that, then I would not have been able to buy nearly as much Bitcoin as I did at the lowest prices.' They describe their approach as a 'reverse dollar-cost averaging.' Instead of buying a little over time, they borrowed a lump sum when BTC was trading between $16,000 and $35,000, then repaid it in monthly installments. To critics who say borrowing to invest is reckless, they responded, 'Taking out loans to buy assets is fine, so long as you can afford to responsibly service the debt. Just don't take out loans to buy liabilities.' They argue that inflationary U.S. fiscal policy will continue to devalue the dollar. Their thesis: borrow in USD and buy an appreciating asset like Bitcoin. 'The strategy is basically a speculative attack on the U.S. dollar,' they said. Trending: New to crypto? on Coinbase. That was the number one question in the comment section. 'Credit Card Balance Transfer Offers. I get them all the time in the mail or with my current credit cards. You have to have a good credit score though,' they wrote. Balance transfer credit cards let users move existing debt from one card to another, often with an introductory 0% interest rate for a limited time, typically 12 to 18 months. Some issuers even allow the transferred funds to be deposited directly into a bank account, turning it interest-free loan for a set period. The original poster also clarified that it wasn't about transferring balances from one card to another in the traditional sense. 'You don't have to transfer a balance. They deposit it directly into your bank account.' As for fees, they acknowledged a 3% upfront transaction fee on those balance transfers. Their income isn't unusually high either. They claim to take home around $65,000 a year, but maintain an 800+ credit score, which is how they secured access to so much credit. Reactions were split. Some called the move genius, gutsy, or inspiring. Others labeled it reckless or 'degenerate gambling.' One commenter wrote, 'I did this with shitcoins and lost $175K. Good luck!' while another added, 'It's not gambling if you have a plan and discipline.' The original poster seems unfazed by either side. 'Bitcoin is the exit strategy,' they said. Read Next: A must-have for all crypto enthusiasts: . Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — This article An Investor Who Took Out $150,000 In Loans To Buy Bitcoin Gives A Three-Year Update. But Everyone Just Wants To Know—How'd He Get 0% Loans? originally appeared on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
MicroStrategy's Michael Saylor On Bitcoin's Quantum Computing Risk: 'I Don't Worry About It'
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. With increased attention and adoption has come increased scrutiny of Bitcoin risks. Among the risks gaining increased attention in recent months is the threat of quantum computing. The fear is that supercomputers will soon emerge that can break Bitcoin's cryptography, putting user assets at risk. But as scary as this potential reality sounds, MicroStrategy (NASDAQ:MSTR) Chair Michael Saylor has said that he is not losing sleep over it. If there is anyone that should be concerned, it is Saylor. Don't Miss: — no wallets, just price speculation and free paper trading to practice different strategies. Grow your IRA or 401(k) with Crypto – . Over the past five years, he has spearheaded an aggressive Bitcoin treasury strategy at the erstwhile business software intelligence firm, which has seen it accumulate 582,000 BTC, currently worth over $63 billion. 'I don't worry about it,' he told CNBC last week, referring to the potential quantum computing threat to Bitcoin. Saylor claimed the recent fuss over quantum computing developments and how it could impact Bitcoin was a marketing ploy by projects seeking to position their assets as an alternative to Bitcoin. 'It's mainly marketing by people that want to sell you the next quantum yo-yo token,' he said. 'Look, Google and Microsoft aren't going to sell you a quantum computer that cracks modern cryptography because it would destroy Google and Microsoft and the US government and the banking system.' Trending: New to crypto? on Coinbase. Saylor said that quantum computing was unlikely to become a genuine concern for Bitcoin for another 10 or 20 years. And then, he said, that like Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT), Google and the traditional banking system, Bitcoin would simply upgrade its software. Saylor's unnerved stance comes despite recent Google research suggesting that it may now take 20 times fewer quantum resources to crack RSA encryption, which likely indicates a faster-than-expected timeline for cracking Bitcoin's Elliptic Curve Cryptography as well. Quantum computing firm Project 11 launched a competition in April to settle the question of how urgent the threat is to Bitcoin. The firm challenged teams and individuals to attempt to break the longest ECC key they can from a selection of 1 to 25 bits for a chance to win 1 BTC. The competition will end on April 5, 2026. Unlike Saylor, Project 11 said that it believed quantum computers could break Bitcoin's wallet encryption within the decade, putting billions in user assets in exposed wallet addresses at risk. The firm estimates that 6.3 million BTC, currently worth over $648 billion, is at risk. Read Next:Deloitte's fastest-growing software company partners with Amazon, Walmart & Target – Image: Shutterstock This article MicroStrategy's Michael Saylor On Bitcoin's Quantum Computing Risk: 'I Don't Worry About It' originally appeared on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
